meolaniyi:
What's going on here. Who is this guy

IamUVO:


[ Livy SAN now defers again to JS Okutekpa SAN who is to conduct the next segment of proceedings. ]

Okutekpa SAN:
This segment is to bring to the court's notice the excruciating experience they've suffered from INEC.
He further noted that, to show bad fate, INEC only brought some documents to them just before they came to court.
He appeals to the court to come to their aid in getting the documents.
He notes again that today, the Petitioners received few documents of IREV REPORTS on few Local Governments in Lagos State, Agege, Oshodi, Isolo, Epe, Surulere, Eti Osa and Alimosho.
He notes that the documents were certified on 29th of May but they decided to bring it today.
That they also just gave them documents for two LGAs of Gombe state this afternoon And they were also certified on 29th of May.

IamUVO:


[ Livy SAN now defers again to JS Okutekpa SAN who is to conduct the next segment of proceedings. ]

Okutekpa SAN:
This segment is to bring to the court's notice the excruciating experience they've suffered from INEC.
He further noted that, to show bad fate, INEC only brought some documents to them just before they came to court.
He appeals to the court to come to their aid in getting the documents.
He notes again that today, the Petitioners received few documents of IREV REPORTS on few Local Governments in Lagos State, Agege, Oshodi, Isolo, Epe, Surulere, Eti Osa and Alimosho.
He notes that the documents were certified on 29th of May but they decided to bring it today.
That they also just gave them documents for two LGAs of Gombe state this afternoon And they were also certified on 29th of May.

IamV:
meanwhile,

100K UP FOR GRAB !

Yes,you stand the chance to win 100k free of charge,and here's the simply task to do.

During the last proceedings at the tribunal,16 June 2023,one of the respondent lawyer crossing examining one of the witnesses claimed that INEC made a publication on 23rd February that they will no longer transmit results [ form EC8A] from the polling unit at real time.
Basically,they have abandoned the capturing of results using BVAS at the polling unit and uploading them to the IREV at real time.

Here's the link to the publication,
https://tribuneonlineng.com/we-wont-transmit-raw-figures-of-election-results-inec-chairman/

If anyone can show everyone of us an excerpt that corroborate that claim from the 23rd February publication,the 100k is yours !


It's simple as that.

Your time starts from now till January 1st 2024.

UPDATED !

Two persons have pledged to add 20k and 100k to it !

Now 220k is up for grab!

Zxcvbnmghtr:


*THE LP/OBI DRAMA*
Out of a total of 176,000 polling units, you provided only 46,000 polling agents. (This means you were not present, and have no evidence in 130,000 Polling Units nationwide, and you imagine that 46,000 is greater than and will upturn 130,000)

You listed a 50 man witnesses. You presented only 5 (with one week to go).

The 5 presented are:
1. An International Data Analyst
2. A Channels TV Staff
3. A Professor in Mathematics
4. An Arise Tv Staff
5. An AIT Staff

There is not a single person (amongst LP witnesses who is directly) connected to the election you are contesting its result.

All are busy body third party hearsay witnesses (none is an eye witness with primary source or evidence).

What do you think these witnesses will amount to?

People testifying as witnesses to an election (in which they were not present but) they participated in only on TV set are all you have and rely on.

Ok naaa.

IamUVO:


[Okutekpa SAN continues ]:

He informs the court that they have consistently written to INEC and even on 20th of May, they detailed all the documents they wanted. Again, on 14 March 2023, they wrote to INEC and asked for these documents to enable them use it In proof of their case.
More pressing is the fact that subpoena were issued to INEC in their office and they refuse to accept. Series of subpoenas have been issued.

[ He draws the attention of the court that they have paid for these documents. ]

He notes that they have requested for Forms EC25 series and nothing have been made available. It appears that INEC is deliberately doing this, he says.
His final application is that the court direct that the copy of subpoena be served on INEC lead counsel to deliver to his client.
He pleads that if INEC don't have the documents, let them be on record stating they do not have it so they will know how to proceed.

IamUVO:


[ The court notes that there are provisions of the law on steps to follow where a person refuses subpoena and should be followed ]

Okutekpa SAN:
Okutekpa SAN notes that the suit is time bound and to start following all those provisions will frustrate their case.

IamUVO:


[Okutekpa SAN continues ]:

He informs the court that they have consistently written to INEC and even on 20th of May, they detailed all the documents they wanted. Again, on 14 March 2023, they wrote to INEC and asked for these documents to enable them use it In proof of their case.
More pressing is the fact that subpoena were issued to INEC in their office and they refuse to accept. Series of subpoenas have been issued.

[ He draws the attention of the court that they have paid for these documents. ]

He notes that they have requested for Forms EC25 series and nothing have been made available. It appears that INEC is deliberately doing this, he says.
His final application is that the court direct that the copy of subpoena be served on INEC lead counsel to deliver to his client.
He pleads that if INEC don't have the documents, let them be on record stating they do not have it so they will know how to proceed.

IamUVO:


AB Mahmoud SAN:
He notes that he received a letter on 15th May from Livy SAN and he promptly replied it on 15th. He has not heard anything from them since then.
That there's no reason to deny Labour Party documents and that their claims are unfounded.
He notes that they are aware of the importance of the issues and they are committed.

Jostoman:
I just like way atiku and Obi are going abiut their case, thay are not leaving any chance for any technicality at all, They must volmit that stolen mandate,

IamUVO:


Dr. Livy SAN:
He notes that he received no letter from Mahmoud SAN at any time. A letter may be written and not sent to him.

[ The court asks what the Petitioners wish to proceed with on the case. ]

Dr.livy SAN :
Dr. Livy notes that through INEC's conduct, the proceedings is frustrated today.

PaellaPaella:





Garfield1 banned me, can you now stop being childish ?

MichaelSokoto:

d error too much 4 their hand dats why ee dey hard dem to show am out ni!

senatordave1:


Down Pandora

Balogunodua:
Video on The FlashDrive Was Played and It Was Of Prof Mahmood Stating that BVAS has Come to Stay.



Obidumbs are funny

jackea:
I don't see the case making it to supreme court

IamUVO:


Dr. Livy SAN:
He notes that he received no letter from Mahmoud SAN at any time. A letter may be written and not sent to him.

[ The court asks what the Petitioners wish to proceed with on the case. ]

Dr.livy SAN :
Dr. Livy notes that through INEC's conduct, the proceedings is frustrated today.

IamUVO:


The Court:
They express displeasure that there is no cooperation amongst counsels which have frustrated the case.

[ The court asks the way forward ]

Dr. Livy SAN:
If they are ready to provide the documents today, they can continue the case, if not, they are being held hostage.

[ Dr Livy now applies for an order of court to compel them to take the subpoena and respond accordingly.]

Balogunodua:
Video on The FlashDrive Was Played and It Was Of Prof Mahmood Stating that BVAS has Come to Stay.



Obidumbs are funny

Balogunodua:
Video on The FlashDrive Was Played and It Was Of Prof Mahmood Stating that BVAS has Come to Stay.



Obidumbs are funny

StreetFight:


After losing here, you see him spending his time on something more useful like focussing on his baby factories spread all over the country where babies are produced and sold everyday

seanfer:


Senatordave1... Did you see anything here?

PaellaPaella:




I know you are actually crying while pretending to be happy

jackea:
I don't see the case making it to supreme court

Zxcvbnmghtr:


*THE LP/OBI DRAMA*
Out of a total of 176,000 polling units, you provided only 46,000 polling agents. (This means you were not present, and have no evidence in 130,000 Polling Units nationwide, and you imagine that 46,000 is greater than and will upturn 130,000)

You listed a 50 man witnesses. You presented only 5 (with one week to go).

The 5 presented are:
1. An International Data Analyst
2. A Channels TV Staff
3. A Professor in Mathematics
4. An Arise Tv Staff
5. An AIT Staff

There is not a single person (amongst LP witnesses who is directly) connected to the election you are contesting its result.

All are busy body third party hearsay witnesses (none is an eye witness with primary source or evidence).

What do you think these witnesses will amount to?

People testifying as witnesses to an election (in which they were not present but) they participated in only on TV set are all you have and rely on.

Ok naaa.

senatordave1:


Which video