StainlessCup:


You are yet to cite the relevant laws bruv

MyPoint:


I said it last week. Amazon wi be coming this week.

Zxcvbnmghtr:


That is why they are the judges. Simple logic.
Don't worry. I will quote you when the whole drama ends. .

IamV2:


Q. So with respect to Form EC8A of the presidential election, after taking the picture, the only problem you experienced was upload.

A. Yes, it couldn't upload but that of senate and House of reps uploaded.

Q. In your training prior to election, you're trained about offline transmission or transfer of Form EC8A

A. Yes.

Q. Can you tell the court what you're trained to do in situations like that.

A. We're trained to do offline transmission when there is no network and we also tried that but couldn't upload.

Q. So you followed the procedure for offline transmission.

A. We followed for both offline and online but couldn't upload.

Q. You cannot tell if the transmission occured subsequently

A. I don't know.

IamV2:


The Court:
This petition is hereby adjourned till tomorrow, Tuesday June 20, 2023 at 2pm for the continuation of hearing.

[ The court appeals to all counsels to cooperate with both sides for the smooth continuation of hearing ]

---------------
Thanks for the update.

Why's anti spam bot banning all my accounts?
This is the second account I'm creating today.
Honestly, it's frustrating.
Mehn,I don't like this .

Everyone have a great day.

[ Yes, I'm angry ]

#Onelove.

IamV2:


Wole SAN :
He addresses the court, noting that, they will get it sorted out.

Dr Livy SAN:
notes that they will approach Mahmoud SAN for the 3rd time to facilitate the process since it won't take anything from him or his person.

N.B :

The new account I created have been banned again by anti spam bot .
This is another new account I created .
I'm tired.

This is frustrating.

Spicycat:


Why are you always putting "HE" before Peter Obi?
What does it stand for and is it absolutely necessary that you must put it?

senatordave1:


They have adjourned till tomorrow.they just wasted today

aswani:


That person wasn't there as an employee of Amazon Web Services.

If that person is reported to AWS HR and they are truly working for that organisation, they might be in serious trouble.

In cases like this, AWS will respond through their lawyers, they certainly wouldn't be sending their Architects/Technical staff to the Tribunal without legal support.

I suspect that person is an independent contractor specialising in AWS technology.

respect80:

Wrong logic!
This is not the first time someone has called such witnesses. People have called such witnesses and won cases.
The fact that a witness is not physically present at the scene of a crime does not make them less a witness.
Don't bother to quote me anyway cos I give little or no fukkk about such things but I just wanted to let you know that the perspective or premises of your argument is faulty. It's that simple, isn't it?

IamV:
Good afternoon gentlemen and ladies, welcome to today's live updates on proceedings at the tribunal,19th June,2023.
But before we proceed, here's a summary of what transpired in court on friday,16th June,2023.

—Proceedings Began at About 9:32am.

—LP Brought a Massive Collection of Evidence Including 2 HD TVs to Play Videos

—The 1st Respondents Brought A Collection of Evidence As well.

—HE Peter Obi Represented Petitioners .

—LP’s Counsel Appearance was Led By Dr Livy Uzoukwu SAN & Proceedings Led by PIN Ikwueto SAN.

—Prof Eric Ufoedo (Maths Prof from NAU) , 1st Witness of The Day but 4th So Far (PW4), Who Also Stood Yesterday, Was Called Up for Cross Examination.

—He Was Cross Examined by AB Mahmood SAN for 1st Respondent (INEC) , Olujimi Akin SAN for 2nd & 3rd Respondents (BAT/Shett) And Abiodun Awonikoko for 4th Respondent (APC).

—Highlights of the Cross Examination of this Witness from All Respondents is The Witness Stating that if iREV Was Properly Utilized, Results Uploaded There upWon’t be Different From From What Was at the Collation Centre and He Was Consulted by Labour Party to Determine INEC’s Compliance with Electoral Acts & Regulations. He Was Contacted Days to The Election and Afterwards, He Analyzed for all the 36 states,but claimed Benue and Rivers stood out.

—He Added That No Maths Formula Was Needed to See that Any Result is Blurred and When Asked By 4th Respondent’s Counsel About the over 18,000 Blurred Results, He Stated That It’s Not Just Connected to Rivers & Benue States Only.

—Second Witness, Lumie Idevbie (5th witness so far, PW5) , An Arise Tv Reporter, Was Cross Examined As Well.

—Highlights of the Cross Examination of This Witness is that His Organization, Arise Tv, Broadcast the Live Program of Prof Mahmood Yakubu at Chatham House & People Within Their Transmission Zone Have Access to Their Broadcasts.

—A Staff of AIT, 3rd Witness of the Day but 6th So Far( PW6), Ijeoma Osamor, Was Called Up.
Her ID Card , Witness Statement Under Oath & A FlashDrive Were Tendered And Admitted By Court.

—Video on The FlashDrive Was Played and It Was Of Prof Mahmood Stating that BVAS has Come to Stay.

—The Highlight of the Cross Examination of This Witness Was Whether She is Aware That INEC Chair, Prof Mahmood Yakubu, Said in Tribune Newspaper of Feb 22nd 2023, That There Won’t Be Transmission of Raw Results from PUs and He Said Same on the Program She Anchors, Democracy Today on AIT.
She Responded that She There and Prof Mahmood Never Said That.

—Proceedings Ended at About 12:43Pm and Adjourned Till Monday, June 19th 2023 by 2pm.

CREDIT: @Misspearls, twitter

Here's a link to the 16th June proceedings at the tribunal.
https://www.nairaland.com/7730128/peter-obi-vs-tinubu-16th

19TH JUNE 2023

CREDITS ;
@misspearls,@TheserahIbrahim,@UkomahH, twitter.

IamV2:


Are you sure you understood what you read ?
I strongly doubt you understood what he wrote there.
He's actually telling you the exact content of that publication.
It was never about INEC saying they will no longer transmit results in real time like one of the respondents cross examiner want to deceive the public & court to think.

The APC propaganda machines even ran along with it citing it as an evidence that INEC actually published that they will no longer transmit results in real time at the polling units.

Go read what he wrote again.

IamV2:


The Court:
This petition is hereby adjourned till tomorrow, Tuesday June 20, 2023 at 2pm for the continuation of hearing.

[ The court appeals to all counsels to cooperate with both sides for the smooth continuation of hearing ]

---------------

Why's anti spam bot banning all my accounts?
This is the second account I'm creating today.
Honestly, it's frustrating.
Mehn,I don't like this .

Everyone have a great day.

[ Yes, I'm angry ]

#Onelove.

IfnobeGod20:

You're aprobating and reprobating at the same time. You took time to point out the error commented by INEC's server but still stand the truth on its head by exonerating them of any wrong doing forgetting that three elections were conducted for different posts same day, why two results were successful uploaded without hassle but only one, the presidential election was delayed, even after two weeks election was conducted.
The question is, why presidential server alone has the problem and not others? I am waiting for INEC rhetoric as to be informed and guided.

senatordave1:

See evidence act 2011

BabaRamota1980:



Ogbeni, drop it! Just drop it! Dont say one more word....just drop and let it go!

Chei! Witnessing don suffer today.

respect80:


Well, I'm not here to argue with you man. The statement I made and which you highlighted already proves your level of awareness about the subject being discussed so never mind, I leave you to your ostentatious display of knowledge. But know this, aside physical presence, someone with a firsthand knowledge of an event or evidence is capable of being a witness. For instance, the Mathematician prof who said he monitored INEC's IREV server during the course of the elections and deduced that there were irregularities and poor compliance by INEC regarding their promise of electronic transmission of results from polling units to the IREV server is eligible to be a witness in this matter. But like I said earlier, I leave you to your ostentatious display of knowledge and awareness since you seem to know better than the respondents to the petition and the judges who acknowledged the individuals who have testified in court so far as witness despite your claims that they aren't eligible to be witnesses since they were not physically present at each polling unit they made reference to.

Jostoman:
I just like way atiku and Obi are going abiut their case, thay are not leaving any chance for any technicality at all, They must volmit that stolen mandate,

jidemojola:


I think what the Labour Party wants to prove to the world is that the election was rigged not for the already sworn-in president to be removed.It can never happen ,even in the United States.

IamUVO:

AB Mahmoud SAN:
Mahmoud SAN, notes that he is just hearing today of the refusal to accept subpoena.

Zxcvbnmghtr:


*THE LP/OBI DRAMA*
Out of a total of 176,000 polling units, you provided only 46,000 polling agents. (This means you were not present, and have no evidence in 130,000 Polling Units nationwide, and you imagine that 46,000 is greater than and will upturn 130,000)

You listed a 50 man witnesses. You presented only 5 (with one week to go).

The 5 presented are:
1. An International Data Analyst
2. A Channels TV Staff
3. A Professor in Mathematics
4. An Arise Tv Staff
5. An AIT Staff

There is not a single person (amongst LP witnesses who is directly) connected to the election you are contesting its result.

All are busy body third party hearsay witnesses (none is an eye witness with primary source or evidence).

What do you think these witnesses will amount to?

People testifying as witnesses to an election (in which they were not present but) they participated in only on TV set are all you have and rely on.

Ok naaa.

senatordave1:


An lp member

BabaRamota1980:


I say drop it!!! You no dey hear?

You can have knowledge of something without being there, but you can never witness something unless you are present there.

MySolace:

Uncle, who told u LP had just 46k agents in d just concluded election?? U people will just sit back and b typing as though u think wit ur anus.

Also, how can u say da d witness provided has no connection wit d election? Are u ok?

So, d TV stations dat interviewed INEC chairman prior to d election have no legal standy to say(wit video evidence) dis is wot d INEC chairman told us?

And if I may ask, who should b an ideal witness in dis case?

EnEnPeecee:
God of justice come and give your children VICTORY over these drug and electoral criminals. They stole our mandate and told us to go to court. Give us VICTORY oh Lord and put them to shame.
Following............

HIGHESTPOPORI:
Agulu is far better than Iragbiji

Jemex003:




But there’s peace in Iragbiji than Agulu gulu

EnEnPeecee:
God of justice come and give your children VICTORY over these drug and electoral criminals. They stole our mandate and told us to go to court. Give us VICTORY oh Lord and put them to shame.
Following............

aswani:


Per the deliberate sabotage, I am interested in knowing how you think that will happen because it's a virtual server.

Whoever paused or shut down the server would have had to be logged in to the AWS cloud for starters.

Also why haven't LP's lawyers asked for the (redacted) audit log to glean information as to what could have "crashed" the server and when?
It just seemed to me that calling the expert to say the Cloud wans't down was a waste of time when they could have asked the Court to subpoena an INEC official (oreven AWS) to produce log files to prove foul PLAY.

respect80:

I agree with you but your opinion is from a layman's perspective.
Smiles
Ok. Now, go ahead and tell us why the court allowed them to be presented as witnesses since they were not physically present in polling units as you assume. Wouldn't they have made it clear that those individuals were not eligible to bear witness? Not even the respondent's legal team is challenging this case from the perspective you are asserting. I wonder where you got this logic from.

I don't blame you though, I blame how rotten our judiciary has become.

You better cut me some slacks by sending me whatever amount you paid as school fees in your final year
Now listen...
Ever heard of eye-witness, expert witness and character witness?

For instance, if NTA promises to show Chelsea vs Manchester united match on their channel by 4pm today, if by 4pm and I tune my TV to NTA channel and the match is not being aired, I don't have to be "PHYSICALLY" present at NTA headquarters to be eligible to bear witness that NTA never aired the match as promised. This is as far as I can go. If you still don't get it at this point then I admit you're right and I'm wrong. Bye 👋