Why the Court is going to INVALIDATE and order a RERUN of the Presidential Election within 90 days.
====================

1. The Supreme Court has held that Accreditation by BVAS, Results on form EC8A and Voters Register are the three foundations of collation of election results.

2. The Supreme Court equally has held that VERIFICATION of Accreditation, Results on form EC8A is mandatory to assure the integrity of the election process. Please see attached.

3. Also the Supreme Court held that regulations 48(a) and 38(i, ii, iii) provided that results from the Polling Unit must be scanned and transmitted to the electronic collection system and IREV.

4. In addition the Supreme Court held that the VERIFICATION of accreditation number on the INEC hard copy with that on the physical BVAS machine; The results scored by political parties must be VERIFIED with the results scanned and transmitted,at the Polling Unit, onto the electronic collation system and the IREV.

5. INEC Collation system forms the backend of IReV, it is the mirror. In other words INEC collation system is a copy of the IREV viewable only by INEC staff.

6. INEC at the court said it did not use the electronic collation system or IREV for collation.

7. INEC implied it did not verify the results scored by political parties on the hard copy form EC8A with the scanned copies uploaded onto the collation system and the IREV

8. INEC admitted that by the time it declared results only about 31% of the results had been uploaded onto the electronic collation system and the IREV.

9. The IREV shows that results from over 18k are unreadable for reason of not being clear, mutilated, wrong documents etc.

10. Evidences also show that nearly nearly 10k Polling units have no accreditation or incorrect accreditation and subject to cancellation.

11. IREV portal shows that nearly about 10k of the results are yet to be uploaded.

12. From the above a total of about 38K or 22% of the PU units results are either unverifiable or questionable. If one uses average of 500 PVC collected then we talk about 19m disenfranchised voters. If we would take average 100voters per Polling Unit we land at about 4m votes. In either case much more than the margin of lead of 1.8m votes.

13. The courts have only two authorities: (a) To Invalid the election or (b) Change the winner of the election. See section 134 and 136 of the electoral act.

14. The court has no power to declare a runoff between two candidates according to the law. It is for INEC to decide depending on the condition of the outcome of the election.

15. Judging from the position of INEC which is clearly contrary to the law and the enormous verifiable evidences of non-compliance or malpractices, I believe it is safe to expect the courts to ANNUL the Presidential Election and order a complete rerun wherein all the qualified candidates could participate.

16. It is therefore not too soon for various candidates and their parties to start strategising and preparing for the inevitable rerun maybe between Dec, 2023/February 2024.
[img][/img]

Lie lie lie . Nothing can happen. Nobody, no court can remove Tinubu.

We pray ooh

Mastersure:
Why the Court is going to INVALIDATE and order a RERUN of the Presidential Election within 90 days.
====================
...
16. It is therefore not too soon for various candidates and their parties to start strategising and preparing for the inevitable rerun maybe between Dec, 2023/February 2024.
[img][/img]

It's really annoying when you beat your chest so hard! Inevitable indeed

Rerun ko Runre ni.
Una eye go clear after 8years.

Piggsss... should wake up already

God pass Tinubu; that I know for sure.

nah re-run...

and if there is a re-run....it is a work over for Tinubu

Lovelive:
God pass Tinubu; that I know for sure.

and God pass obi

Hahaha 🤣🤣🤣
E be like na now the pain of obidiotssssss defeat just start afresh.

He pass you and pass anyone that put suffering on the masses

blabulu2000:


and God pass obi

If the election is invalidated on the ground of substantial noncompliance with the electoral act, a fresh election involving all the candidates will be ordered and not a rerun election.

So, was the noncompliance with one of the INEC guidelines (not constitutional or electoral act provisions) substantial enough to affect the result of the election? How exactly did the failure of INEC to upload result to IREV from polling units affect the outcome of the election? So, why will the Supreme Court want to throw the entire country into chaos and political instability over something that did not affect the result of the election?

Mastersure:
Why the Court is going to INVALIDATE and order a RERUN of the Presidential Election within 90 days.
====================

1. The Supreme Court has held that Accreditation by BVAS, Results on form EC8A and Voters Register are the three foundations of collation of election results.

2. The Supreme Court equally has held that VERIFICATION of Accreditation, Results on form EC8A is mandatory to assure the integrity of the election process. Please see attached.

3. Also the Supreme Court held that regulations 48(a) and 38(i, ii, iii) provided that results from the Polling Unit must be scanned and transmitted to the electronic collection system and IREV.

4. In addition the Supreme Court held that the VERIFICATION of accreditation number on the INEC hard copy with that on the physical BVAS machine; The results scored by political parties must be VERIFIED with the results scanned and transmitted,at the Polling Unit, onto the electronic collation system and the IREV.

5. INEC Collation system forms the backend of IReV, it is the mirror. In other words INEC collation system is a copy of the IREV viewable only by INEC staff.

6. INEC at the court said it did not use the electronic collation system or IREV for collation.

7. INEC implied it did not verify the results scored by political parties on the hard copy form EC8A with the scanned copies uploaded onto the collation system and the IREV

8. INEC admitted that by the time it declared results only about 31% of the results had been uploaded onto the electronic collation system and the IREV.

9. The IREV shows that results from over 18k are unreadable for reason of not being clear, mutilated, wrong documents etc.

10. Evidences also show that nearly nearly 10k Polling units have no accreditation or incorrect accreditation and subject to cancellation.

11. IREV portal shows that nearly about 10k of the results are yet to be uploaded.

12. From the above a total of about 38K or 22% of the PU units results are either unverifiable or questionable. If one uses average of 500 PVC collected then we talk about 19m disenfranchised voters. If we would take average 100voters per Polling Unit we land at about 4m votes. In either case much more than the margin of lead of 1.8m votes.

13. The courts have only two authorities: (a) To Invalid the election or (b) Change the winner of the election. See section 134 and 136 of the electoral act.

14. The court has no power to declare a runoff between two candidates according to the law. It is for INEC to decide depending on the condition of the outcome of the election.

15. Judging from the position of INEC which is clearly contrary to the law and the enormous verifiable evidences of non-compliance or malpractices, I believe it is safe to expect the courts to ANNUL the Presidential Election and order a complete rerun wherein all the qualified candidates could participate.

16. It is therefore not too soon for various candidates and their parties to start strategising and preparing for the inevitable rerun maybe between Dec, 2023/February 2024.
[img][/img]

IREV babies, keep fooling yourselves. Maybe you've not heard the word substantial compliance before

No court can order a rerun of presidential elections in Nigeria. This has to be the most stupid verdict in the history of the country. The best a court can do is order the president to vacate his office and instruct another contender to take over.

Here we go with the illiterate supporters.

Nada they don't know

Rerun ko Re-slow ni

SmartPolician:
No court can order a rerun of elections in Nigeria. This has to be the most stupid verdict in the history of the country. The best a court can do is order the president to vacate his office and instruct someone else to take over.

Vacate office and destabilize our democracy bah?

helinues:


Vacate office and destabilize our democracy bah?

If Tinubu is ordered to leave Aso Rock, Nigeria's democracy won't be destabilised. He will stay in office and appeal the case. If he loses at the appeal court, he will push it until it gets to the Supreme Court while he maintains his position as president.

If the Supreme Court orders him to leave the office and he refuses, he and his wife will be flung out of Aso Rock through the window! A Nigerian politician may think he's above the law, but not when his stay in office is questioned or declared unconstitutional

SmartPolician:


If Tinubu is ordered to leave Aso Rock, Nigeria's democracy won't be destabilised. He will stay in office and appeal the case. If he loses at the appeal court, he will push it until it gets to the Supreme Court while he maintains his position as president.

If the Supreme Court orders him to leave the office and he refuses, he and his wife will be flung out of Aso Rock through the window! A Nigerian politician may think he's above the law, but not when his stay in office is questioned or declared unconstitutional

Appeal court for presidential election dispute.

And your name is smartpolician? Change your moniker's name abeg

helinues:


Appeal court for presidential election dispute.

And your name is smartpolician? Change your moniker's name abeg

He meant the supreme court. Olodo.

helinues:


Appeal court for presidential election dispute.

And your name is smartpolician? Change your moniker's name abeg

I am not a lawyer, but I have told you how things will play out. If appeal court is all you can get from that message, it's entirety your business.

SmartPolician:


I am not a lawyer, but I have told you how things will play out. If appeal court is all you can get from that message, it's entirety your business.

Stop shooking mouth in what you have little knowledge about. There is nothing like appealing at the appeal court

From Tribunal court to SC

helinues:


Stop shooking mouth in what you have little knowledge about. There is nothing like appealing at the appeal court

From Tribunal court to SC

Whatever routes it takes, a president can be kicked out and that won't destabilize the country. QED!

helinues:
Here we go with the illiterate supporters.

Nada they don't know

Rerun ko Re-slow ni

Same people who still believed that Tinubu won't be sworn in on the very day of the swearing-in ceremony .

Leave these onufias.

SmartPolician:


Whatever routes it takes, a president can be kicked out and that won't destabilize the country. QED!

FAFO.

helinues:


Stop shooking mouth in what you have little knowledge about. There is nothing like appealing at the appeal court

From Tribunal court to SC

You lack home training for you to be insulting people up and down.

SmartPolician:


I am not a lawyer, but I have told you how things will play out. If appeal court is all you can get from that message, it's entirety your business.

On what grounds will the court tell him to vacate office? Oga,highest you can get is a partial rerun

blabulu2000:
nah re-run...

and if there is a re-run....it is a work over for Tinubu

He's not going to be a part of the party. Too many forgeries and fake documents would be his greatest undoing

Delusional.

duro4chang:
Lie lie lie . Nothing can happen. Nobody, no court can remove Tinubu.

Really? Even if it's rigged? Even the Supreme court?

Someone that’s already ecowas chairman. Let the court try nonsense, wo, let me not say much