Micro organisms are in the waters and on the land.

they are also on/within
plants and animals.


They contribute to both the development and deterioration of the systems of plants and animals(+man).


Then,why can't we ascribe the ORIGINS of other living things fundamentally to the movements of these micro organisms?


There is no way the presently discovered living things must have come into existence b4 micro organisms since they NEED them to exist while the micro organgisms dont.

it is not about the complexity of the DNA/RNA since the DNA/RNA cant be alive.
In other words, the common ancestors( since different classifications cant have the same origin) of the other living things only NEEDED the ORIGINATING MOVEMENTS of these micro organisms for their ADULT APPEARANCE(more than a DNA/RNA composition or combination) across whatever region of ORIGINATING CONDITIONS.


Why do we not SEE such movements and conditions today?
it is because the movements and conditions cannot RESTART exactly where REPRODUCTION happens.


Why did the movements and conditions CREATE the common ancestors?


the micro organisms had no other way to live except TO MOVE ALONG WITH WHATEVER THEY COULD MOVE WITH THEREBY FORMING WHATEVER COULD BE FORMED.



They ,just like a baby that did not plan to be born,did not plan to find themselves in ORIGINATING CONDITIONS OR WHERE THEY HAD NO OTHER WAY TO LIVE.

Were these micro organisms in existence b4 the conditions happened?

impossible!

The conditions where they came into existence were also made of ALL THEY ARE PRESENTLY MADE OF b4 they came into existence.


How did they come into existence,then?
The movements of ALL THEY ARE PRESENTLY MADE OF.

What led to the movements?


Inevitable transformation/release of energy, change of state,change in temperature,etc that accidentally lead to conditions 4 such movements.

Why accidental?


Complexity,alone, is not an evidence of intelligence .