Penguin2:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPgu-DrnBus

A group of public affairs analysts have said that APC’s worst mistake was challenging the outcome of Osun gubernatorial election in 2022.

They were speaking in relation to the cases before the presidential election tribunal and the expected judgment.

According to them, the Osun judgment was the first time the Supreme Court interpreted the 2022 Electoral Act. And in doing so, the Supreme Court gave some significant pronouncements which includes:

First, that IREV was an integral part of of INEC’s collation process.

Again, that the BVAS and from EC8A were primary sources of evidence in proof of electoral fraud or anything thereof.

Similarly, that both the Constitution, the Electoral Act and INEC Guidelines and even Training Manual are justiciable. That is, that they are all legal instruments that can be used against INEC should they deviate from any. In doing this, the Supreme Court even quoted a section of INEC’s guideline verbatim which established the undisputed place of INEC Guidelines in law.

Now, this group are of the opinion that almost all the resolutions of the Supreme Court in the Osun Judgment, is working against APC’s case at the Tribunal right now. And considering that the Osun judgment is as recent as 3 months ago, it is a precedent that the Supreme Court might easily depart from anytime soon.

Nlfpmod
Mynd44

immortalcrown:
APC is synonymous with errors.

garfield1:


You mean it is working against lp and pdp? Have they forgotten that online evidences were called third hand evidence? Bvas and ec8a are primary evidence,how many did obi tender

Penguin2:

Lol!

First, Obi tendered the form EC8As for all the polling units in all the states he’s contesting their result as declared by INEC.

Again, he submitted the BVAS accreditation data for the same polling units. Recall that in the same Osun judgment, Supreme Court said that to make for a less bulky presentation in court, the hardware BVAS machine must not be brought to court, that the accreditation data can suffice. Or haven’t read that aspect of the judgment?

Lastly, if the Supreme Court rated online evidence in third place, does that render it non admissible or reduce the place of online evidence/data in electoral dispute?

garfield1:


Obi tendered form ec8a and bvas reports from server without linking or establishing anything on them.he simply dumped them,his written address only linked irev copies..

The apex court at the end stated that pdp should not have entered any defence since third hand evidence are useless.obi has failed woefully

Penguin2:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPgu-DrnBus

A group of public affairs analysts have said that APC’s worst mistake was challenging the outcome of Osun gubernatorial election in 2022.

They were speaking in relation to the cases before the presidential election tribunal and the expected judgment.

According to them, the Osun judgment was the first time the Supreme Court interpreted the 2022 Electoral Act. And in doing so, the Supreme Court gave some significant pronouncements which includes:

First, that IREV was an integral part of of INEC’s collation process.

Again, that the BVAS and from EC8A were primary sources of evidence in proof of electoral fraud or anything thereof.

Similarly, that both the Constitution, the Electoral Act and INEC Guidelines and even Training Manual are justiciable. That is, that they are all legal instruments that can be used against INEC should they deviate from any. In doing this, the Supreme Court even quoted a section of INEC’s guideline verbatim which established the undisputed place of INEC Guidelines in law.

Now, this group are of the opinion that almost all the resolutions of the Supreme Court in the Osun Judgment, is working against APC’s case at the Tribunal right now. And considering that the Osun judgment is as recent as 3 months ago, it is a precedent that the Supreme Court might easily depart from anytime soon.

Nlfpmod
Mynd44

Penguin2:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPgu-DrnBus

A group of public affairs analysts have said that APC’s worst mistake was challenging the outcome of Osun gubernatorial election in 2022.

They were speaking in relation to the cases before the presidential election tribunal and the expected judgment.

According to them, the Osun judgment was the first time the Supreme Court interpreted the 2022 Electoral Act. And in doing so, the Supreme Court gave some significant pronouncements which includes:

First, that IREV was an integral part of of INEC’s collation process.

Again, that the BVAS and from EC8A were primary sources of evidence in proof of electoral fraud or anything thereof.

Similarly, that both the Constitution, the Electoral Act and INEC Guidelines and even Training Manual are justiciable. That is, that they are all legal instruments that can be used against INEC should they deviate from any. In doing this, the Supreme Court even quoted a section of INEC’s guideline verbatim which established the undisputed place of INEC Guidelines in law.

Now, this group are of the opinion that almost all the resolutions of the Supreme Court in the Osun Judgment, is working against APC’s case at the Tribunal right now. And considering that the Osun judgment is as recent as 3 months ago, it is a precedent that the Supreme Court might easily depart from anytime soon.

Nlfpmod
Mynd44

Penguin2:

Lol!

First, Obi tendered the form EC8As for all the polling units in all the states he’s contesting their result as declared by INEC.

Again, he submitted the BVAS accreditation data for the same polling units. Recall that in the same Osun judgment, Supreme Court said that to make for a less bulky presentation in court, the hardware BVAS machine must not be brought to court, that the accreditation data can suffice. Or haven’t read that aspect of the judgment?

Lastly, if the Supreme Court rated online evidence in third place, does that render it non admissible or reduce the place of online evidence/data in electoral dispute?

helinues:
Mushroom group

garfield1:


You mean it is working against lp and pdp? Have they forgotten that online evidences were called third hand evidence? Bvas and ec8a are primary evidence,how many did obi tender

olril17:

Apc is terrible,agreed. But u sef no too get sense,you are a brainless tribalist😎

garfield1:


You mean it is working against lp and pdp? Have they forgotten that online evidences were called third hand evidence? Bvas and ec8a are primary evidence,how many did obi tender

SIONKPO1:

Gayam and Ciroma ward in Lafia,thats why AA SULE IS A GOONER.
and the mutilated results in Rivers state,

Spy360:

You will just be repeating foolish questions even after getting answers.

garfield1:


Obi tendered form ec8a and bvas reports from server without linking or establishing anything on them.he simply dumped them,his written address only linked irev copies..

The apex court at the end stated that pdp should not have entered any defence since third hand evidence are useless.obi has failed woefully

Spy360:

See your life? In one voice you said Obi did not tender BVAS and form EC8A, in another voice you said he tendered but didn't read it.

Are you a joker or what?

AndroBlaze:


This guy is becoming a real nuisance on this board, he is never tired of twisting the truth.

Even an illiterate fool knows that the final judgement on the Osun case favours APC over LP, but keep on with your deceitfulness.

MichaelSokoto:

dats why high-neck was seriously foot dragging wen asked for access to bvas even after bn paid for d process!
Bone hook dem 4 throat!

AndroBlaze:


This guy is becoming a real nuisance on this board, he is never tired of twisting the truth.

Even an illiterate fool knows that the final judgement on the Osun case favours APC over LP, but keep on with your deceitfulness.

olril17:

Apc is terrible,agreed. But u sef no too get sense,you are a brainless tribalist😎

garfield1:


Obi tendered form ec8a and bvas reports from server without linking or establishing anything on them.he simply dumped them,his written address only linked irev copies..

The apex court at the end stated that pdp should not have entered any defence since third hand evidence are useless.obi has failed woefully

Penguin2:

No sir, Obi submitted INEC certified hard copies of forms EC8A.

The only thing taken from server was the evidence of the Mathematics Professor.

Get your facts right and don’t mislead the public.