Amayabor1:


You tell me.

Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, they turned Syria into rubble etc.

zoghys:


The same Putin who said he will take Kiev in days is still in the war more than two years now and still counting.

I also thought about it when read the OP's post. Putin says much but nobody in the world takes his words seriously. But I'm sorry there are still those who support his aggression. I personally stand with Ukraine. These people deserve a better life. Actually, they had it until russians invaded their country. Fortunately, they are ready to fight and do their best to win. And projects like CarToDonate are great examples.

Olachase:
this man against the world

i don't kw why i just like this Putin.

maybe due to the way his name sound PUT IN

because you are an idiot

themanderon:


Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, they turned Syria into rubble etc.

Same thing with Russia. They invaded Afghanistan, Georgia, ukraine. Etc

1x2x3:


You think he will just wake up and make those statements? He has intel on what NATO is planning to do so it's important he constantly remind them if need be. If there are no Nuclear weapons in Russia then NATO would have tried some stupid moves.

even without nukes nato wont invade russia..unless russia does otherwise. Ask yourself why there are more countries in europe joining Nato than aligning with Russia.

GentleRay:
You people are ignorant. Are you aware that China has also threatened if NATO attack Russia they will respond militarily? Europe is too small to withstand a world with Russia. NATO have lost credibility even in their own countries. They have soldiers who never tasted war before.

the same russia that is using nepals and indians as footsoldiers. Russian even with nukes cant even stand NATO. Nato is all over russia.

Jovi10:



. Who defeated Germany? If he doesn't have balls NATO won't be afraid of him and want him out by all means.

Combined efforts of Russia, u.s and u.k forces.

Amayabor1:


Same thing with Russia. They invaded Afghanistan, Georgia, ukraine. Etc

Ehen. So none of them has the moral right to tell the other what to do. International law is all about interests.

TenQ:

What is the offence of Ukraine a sovereign independent country to warrant an invasion from Putin and annexing their lands?

What's the offence of Serbia a sovereign independent country to warrant an invasion from US and it NATO allies?..

Is it because Serbia is a small and not so powerful country?.

frugal:


He seems to be the only one talking about it every week. Either that or he's talking about nuclear weapon. He's scared out of his mind.

Putin did not talk about it every week, Joe Biden talk about it more than Putin..

The West just like portraying Putin/Russia as evil because they control the media..

zoghys:


The same Putin who said he will take Kiev in days is still in the war more than two years now and still counting.

Show me where Putin said he'll take Kiev in days.. Will you put your family on the line?.. You don't just talk anyhow...

It's a US general that said Russia can take Kiev in days and that's the truth... If Russia intention at the beginning of the war was to take Kiev, that would've been the easiest thing to do.. In 2 days, they already surround Kiev at the beginning of the war, Russia intention was not to kill Ukraine but the West choose to use Ukraine as a proxy against Russia..

ruggedtimi:
Combined efforts of Russia, u.s and u.k forces.

Which US . It was the red army alone. USA only got involved when Pearl harbor was attacked by Japan, and USA didn't fight conventionally they used nukes.

themanderon:


Ehen. So none of them has the moral right to tell the other what to do. International law is all about interests.

The US is not telling Russia what to do. Russia invaded Ukraine. The US and some other countries are supporting Ukraine militarily and financially.

Let's see who carries the day!

Jovi10:



Which US . It was the red army alone. USA only got involved when Pearl harbor was attacked by Japan, and USA didn't fight conventionally they used nukes.

lol..bro this argument is futile.

ruggedtimi:
lol..bro this argument is futile.

It's not an argument it's me schooling you. You can go ahead and read about the ww2 to know what transpired. Read from both sides and draw out your conclusion. Ignorance is no excuse

My goal is not to justify or crucify the objective of NATO:
However, is it true that from between 1988-1989 when Milosevic abolished Kosovo's autonomy, he fired thousands of Albanians from state institutions and factories, and transformed a bi-national police force into a purely Serbian entity which often beat and arrested Albanians often without much cause?

Dream25:

What's the offence of Serbia a sovereign independent country to warrant an invasion from US and it NATO allies?..

Is it because Serbia is a small and not so powerful country?.

If I get your argument correctly,
Your argument is that "if USA and its NATO Allies can invade Serbia in 1999, then it makes it perfectly right for Russia to invade Ukraine from 2014 and annex their lands"!


Is this what you are saying?

Jovi10:



It's not an argument it's me schooling you. You can go ahead and read about the ww2 to know what transpired. Read from both sides and draw out your conclusion. Ignorance is no excuse

this is Joseph stalin's quote at a dinner : “The United States … is a country of machines. Without the use of those machines through Lend-Lease, we would lose this war.”

Yes the USSR suffered the most casualties and the germans suffered their most casualties at the eastern front. And USSR captured berlin by ground invasion in one of the deadliest urban warfare, door to door...but you should know before the red army invaded berlin, u s airforce bombarded berlin couple of days before the berlin ground invasion. The u.s was fighting on three fronts; pacific, africa and western europe. Ofcourse the deadliest battle occured on the eastern front between nazis and the red army. The u s were the first to invade germany and capture a city, the nazis first surrendered to u.s hq in france...but stalin didnt agree and they had to surrender again in berlin. The u.s/ british forces had alot of roles to play in ww2 and without the u.s it would have been difficult for USSR to fight off the german forces.

Jovi10:



Which US . It was the red army alone. USA only got involved when Pearl harbor was attacked by Japan, and USA didn't fight conventionally they used nukes.

u.s used nukes only..lol! What happened in the battle of midway

membranus:


Nuclear bombs do not require quantity, only quality. Detonation of one or two of the bombs over the territorial land of your enemy is enough to deliver the destructive message.

Therefore if Putin send one, he gets multiple back from the NATO allies. The other BRICS nations will not support him, because theirs is an economic alliance, and not military alliance like NATO.

If you understand the bolden, that you wrote, you will know that Russia has
the Tzar Bomba which bests the other nuclear weapons of NATO.
NATO no get am.
Russia also has nuclear weapons in Space.
Do not phuckin play with Mother Russia.

TenQ:
My goal is not to justify or crucify the objective of NATO:
However, is it true that from between 1988-1989 when Milosevic abolished Kosovo's autonomy, he fired thousands of Albanians from state institutions and factories, and transformed a bi-national police force into a purely Serbian entity which often beat and arrested Albanians often without much cause?


If I get your argument correctly,
Your argument is that "if USA and its NATO Allies can invade Serbia in 1999, then it makes it perfectly right for Russia to invade Ukraine from 2014 and annex their lands"!


Is this what you are saying?

Yes you got me right.

USA and it NATO allies set the precedence for Russia in Ukraine. You have no right to criticize Russia in Ukraine if you see nothing wrong with what NATO did in Serbia..

ruggedtimi:
this is Joseph stalin's quote at a dinner : “The United States … is a country of machines. Without the use of those machines through Lend-Lease, we would lose this war.”

Yes the USSR suffered the most casualties and the germans suffered their most casualties at the eastern front. And USSR captured berlin by ground invasion in one of the deadliest urban warfare, door to door...but you should know before the red army invaded berlin, u s airforce bombarded berlin couple of days before the berlin ground invasion. The u.s was fighting on three fronts; pacific, africa and western europe. Ofcourse the deadliest battle occured on the eastern front between nazis and the red army. The u s were the first to invade germany and capture a city, the nazis first surrendered to u.s hq in france...but stalin didnt agree and they had to surrender again in berlin. The u.s/ british forces had alot of roles to play in ww2 and without the u.s it would have been difficult for USSR to fight off the german forces.

I hate lies, your attempt to distort history is nauseating.. Stalin quote was just a normal protocol, it's necessary to praise an ally for what he did to you.. Yes US supplied some weapons to USSR but this Lend-lease act contribute less than 10% of USSR weapon used.. You need to understand that over 70% of German war machine is concentrated on the Eastern front, they even had to withdraw some of their best troop from West and transfer to the Eastern front when it come to shove and they USSR was routing them out.. This withdrawing is what help the western allies to land in France, Germany is almost gone already thanks to Soviet red army..

Stop trying to rewrite history, the Nazi surrender to the Soviets not US. What do you gain by attempting to distort history?. USSR liberated the whole eastern Europe and places in Asia. USSR liberate Mongolia, North China and Korea from the Japanese.. The Soviets face the best of the best of the Germany and Japanese army..

Hitler greatest mistake was invading Soviet Union, he could've become unstoppable with a neutral Soviet or an ally..

Dream25:

I hate lies, your attempt to distort history is nauseating.. Stalin quote was just a normal protocol, it's necessary to praise an ally for what he did to you.. Yes US supplied some weapons to USSR but this Lend-lease act contribute less than 10% of USSR weapon used.. You need to understand that over 70% of German war machine is concentrated on the Eastern front, they even had to withdraw some of their best troop from West and transfer to the Eastern front when it come to shove and they USSR was routing them out.. This withdrawing is what help the western allies to land in France, Germany is almost gone already thanks to Soviet red army..

Stop trying to rewrite history, the Nazi surrender to the Soviets not US. What do you gain by attempting to distort history?. USSR liberated the whole eastern Europe and places in Asia. USSR liberate Mongolia, North China and Korea from the Japanese.. The Soviets face the best of the best of the Germany and Japanese army..

Hitler greatest mistake was invading Soviet Union, he could've become unstoppable with a neutral Soviet or an ally..

lol!! You admitted stalin made the statement. German chief of defence staff surrendered to u.s armed forces @reims..stalin didnt recognise it and the next day berlin defense boss had to surrender to the soviet. And the russians only recognize that date as the official date. This is estimated support from the u.s to the USSR in ww2

In total, the U.S. deliveries to the USSR through Lend-Lease amounted to $11 billion in materials (equivalent to $143 billion in 2022): over 400,000 jeeps and trucks; 12,000 armored vehicles (including 7,000 tanks, about 1,386 of which were M3 Lees and 4,102 M4 Shermans); 11,400 aircraft (of which 4,719 were Bell P-39

and you call this a small amount.

Now i m not denying the fact that the germans sent most of their best men to stalingrad or if the german lost at stalingrad wasnt a major score at the war. After the fall of France Hitler tried to invade london bt the royal airforce gave the luftwaffe a hard one and hitler changed direction to the east, invading soviet union.
You claimed earlier that the americans did nothing to defeat the germans and you are insinuating that it was only the red army that fought the germans and japanese...meaning the war was only between USSR / NAZI GERMANY. I am re-writing history?? You mean the battle of midway didnt happen or normandy invasion were all lies?? Because my narrative doesnt support yours...pls stop the propaganda

Dream25:

Yes you got me right.

USA and it NATO allies set the precedence for Russia in Ukraine. You have no right to criticize Russia in Ukraine if you see nothing wrong with what NATO did in Serbia..

If you feel this is justifiable :
Then you should be conformable with this from me to you:
I pray that what befell Ukraine in the Hands of her neighbour Russia should befall you. Amen!

You should be happy for this prayer for you:
Following your argument
1. If America is justified for invading Serbia AND
2. If Russia is justified for invading Ukraine
THEN
It should equally be justified if your strong neighbours invade your life and take anything they choose for themselves.

ruggedtimi:
this is Joseph stalin's quote at a dinner : “The United States … is a country of machines. Without the use of those machines through Lend-Lease, we would lose this war.”

Yes the USSR suffered the most casualties and the germans suffered their most casualties at the eastern front. And USSR captured berlin by ground invasion in one of the deadliest urban warfare, door to door...but you should know before the red army invaded berlin, u s airforce bombarded berlin couple of days before the berlin ground invasion. The u.s was fighting on three fronts; pacific, africa and western europe. Ofcourse the deadliest battle occured on the eastern front between nazis and the red army. The u s were the first to invade germany and capture a city, the nazis first surrendered to u.s hq in france...but stalin didnt agree and they had to surrender again in berlin. The u.s/ british forces had alot of roles to play in ww2 and without the u.s it would have been difficult for USSR to fight off the german forces.

What is lend-lease again? Define it . You American puppets sha want to rewrite history

Xkale1996:
mumu go check which country has the powerful nuclear weapon

Ewu..... Ask how Russia will defeat a nation's NATO of numerous artillery war equipment

Jovi10:



What is lend-lease again? Define it . You American puppets sha want to rewrite history

no wahala...russian puppet.

ruggedtimi:
no wahala...russian puppet.

Before Pearl harbor was attacked, who have the Nazis been fighting before then? Y'all can't change history, we no go gree for una

Amayabor1:


So, Russia should quickly bring the war to an end. This war just showed how over rated they are!

the more reasons the west, nato and all it's alies should do the needful Russia is overrated but has the last resort that is nuking the world to iceage.

SEGLIZ:
the more reasons the west, nato and all it's alies should do the needful Russia is overrated but has the last resort that is nuking the world to iceage.

Let Russia go ahead and nuke the world to ice age. Have they not been provoked enough by Nato and the US? What is holding them?

Lol. Wishful thinking!

Jovi10:





Before Pearl harbor was attacked, who have the Nazis been fighting before then? Y'all can't change history, we no go gree for una

funny guy!! There is no point here bro...before operation barbarossa who have the nazis been fighting before then?

ruggedtimi:
funny guy!! There is no point here bro...before operation barbarossa who have the nazis been fighting before then?

And where did the Nazis evade from? Ukraine and Poland which brings us to today. Same NATO supporting nazi ideologies want to invade Russia again through same Ukraine. You know what happened to the Germans right? The Soviet red army pushed them back from Moscow and out of Ukraine and out of Poland all the way to Germany and the rest is history.

Nazi NATO supporters have not learnt from history they will suffer same fate when they officially join the war in Ukraine. Russia is waiting let them come

Jovi10:




And where did the Nazis evade from? Ukraine and Poland which brings us to today. Same NATO supporting nazi ideologies want to invade Russia again through same Ukraine. You know what happened to the Germans right? The Soviet red army pushed them back from Moscow and out of Ukraine and out of Poland all the way to Germany and the rest is history.

Nazi NATO supporters have not learnt from history they will suffer same fate when they officially join the war in Ukraine. Russia is waiting let them come

is russia now...not USSR,no more ukraine on their side. This russia una dey hype...the nukes dey have now was a stolen information from the u.s secret project. Nato and russia war will be a difficult one but russia will suffer the most because the war will be fought at their doorstep.