asha 80:

i people said jonathan is weak?

karl max:

GEJ the so called weak President I hope his showing the haters that call him a WEAK PRESIDENT!! Now  Ơ̴̴͡.̮Ơ̴̴̴͡. How weak he is

Rad1cal:

[size=16pt]Strong leadership at play   .

Christ Embassy Church : Pastor before he was weak, but now he is strong

let some one shout halleluyah . .

All roads leads to the Ojota Carnival site tomowo .Please bring your chicks along and let's make it a day to be remembered

Signed Rally Coordinator   [/size]

babestella:

I hear some pple compare removal of fuel subsidy to Soludo 25 billion recapitalization, and even the GSM. Well, they need to think well, because; 1. Soludo's 25 billion recap actually afforded ppl the opportunity for ppl to invest in the banking industry by buying shares, and again this was optional, it wasn't compulsory, unfortunately we have fraudulent people in the banking industry too which has made it what it is today cos the system does not have an effective way of using the legal structure to punish offender which is what we are seeing in the oil industry and we are letting it slip off our hands. Same goes for GSM, it wasn't compulsory also, and NON of both programs affected the prices of goods and services in the market. GSM did not affect the price of transportation, foods and essential services.

Fuel subsidy removal is the opposite and we should all think aright here. Is there any other way we can remove fuel subsidy without necessarily inflicting more hardship on the people Is there anyway we could provide healthcare, roads, child support for single parents who do not have jobs, security, water, electricity without undue hardship to the people?? That is a positive way to think, change is necessary, but it does necessarily have to be painful. Our government has to be creative in other to move this nation forward.

na_so:

This "65 naira or nothing" gang is not helping matters. They are putting so much pressure on NLC and that might not help us all.
I support the removal of subsidy but would want a phased approach with clearcut deliverables and timelines.

I also support the mass protest for "better governance" from our leaders. Elimination of every kind of waste , but that is not to mean we blind our eyes to market dynamics in the oil sector.

Some are even fraudulently now saying there is no subsidy and i simply ask, on what basis did labour agree on 70 naira in 2007 and on what basis was it reduced to 65 naira later?

What else has remained at same price since 2007? lets be wise. we need concessions from both labour and govt , if we heat the polity up we all stand to lose when "jungle mature".

mbulela:

when we return to 65 naira first, then we can address the phased removal in phases with palliative measures in place.
most importantly any agreement with govt without addressing the waste in the governmental system will be a failed strike.
even 141 with a removal of most of the waste in govt is not even a failed strike.

moshoodn:

You said my mind in its entirety.

liaslo++:

this shows that the government did not even send us even if Nigerians are dying,  what a pity

kingsilly:

U sure u get anytin talk b4