₦airaland Forum

I just went through a thread from a few days ago about saving a mother's life during a delivery over the child. That's the gist of the thread. For those who haven't read it:
https://www.nairaland.com/8485590/anything-goes-wrong-during-labor

Whilst reading, it wasn't the subject matter that I found interesting, but rather the replies from guys on the thread. The female in question had stated that in the event of some complication during childbirth her life should be prioritised over the child - and there was an overwhelming verdict that she was right. She's technically right though, but you see that's what's interesting about it...

Did her statement sound logical? Yes, it did. Rather, to be precise, her statement coincides with logic. What's interesting is the (supposed) oversight on the part of the male commenters. There was no mistake in trying to ascertain the logic in what was said, but the issue is that they didn't deem it necessary to go further and ask themselves "Where is this statement coming from exactly?"

Woman is inherently selfish, thus solipsistic. She can have no true/sincere input without a motive, and if there is no motive it's because it doesn't appeal to her, and if it doesn't appeal to her then it doesn't concern her to begin with. Woman does not do anything that doesn't benefit her in some shape or form. She sees only self and cannot fixate her sight on what is past self. As a consequence, woman is anti-logical as logic demands an objective view upon what is outside of oneself first and foremost.

When whatever comes out of a woman's mouth coincides with logic it's actually just a Trojan horse of selfishness (though they don't see it that way). It looks like the gift of logic and sound reasoning on the outside, and on the surface that's good enough. You let them wheel this horse past the walls of your city---into your mind, and then, it is not until the dark of night---in hindsight---do you see a small battalion of soldiers quietly springing forth from within the horse to slit the throats of their enemies in their sleep does it then become apparent that this "gift" had always been self-serving; that this gift was not an ends itself - but, as always, a means to an end.
This is how women use a man's logic against him and turn him into a tool to serve her wants and whims.

It's no different from how women say they want a really sweet, caring guy, who is nice and respects them. Though they speak from feelings of the moment, it does sound logical to men. Why wouldn't they want a nice guy who respects them? Why would a man listen to woman if what she said didn't, at first, sound logical?
So you listen and don't think to look beneath the surface... Until you start seeing a disconnect between what you've been told and what you're seeing. If you then decide to apply wisdom by disregarding what women say and start doing what actually works you'll see an even bigger disconnect. You'll start, for instance, noticing that their natural craving for drama and emotional stimulation is not even compatible with that respect which they claim to want.
Because at the kernel of their words and "logic"---in making you a beta/simp, in this example---is something tailored solely for their benefit.

The child, like woman, is neither logical nor rational; hence, when presented with a statement that seems built on logic, one ought to always ask themselves "What are they peddling (to me)?" If you ask yourself this question in truth, and deduce their angle/pov in the matter, then, you'll be surpised on how you'll begin to see the feelings and self-serving prompts in their "logic".

Look deeply upon any woman or at the below picture even. Does this look like a creature of truth, capable of logic and of magnanimity?

Ay some point she is correct.

1, if she dies who then take care of the orphaned baby?
2, the child wasnt asked to be born in the first place. This world is a crule cold wicked place to be so honestly she will be doing the baby a favor in some ways.
3, nobody knows what the outcome will be in the event of the child birth process so let her choose after all, its her life.

Yes I m in support of this, her life first, baby will still come later.

Infotubia9ja:
Ay some point she is correct.

1, if she dies who then take care of the orphaned baby?
2, the child wasnt asked to be born in the first place. This world is a crule cold wicked place to be so honestly she will be doing the baby a favor in some ways.
3, nobody knows what the outcome will be in the event of the child birth process so let her choose after all, its her life.

1) is 90% right (2) hmmmmm is just number of days or months she may for get about it and (3) is 50 \50 % my prayer for every woman in her place is to come out with songs of Joy in the mouth

Pat081:
1) is 90% right (2) hmmmmm is just number of days or months she may for get about it and (3) is 50 \50 % my prayer for every woman in her place is to come out with songs of Joy in the mouth

We all pray for safe delivery always.
I have a 3 years old daughter and I will burn down the whole entire earth if anything stands in my way to get to my baby. Everything i am trying to achive in life today is for her.

But the truth still remains thesame on my point number 2.
You and I were never asked to be born we came here due to our parents one time enjoyment of skin to skin pleasure. Still never asked to be born.
Left for me, if my wife have had a complication during child birth process and I was to choose BTW her and the baby, I would have chose my wife thats just me even if she was telling the doctor to choose the baby I will use my hand put enough dosage for the injection I go inject her myself for that labor room she go pass out and I tell the doc. Save my wife the baby can go.
I will be in pains but still I will choose my wife.

Infotubia9ja:
We all pray for safe delivery always.
I have a 3 years old daughter and I will burn down the whole entire earth if anything stands in my way to get to my baby. Everything i am trying to achive in life today is for her.

But the truth still remains thesame on my point number 2.
You and I were never asked to be born we came here due to our parents one time enjoyment of skin to skin pleasure. Still never asked to be born.
Left for me, if my wife have had a complication during child birth process and I was to choose BTW her and the baby, I would have chose my wife thats just me even if she was telling the doctor to choose the baby I will use my hand put enough dosage for the injection I go inject her myself for that labor room she go pass out and I tell the doc. Save my wife the baby can go.
I will be in pains but still I will choose my wife.

that is prayer sir songs of Joy should be from every mother /father

Dizzyyish:
I just went through a thread from a few days ago about saving a mother's life during a delivery over the child. That's the gist of the thread. For those who haven't read it:
https://www.nairaland.com/8485590/anything-goes-wrong-during-labor

Whilst reading, it wasn't the subject matter that I found interesting, but rather the replies from guys on the thread. The female in question had stated that in the event of some complication during childbirth her life should be prioritised over the child - and there was an overwhelming verdict that she was right. She's technically right though, but you see that's what's interesting about it...

Did her statement sound logical? Yes, it did. Rather, to be precise, her statement coincides with logic. What's interesting is the (supposed) oversight on the part of the male commenters. There was no mistake in trying to ascertain the logic in what was said, but the issue is that they didn't deem it necessary to go further and ask themselves "Where is this statement coming from exactly?"

Woman is inherently selfish, thus solipsistic. She can have no true/sincere input without a motive, and if there is no motive it's because it doesn't appeal to her, and if it doesn't appeal to her then it doesn't concern her to begin with. Woman does not do anything that doesn't benefit her in some shape or form. She sees only self and cannot fixate her sight on what is past self. As a consequence, woman is anti-logical as logic demands an objective view upon what is outside of oneself first and foremost.

When whatever comes out of a woman's mouth coincides with logic it's actually just a Trojan horse of selfishness (though they don't see it that way). It looks like the gift of logic and sound reasoning on the outside, and on the surface that's good enough. You let them wheel this horse past the walls of your city---into your mind, and then, it is not until the dark of night---in hindsight---do you see a small battalion of soldiers quietly springing forth from within the horse to slit the throats of their enemies in their sleep does it then become apparent that this "gift" had always been self-serving; that this gift was not an ends itself - but, as always, a means to an end.
This is how women use a man's logic against him and turn him into a tool to serve her wants and whims.

It's no different from how women say they want a really sweet, caring guy, who is nice and respects them. Though they speak from feelings of the moment, it does sound logical to men. Why wouldn't they want a nice guy who respects them? Why would a man listen to woman if what she said didn't, at first, sound logical?
So you listen and don't think to look beneath the surface... Until you start seeing a disconnect between what you've been told and what you're seeing. If you then decide to apply wisdom by disregarding what women say and start doing what actually works you'll see an even bigger disconnect. You'll start, for instance, noticing that their natural craving for drama and emotional stimulation is not even compatible with that respect which they claim to want.
Because at the kernel of their words and "logic"---in making you a beta/simp, in this example---is something tailored solely for their benefit.

The child, like woman, is neither logical nor rational; hence, when presented with a statement that seems built on logic, one ought to always ask themselves "What are they peddling (to me)?" If you ask yourself this question in truth, and deduce their angle/pov in the matter, then, you'll be surpised on how you'll begin to see the feelings and self-serving prompts in their "logic".

Look deeply upon any woman or at the below picture even. Does this look like a creature of truth, capable of logic and of magnanimity?

Great piece! I'll turn it into a thread and acknowledge you.

Typed a whole lot of nothing. Should’ve posted this in the original thread instead.

Dizzyyish:
I just went through a thread from a few days ago about saving a mother's life during a delivery over the child. That's the gist of the thread. For those who haven't read it:
https://www.nairaland.com/8485590/anything-goes-wrong-during-labor

Whilst reading, it wasn't the subject matter that I found interesting, but rather the replies from guys on the thread. The female in question had stated that in the event of some complication during childbirth her life should be prioritised over the child - and there was an overwhelming verdict that she was right. She's technically right though, but you see that's what's interesting about it...

Did her statement sound logical? Yes, it did. Rather, to be precise, her statement coincides with logic. What's interesting is the (supposed) oversight on the part of the male commenters. There was no mistake in trying to ascertain the logic in what was said, but the issue is that they didn't deem it necessary to go further and ask themselves "Where is this statement coming from exactly?"

Woman is inherently selfish, thus solipsistic. She can have no true/sincere input without a motive, and if there is no motive it's because it doesn't appeal to her, and if it doesn't appeal to her then it doesn't concern her to begin with. Woman does not do anything that doesn't benefit her in some shape or form. She sees only self and cannot fixate her sight on what is past self. As a consequence, woman is anti-logical as logic demands an objective view upon what is outside of oneself first and foremost.

When whatever comes out of a woman's mouth coincides with logic it's actually just a Trojan horse of selfishness (though they don't see it that way). It looks like the gift of logic and sound reasoning on the outside, and on the surface that's good enough. You let them wheel this horse past the walls of your city---into your mind, and then, it is not until the dark of night---in hindsight---do you see a small battalion of soldiers quietly springing forth from within the horse to slit the throats of their enemies in their sleep does it then become apparent that this "gift" had always been self-serving; that this gift was not an ends itself - but, as always, a means to an end.
This is how women use a man's logic against him and turn him into a tool to serve her wants and whims.

It's no different from how women say they want a really sweet, caring guy, who is nice and respects them. Though they speak from feelings of the moment, it does sound logical to men. Why wouldn't they want a nice guy who respects them? Why would a man listen to woman if what she said didn't, at first, sound logical?
So you listen and don't think to look beneath the surface... Until you start seeing a disconnect between what you've been told and what you're seeing. If you then decide to apply wisdom by disregarding what women say and start doing what actually works you'll see an even bigger disconnect. You'll start, for instance, noticing that their natural craving for drama and emotional stimulation is not even compatible with that respect which they claim to want.
Because at the kernel of their words and "logic"---in making you a beta/simp, in this example---is something tailored solely for their benefit.

The child, like woman, is neither logical nor rational; hence, when presented with a statement that seems built on logic, one ought to always ask themselves "What are they peddling (to me)?" If you ask yourself this question in truth, and deduce their angle/pov in the matter, then, you'll be surpised on how you'll begin to see the feelings and self-serving prompts in their "logic".

Look deeply upon any woman or at the below picture even. Does this look like a creature of truth, capable of logic and of magnanimity?