Ibime:
Make una pipe low. Chelsea fans too dey jump jump. Una blood too dey hot.

Make 10 games pass first before we cast judgement considering injuries, late signings, lack of preseason and dud goalkeepers, 10 games is the point at which we go know how far.

10 games kwa? Is you joking or what? No one can watch the way we play and be happy. 10 games is a long time in football.
The earlier we can string together a number of wins the better otherwise them boys could be affected mentally. Alonso, Kepa are already in that zone.. Lol..
A win against CP is a must.

nateevs:


The way he threw Mount like a child

lol.

MrColdsweat:


Weak points in defense of the amateur lampard.
Sarri got these same players to play compact possession football. Under sarri, Chelsea has zero problems with build-up.

Sarri got these same players to win a continental cup.

What is lampards approach?

Can you tell me what the team does repeatedly that we can agree to be a part of lampards strategy?

At least when you watch hasenhttl, you see high tempo attacking possession football and tactically aware defenders who almost keep the offside trap perfectly.

When you watch potter of brighton, you see how they keep the ball perfectly to force the opposition out of their positions.


When you watch ancellotti, you see the compact defending with 4-4-2, you see how they waste no time in buildup or bypassing a press. They transit from defense to attack with just 4 passes unlike other team who spend so much time passing the ball out from the back.


Tell me, what do you see the Chelsea team do repeatedly that you can claim to be part of lampard's strategy?

This is incorrect. A lot of personnel problems required change of Lampard pattern from game to game in the 2nd half of last season that made you think he has no pattern. It is actually adapting the style of play to the personnel, not lack of pattern.

Lampard pattern was set in the first half of last season, a high pressing, high attacking team. Abraham's injury forced the tactics to adapt away from high pressing because Giroud cannot fulfill that function. Let Graham Potter be forced to use Glenn Murray and you will see Brighton pattern of play change.

On the attacking front, it is the managers job to get players into scoring positions. Lampard does that and frequently. The chart below shows we had the 2nd highest expected goals last season behind Man City. It is the quality of the finishers that will actualise that XGF into actual goals.

On the defensive front, expected Goals Against (XGA in the chart below) is also very good in comparison. The quality of the Goalkeeper and the defenders will actualise that XGC into low goals conceded. Another personnel problem that confused you is Lampard changed to back three for personnel reasons which disrupted the usual pattern of play. This is because Lampard saw his keeper is useless, his left-full back Alonso is useless defensively, Kante is always injured meaning midfield protection is gone and Rudiger is full of brain farts. That is just a manager trying to reduce risk from personnel problems from game to game to survive the short-term which you interpreted as a lack of pattern. Sarri never had the level of problem with Kepa that Lampard faced. Sarris Kepa and Lampard Kepa are two different players. Also Sarri did not face the same Kante injury problems.

You also say Ancelotti has distinct style of play. Where were you when Ancelotti was having personnel problems last season when Tom Davies and Sigurddson turned his midfield into highway for any team to score 4 goals against them.

Now Ancelotti has solved his personnel problem, you are attributing it to pattern of play. Where was his pattern when his personnel were weak?

Don't confuse personnel issues with lack of pattern.

Lampard will be judged by me when the error players have been replaced in the starting 11. I'm talking Alonso, Kepa, Jorginho, Rudiger, Chris primarily.

Does he get his players in scoring position to have high XG? Yes. Does his defence have low XGA? Yes. That's the managers job done. You are just judging on player errors, for example because 2 players made 3 brain farts against West Brom and Emerson made another brainfart yesterday.

Barkley out.

Alonso, Kepa, Rudiger, RLC, Jorginho nexts


Then Declan Rice in to cement that spot from shakushaku Kovacic

Ibime:


This is incorrect. A lot of personnel problems required change of Lampard pattern from game to game in the 2nd half of last season that made you think he has no pattern. It is actually adapting the style of play to the personnel, not lack of pattern.

Lampard pattern was set in the first half of last season, a high pressing, high attacking team. Abraham's injury forced the tactics to adapt away from high pressing because Giroud cannot fulfill that function. Let Graham Potter be forced to use Glenn Murray and you will see Brighton pattern of play change.

On the attacking front, it is the managers job to get players into scoring positions. Lampard does that and frequently. The chart below shows we had the 2nd highest expected goals last season behind Man City. It is the quality of the finishers that will actualise that XGF into actual goals.

On the defensive front, expected Goals Against (XGA in the chart below) is also very good in comparison. The quality of the Goalkeeper and the defenders will actualise that XGC into low goals conceded. Another personnel problem that confused you is Lampard changed to back three for personnel reasons which disrupted the usual pattern of play. This is because Lampard saw his keeper is useless, his left-full back Alonso is useless defensively, Kante is always injured meaning midfield protection is gone and Rudiger is full of brain farts. That is just a manager trying to reduce risk from personnel problems from game to game to survive the short-term which you interpreted as a lack of pattern. Sarri never had the level of problem with Kepa that Lampard faced. Sarris Kepa and Lampard Kepa are two different players. Also Sarri did not face the same Kante injury problems.

You also say Ancelotti has distinct style of play. Where were you when Ancelotti was having personnel problems last season when Tom Davies and Sigurddson turned his midfield into highway for any team to score 4 goals against them.

Now Ancelotti has solved his personnel problem, you are attributing it to pattern of play. Where was his pattern when his personnel were weak?

Don't confuse personnel issues with lack of pattern.

Lampard will be judged by me when the error players have been replaced in the starting 11. I'm talking Alonso, Kepa, Jorginho, Rudiger primarily.

Does he get his players in scoring position to have high XG? Yes. Does his defence have low XGA? Yes. That's the managers job, not to be judged because 2 players made 3 brain farts against West Brom and Emerson made another brainfart yesterday.

I am no Chelsea fan but stumbled upon your post. Well, good coaches can lose it and that is why even good coaches get sacked sometimes. His analysis of the Chelsea team was for this season but your response was defending the Chelsea of last season. This season is different as obvious to us all and if we judge Lampard by this season's performance so far, he has been terrible. It's not always about the players, the choice of who to play, what position to play, what approach to each match matters alot. So far Lampard has given a bad account of himself on and off the pitch and needs to step up or go for the sake of good football.

Nezzjnr:
Eph12 u don dey support Chelsea??

weedtaker:
eph12? Confusion in enemies camp

chidexxy007:

eph12 kwa

Sniper4real:

eph12 keh?

Omo see confusion

I can literally feel the pain he's going through

Skimpledawg:
Barkley moves to Villa on loan.


I really hope thecassanova guy would take this well

Only Lampard will loan out a decent squad player that can drive the ball forward & contribute greatly to our attack and keep Kovacic the activity former with pointless dribbles & backpasses.

Our 433 with Kante as lone DM & 2AMs is out of the window. My LampardOut campaign just got more triggered.

Thecassanova:

Only Lampard will loan out a decent squad player that can drive the ball forward & contribute greatly to our attack and keep Kovacic the activity former with pointless dribbles & backpasses.

Our 433 with Kante as lone DM & 2AMs is out of the window. My LampardOut campaign just got more triggered.

Kova is not good enough for the first team.

He is a squad player at best.

Truthspoon1:
I am no Chelsea fan but stumbled upon your post. Well, good coaches can lose it and that is why even good coaches get sacked sometimes. His analysis of the Chelsea team was for this season but your response was defending the Chelsea of last season. This season is different as obvious to us all and if we judge Lampard by this season's performance so far, he has been terrible. It's not always about the players, the choice of who to play, what position to play, what approach to each match matters alot. So far Lampard has given a bad account of himself on and off the pitch and needs to step up or go for the sake of good football.

His accusation of lack of pattern is from last season, unless you want to tell me 4 games is enough to draw his conclusion which speaks more of a jump jump personality than any rational analysis.

This season we played Liverpool where you would adjust your pattern to contain them anyway and lost to a red card. We played West Brom where 3 brain farts put us behind but the attacking play the manager has worked on brought us back in the game. The other two games have been OK.

So what exactly are you talking about this season, except to tell us your blood is hot. We have had two weeks preseason and the players brought in to eliminate our error players are really yet to take to the pitch so the old players are still making brainfarts as expected.

Thecassanova:

Only Lampard will loan out a decent squad player that can drive the ball forward & contribute greatly to our attack and keep Kovacic the activity former with pointless dribbles & backpasses.

Our 433 with Kante as lone DM & 2AMs is out of the window. My LampardOut campaign just got more triggered.

Lmao. Calm down man

Sulele04:
The penalty defeat yesterday have exposed a lot of trolls and plastic fans.
you guys could not stand by the club,manager or players when we lost so i dont want to see any of you here when we win.
(ennyjay72 popizano hensben eph12 bunch of fair-weather fans)
i don mark una name when we start winning you guys can go masturbate to lampardout for all i care, just avoid here.

I'm too certain you don't like and support lampard more than I do,so chill. My stand is simple and remains the same and that is play well,play well.I can endure losing as there can be only one winner in football, but what I frown at is not playing well and losing.if we dominate our opponents from start to finish and we end up losing you will never see me calling out lampard even if we relegate.Lampard should make us dominant on the ball with vertical penetrative passes,quick transition of the ball from the defence to attack,and if we end up losing,we will be calling out the players and not the manager.



Before someone would quote me to tell me about time and gelling he should tell me the numbers of years it took Brighton manager to get his team playing well.

Skimpledawg:
Barkley moves to Villa on loan.


I really hope thecassanova guy would take this well

I pray he does well and makes England team.


Aaaa, so na RLC go stay. Watching this season in 3D

Shey Mendy come baff for pitch ni?

Ibime:


This is incorrect. A lot of personnel problems required change of Lampard pattern from game to game in the 2nd half of last season that made you think he has no pattern. It is actually adapting the style of play to the personnel, not lack of pattern.

Lampard pattern was set in the first half of last season, a high pressing, high attacking team. Abraham's injury forced the tactics to adapt away from high pressing because Giroud cannot fulfill that function. Let Graham Potter be forced to use Glenn Murray and you will see Brighton pattern of play change.

On the attacking front, it is the managers job to get players into scoring positions. Lampard does that and frequently. The chart below shows we had the 2nd highest expected goals last season behind Man City. It is the quality of the finishers that will actualise that XGF into actual goals.

On the defensive front, expected Goals Against (XGA in the chart below) is also very good in comparison. The quality of the Goalkeeper and the defenders will actualise that XGC into low goals conceded. Another personnel problem that confused you is Lampard changed to back three for personnel reasons which disrupted the usual pattern of play. This is because Lampard saw his keeper is useless, his left-full back Alonso is useless defensively, Kante is always injured meaning midfield protection is gone and Rudiger is full of brain farts. That is just a manager trying to reduce risk from personnel problems from game to game to survive the short-term which you interpreted as a lack of pattern. Sarri never had the level of problem with Kepa that Lampard faced. Sarris Kepa and Lampard Kepa are two different players. Also Sarri did not face the same Kante injury problems.

You also say Ancelotti has distinct style of play. Where were you when Ancelotti was having personnel problems last season when Tom Davies and Sigurddson turned his midfield into highway for any team to score 4 goals against them.

Now Ancelotti has solved his personnel problem, you are attributing it to pattern of play. Where was his pattern when his personnel were weak?

Don't confuse personnel issues with lack of pattern.

Lampard will be judged by me when the error players have been replaced in the starting 11. I'm talking Alonso, Kepa, Jorginho, Rudiger, Chris primarily.

Does he get his players in scoring position to have high XG? Yes. Does his defence have low XGA? Yes. That's the managers job done. You are just judging on player errors, for example because 2 players made 3 brain farts against West Brom and Emerson made another brainfart yesterday.

Wow posts like this should be getting like 40likes

But u will be seeing many likes on trash and trolls. Finally no be likes they make post get point.

Worth the read

TalabiAudu:
Barkley out.

Alonso, Kepa, Rudiger, RLC, Jorginho nexts


Then Declan Rice in to cement that spot from shakushaku Kovacic

hmm, should Lampard still be given another player. Anyway shey na £40m dem wan use buy Rice, e dey ok

popizaino:





I'm too certain you don't like and support lampard more than I do,so chill. My stand is simple and remains the same and that is play well,play well.I can endure losing as there can be only one winner in football, but what I frown at is not playing well and losing.if we dominant our opponents from start to finish and we end up losing you will never see me calling out lampard even if we relegate.Lampard should make us dominant on the ball with vertical penetrative passes,quick transition of the ball from the defence to attack,and if we end up losing we will call not the players .



Before someone would quote me to tell me about time and gelling he should tell me the numbers of years it took Brighton manager to get his team playing well

soooo Chelsea did not play well yesterday ?

BlueAngel444:
soooo Chelsea did not play well yesterday ?

Did they win?

Lana1:
Shey Mendy come baff for pitch ni?

whivh kind habit be this

RLC will also leave Chelsea soon

Be like Rice is definitely coming to Chelsea
And Lampard wants to move ahead with 4-2-3-1

Kante, Kovacic, Jorginho and Rice
With 2 AMs Havertz and Mount.

Ibime:


This is incorrect. A lot of personnel problems required change of Lampard pattern from game to game in the 2nd half of last season that made you think he has no pattern. It is actually adapting the style of play to the personnel, not lack of pattern.

Lampard pattern was set in the first half of last season, a high pressing, high attacking team. Abraham's injury forced the tactics to adapt away from high pressing because Giroud cannot fulfill that function. Let Graham Potter be forced to use Glenn Murray and you will see Brighton pattern of play change.

On the attacking front, it is the managers job to get players into scoring positions. Lampard does that and frequently. The chart below shows we had the 2nd highest expected goals last season behind Man City. It is the quality of the finishers that will actualise that XGF into actual goals.

On the defensive front, expected Goals Against (XGA in the chart below) is also very good in comparison. The quality of the Goalkeeper and the defenders will actualise that XGC into low goals conceded. Another personnel problem that confused you is Lampard changed to back three for personnel reasons which disrupted the usual pattern of play. This is because Lampard saw his keeper is useless, his left-full back Alonso is useless defensively, Kante is always injured meaning midfield protection is gone and Rudiger is full of brain farts. That is just a manager trying to reduce risk from personnel problems from game to game to survive the short-term which you interpreted as a lack of pattern. Sarri never had the level of problem with Kepa that Lampard faced. Sarris Kepa and Lampard Kepa are two different players. Also Sarri did not face the same Kante injury problems.

You also say Ancelotti has distinct style of play. Where were you when Ancelotti was having personnel problems last season when Tom Davies and Sigurddson turned his midfield into highway for any team to score 4 goals against them.

Now Ancelotti has solved his personnel problem, you are attributing it to pattern of play. Where was his pattern when his personnel were weak?

Don't confuse personnel issues with lack of pattern.

Lampard will be judged by me when the error players have been replaced in the starting 11. I'm talking Alonso, Kepa, Jorginho, Rudiger, Chris primarily.

Does he get his players in scoring position to have high XG? Yes. Does his defence have low XGA? Yes. That's the managers job done. You are just judging on player errors, for example because 2 players made 3 brain farts against West Brom and Emerson made another brainfart yesterday.

Bless you. In summary, let the team be at full strength and let them play together for some time, the manager's ideas will start to show.
I still have some issues with him in terms of selecting personnel - e.g using Abraham against a team that sits deep instead of Giroud who could provide better link up, and using Giroud against a team with a less conservative approach instead of Abraham that can stretch the defence better. I also don't know why Mount completed that game last night.
But all in all, it's too early to be calling for his head. People blood just dey hot.

Thecassanova:

Only Lampard will loan out a decent squad player that can drive the ball forward & contribute greatly to our attack and keep Kovacic the activity former with pointless dribbles & backpasses.

Our 433 with Kante as lone DM & 2AMs is out of the window. My LampardOut campaign just got more triggered.

Not at all. Havertz and Mount, that's always been the plan.

Ibime:


This is incorrect. A lot of personnel problems required change of Lampard pattern from game to game in the 2nd half of last season that made you think he has no pattern. It is actually adapting the style of play to the personnel, not lack of pattern.

Lampard pattern was set in the first half of last season, a high pressing, high attacking team. Abraham's injury forced the tactics to adapt away from high pressing because Giroud cannot fulfill that function. Let Graham Potter be forced to use Glenn Murray and you will see Brighton pattern of play change.

On the attacking front, it is the managers job to get players into scoring positions. Lampard does that and frequently. The chart below shows we had the 2nd highest expected goals last season behind Man City. It is the quality of the finishers that will actualise that XGF into actual goals.

On the defensive front, expected Goals Against (XGA in the chart below) is also very good in comparison. The quality of the Goalkeeper and the defenders will actualise that XGC into low goals conceded. Another personnel problem that confused you is Lampard changed to back three for personnel reasons which disrupted the usual pattern of play. This is because Lampard saw his keeper is useless, his left-full back Alonso is useless defensively, Kante is always injured meaning midfield protection is gone and Rudiger is full of brain farts. That is just a manager trying to reduce risk from personnel problems from game to game to survive the short-term which you interpreted as a lack of pattern. Sarri never had the level of problem with Kepa that Lampard faced. Sarris Kepa and Lampard Kepa are two different players. Also Sarri did not face the same Kante injury problems.

You also say Ancelotti has distinct style of play. Where were you when Ancelotti was having personnel problems last season when Tom Davies and Sigurddson turned his midfield into highway for any team to score 4 goals against them.

Now Ancelotti has solved his personnel problem, you are attributing it to pattern of play. Where was his pattern when his personnel were weak?

Don't confuse personnel issues with lack of pattern.

Lampard will be judged by me when the error players have been replaced in the starting 11. I'm talking Alonso, Kepa, Jorginho, Rudiger, Chris primarily.

Does he get his players in scoring position to have high XG? Yes. Does his defence have low XGA? Yes. That's the managers job done. You are just judging on player errors, for example because 2 players made 3 brain farts against West Brom and Emerson made another brainfart yesterday.

XG is the biggest bullshit analytical tool in modern football statistics.....

A person gives a chance to a rating based on a range of things. Different people have different ways of measuring xg. It's not the be all and end all stat, it's subjective and people don't treat it as such....

XG is pointless drivel. The only stat that ever matters in football is the full time score,chikena..

I guess that means RLC stays?

If error from players no dey ball,how goal wan come......Reece james wey score bullet from outside the box,na error from defender or midfielder too wey no close am up now....

All goals came as a result of an error from a player not doing his job well....

Which kind epistle ibeme write for there so?

Hensben come and Carry your fraud from my club please and to Madrid5 I repeat , come end of season if hazard don't produce anything sensible we shall wear one trouser.

weedtaker:
Which kind epistle ibeme write for there so?

Him dey vex dey type....

Lol.... See wetin Mount and Odoi cause

BlueMann:


Not at all. Havertz and Mount, that's always been the plan.

No depth. We will be playing over 40 games, any injury to either we’re back to square one. Can’t bank on RLC.

Melvyn11:
Hensben come and Carry your fraud from my club please and to Madrid5 I repeat , come end of season if hazard don't produce anything sensible we shall wear one trouser.

This may be the worst transfer in football history considering his fee, expectations and he was in the last year of his contract, cost around 140m and has just 1 goal.

BlueMann:
I guess that means RLC stays?

person way dem talk say dey go offer am with Rudiger on top Rice matter

Lampard said it will be good for RLC to play regularly and believes he could have a big future in the club. So loan fi dey on the cards for am

Sulele04:

ordinary carabao cup penalty exit u start to dey shout lampardout. when lampard wins champions league this season i wonder what you will shout.
DUMB TROLL.

if lampard qualify for semi, I will paint this place with money.

Melvyn11:
Hensben come and Carry your fraud from my club please and to Madrid5 I repeat , come end of season if hazard don't produce anything sensible we shall wear one trouser.

if you mention my monicker again,na thunder go fire you,I don warn you oh