larride:


You are saying rubbish. Spurs scored 3 goals. 3.

Stop saying rubbish.

Eruditor:


What is shot on target? Do you know for example that when a ball hits the bar it is not counted as a shot on target? Or if a player rounds the keeper and misses the post it is not a shot on target?

I should be asking you if you watched the game.

Eruditor:


The handle of a United fan but the brain of a Shekpite.

What are the 3 goals? Describe them.

larride:


That’s why I’m asking you if you watch the match.

Did any City shot hit the post yesterday?

Did any City player round the keeper and misses the post?

So I ask again how is 8-6 goal on target means the team that had 6 goal on target was demolished? How?

Leave that canopy and look for good TV to buy.

larride:


I should describe the 3 goals for you?

A40:
Pochettino

Eruditor:


Gifted to them how? Mehn, I don't have energy for all these biased and hate-driven arguments.

When you are tired of being happy City didn't qualify, watch that match again. Tottenham were supposed to be set up to frustrate City and hit them on the break. Yet they were being dissected and torn apart time after time after time. Yet you are here telling me Tottenham did not play badly because City's best CB was awful yesterday and a handball goal was allowed yet that same handball would have been called a penalty going by the same rules if it hit a City player's hand first.

diggz:


Simply because I don't agree with you...doesn't make my position hate driven. You are way too emotional man, but Las Las...you go dey alright.

Eruditor:


Don't worry about the TV I use. I am good trust me. If a Spurs player hits a cross from a dead ball and Ederson holds it, it is a shot on target as long as it was in the direction of the post. If a player uses his hand to push a ball into the post, it is a shot on target. If a defender clears his lines wrongly and the ball falls to a striker who shoots, it is a shot on target.

So dumbing down an argument to 8-6 shots on target is dumb. There are many other metrics to determine being outplayed right?

Eruditor:


LOL @emotional.

All these blackmail because I would not baulk.

afrodoc2:

Abeg the people wey promise to cannibalize themselves and chop hands should do the needful and upload video make we confirm.

larride:


So out of all these instance you listed, show me the one that applied to the City v Spurs match.

What are the other metrics that determine being outplayed? Possession?

diggz:


Ogbeni still busy dey blow grammar upandan...e even don say him go use epistles use bet say city go win ucl next season....mscheeeeew

diggz:


Ogbeni still busy dey blow grammar upandan...e even don say him go use epistles use bet say city go win ucl next season....mscheeeeew

Eruditor:


Danny Rose free kick. Shot on target. Laporte mistake(s). 2 shots on target. Llorente Handball. Shot on target. Eriksen from almost centre circle. Shot on target. Raheem goal..offisde. No shot on target. Etc

What determines being outplayed? Lol.

Eye test. Chances created. Clear cut chances created. Possession in key areas. Corners. Final 3rd presence. Blocks by defenders and saves by opposing keeper. Being taken off ones stride. Forced to kick the ball into row Z at almost every opportunity. Shots at goal etc etc.

afrodoc2:


Ibime don warn am.

When City loses the EPL this season he will eat his hands. And he wants to stake his legs next season that City will win the UCL.

The guy sha wan disable himself by fire by force.

larride:


Which one is Llorente handball again? Laporte mistakes

Okay. Let’s go with your criteria of what being outplayed is.

Let me help you with the little stats I can gather

Attempt on goal:
City - 8, Spurs - 6

Attempt off goal:
City - 8, Spurs - 3

Blocked shot:
City - 4, Spurs - 2

Corner kick:
City - 4, Spurs - 3

Freekick
City - 15, Spurs - 11

Goalkeeper saves:
City - 3, Spurs - 4

Offside:
City - 3, Spurs - 2

Throw in:
City - 20, Spurs - 16

Foul:
City - 8, Spurs - 13

You can bring your own stats also. Let’s see how City demolished Spurs according to you.

Eruditor:


City didn't progress. I am sad. But City did the other things I said they will do.

Amoto94:
Credits to Spurs and Pochettino for their performance last night, over two games they were the better side.
Having said the above it is important to state why Guardiola lost the game.
When I saw the lineup and Gundogan deployed as holding midfielder instead of Fernandinho I said to a friend that Pep has lost the game because Gundogan is not suitable to that role as he is more of a box-to-box midfielder and lacks the positional discipline to play in that role. In the end, it proved costly.
Dropping Sane for Bernardo Silva was another blunder Sane's pace would've made it difficult for Spurs fullbacks does making Son and Moura focus on tracking the runs of Sterling and Sane.
Stones should have played ahead of Kompany or Laporte I don't know if he was injured but his recovery speed and long-passing skill are better than those of the mentioned players.


In the end, overconfidence killed Pep and Man City, not VAR or luck.
Eruditor you said no excuses last week but this week you are making silly excuses, isn't this doublespeak?

Segedinho:

Like humiliating nd giving them them the worst beating?

raumdeuter:


A former Premier League referee said VAR got it wrong and Fernando Llorente’s dramatic winning goal, which saw Tottenham dump Manchester City out of the Champions League should NOT have stood.

Ibime:
I bless the day we sold Diego Costa. This is worse than Benteke.

raumdeuter:


The ball hit Llorentes hand, hit his hips before going in. So Llorente was the first to handle the ball

airmark:


But raumdeuter said we would regret his sale. Can we mark this as another L for Dayo?