davidylan:

Mr. Okonkwo, many of us not just read science journals, we also author some of them. Most of them are as useless as the paper they are written on. One of the biggest problem pharma consistently encounters when it comes to science journals is the inability to replicate a vast majority of the "science" published today. Is okonkwo aware of this? I guess not.

This is one thing that many people do not know about academic writing and academic "papers". Quite a lot of it is tosh and/or fanciful nonsense.

Enigma:

This is one thing that many people do not know about academic writing and academic "papers". Quite a lot of it is tosh and/or fanciful nonsense.

Its quite funny when i hear folks tout science journals... it just tells me they probably have no idea what they themselves are talking about.
Trying to read the methods section of most of the journals on pubmed is an exercise in futility.

"For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountain of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries".....Robert Jastrow (American astronomer, physicist, cosmologist and leading NASA scientist)

@ Poster......No you got it wrong!!!! it is actually the end of your own god.

davidylan:

1. I have nothing against the "god particle". I think it is a worthwhile investment.

2. There are many scientists who are still unsure that what was discovered is actually the Higgs Boson as theorized.

3. HOW does the "god particle" explain or justify the big b[i]a[/i]ng theory? Please explain to us in clear terms.

Re the bolded

http://www.technewsworld.com/story/Will-the-Real-Higgs-Boson-Please-Stand-Up-75596.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2171611/Is-God-particle-impostor-Scientists-claim-signal-Large-Hadron-Collider-Higgs-all.html