₦airaland Forum

Ibime:

Syrians in northwest Syria are celebrating rumors of Nasrallah killing in Beirut. pic.twitter.com/CmJKRXTe0d

— Fared Al Mahlool | فريد المحلول (@FARED_ALHOR) September 27, 2024

Sunnis everywhere celebrating Nasrallah death

Clearly Israel did their homework on Hezbollah unlike Hamas that caught them by surprise. Maybe Hezbollah saw Hamas doings and thought Israel would be weak

Roland17:
Ayatollah is cornered and he knows it.

raumdeuter:
Bibi went to UN General assembly today and called the bluff of everyone, Immediately he stepped out, greenlighted the attack on Nasrallah and they are still following up till now with missiles. Looks like Bibi is working with a deadline in mind and I think its the US elections

LordAdam16:
The Ayatollah does not want a hot war.
Israel will kill 70% of Iranian generals in 48 hours in a hot war.

Hamas was willing to fight a war of attrition with Israel.
Iran does not have that appetite.

The open question is at what point does the Iranian public go from "I'm not going to die for the Ayatollah" to "Family, country, Allah".

-Lord

Ballzproblem2:
Israel really went for nassarallah himself,shit let me process this.This is huge.


Iran might respond,middle east is about to change

Sportsweb:
Omo

birdman:
Not as easy as you think. Celebrity messes with your mind big time. And everybody around you will always say yes to your ideas, no matter how dumb. Just to stay in your good books

EmmanuelScott1:
All we needed from k.dot is to sing "not like us" for seventy × seven

Certified Loverboy never see this coming 🤣🤣🤣

Ibime:
Omo Jay Z really turn the screw on Drake with this one. It still ain't safe for Drake to come outside. I heard Kendrick album is dropping same time

BlueRayDick:
Omo! Make person no see problem ni o.

Most people there don see wahala wey pass their power; that's why they will take any promise of alleviation of their sufferings no matter how unrealistic those promises are.

Ibime:
A40

raumdeuter:
You know as e dey go
Aboki same skin color o, from same country oh. Never mind from another country
In some places you same ethnic group, if you cross your own LGA dem go remind you where your Papa come from
People even have gates and doors in their homes to control the entry into it but dont think a country deserves to account for entry and exit


The US already has one of the most relaxed immigration law. To enter Canada legally through express entry you need to get a very high IELTS score, almost have a masters degree. In UK even if you give birth to children your kids are not guaranteed

But in US your give birth today even if you are illegal, you child is immediately a citizen, You dont even need to speak English to migrate and when its proposed, you head screams of racism

SpaceX:
I have a theory;

After Careful consideration and review, I believe all the folks hiding behind kamala are probably illegal Aliens this explains why they detest the incoming president, they know He is ready to vacuum and flush them out. I just painted a perfect picture of the situation they are in— This also explain the name-calling propaganda and cult-like personality they display here, come November 5th there shall be tears and hitting of head on the wall. Kleenex stock will be through the roof. I apologize in advance!

donlittle25:
There have been rumors going on that he is gay and he also isn't into black women. I think it was intentional


https://x.com/nhoodpublicist/status/1834238672650047991?s=46&t=C_RU1TqESdx7bwXTHRpVHg[/quote]But I've seen his kids. They're all black. Which means at some point he must have been into black women. And even if he's not why does he owe anyone an explanation

Plus if you're straight you know what you've been knacking.

These celebs dey try sha. I wish I would care what anyone thinks to the point where I have to prove straightness or the type of women I like. Do you see as Di Caprio dey move? You will wail and move on with your life

SmooshCHN:
I have no reasons to think it was intentional. Why would he do that?
The attempt to claim he was hacked.

LordAdam16:
Ibime, this is what we mean by Harris being an airhead.

Oh my goodness this is an absolute train wreck.

Reporter: What are your specific plans to bring down prices?

Kamala: "I grew up a middle class kid... I grew up in a neighborhood of folks who were very proud of their lawn. Ya know?"pic.twitter.com/lhOdWoygy2

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) September 13, 2024

Word salad without her emotional support governor.

cc A40

-Lord

bemeruca:
Ibime, if someone cannot get to the office because of an accident and they tell you why, it is an excuse. If Trump had an excuse and the moderators were the reason Harris seemed to perform well or they made him look bad while making her look good that is a good excuse because you are here saying she won. She was poor. this happens in football. recently rice was sent off and the game ended in a draw because the ref might have made an error giving Rice a 2nd yellow card and it affected the outcome of the game. Eze scored a goal but the ref blew and disallowed the goal. palace lost that match and saying they did because of the ref is a good excuse because it is true and the ref's action affected Palace negatively. so what you are saying does not make sense if that is the case.

This clip

This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.

There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.

This is not “bias."

It’s much worse.… pic.twitter.com/tYJhZwGwdW

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) September 11, 2024

may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.

There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.

This is not “bias."

It’s much worse.

This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.

When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.

The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.

In this clip:

1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.

2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.

3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.

4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.

5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.

6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.

7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.

To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:

"They did exactly what their bosses wanted." -western

LordAdam16:
Anyone on this thread will cook Kamala.
Even Obri.gardo go turn her like barber chair.

Trump walked in there fixing to end another career but then was distracted by crowd sizes.
If I tell you say e no pain me eh.
By now we suppose don dey write eulogy. Race tied. Position better than 2016, 2020.
Weakest candidate in a generation on a compressed timeline.
Just hammer her record. No time for recovery. He start dey pursue butterfly.

-Lord

Ibime:
The main koko is Kamala is smart unlike what you made out. Her taking that debate is like Tinubu winning debate against Obi in present day Nigeria. Tinubu has no right to win any debate with the emotions people are feeling. Not that Dems are responsible for 2021-22 inflation anymore than Trump is responsible for 2011 to 2019 low interest rate environment , that's just the stage of the business cycle, but that's a matter for another day. Trump just has no right to lose the debate or even be close in the debate, given the conditions, unless his opponent is smart and wily.

raumdeuter:
Top 5 lies that the ABC News moderators refused to fact-check or falsely fact-checked during the debate:

1. Mandatory Firearm Buybacks:

Kamala Harris told Trump to "stop lying" about her wanting to confiscate firearms. Harris has previously stated multiple times that she wants to launch a mandatory buyback program.

The ABC moderators said nothing.

2. "Fine People" Hoax:

Kamala Harris claimed Trump called neo-N*zi's "very fine people." This hoax was debunked by Snopes but the ABC moderators let it slide.

The ABC moderators said nothing.

3. Post-Birth Abortion:

Trump claimed babies were 'k*lled' outside the womb in failed abortions. Under Tim Walz, babies born alive in botched abortions are allowed to be left to d*e.

Eight babies who survived abortions in Minnesota were abandoned and sadly perished under Walz.

The ABC moderators simply said Trump was lying and moved on without adding context.

4. Defund the Police:

Kamala Harris laughed when Trump said she wanted to defund the police. During a previous interview, Harris said having more cops on the street is "wrong."

She also supported taking police officers out of schools.

The ABC moderators said nothing.

5. Bl**dbath Hoax:

Kamala Harris claimed Trump said there would be a bl**dbath if he is not elected, insinuating that his supporters would start k*lling people.

This is completely false. The comment was made during a rally where Trump said there would be a "bl**dbath" for the American auto industry if he is not elected.

The ABC moderators said nothing.

Top 5 lies that the ABC News moderators refused to fact-check or falsely fact-checked during the debate:

1. Mandatory Firearm Buybacks:

Kamala Harris told Trump to "stop lying" about her wanting to confiscate firearms. Harris has previously stated multiple times that she wants… pic.twitter.com/6aXznDnq7O

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 11, 2024

Ibime:
3 Vs 1 is losers nonsense

He was talking so much nonsense about cats, dogs and abortion after birth. Media have a duty to set the record straight. Setting record straight on a mad man for the benefit of the public is not taking sides

He was even handed an alley hoop with the first question on economy, kicking off on his strong point. If they started off on abortion, I will know it was 3 Vs 1

Trump had all the ammunition that matters - Economy, Immigration and Afghanistan withdrawal and still lost the debate, Kamala didn't have much to work with except abortion and still won. If you give any reasonable politician Trumps strong points, it would have been a whitewash

LordAdam16:
Trump cannot do that.
Do you really think no one told him to avoid her baits? Even during the breaks.
He decided not to listen to them.

The thing is that we have way slicker candidates on the conservative bench.
But the core of the voting block do not trust them like they do Trump.
They know Trump will build the wall. They know he will carry out deportations. They know he will drill baby drill and be pro-fossil fuels. They know he will avoid wars.

So it's like a package deal. He has this great record, but all you need to trip him up is say he draws small crowds. His ego will not let him be effective. But if you bring in a smooth talker like Vivek, Rubio, or even Pence; the base will not trust that they'll follow through.
A second debate would be better for him. He tends to listen only after his stubbornness blows up in his face. So he'll finally listen to his debate advisors, like he only listened to them in 2020 after the first was a dumpster fire. But that's 4 wasted weeks when we could have started running away with this election.

The positives to draw is that Kamala ducked and weaved and he laid into her the handful of times he comported himself.
I'm confident that by next week, the debate is old news and we're back to "Kamala, why did you you push for tax-funded gender change treatments for illegal migrants in 2019".

In all, he did okay. The only reason why the race is close while he has the advantage on economy, immigration, and foreign policy is that he has flaws and last night one flaw floated to the top. Trump has an ego is no surprise to 90% of Americans. But it'll be a short drag because Americans will go out to the grocery stores and still see the high prices. Migrants will commit more crimes, stream across the border, and be given handouts while Americans rack up credit card debt and can't afford housing. The realities do not change because you got Trump to bloviate about how much his father left him.

American' are facing real crises and Harris and her tag team masquerading as moderators fixated on the candidate Trump. And failed to make the case about fixing the current mess tied to her administration. Her debate performance will have about as much effect as her DNC speech. Both were celebrated, but the convention bounce did not happen.

-Lord

CNN Undecided Voter: "My life was better when Trump was in office. The economy was better. Inflation was lower. Things were better overall. And now, with Kamala's administration, things haven't been so fantastic. She's saying she can fix the problems that her administration has… pic.twitter.com/J1XWCSJYHB

— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) September 11, 2024

IjeBos:
Trump lies about demonstrably provable things. They could have fact checked him all night. They didn't. You can't have a debate when one person just pushed provable false things. He puts ABC in a bad position of pushing disinformation to voters. Trump should try not lying.

Someone you think got destroyed by Tulsi destroyed Trump. What does that tell you?

raumdeuter:
Does the Democrat have a limit on abortion? 6 months, 7 months 9 months or what do they have

raumdeuter:
Kamala do you bear any responsibility for the Afghanistan withdrawal?

No response just lots of words and nothing to address the question

LordAdam16:
They asked her if she thinks Americans are better off under her than 4 years ago under Trump and her answer segued into Trump being boring.

Trump missed a lot of easy layups.
He is fortunate their records are stark and American swing state voters are discerning.

Reuters did a follow-up of undecideds. Most leaned Trump. Half said Harris was vague. I can bet that most thought Harris won the debate.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/some-undecided-voters-not-convinced-by-harris-after-debate-with-trump

Kudos to Harris for executing her plan. But her plan did not entail distancing herself from Biden. She did not sufficiently answer why she hadn't done the things she was talking about. And many saw her baiting Trump as a cheap trick to avoid getting in the weeds about her policies.

-Lord