₦airaland Forum

Abuheekmat:
Check the hadiths I posted.

Lol. Illiteracy at its peak
You haven't point a single Hadith that called kawarij kufr

Abuheekmat:
OK.
Let me play along. .

..
If khawarij are Muslims to you ..that means not all sects are kufar to you right?

Am I the person to dictates which sect is kufr and which is not

Abuheekmat:
Laughing. .
You are too far from knowledge. The little you know , you do it with taqleed..

.. Do you even know why rosul call khawarij kufar?

You Bastard.
point a single Hadith where rasul called kawarij kufr

Abuheekmat:
Taqleed lo ma ba igbese aye e je .

You are using salafs mistakes to refute hadith rosul..


Kontinue..

Save me from you? Like what the f**k. You're so dumb. You sit in your thatch mud with your dumb head saying what is correct

Abuheekmat:
Emi mi omo ale..


Kontinue

Stop speaking your damn language you illiterate

Abuheekmat:
Explain with dalil from rousl or sahabah NOT ALFA why khawarij are Muslims o..

Laughing .

As worst as kufar alaro, sarumi ,ejigbo, amubieya and others .. They even know khawarij are kufar..


You are too far from knowledge o..


Laughing

An-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
The view of ash-Shaafa‘i and the majority of his
fellow scholars is that the Khawaarij are not to be
described as disbelievers; this also applies to the
Qadariyyah and the majority of the Mu‘tazilah and
other groups that follow whims and desires.

End quote from Sharh Muslim, 7/160

Abuheekmat:
I gave you 3 hadith..
And it's not proof ?

Where do you even get the moxie from to type hokum??
You've laid bare your ignorance here many a time.
You are a bastard

Abuheekmat:
Copy and paste master. ..

Laughing. .


Its scholars that Allah sent to u abi ..

Oponu ..

You see hadith where rosul call khawarij kufar, told sahabahs to kill them, you saw hadith where sahabahs kill them, call them dog of fire, said the worst slain on earth is khawarij and best slain is those who khawarij killed .


And you rejected it all because of oro alfa




Agbako ni e fa

What brought copy and paste. Illiteracy at its peak.


You call Ibn ‘Aabideen (may Allah have mercy on him) and
Shaykh ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan ibn Saalih al-Mahmoud
(may Allah preserve him) Liers.

You are a bastard

Abuheekmat:
Explain with dalil from rousl or sahabah NOT ALFA why khawarij are Muslims o..

Laughing .

As worst as kufar alaro, sarumi ,ejigbo, amubieya and others .. They even know khawarij are kufar..


You are too far from knowledge o..


Laughing

Dear illiterate.
You haven't brought any proof that kawarij are kufar.
But I have brought you proof why they are not.


You are so dumb

Abuheekmat:
Hadith



حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو كُرَيْبٍ، حَدَّثَنَا وَكِيعٌ، عَنِ الرَّبِيعِ بْنِ صَبِيحٍ، وَحَمَّادِ بْنِ سَلَمَةَ، عَنْ أَبِي غَالِبٍ، قَالَ رَأَى أَبُو أُمَامَةَ رُءُوسًا مَنْصُوبَةً عَلَى دَرَجِ مَسْجِدِ دِمَشْقَ فَقَالَ أَبُو أُمَامَةَ ‏‏ كِلاَبُ النَّارِ شَرُّ قَتْلَى تَحْتَ أَدِيمِ السَّمَاءِ خَيْرُ قَتْلَى مَنْ قَتَلُوهُ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ ثُمَّ قَرَأَ ‏:‏ ‏(‏ يَوْمَ تَبْيَضُّ وُجُوهٌ وَتَسْوَدُّ وُجُوهٌ ‏)‏ إِلَى آخِرِ الآيَةِ قُلْتُ لأَبِي أُمَامَةَ أَنْتَ سَمِعْتَهُ مِنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ لَوْ لَمْ أَسْمَعْهُ إِلاَّ مَرَّةً أَوْ مَرَّتَيْنِ أَوْ ثَلاَثًا أَوْ أَرْبَعًا حَتَّى عَدَّ سَبْعًا مَا حَدَّثْتُكُمُوهُ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ وَأَبُو غَالِبٍ يُقَالُ اسْمُهُ حَزَوَّرُ وَأَبُو أُمَامَةَ الْبَاهِلِيُّ اسْمُهُ صُدَىُّ بْنُ عَجْلاَنَ وَهُوَ سَيِّدُ بَاهِلَةَ ‏.‏"



Narrated Abu Ghalib:

"Abu Umamah saw heads (of the Khawarij) hanging on the streets of Damascus. He said: 'The dogs of the Fire and the worst dead people under the canopy of the heavens. The best dead men are those whom these have killed.' He then recited: On the Day when some faces will become white and some faces will become black... (3:106) until the end of the Ayah. I said to Abu Umamah: 'Did you hear it from the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ)?' He said: 'If I had not heard it but one time, or two times, or three times, or four times - until he reached seven - I would not have narrated it to you.'"

Hasan (Darussalam)

English : Vol. 5, Book 44, Hadith 3000
Arabic : Book 47, Hadith 3270

..

Explain this too o..
Laughing

You illiterate. try to read and understand


Ibn ‘Aabideen (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
Even though you may find that some scholars, within
the context of debating with the Mu‘tazilah and
other groups, use the word kufr (disbelief) when
refuting their arguments, what they meant is that
their (the Mu‘tazilah’s) arguments would inevitably
constitute disbelief, without implying that they
themselves were disbelievers, because what may be
concluded from a view is not necessarily to be
attributed to the one who holds that view.
Moreover, they think that they have shar‘i evidence
to support their view, even though they are wrong
and are falling into error.

End quote from Haashiyat Ibn ‘Aabideen, 3/46

Shaykh ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan ibn Saalih al-Mahmoud
(may Allah preserve him) was asked: Are the
Khawaarij kaafirs (disbelievers)?
He replied

The scholars differed as to whether they are
disbelievers, but the correct view is that they are not
to be regarded as disbelievers. ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib
(may Allah be pleased with him) was asked about
them: Are they disbelievers? He said: They fled
from disbelief, but they fell into the innovation of
labelling others as disbelievers; we will not fall into
the innovation of labelling others as disbelievers
and thus label them as such. This is the correct
view, in sha Allah, even though their innovations
may be described as innovations that constitute
kufr.

Abuheekmat:
Who will come laugh at my illiteracy
They are not kufar but their bidha constitute kufru..

Laughing..

CONSTITUTE You illiterate.

Abuheekmat:
Laughing...

Do you know my sheik ..

Sheik Muhammad Ali Jabata..

Who's your alfa.. Je ka gbo

Who cares about Sheikh??

Abuheekmat:
Hadith

حَدَّثَنَا مُوسَى بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْوَاحِدِ، حَدَّثَنَا الشَّيْبَانِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا يُسَيْرُ بْنُ عَمْرٍو، قَالَ قُلْتُ لِسَهْلِ بْنِ حُنَيْفٍ هَلْ سَمِعْتَ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَقُولُ فِي الْخَوَارِجِ شَيْئًا قَالَ سَمِعْتُهُ يَقُولُ ـ وَأَهْوَى بِيَدِهِ قِبَلَ الْعِرَاقِ ـ ‏

‏ يَخْرُجُ مِنْهُ قَوْمٌ يَقْرَءُونَ الْقُرْآنَ لاَ يُجَاوِزُ تَرَاقِيَهُمْ، يَمْرُقُونَ مِنَ الإِسْلاَمِ مُرُوقَ السَّهْمِ مِنَ الرَّمِيَّةِ ‏"

‏‏‏

Narrated Yusair bin `Amr:

I asked Sahl bin Hunaif, "Did you hear the Prophet (ﷺ) saying anything about Al-Khawarij?" He said, "I heard him saying while pointing his hand towards Iraq. "There will appear in it (1:e, Iraq) some people who will recite the Qur'an but it will not go beyond their throats, and they will go out from (leave) Islam as an arrow darts through the game's body.' "



Sahih al-Bukhari 6934
In-book : Book 88, Hadith 16
USC-MSA web (English) : Vol. 9, Book 84, Hadith 68  (deprecated)



EXPLAIN THIS HADITH #MR SCHOLAR QUOTER

Can't you read at all??

Try to read what I posted earlier but this time slowly


But let me help you summarize it. kawarij are not kufar, it's just their innovations that constitute kufr.

Abuheekmat:
Laughing...

You failed question 1.

Kindly answer question 2.
Can we call a Muslim that reject iman a kafir..

Dear illiterate
How does that your question relate to what I typed above. I won't stop advising you, get off your butt online and searching Islamic knowledge. You are religiously not sound and very dumb at the same time. I pity you

Don't sell sterling and thank me later

Abuheekmat:
Failed question...

Question 2..
Can one make takfeer of a Muslim that falls into kufru after shurrot is complete on the person?

others will not tell you the truth but I will.
Your brain is full of fufu.


Can you read at all?
You called a Muslim kafir, I corrected you. You called kawaarij kufar, I still corrected you. And now you are asking another unrelated question from your dumb head. Who are you to dictate who is kafir and who is not.

As I said before, get off your butt online and start searching for knowledge. And stop displaying your illiteracy.

Criminals

Op, please summarize. No time

Flat heads Vs skull miners

CastedDude:
The two criminals, namely; Oguntuga Saheed and Omotayo Adeniran

Na them

Is it obligatory to obey a ruler who does not rule according to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him)?


https://www.nairaland.com/4920643/it-obligatory-obey-ruler-does

Is it obligatory to obey a ruler who does not rule according to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him)?.

Answer

Praise be to Allaah.

The ruler who does not rule according to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger should be obeyed in matters that do not involve disobedience towards Allaah and His Messenger, and it is not obligatory to fight him because of that; rather it is not permissible to do so unless he reaches the level of kufr, in which case it becomes obligatory to oppose him and he has no right to be obeyed by the Muslims.

Ruling according to anything other than that which is in the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger reaches the level of kufr when two conditions are met:

1.When he knows the ruling of Allaah and His Messenger; if he is unaware of it, then he does not commit kufr by going against it.

2.When what makes him rule by something other than that which Allaah has revealed is the belief that it is a ruling that is not suitable for our time and that something else is more suitable than it and more beneficial for people.

If these two conditions are met, then ruling by something other than that which Allaah has revealed constitutes kufr which puts a person beyond the pale of Islam, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And whosoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed, such are the Kaafiroon (i.e. disbelievers)” [al-Maa’idah 5:44]. The authority of the ruler becomes invalid and he has no right to be obeyed by the people; it becomes obligatory to fight him and remove him from power.

But if he rules by something other than that which Allaah has revealed whilst believing that ruling by that – i.e. that which Allaah has revealed -- is what is obligatory, and that it is more suitable for the people, but he goes against it because of some whims and desires on his part or because he wants to wrong the people under his rule, then he is not a kaafir; rather he is a faasiq (evildoer) or a zaalim (wrongdoer). His authority remains, and obeying him in matters that do not involve disobedience to Allaah and His Messenger is obligatory, and it is not permissible to fight him or remove him from power by force or to rebel against him, because the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) forbade rebelling against rulers unless we see blatant kufr for which we have proof from Allaah. End quote.

Abuheekmat:
Who is this one. . This is the 2nd time you will display your ignorance about deen... But this time ,I won't ignore you. .

..
Tell me ..is khawarij Muslim or kufar ?
Then explain why?
Then explain the difference between sects claiming islam and khawarij

As I said before, get off your butt online and start searching for knowledge but let me answer your question.


The Khawaarij are followers of whims and desires
and innovation who have deviated from the path of
Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah, but we do not
describe them as disbelievers because of their
innovation, unlike others who follow whims and
desires.

An-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
The view of ash-Shaafa‘i and the majority of his
fellow scholars is that the Khawaarij are not to be
described as disbelievers; this also applies to the
Qadariyyah and the majority of the Mu‘tazilah and
other groups that follow whims and desires.

End quote from Sharh Muslim, 7/160

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have
mercy on him) said:

The Khawaarij who deviated, whom the Prophet
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) enjoined
us to fight, and whom Ameer al-Mu’mineen ‘Ali
(may Allah be pleased with him), one of the Rightly-
Guided Caliphs fought, and whom the leading
scholars of Islam among the Sahaabah, Taabi‘een
and those who came after them were unanimously
agreed upon fighting, were not described as
disbelievers by ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib, Sa‘d ibn Abi
Waqqaas and others among the Sahaabah; rather
they regarded them as Muslims even though they
fought them, and ‘Ali did not fight them until they
shed blood unlawfully and raided the property of
the Muslims; then he fought them in order to ward
off their wrongdoing and aggression, not because
they were disbelievers. Hence he did not take their
womenfolk captive and he did not seize their wealth
as booty.
End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa, 3/282

Ibn ‘Aabideen (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
Even though you may find that some scholars, within
the context of debating with the Mu‘tazilah and
other groups, use the word kufr (disbelief) when
refuting their arguments, what they meant is that
their (the Mu‘tazilah’s) arguments would inevitably
constitute disbelief, without implying that they
themselves were disbelievers, because what may be
concluded from a view is not necessarily to be
attributed to the one who holds that view.
Moreover, they think that they have shar‘i evidence
to support their view, even though they are wrong
and are falling into error.
End quote from Haashiyat Ibn ‘Aabideen, 3/46


Shaykh ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan ibn Saalih al-Mahmoud
(may Allah preserve him) was asked: Are the
Khawaarij kaafirs (disbelievers)?

He replied:

The scholars differed as to whether they are
disbelievers, but the correct view is that they are not
to be regarded as disbelievers. ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib
(may Allah be pleased with him) was asked about
them: Are they disbelievers? He said: They fled
from disbelief, but they fell into the innovation of
labelling others as disbelievers; we will not fall into
the innovation of labelling others as disbelievers
and thus label them as such. This is the correct
view, in sha Allah, even though their innovations
may be described as innovations that constitute
kufr.


Among their innovations are the following:

- They think that failing to do something obligatory
constitutes disbelief.
- They think that committing a major sin constitutes
disbelief.
- They believe in fighting those Muslims who
disagree with them.

And Allah knows best.

Abuheekmat:
So plenty.. Wallohi..

You are a kafir
Abdelkabir is a kafir
Emipree and albaqir and his shite brothers are kufar
Ladauna is a kafir
And their Sufi brothers

..
Other than that..

One of the worst things that a Muslim can do, is call his fellow
Muslim a disbeliever/Kafir.

The majority of people call each other Kafirs just because
someone does not believe in what they are following or their
group or there interpretation of an issue. So this is really
about rejecting group mentalities not about rejecting Islam
but so many of us reject what one group says and then call
them Kafirs. This ignorance has to stop, it really does I am so
tired of this backward mentality. The most shocking thing
about this fact is that almost everyone is doing this!
Irrespective of the group that they belong to, they are all doing it!

Reading the following prophetic narration should be enough to
make you stop and think before you move your mouths next
time:

Ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the
Messenger of Allah (May Allah bestow peace and blessings
upon him) said, “If a man addresses his brother as, ‘O’
Disbeliever,’ it returns to one of them; either it is as he said or it
returns to him.” (Agreed upon – in both Bukhari 10/427 and
Muslim 60)


Do you really want to take the chance of calling someone a
disbeliever and this curse returning to you? Do you really want
to take that chance? Are you really that sure of yourself? The
curse of disbelief returns to the one who said it; if that person
he labelled as a disbeliever was not worthy of that name.
There are so many people who have not studied Islamic belief but find it totally acceptable to call someone a disbeliever.
How can you when you have not studied Islamic belief? How
can you be certain what is in people’s hearts? Don’t we
remember what happened to Usama ibn Zaid (may Allah be
pleased with them) when he killed a man who testified to
Islam but this individual after testifing kept coming back to
fight the Muslims? The Prophet (may Allah bestow peace and blessings upon him) kept asking Usama if he looked into his heart? Usama was so upset that he almost wished that he
had not accepted Islam. This is how severe this problem is.

Abu Dhar (may Allah be pleased with him) said that he heard
the Messenger of God (may Allah bestow peace and blessings
upon him) say, “Whoever addresses a man as a disbeliever or
calls him the enemy of God, and he is not, then it returns to
him.” (Agreed upon Bukhari 10/377 Muslim 61)

Is this not enough for you to stop this nonsense? Are we
following the Sunna of the Prophet (may Allah bestow peace
and blessing upon him) or are we making up our own? As it
seems that people have abandoned this Sunna a long, long
time ago. I have yet to find a hadith that the Prophet (may
Allah bestow peace and blessings be upon him) addressed
anyone as a disbeliever but we find this word as easy to use
as breathing.

WHAT PEOPLE THINK IS DISBELIEF BUT IT IS NOT

This is a sad list because what most people think is disbelief
is not actual disbelief because it might be a major sin.


- Rejection of a group methodology. It might not be a sin, it
might be sin.

-Dress, hats, ties etc. There are many incorrect Fatwas that
state wearing a particular type of dress is belief. This is also
incorrect. It might be a major sin for Muslim to look like a
priest but not disbelief.

- Transmitting a statement of disbelief is not disbelief. When
warning or explaining to someone.

- Seeing a fortune teller or horoscopes is a major sin not
disbelief. The hadith is a warning because it is singular.

- Despairing of the mercy of Allah (the Exalted) is a major sin
but not kufr.

- Rejecting rare hadith. This is complicated, because it is only disbelief if it mass transmitted. Otherwise it could be a sin but not kufr to reject rare hadith when it opposes other stronger hadith.

- There are things that are in books of fiqh and so forth, that
the writer may deem as kufr but it is not kufr but major sin. He said it was kufr to stop people from doing it. So just becausesomeone said doing 'X' is kufr, in a book, does not mean that is how it actually is.


OUTWARDLY MUSLIM?

Ibn Daqiq Al-'Id said in commentary of the forty hadith of
Imam Nawawi, "Al-Khattabi mentioned this, stating, “There are people who are outwardly Muslim but secretly disbelievers; we accept their outward Islam.’ This is the opinion of most of the scholars."


We do not pry about peoples faith. If they say that there are
Muslim that is sufficient. The only exception is when there is a genuine reason to trust that.

He meant Biafra republic. Nothing for Igbos in Nigeria (if you no you no)

But for sure Atiku is not the solution

Some of this users are dead sef

Abuheekmat:
Kindly quote where i call those imam kufar..


Abu haneefa is already a kafir.. He died a kafir . He was khawarij and murjiah.. . Although he fall into calling Quran creation of Allah.. ... ... But he rojjah on that but not the rest

Subhanallah
Please get off your butt and start searching for knowledge.

Peace be upon you


Allah says “That was a nation which has
passed on. It will have [the consequence of]
what it earned, and you will have what you
have earned. And you will not be asked about
what they used to do .[al Baqarah ayah 134]

The Prophet (p.b.u.h) said , “Don’t abuse the
dead, because they have reached the result
of what they forwarded.
In fact this is command on us that that we
should hide the mistakes of dead and show
the virtues of them.
Prophet peace be upon him said :” Remember
the virtues of your dead and do not touch
there mistakes“

Also see this story,
Aisha ra asked in one of the gatherings
regarding Yazeed bin Qais May Allah curse
him- How is he? ( Note that yazeed bin qais
openly abused Aisha ra and he was leader of
people against Uthman) People said he
died. Listening this Aisha recited
Astaghfar. People said you were criticizing
him and now you are reciting astaghfar, what
does that mean? Aisha repled that Prophet
peace be upon him said: “ Don’t abuse the
dead, because they have reached the result
of what they forwarded .

The words of Sunan abu Dawud are Short:
“When (one of) your companion die then
leave him do not fall behind his faults
Especially, When by abusing the dead living
people feel hurt it is more worse.
Prophet peace be upon him said “ Do not
abuse dead so that living suffer.
By watching these ahadeeth If there is no
reason then it is forbidden to accuse dead. In
fact according to some scholars if by saying
something wrong to Non Muslim dead person
and if it is hurting living people then it is not
allowed to say something against a Kafir
After this tamheed the personality of Imam
Abu Hanifa May Allah be please with him is
disputed among the scholars some of the
scholars accused him due to some issues,
There are some bad things attributed to Imam
Abu Haneefah in the books. On the other hand
some people go to extremes regarding him, If
not by tongue, with their actions they make
their creed that he was Infallible and they
quote fabricated ahadeeth on his virtues. Both
of these ways are rejected according to fair
people of knowledge, The better opinion
regarding Imam (abu haneefa) is that he was
one of the great Imams of Ahlus Sunnah wal
Jamah, Follower of Quran and Sunnah and
servant of Religion of Islam, and the scholar
who defended Islam . He is not free from
mistakes as well as he is not preacher of evil,
kufr and innovation
see.
So In the era of books of trajim,history and
seyar there is consensus of trustworthy
Scholars of Ahlus sunnah, Whoever read the
trustworthy books of history written in 6th and
7th Hijrah and after that he will agree with it.

I am quoting some references here:
Imam ad-Dahabee May Allah be please wil
him said in his Book Tazkaratul Huffadh:
He was devoted, Practicing scholar, the one
who worship, very Prestigious, never
accepted the gifts from Kings but he himself
did business and earn provisions.
Imam ad-Dahabee wrote fifteen pages in his
Seyar al Ailam al Nubala and he wrote only
good about Imam, and he did not mentioned
any word of accusation against him in fact he
did not even mentioned signals that there is
some kalam on Imam, then he wrote in the
end.
Shafiee said: People are children of Abu
Haneefa in fiqh. I say: Fiqh and Deducing
rulings from fiqh is clear from this Imam. This
is something where there is no doubt. (Then
dahabee writes the arabic poetry which
means) Even If there is a need to provide
evidence for emittance of the day, Then
according to the people who have this type of
mind nothing is authentic. Two volumes can
be written on the life of Imam, this was the
life of Imam. May Allah be please with him
and shower his mercy on him. He was
martyred in 150 Hijrah because someone
gave him poison. He was 70 years old at that
time.
2. In the era of Imam ad-Dahabee there is
another Imam who is famous in the works of
Tafsir,Hadeeth and History. I mean Hafiz
Imad ud din Ibne Kathir Rahimullah he writes
in his famous book Al Bidaya wal Nihaya:
Faqeeh of Iraq, one of the scholars of Islam,
One of the leaders of Islam and one of those
who seek, one of the four matbua Imams.
Then he wrote praises of scholars on him in
approximately one page
3. Hafiz Ibne Hajar asqalani Rahimullah wrote
approximately four pages in Tahzeeb at-
Tahzeeb and he only mentioned good about
Imam, he does not mentioned any bad thing
against him. In fact he writes in the end
There are many virtues of Imam Abu Haneefa
May Allah shower his mercy and grant him
pradise ameen.
Note that all of these three scholars we
mentioned are not hanafis, and there is no
doubt in that all those sayings were in front
them in detail from which it is proven insult of
Imam Abu Haneefa, But these scholars did
not point out these sayings in fact leaving of
these all the sayings is the proof, according to
these researchers the sayings are not fit for
The Imam, his knowledge, cautiousness and
taqwa
4. Hafiz as-Suyuti also mentioned him in 5th
tabqa in his book Tabqaat al-Huffaz and he
didn’t quote single word against him
5. In Fact see the co-incidence that Hafiz
Dahabee ra wrote a short book on Tabqat ul
Muhadditheen, in which he wrote the names
of great Muhadditheen and Huffaz, he wrote ”

This book has 27 tabqaat of Muhadditheen,
The heading of 4th tabqa is “Tabqa of Al-
Amash and Abi Haneefa” the name of Abu
Haneefa is in this tabqa of muhadditheen

6. Imam Ibne Khilkaan May Allah be please
with him is the famous Imam and historian of
the 7th Hijrah. He also mentioned only good
about Imam Abu Haneefa May Allah be please
with him in his book “Wafayat al-A’ayan”. He
writes in one place.
He was a practicing Scholar, ascetic
worshiper, devoted Pious , He was always
focused and turned towards Allah Tala
[5/406]
He did not mention single word against him.
In fact he wrote it was better if Khateeb
Baghdadi would not mention those words
against the Imam.
If we mention the quotes of other scholars
then the topic would be too long, We only
quoted five scholars who are trustworthy
according to Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamah,
specially weakness and authenticity of
hadeeth is relied on the works of first three.
Now these scholars did not even quote single
word against the Imam is the evidence that
these sayings against the Imam are worthy to
be left. Allah knows best
This is the manhaj of great scholars of Ahlul
hadeeth and we have
seen our scholars on this manhaj, Shaykh ul
Kul Mian Nazeer Hussain Muhaddith Dehalvi
May Allah be please with him mentioned in
his book “Meyar ul Haq” that Imam Abu
Haneefa May Allah be please with him was his
leader Mujtahid, Follower of Sunnah, Pious
and devoted

Drunkards are not happy now