popizaino: Raumdeuter i have been banned from Chelsea thread so pls help me ask ibi.me who scored Barcelona 2nd goal against Chelsea in the UCL in 2012. He claimed the only goal iniesta scored against a big opponent was his semifinals goal against Chelsea in 2009.
You asked your 'Brother in the Fraudiola' to help you pass message from another thread and he just did.
To help us find Eruditor to pay his debt caused by Fraudiola, Raumdeuter turned deaf and dumb.
popizaino: Raumdeuter i have been banned from Chelsea thread so pls help me ask ibi.me who scored Barcelona 2nd goal against Chelsea in the UCL in 2012. He claimed the only goal iniesta scored against a big opponent was his semifinals goal against Chelsea in 2009.
You asked your 'Brother in the Fraudiola' to help you pass message.
Thecassanova: How valuable, someone played an attacking midfield role with nothing to show just baseless activity. Croatia coach better pair brozovic & Modric next game against Czechs or use vlasic that can do tangible things with the ball forward.They’ll mostly play in the opposition half anyways.
So Kovacic played AM against England in 4-1-2-3 formation that saw them being conservative throughout? See person wey i dey follow argue football sef. Done with you.
Thecassanova: You & amala turning, showing the part of the buildup play that suit your agenda . His CM partner, brozovic was following the ball on the right till the box and he even made slide attempt but instead of kova to quick cover on the left & mark, he was in a no man’s land when the goal came in.
Kovacic was the RCM and Brozovic was the LCM, and when out of position initially he pressed the area he should, to chase his man.
When one of the CMs presses, the other should drop, but you've already put his name as default in your blaming machine so he must be blamed by all means. Sha no get HBP.
Kovacic has been doing well with Croatia and gave an assist yesterday, if you like hit your head on a wall, he will continue to be in your face for club and country for now.
Thecassanova: [s]Lol I now understand why raumdeter says you’ve a limited football knowledge. I showed you this gif earlier of his ball watching in the Scotland goal you claim he was marking on the right. [img]https:///media/6-22-2021/0PA71u.gif[/img]
Which right? It’s evident you’ve inadequate CM grasp. People that are familiar with DM/CM positioning knows he was ball watching for that goal.
Shebi this was you telling us If Kovacic don’t play against Madrid Kante will collapse. Kovacic got injured, not only did we beat Madrid, we also won the UCL without him. Take your Fat L . [/s]
Which one is DM/CM?
You don't even know the formation Croatia played. If you have 2 CMs and one went to the right to close up space/ball, where should the 2nd CM be as seen below?
You didn't see the fault in the defender that made poor clearance to opponent, but Kovacic who expected the defender to clear well after he had gone to mark must be blamed.
Meanwhile, you told us that Croatia wouldn't field Kovacic as he is useless. He has played in all their matches and gave you a big L with his assist today. Choke on it.
Thecassanova: Average players like Drinkwater, Bakayoko will. It’s pure modric brillance & Btw with his poor final ball stats there’re more chances of him not setting it well in the future than otherwise.
Nothing concern us with future. For now he registered an assist that pasted a big L on your forehead as he has been doing well for the team, despite you telling us that Croatia coach would bench him during the tournament.
Thecassanova, always romancing Ls.
BlueMann: No forget bros, Kovacic has been good for Croatia. He's a valuable player to the team.
BlueAngel444: Then you didn't watch Kovacic then in their last match?
Modric, Kovacic, and Brozovic played very well, their problem was no point man, same with perisic, no body to play final ball to.
Thecassanova: You’re playing a DM/CM but you can’t scan over your shoulders for opponents, stay in position or track runners. Look at him standing by the Ref allowing that shot.
Ibime: If Lampard had accepted to go to Barca, there is no tournament that Barca will not win especially those games Iniesta will be waiting for Messi to carry him along, and Messi is unable to save him every time.
Iniesta would have been dragging left wing with Henry at best, if not sent on loan.
Exactly.
Barca would have been on an unassailable cheat mode for longer years.
Debroslink: [s]What did Lampard achieve for his country in 10 years except to fail fail and fail.
He used the Russian money to book himself a ticket to the beach while his mates were playing Euro 200[/s]8
This is Iniesta seeing Lampard as his master.
Iniesta : "Lampard is a reference in football, both in England and worldwide. I can't say much more about him.
"He is really experienced both at club and international level. He's got all my respect and huge credit to him as he's one of those players you can look at and learn."
Ibime: This must be the season they bought Mata and Oscar. A 35 year old still had to save them from sliding out of the top 4. They already slid out of UCL group stage when he was injured.
popizaino: No....you're mistaken him for frank Lampard who had Drogba to leach on.
[s]Tell us why England didnt make euro 2008 with peak Lampard [/s]
Even Iniesta disagrees with you. In fact he didn't mention Lampard and Drogba as a pair. That only exists in your head.
Iniesta : "Lampard is a reference in football, both in England and worldwide. I can't say much more about him.
"He is really experienced both at club and international level. He's got all my respect and huge credit to him as he's one of those players you can look at and learn."
Do you want Lampard to isolate the names when he suffered from both from time to time?
In the publication, he isolated and praised Messi as quoted below.
Don't force it, you planted a bomb, i picked it up and threw it at your face. Boom.
From the publication:
Lampard: "Can I give you two answers? It'll actually be three. The first is Lionel Messi because he was the most incredible player, and the player with balance and speed."
So rest, you've empowered Ibime unconsciously, to deal with you more with this publication.
Lampard couldn't isolate Iniesta for praises, but had to add Xavi to it. This even gave Ibime's carryalong points more feathers. Rest.
While Iniesta singled out Lampard and tagged him a reference in football, Lampard knew without Xavi, Iniesta was like a generator without engine. I have helped you to quote him below in case you want to turn Amala. Find another publication to use.
Lampard concluded: "Those two, as a pair, were something special. It was football that wasn't normal for me. It was different from anything else I came up against."
Ibime: Save the carryalong stories for people who like carryalongs.
Some people are helped to trophies while others are helpers.
No sensible Iniesta fan will try to bring him near Lampard.
Iniesta : "Lampard is a reference in football, both in England and worldwide. I can't say much more about him.
"He is really experienced both at club and international level. He's got all my respect and huge credit to him as he's one of those players you can look at and learn."
popizaino: [s]Even someone with an impaired vision knows it is an insult to compare Andres iniesta with frank Lampard whose club career without Drogba would have gone the way of his national Team. The real career Leach couldnt qualify three lions for euro 2008 at the peak of his career . That's enough to show how pointless it is trying[/s] to bring Frank Lampard who isnt even convincingly better than cesc Fabregas [s]into the Andres iniesta conversation. When Andre's iniesta discussion is taking place,we will have to name about 5 midfielders below him before we remember lampard in the same discussion but the issue here is not about the penalty merchant and personal glory hunter who scoring more goals than strikers matter more to him than the teams collective achievements. Thank RDM to drop him to the base of the midfield were he would be limited going forward before we could lay hands on the holy grail.pls if you dont have deep knowledge about Chelsea from 07-12 don't disgrace your generation by quoting me. Now the myth I am trying to unearth here is about Andres iniesta is just good while xavi Hernandez is great which is quite worthy of my attention than iniesta vs Lampard comparison .Now those who are trying to sell us this agenda should tell you why no reputable publication has ever named xavi above iniesta? From fifa,to uefa to la Roja to Barcelona iniesta has always been above xavi .Imagine two player played in the same,same team all their lives and one names always appear above the other name yet the name above is the very good player whilst the name below is the great player. Isnt that ment ? ;Dhttps://www.iffhs.com/index.php/posts/954[/s]
hensben: Vincente de Bousque use style finish Bousquet for this quote “Watch the game you won't see Busquets, but watch Busquets and you'll see the game.” So make we just Dey watch Bousquet like Rafael Nadal so see the game, that’s some boring ish
All players on the field will ask us to only watch them to see game too. Nonsense.
Meanwhile, can Gerard Moreno fit into this Chelsea team as Haaland's alternative?