₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,253 members, 8,420,990 topics. Date: Friday, 05 June 2026 at 04:10 PM

Toggle theme

AkinPhysicist's Posts

Nairaland ForumAkinPhysicist's ProfileAkinPhysicist's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 (of 78 pages)

RomanceRe: Kenya Man Caught On Camera Having Sex With Friend's Wife Next To His Car (Photos by AkinPhysicist: 2:08am On Feb 18, 2017
silvercute:
Blood of Habakkuk! shocked shocked shocked
shocked

RomanceRe: Meet The Us-based Nigerian B00ty Queen Raking Heavy Dollars From Showing Off Her by AkinPhysicist: 2:06am On Feb 18, 2017
cheesy
RomanceRe: Did This Lady Sin? (photo) by AkinPhysicist: 1:59am On Feb 18, 2017
grin

NYSCRe: Female Muslim Corpers Step Out In Style (Photo) by AkinPhysicist: 8:15pm On Feb 17, 2017
Pooh!
CelebritiesRe: Actor Odunlade Adekola Drunk On Fame And Losing His Credibility? by AkinPhysicist: 7:51pm On Feb 17, 2017
kanicorp9:
[s]Ever wondered what happens in a celebrities head when fame comes calling and their fame skyrockets?




One thing remains a fact....... losing one’s credibility along in lineof being famous is a big fail.

Nollywood has got many great actors but one who has continuously stood out over the course of his career is Yoruba actor, Odunlade Adekola.


Odunlade Adekola started his career back in 1996 but became active in 2006. The actor ruled the Yoruba sector to a core but he has since made his way into the English crowd where he seems loved and respected just as much.

While it cannot be contested that Odun is a great and phenomenal actor, the news and reports trailing him in recent times has left people wondering as to what exactly might be happening to the young man who supposedly has everyone in his corner.

Two years ago, he got his first English debut in the movie ‘Taxi Driver’ one would have thought that Odun would be proud of this step, the actor was reported to have been un-bothered about the state of the movie to the extent that he failed to promote it despite the fact that he was paid higher than his usual fee.



Truth is, Odun’s role could have been interpreted better by anyone...

His actions towards the movie could have been said to be a mistake that could not be avoided, Odun pulled yet another stunt with Funmi Holder’s movie ‘The Grudge’. He was said to have failed to turn up at the location while the movie was being shot and his hotel room left vacant because he failed to show up.


To add to it, Odun failed to show up at the premiere after stating that he was going to be there and once again failed to promote the movie on any of his social platform.

His recent action is his lack of commitment to a contract he had signed with the former MD of M-Net Africa, Biola Alabi on her recent movie. It was reported that Odun had failed to show up once again. These re-occurring acts from him has shown that Odun is beginning to thread a path of those who have taken their fame for granted.


Odun is starting to lose his credibility amongst his colleagues especially at a point where his career seems to be doing so well. It is important to ask if Odun has lost the touch of professionalism?
Is his fame starting to get the worst of him? Is this a deliberate action on his path? Broadway Africa decided to reach out to the Nollywood actor but all efforts to get to him through phone calls and text messages has been futile as he has refused to acknowledge any of them.

https://newslanda..com.ng/2017/02/actor-odunlade-adekola-drunk-on-fame.html?m=1[/s]
UNMITIGATED TRASH!
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 10:46pm On Feb 16, 2017
oaroloye:
LASERS have nothing whatsoever to do with QUANTUM PHYSICS.

Light Amplified by Stimulated Emission of Radiation is about generating beams of light whose photons are all in one phase.

TRANSISTORS are the solid-state application of the TRIODE amplifier, by sandwiching semiconductor of two or more different types together, with a view to controlling the electric currents between them.

GPS- the Global Positioning System has absolutely nothing at all to do with "QUANTUM PHYSICS!"

This is a technique of locating the position of a radio transmitter by triangulation.

It is widely claimed this system depends on something called "satellites," but there is no evidence that they exist, nor play any role in GPS. It has always been land-based, and existed before Oyinbo began telling us that they could do it with "Space Satellites."

MOBILE PHONES have nothing whatsoever to do with QUANTUM PHYSICS.

They are just Radio Transmitters and Receivers, that is all.
I was gonna reply you with a detailed post to correct your errors. Then I saw the emboldened. There is no way I can have a conversation with someone who is unable to convince himself of the existence of satellites. SMH
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 10:27pm On Feb 16, 2017
ponzihater:
Shame on you!!!
Why? Because I exposed you as a worthless charlatan?
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 10:26pm On Feb 16, 2017
fabre4:
Wow thanks. I hope to vibrate at your own frequency very soon with your help.
You are welcome. Anytime. I am here and willing to assist.
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 9:05pm On Feb 16, 2017
ponzihater:
You are too young to begin life like this.
I am too smart to buy into the obvious pathetic/cheap attempt hijack of the hard-work of science by lazy religious merchants.

ponzihater:
Google is your friend browse quantum mechanics
You should do EXACTLY this. Follow your own advice.

ponzihater:
and spirituality or Christianity and you'll several well framed article on the matter.
Anybody can write any article about anything. Have you read the article about the 'flying monkey civilization on the orbit of Jupiter?

ponzihater:
The fact that you can't articulate the subject title doesn't discountenance it.
Just because I find something stupid does not mean I cannot articulate it. Articulating something does not make it accurate or correct.

ponzihater:
Open ur lazy skull and research. And if you can't do that STFU.
Ad hominem. And researching quantum spirituality is like using a basket to fetch water - MAJOR waste of time.

ponzihater:
David Van Kovering is a scientist of repute but discovered the [b]connection between quantum mechanics and creation[/b]and marvelled at the possibility.
Anyone who makes the emboldened claim is a fraud that should not be taken seriously.
ponzihater:
Enjoy ur evening
Sgt Ponzi Hater
Do same

Again thrash. No such connection CAN exist. Quantum physics is an EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICAL science.
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 7:57pm On Feb 16, 2017
ponzihater:
[s]People like u end up wearing one old worn out trousers for months. Quantum physics brought a rebirth to spirituality. The bible says "things which are seen where from things which are not". That phrase it self explains the invisible part of matter. I know your feeble academic frame cannot withstand this and you'll resort to insults. Know the academic aspect of quantum physics will do you no good, understanding how it affects your everyday life changes the whole picture. I am a quantum leaper and I keep making quantum leaps in life because of my sound practical knowledge and spiritual illumination on quantum mechanics.[/s]
Sgt Ponzi Hater
Unmitigated thrash. There is no such thing as a quantum leaper. The writers of the bible have ZERO idea about quantum physics. Stop deluding yourself.
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist:
Phinity318:
Dummies like u will always resort to abuse and intimidation when threatened.

Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 5:01pm On Feb 16, 2017
ponzihater:
[s]Quantum physics proofs dat science and spirituality are interrelated. Quantum physics reignites a new phase of spirituality. I am a quantum leaper, I believe that every individual Running about an orbit must at one point in time take a leap or cease to exist. Then there's a concept of wandering stars. These were revolving round an orbit but did not gather enough energy to quantum jump to the next orbit thus fell off the circle.

Will be righting an article on quantum physics and conceptual age spirituality - what we should know. It will teach how to use quantum physics to attain a immense spiritual heights.[/s]

Sgt Ponzi Hater
Absolute thrash. Quantum physics is PHYSICAL science. There is no such thing as SPIRITUAL in physics.

Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 3:23pm On Feb 16, 2017
mvem:
...not all sciences are meant to be applied just like pure physics and pure maths...they are done for beauty of it, thats if u understand what i mean....some theories are very abstract and pure but no one can say that it is useless because in the next 100 years it might be applicable and game changing....just look at relativity that was known as abstract and not making sense but now it is very fundamental in a lot of tech
I hope some of you realize you will NOT have a cellphone (iphone etc.), GPS etc. without the knowledge gleaned from QUANTUM physics.
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 3:18pm On Feb 16, 2017
fabre4:
D? how did u do it studying it 400 level I can easily derive Schrödinger wave equation but that equation for total energy is using Hamiltonian operator is a dead end for me
The Hamiltonian is an operator representing the total energy of the system. To get the total energy of the system all you have to do is compute the EXPECTATION VALUE of the Hamiltonian. This computed value is basically your total energy. Computing expectation value is trivial - if you need help I can show you.
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 3:14pm On Feb 16, 2017
Phinity318:
U sound more like a lazy teacher who doesn't know his subject...
Here is the flogging your teachers failed to impact into your unfortunate life.

Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 3:10pm On Feb 16, 2017
benji93:
you are wrong," is there any experimental proof that an electron could be in a box and outside a box at the same time", you missed the point, i used the word "simultaneously", this phenomenon described above does not mean quantum tunnelling,quantum tunnelling is the process by which quantum objects including atoms pass through barriers,especially when a barrier initially reflective is made thinner.
Once again you show an abject lack of knowledge of the fundamentals of quantum physics. The ONLY way the particle in the box can have a non-zero probability of existing outside the box is through quantum tunneling. Because the wall of the box represents 'infinite potential' there is no classical way the particle can surmount this 'obstacle' hence quantum tunneling. You have described quantum tunneling but yet you believe its something else. Simultaneous? Of course - the wave function is always represented as a snapshot in time. Go and review your undergraduate particle in the box notes and you will see the wave function is represented as a function of position NOT time. What you have described is quantum tunneling which has been confirmed experimentally decades ago. Your lack of understanding is confusing you.

benji93:
Yet again you are assuming a stationary electron cannot be charged, which is the same as assuming tht a stationary proton cannot be charged. If you agree that electrons are charged.
You have a long way to go in understanding basic physics let alone quantum physics. The charge of an electron is intrinsic. The idea of 'charging' an electron is nonsensical. You are confusing static electric field of a charge with EM generated by an accelerated charge. Now, if I grant your ridiculous claim that static electric field is the solution to explain the wave nature of subatomic particles then, how do you explain the wave behavior of a neutral subatomic particle like the neutron?. Your 'theory' fails because it doesn't even pass a cursory logical test. This is because you don't understand physics.

benji93:
What is a magnetic force? Basically F=Bqvsin(theta)(v=velocity), so an electron does not have to be accelerating to be affected by a magnetic force,
Another evidence of lack of basic understanding. The equation you wrote says a particle of charge q and velocity v INSIDE a magnetic field of strength B will experience a force F. This force is the force the magnetic field EXERTS on the charge. This is different from the charge itself GENERATING an EM field due to its vibrational (accelerating motion). You are showing a lack of understanding of basic concepts. You need to calm down and think.

benji93:
and y would the constant velocity electron be affected by a force,f it does not exert such a force itself?
The same way a car moving with constant velocity experiences a force when it is rear-ended by a tipper -what don't you get?
You are confused because you don't know basics. The field of a charge does not affect the charge itself but other charges around it. This is high school physics 101 - go an review it.

benji93:
so a constant velocity electron must be producing a magnetic field itself,
So? What has that got to do with EM field generated by accelerating charge? And how does that help your 'theory'?


benji93:
[s]well it will accelerate due to the external force, but this is only because, it has a tendency to accelerate or accelerate another entity by virtue of the force field.Before the electron moves it accelerates from rest,thts fine, but this time i am talking about the state by which it is moving at a constant velocity.[/s]
Word jumble makes no sense. Reword it or forget it.

benji93:
I repeat again, you need to reevaluate ur knowledge bro,
Everything I posted is backed up by experiment. Go and check it.

benji93:
its a fact that electromagnetic radiations are emitted by accelerating charges,this does not mean non-accelerating charges to not produce electromagnetic fields-an electromagnetic radiation implies an electromagnetic field, but the reverse is not true. because by virtue of the aforementioned, electrons moving at a constant velocity should produce both electric and magnetic fields. Now let me refer you to an argument tht will help us tread on the same lane.How is an electromagnetic radiation produced, you might say an accelerating charge.But literally and deeply electromagnetic waves are produced by oscillating electric and magnetic field, this oscillation implies, there is a change in electric and magnetic field, so we can thus say an accelerating charge can produce an electromagnetic wave(sometimes it does not).But we are talking about changing electric and magnetic fields here not the presence of electric and magnetic field itself.The electromagnetic field can be present but not changing,so an electron moving at constant velocity can produce an electromagnetic field but not a changing electromagnetic field, hence no radiation of electromagnetic waves.
Long epistle but still does not explain the wave behavior of a neutral subatomic particle - this is why your 'theory' fails. If your 'theory' only applies to charged particles then it is of no value.

benji93:
i.the electric field produced by the electron is intrinsic, regardless of whether it is moving or being at rest.
So? how does this help your 'theory'?

benji93:
ii.a magnetic field is produced by an electron in motion, be it uniform or non-uniform,that is explainable by the expression F=Bqvsin(theta).
Your formula is incorrect. F is NOT magnetic field produced by the electron. F is magnetic force exerted on the electron. Please go and learn basics. The formula you want is (is the cross product formula): B = constant qv X rhat/r^2. This is the magnetic field produced by a charge.
benji93:
So a stationary electron cannot produce a magnetic field, by virtue of the expression
Trivial - physics 101
benji93:
iii.an electromagnagnetic radiation is produced by a changing electric and magnetic field.
Trivial - physics 101
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 12:45am On Feb 16, 2017
benji93:
is there any experimental proof that an electron could be in a box and outside a box at the same time, there is none, thts a theory, there is a proof of the wave-like behaviour of electrons(double slit),you seem not to be following the argument, i am not disputing the verity of this fact, but i am disputing the reason provided for it.The double slit experiment explains the wave-like behaviour, due to the effect of superposition.Generally we ascribe this to the probablistic behaviour of electrons, but i dont agree with this fact.A theory in this regard is a proposal meant to express a fact,the theory could be correct but the reason provided for the theory could be reasonable but tht does not make it true.So in certain cases, a theory could be a reason for an occurence,in other cases a theory could be the occurence itself.We need to understand which stance a proposal takes.
2.to some extent my point on wave-particle duality is not a theory, its is my proposition about the reason for which that exists.
3.you are missing a point, you mistook electromagnetic field for electromagnetic wave.The latter is emitted by a decelerating, due to a change in the intrinsic electromagnetic field.So a non-accelerating electron has an intrinsic electromagnetic field, but an accelerating electron could mean a change in the electromagnetic field, but it does not mean electromagnetic field does not exist, it means the electromagnetic field component(electricand magnetic field) vectors have changed.I hope u get my point.
4.I agree that i should have been more specific, about my point, nt just saying its a theory, but was not wrong by calling it a theory,i was only vague.In other words, it is a theory that explains a theory.
1. Guy- you don't know what you are talking about. Quantum Tunneling was confirmed decades ago. It is one of the experimental corner stones of quantum physics.You still do not understand double-slit experiment - please go back and re-learn it. The fact is an electron behaves both as a particle (photo-electric effect) and as a wave (double-slit experiment).

2.As long as you are not disputing this fact, then we are good.

3.You don't understand Electromagnetic fields. Go and re-learn it. EM fields are generated by accelerating charges - no such thing as the mysterious ambient/intrinsic EM field you seem to be suggesting. Please go and re-learn this basic stuff.
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 11:56pm On Feb 15, 2017
GodIsBiafran:
AKIN - you are smart o! I thought you were just one useless amala chugging Afonja. Honestly, I am interested in physics and would appreciate if we can put our political disagreement aside once in awhile to discuss this beautiful subject.
flat-Headmaster you and your useless people will forever worship at the shrine of akpu grubbing and chest beating. No yawa, anytime you wanna discuss physics, let me know.
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 11:44pm On Feb 15, 2017
benji93:
It is accepted because it provides an explanation, but it does not make it absolute.We will accept it as long as we have no other theory that supplants it.the fact that an idea factors in certain certain realities or makes certian predictions does not mean it is true.[/b]You can only say its true if it factors in [b]all relevant predictions.Its like a venn diagram.The intersection of 3 choices is only 1, but the intersection of 2 choices is 3, for example we can have a venn diagram of people who passed chemistry, maths and physics(all students studied all),you can only be termed as absolute, if you passed all 3.but 3 categories of students passed at least 2,there is a reason why those students passed at least 2, we will need to dig deep into their history to understand, some probably cheated to pass, but my venn diagram does not tell you that.So predicting 2 out of 3 could be entirely different from predicting 3 out of 3, they appear similar, or perhaps we might assume that, if at this stage we can predict 2 out of 3, then we are well on track, we will eventually predict all 3.No the track that predicts 2 out of 3, might never predict all 3, i am implying that the path that predicts 3 out of 3, might just have 1 power set.
1.UNTIL you find an experimental verification of your 'theory' you are just blowing hot smokes.

2. It is 'true' because we have experimentally verified it

3. factor in ALL relevant predictions? A prediction is just that. A prediction. If it not proven by experiments its not worth the paper its written on.

4. If you have an idea that explains more than the wave-particle theory then present it. The problem with the idea you presented is that its un-physical. Physics is a study of the PHYSICAL world. If you present an idea that is un-physical - that idea fails by default. You ascribed an intrinsic electromagnetic field to a non-accelerating electron - there is no such thing.
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 11:04pm On Feb 15, 2017
euromilion:
I have a quick question for you guys here.

Now, if a person was struck by a vehicle moving at the speed of 50kmph the person has 50% chance of surviving,but if a person was struck by vehicle moving at 60kmph the person has 90% chance of dying,why is that?
The energy (kinetic) from a moving object goes as the square of the velocity. So even though you are increasing the speed by 10 kmph in reality you have increased the energy by 100 units. This will explain why the chances do not go linearly with the speed. Although, I am not sure about your numbers.
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 10:46pm On Feb 15, 2017
Phinity318:
I don't want examples of devices using QP
I mean giv us a dummy guide to testing QP as a DIY. project. u know how dy tell u to run a litmus paper test in chemistry lab.
You sound like a lazy fellow (who doesn't even know the meaning of PRACTICAL APPLICATION). Google is your friend.
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 10:45pm On Feb 15, 2017
benji93:
I still disagree with the non -deterministic nature of electrons, i can still regard the electron in classical sense, but with the added presence of fields, that emanates from them, by using the word emanation, i dont mean quanta, i mean a presence.I could ascribe the wave-like behaviour of electrons to the the presence and influence of this fields.There is little wave-like behavior on a macroscopic scale because of the insignificant behaviour of this fields(field-mass relationship)In my opinion///// fields of forces exist in pairs,so electromagnetism is bi constitutive,so there is no question of which results into which.again this is my opinion, and i have a theory in mind by this.
1.In physics a theory is accepted in the field IF it works. So far the wave-particle duality explains experimental observations and so its accepted. Just because you don't like an idea does not make it wrong. Nature, does not take permission from us before it establish its laws.

2.Fields are generated from vibrating ('accelerating') charges. An non-accelerating electron radiating EM waves is nonsensical.

3. You have to explain what you mean by presence - no such thing as ghosts in physics.

4. You are wrong. The wavelike behavior has nothing to do with that. subatomic particles like electrons are small enough such that there wave-like properties are observable.

5. What do you mean force fields exist in pairs? For example are you saying there is an anti-gravity force field in nature?
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 10:33pm On Feb 15, 2017
Phinity318:
Op kindly tell us the practical application of QP
Lasers, transistors, GPS, mobile phones just to name a few.
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 10:23pm On Feb 15, 2017
debowale2015:
Nice one OP....Infact, I was static for the few minutes i used to read all through this material.
My observation is around that area where u talked about an "electron in a box".....What i was taught is that tho electron itself is a particle since its exhibit the atomic structure of a matter. Then the phenomenon of the electron being located in a box is called "particle in a box".
Your information here simplifies quantum physics even though we all know that quantum physics is not just as easy to comprehend like that.
Also, tell us also about the Hamiltonians and the perturbation theory.
Am proud to be a physicist!
Well done OP....
I believe I can help here.

1.The electron has both properties - particle and wave. Photoelectric effect is due to the electron's particulate nature; and electron has been shown to behave like waves in diffraction experiments thereby confirming the wave-like nature.

2. "Particle in a box" is just a short-hand way of saying you have a particle under the influence of a box-like force field. A box-like force field represents a potential that has an infinite value at the extremes (-a and +a for a 1D 'box') and zero between these two points. The 'particle in a box' is used to 'simulate' the behavior of an electron inside an atom - basically, you are simply using the box potential to replace the potential due to the positive nucleus. This is just an attempt to simplify a more complicated problem.

3. The Hamiltonian is just the total energy of a system. The system could be just a single particle or a collection of particles. Of course in quantum physics observables are represented by operators (another topic). Anyway, the Hamiltonian, H = Kinetic energy + Potential energy.

4. Perturbation theory: This is basically a mathematical tool used to solve quantum physics problems. It works like this: You have a system with Hamiltonian H1 for which you already have the solution. Now, you encounter a new system with Hamiltonian, H2 for which you do NOT have a solution. However, if you can write H2 = H1 + H0, then you can solve for H2.
Note that solution means: You find the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian. There are many mathematical methods used to solve problems in quantum physics. One technique that I find valuable is the Fermi Golden Rule. Which is basically a very neat method to compute the transition rate of a system to transition from one state to the other (e.g for an electron to move from spin-up to spin down and vice versa).
Science/TechnologyRe: Basic Concepts Of Quantum Physics by AkinPhysicist: 9:39pm On Feb 15, 2017
OP most Nairalanders won't understand most of what you have written. For this kind of audience it is enough to just let them know the following:

1. While classical physics deals with the motion/behavior of macroscopic objects, quantum physics deals with the motion/behavior of microscopic/sub-microscopic objects.

2. The laws of classical motion (inertial; force causing acceleration; and equal and opposite reaction) are intuitive as our daily experience confirms their validity. However, the laws of quantum physics are not always intuitive. For example, in the macroscopic world an object cannot occupy more than one positions at the same time, however, in quantum physics an electron can occupy two positions at the same time.

3. To begin an understanding of quantum physics one should first try and understand the wave-particle duality. Basically (it might sound crazy to you) every object is a wave. The reason why you don't see the waves of macroscopic objects is because their wavelength is too small. There is an inverse relation between an objects wavelength and the size of the object. So that is why the electron behaves like a wave under observation but a stone under observation does not.

4. Uncertainty principle should also be understood - but its a more difficult concept.
SportsRe: Nigeria's Ejike Uzoenyi Signs For Wits, Completes Switch From Sundowns by AkinPhysicist: 3:53pm On Feb 15, 2017
cheesy 24 cheesy
InvestmentRe: MMM Participant Breaks Silence After Loosing N3million To Scheme by AkinPhysicist: 2:10pm On Feb 15, 2017
ellechrystal:
When you are paid salary u eat chicken.
When the salary don dey reduce, u eat chicken products(eggs)
When the salary don almost finish you eat chicken food (maize , Millet, wheat)
When the salary don finish, you are broke, and you are now the chicken, WALKING AROUND LOOKING FOR WHAT TO EAT.

this is what happened to MMM participants, when they were enjoying their SALARY(BONUS)

LEAVE PONZI SCHEME ALONE, THEM NO GREE HEAR, NOW U SEE AM?

CultureRe: 23 Year Old : Obi Nduka Ezeagwuna II Crowned 20th Obi Of Issele-uku - Pictures by AkinPhysicist: 3:51am On Feb 15, 2017
grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin

PoliticsRe: Alert!alert!alert!ongoing Massacre OF Biafrians By Nigerian Army In Asaba by AkinPhysicist: 3:05am On Feb 13, 2017
shocked

EducationRe: Futo Student Excursion Bus Catches Fire On Its Way To Kogi by AkinPhysicist: 2:55am On Feb 13, 2017
shocked

SportsRe: My Lagos City Marathon Experience - Akande Segun by AkinPhysicist: 2:54am On Feb 13, 2017
cheesy
FashionRe: Jennifer Lopez Grammys Red Carpet Photos 2017 by AkinPhysicist: 2:52am On Feb 13, 2017
sad shocked

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 (of 78 pages)