₦airaland Forum

The lady did not say sex should be the sole focus. She said it is a key factor. Tbe truth is that no quality can make up for sex, and msrriage is invalid without sex. This lady's advice seeks to protect the interest of women, who, when push graduates to shove, are not as free to manize as the men are free to womanize.

The problem you have is that you are struggling to be who you are NOT supposed to be, comparing yourself with others, instead on discovering yourself and being content with it. This brings frustration. You must accept the fact that what you want to be is different from what you can be. So, on a sense, you are right when you say 'I am not who I am supposed to be.' Yes, you are struggling to be who you are not supposed to be. When I entered JS,1 twenty-seven years ago, I wanted to be a medical doctor. By JS 3, I was so bad in Maths that I had to resit it. By SS1 I discovered I was, without struggle, good in English and Literature. I abandoned the dream of becoming a medical doctor and started checking courses that I could study with little or no mathematical calculation. Today, I am a lawyer respected by friends and colleagues. Being a lawyer was not my dream, but it was what I could be without struggle. Everyone is gifted , identify your gift and fly free!

This is clearly a Muslim vs. Christian debate. I believe it is quite different from Truth vs. Falshood debate. To my mind, the theological abstractions of our muslim brothers seem illusive and far-fetched. But there are, in fact , some contradictions and inaccuracies in our Bible. 1. Gal. 3:16 says the 'seed' that was promised to Abraham was in the singular, so that the 'seed' can be Jesus Christ. But in Genesis, all promises made to Abraham was to his DESCENDANTS , not DESCENDANTS. 2 . In Mk. 2:25, 26, Jesus is quoted as saying it was Abiathar who was the high priest when David took the shewbread. But according to 1 Sam. 21:1-6; 22:11-23, it was Ahimelech that was the high priest. 3. In Acts 7:15, 16, Stephen is quoted as saying Abraham bought a cave in Shechem. But according to Gen. 33:18, 19, it was Jacob that bought a place in Shechem, not Abraham. According to Gen. 23:9-20; 25:9; 49:30 and 50:23, it was in Machpelah, not Shechem, that Abraham bought land. Truth is truth, we do not need to accept it for it to be what it is.

This is clearly

In the context of Matt. 5:17-19, DESTROY means BREAK , not ABOLISH. It is FULFIL that means ABOLISH. First he said he did not come to destroy , but to fulfil the Law, and until such fulfilment is done, not one jot or title shall pass from the Law. Until such fulfilment is done, no one should break (destroy) or encourage others to break the Law. The question then is: did Jesus fulfil the Law as he said he would? If yes , then the Law stands abolished, and I will go with the writers Rom. 10:4; Gal. 3:19, 23-25; Heb. 7:11, 12, 18, 19.

Charix I believe you! Money grabbing and wealth chasing is mucking the whole whole place up.

Honestly, I don't see why a well qualified man should not do better in the U S than in Nigeria. Except you are being lured by Nigeria's thieving politicians and corrupt engineers who come to the U S to flash blood money

What has happened to the Bible's 'greet one another with a holy kiss'? We should all remember that abuse does not take away use. To the pure, everything ought to be pure, abi?