₦airaland Forum

Peacecore:
Israel is not the problem of middle East rather it's dominance by Islam. Look at Nigeria as a case study. Their good number here is a problem.

Islam is not the root problem of the Middle East, but many have been misled to believe it is. Let me clarify this for you, and I hope you read with an open, unbiased mind.

Regarding Arabs: The core issue in the Middle East, including Arabs and Israelis, lies more in their culture than their religion. Long before Islam, during the period known as jahiliyyah (the age of ignorance), Arab society was plagued by conflicts. Tribal and clan rivalries dominated, with frequent battles over resources and honor. After Islam emerged, tribal warfare decreased but transformed into conflicts between Muslims and idol-worshippers. Following the death of the Prophet, Arabs continued fighting in the name of jihad—wars that were never formally commanded by the Prophet—reflecting a warlike cultural heritage deeply ingrained in their history.

Regarding Jews: The situation is no different. Violence and conflict are deeply embedded in Jewish culture as well. While Jews rarely fight amongst themselves as Arabs do, they engage in violent conflicts with other tribes, often viewing others as inferior. The name "Israel" was given to the patriarch Jacob after wrestling with a divine being or angel, meaning "one who struggles with God." This symbolism of struggle and conflict is echoed throughout their history. Much of the Bible recounts wars between Israel and its neighbors, resembling the present-day scenario. Like the Quran, the Bible contains numerous passages about warfare because conflict has been central to their way of life.

These two Middle Eastern groups have fused conflict and war into their religious and cultural identities. Anyone seeking to follow their religions sincerely must carefully select the positive teachings while rejecting the enduring legacy of violence. Neither group is superior; they are simply two sides of the same coin.


Peace!

Sirleo05:
What will you call what is going on in the north? Are people and security agencies being killed everyday in the south east like what you see in the north currently? What IPOB and ESN did is it more than what boko harm, iswap and bandits are doing now ?

Are you trying to use Boko Haram, ISWAP, and bandits as an excuse for IPOB and ESN's killings of Igbos in the southeast? That's incredibly insensitive. Does your lack of empathy stem from not having any family members affected by IPOB and ESN's violence? If you still possess your humanity, denounce both Boko Haram and IPOB.

Peace!

Since Israel's creation on May 14, 1948, from the territory now known as Palestine, the country has endured relentless warfare. One conflict after another has plagued the nation. Considering the unrelenting violence and instability, one cannot help but wonder if the founding of Israel has been worth the immense cost in human lives, suffering, and regional turmoil.

Peace!

Nigerians seem to be drawn to empty promises, consistently supporting leaders who make such promises. It's as if we're under a curse of poor leadership. I only hope the Baba responsible for this curse is still alive, so we can find him and ask for forgiveness when we realize our troubles stem from him.

What's happening to me? I misread 'Pastor Tobi' as 'Peter Obi.' I need to take a step back and avoid becoming one of Obi's special advisors. I'm taking a break from commenting on Obi-related matters. If no one else cautions me, I'll advise myself.

Peace!

Checkwell:
He can do a lot within 4 years. Everyone deserves a chance to prove themselves.

Are you implying that he can accomplish a lot within four years in Anambra, where Peter Obi served for eight years without achieving significant results? If so, it appears that you believe he can outperform Obi in just four years. Is that an accurate assessment of your belief?

donmixc:
Northerners are bless with wealth, we don’t make mouth like the south😒😒

Wetin you dey make now? Na nose you dey make?

Jennyclay:
As for me, my major red flag is a man who is broke and poor

No finance, No romance my dear.

You must be capable of taking very good care of me and also show me true love

This is my standard and I believe everyone has their standard.

Your phrase "You must be capable of taking very good care of me" is quite disconcerting, as it perpetuates the notion that you are akin to a "pet" and financial burden. This perspective fails to recognize women as autonomous beings with the ability to care for themselves and make meaningful contributions to the lives of their partners, beyond sexual and reproductive roles. Such a narrative ultimately undermines the inherent value and potential that women possess within relationships and society at large.

For the sake of fairness, it is important for you to change your mindset. This involves discarding traditional gender roles and expectations that portray women as helpless or dependent. Instead, you should embrace your capabilities and strive for autonomy, understanding that your worth extends beyond the confines of a romantic or reproductive role.

Peace!

PeterObiGuy:
If they won't steal his mandate again, Peter Obi would still win.


@Ditari of Ijaw.

Lol, Peter Obi finished third in the 2023 election, and nobody can steal the third position (mandate) from him. Even in the 2027 election, his position will remain secure.

Checkwell:
He can do a lot within 4 years. Everyone deserves a chance to prove themselves.

Are you implying that he can accomplish a lot within four years in Anambra, where Peter Obi served for eight years without achieving significant results? If so, it appears that you believe he can outperform Obi in just four years. Is that an accurate assessment of your belief?

Peace!

Desperado, many, many
My amigo, Balotelli...

superlanny:
To the people who still support this administration, I wish you recovery's from the mental madness that has befallen you. Continue

Don't be concerned about their mental health issues—once Obi becomes the president of Biafra, he will likely seek out individuals like them to serve as his special advisors.

SmartPolician:
A government that negotiates with terrorists has no moral justification to still detain Nnamdi Kanu.

Do you know how many times the government attempted to negotiate with Nnamdi Kanu to halt the Biafra agitation, only for him to refuse? He believes it is his right, and as long as he refuses to cease the agitation, he will remain in DSS custody until he changes his stance.

CodeTemplarr:
Even though removal of petrol n currency subsidies was right, Tinubu failed and is failing. Umahi built seven useless flyovers in Ebonyi but is still trying to replicate that wastage with subsidy funds saved. The issue is not the advise from WB or IMF. It is a function of a weak if not dead system.

It is like advising a drug addict to take up a second job to improve his pocket but retain his wasteful ways. He may die sooner.

It seems that if Obi were president, he wouldn't be struggling in his role. By now, he would have transformed Nigeria into a prosperous nation akin to Dubai, right? And all his ministers would undoubtedly possess saintly qualities, competence, and be infallible. I regret to inform you, but I don't consider Obi a viable option.

KnowledgePower7:
boy go and sit down.
People like you are the reason I don't want to post the full context of my Convo with A.i
You are just yapping dust.

A.I didn't say there is no God..
It said the God we know and worship on earth is not the true God.

Be cautious not to rely solely on AI for matters concerning religion, spirituality, and academia. AI should primarily serve as a supplemental tool to enhance language, math, coding, reference retrieval etc, it should not replace critical thinking and thorough research. Most AI systems explicitly state that their output is for reference purposes only, indicating that the information is sourced from individuals with varying opinions, perspectives, and educational backgrounds. Consequently, AI-generated content may not always be accurate or of high quality.

AI is generally not suitable for academic writing due to the potential lack of authority and quality in its sources. Its failure in academic tests further emphasizes that it is not a reliable source for religious doctrines and teachings. The AI-provided view about God likely comes from an unreliable source, and even Seun, the leader of the atheist community on Nairaland, would likely refrain from using AI claims to defend his arguments.

When employing AI in academia or religion, scrutinize the sources it provides, and select those authored by recognized authorities in the respective field. For religious opinions, verify that the source originates from a credible figure within that particular religion. This approach will help you effectively utilize AI without being misled or misinformed. Remember, AI is not intended for those seeking quick and effortless answers; instead, it complements your intellectual journey and encourages further exploration of ideas.

Peace!

31. Nnamdi Kanu, aged 58 and sentenced in 2021 to life imprisonment at Katsina Custodial Centre for illegal dealing of arms and terrorism. Sentence reduced to 20 years.

Brendaniel:
it will pay everybody including you...

but Obi's presidency is not the issue I have with Nigeria, in fact to me the presidency is a lesser issue to what has been revealed in Nigeria by Tinubu and Buhari's presidency, the bigger problem lies in the ideological differences, I've given up on the unity of Nigeria not because of the presidency, even if Peter Obi becomes president or any other Igbo man becomes president, my desire will be to still divide Nigeria because of the ideological differences.

To me, it is the biggest problem of Nigeria, I've removed mind from Nigeria's leadership, I'm here to speak the truth and possibly still see if we can still get better leadership while the division tarries because my desire is to divide Nigeria, so every region can run with their ideology as they like...

Explain how Obi's presidency would benefit me. Did his governorship bring positive change to Anambra during his eight-year term? We have witnessed his poor performance and the criticism he faced from the Igbo community, as evidenced by Nairaland threads from 2012. Notably, Obi left Anambra to reside in Lagos with his fellow tribesmen who sought better opportunities there, while Tinubu remained in Lagos.

You mentioned, "The present state of Nigeria is the product of regressive ideologies mixed with deceit by a certain set of people in order to try and achieve supremacy and dominance over a certain people, even when it doesn't benefit them." I now realize that your statement accurately describes you and your tribesmen. You refuse to acknowledge any leadership qualities unless the leader is an Igbo man, even when their performance is lackluster. How can one exhibit more regressive ideology than that?

In a nation of over 200 million people in the 21st century, it is irrational to believe that everyone must share the same ideology to maintain unity. Do countries with larger populations than Nigeria, such as China, India, and Brazil, require a uniform ideology to function as a single entity? If Nigeria were divided into geopolitical zones, could the Igbos sustain themselves? We have observed that the Southeast struggles to generate sufficient revenue for self-sufficiency. This perceived dependence might explain their insistence on including regions like the South-South and parts of North Central in their proposed Biafra.

Do other languages not have the right to lead the country as well? What about the rights of minority tribes like ours? Must leadership be exclusive to the three major tribes? This is not democracy but rather "ethnocracy," as I previously mentioned. If Nigeria were to elect an Igbo man in 2027, regardless of his competence, you would be satisfied because leadership is your primary concern. If the Igbo cannot lead, should the country be divided? Should the other 500 languages demand the same? Would Nigeria even exist in such a scenario?

I sincerely engaged in this dialogue, believing that we were exchanging productive ideas as patriotic citizens. However, it is now evident that our discussion has been futile. Nonetheless, I appreciate your time, but our dialogue has reached an impasse. Please don't take offense if I don't reply further; I cannot afford to participate in unproductive exchanges that lead nowhere. Once again, thank you for your time.


Peace!

Brendaniel:
Like said earlier on The present state of Nigeria is the product of regressive ideologies mixed with deceit by a certain set of people in order to try and achieve supremacy and dominance over a certain people even when it doesn't pay them...

Will it pay you should Obi emerges as the president of this country?

Brendaniel:
The present state of Nigeria is the product of regressive ideologies mixed with deceit by a certain set of people in order to try and achieve supremacy and dominance over a certain people even when it doesn't pay them...

It's intriguing how someone in the future might reference our past discussions and attempt to infer that I voted for Tinubu, when in reality, these exchanges don't provide sufficient evidence of my actual voting choices. Nonetheless, I can assert with confidence that, if given the choice, I would choose Tinubu over Obi and Atiku without hesitation.

Now, let's circle back to the question at hand: I am still curious to know your reasoning behind supporting Obi's candidacy in the 2023 elections, considering your knowledge of his previous shortcomings as the governor of Anambra.

Brendaniel:
So why did you support Buhari's election in 2019 when you knew he had failed in his first term?

Interestingly, you seem to have overlooked the part where I mentioned that even Buhari's supporters voiced their dissatisfaction with his performance. This statement indirectly implies that I did not cast my vote for him in the 2015 and 2019 elections. Often, I abstain from participating in the voting process due to the belief that uneducated Nigerians predominantly influence the election outcomes. However, regardless of who is elected, I make it a point to offer my support and wish them well in their endeavors.

On the topic of Obi, I am curious to understand why you supported his candidacy in the 2023 elections, given that you were aware of his previous shortcomings as the governor of Anambra.

Brendaniel:
You supported Buhari for 8 years, did you know he was failing while you were supporting him?

Even Buhari's supporters expressed disappointment in his performance. However, acknowledging his shortcomings does not negate the effectiveness of some of his policies; I have commended the successful ones while criticizing those that fell short. Despite not voting for a president, I believe in setting aside differences once they assume office and offering support whenever possible.

I refuse to adopt the stance of Obidients who dedicate years to hoping for their president's failure, relentlessly seeking negative news about their country, and dismissing any positive developments or accomplishments as mere propaganda. Notably, throughout Peter Obi's eight-year tenure, his constituents frequently voiced their discontent, as evidenced by Nairaland threads from 2012 and beyond. Yet, those same individuals, including yourself, insist on promoting him.

Supporting someone who is currently faltering may be problematic, but endorsing a candidate who has already demonstrated failure as a governor is even more misguided. Doing so is akin to knowingly deceiving others.

Gracias!

Brendaniel:
So how did OBJ improve the economy from the terrible state he met it in 1999 despite paying subsidy and defending the naira?

At that time, the situation had not escalated to its current state. Consider the factors that have changed in the past decades: Nigeria's population has grown substantially, fuel consumption has increased, and governance costs have risen. Furthermore, corruption has worsened, exacerbating the challenges the country faces.

In the 1990s, these issues were already accumulating, similar to the progression of a mosquito-borne illness. Initially, the patient may continue with daily activities, but as it accumulates, symptoms gradually manifest. The worsening condition eventually reaches a critical stage where the patient's life is at risk. This comparison illustrates how Nigeria's problems have intensified over time, culminating in the current crippling economic situation.

Had subsidies not been removed at this juncture, Nigeria for don collapse kpata-kpata. Tinubu's ability to effect change would have been severely limited. International institutions such as the World Bank or IMF would hesitate to lend support, knowing that the country's capacity to repay loans is compromised, partly due to the pre-sale of substantial amounts of crude oil.

Shalom!

Brendaniel:
You are wrong....

Any president who leaves the country worse than he met it did not perform well, and that is the case of Buhari and Tinubu is already towing that part, if everyone blames their predecessors for not improving on what they met then it means the country will never be good...

OBJ met the country worse than he met it and still improved the country even with subsidies being paid, Yaradua was already towing the same path but sickness didn't let him stay through his tenure, Jonathan though he messed up but still tried to maintain some level.

Buhari came and destroyed far more than he met and Tinubu is towing that same path, the stats here are not lying...

So no one should blame should any predecessor for failing to improve on what he met as president, That's what Buhari did and that;s what Tinubu is already doing.

So please you guys should stop this nonsense defense for failure....

Lol. Is the perceived inaccuracy in my argument related to the fact that Obasanjo initiated fuel subsidies and naira defense measures? Or does it concern the notion that his decisions have led to growing challenges that have weakened our economy? Buhari inherited an economy already in decline due to the effects of subsidy and naira defense, yet he continued paying subsidies and defending the naira until the country could no longer sustain it. He borrowed heavily and sold some of our crude oil in advance just to keep these policies going.

You condemn Buhari as though you would do better if given the chance. Buhari was just like you when Jonathan was president; he thought he could do better—promising one naira to one dollar and solutions to youth unemployment—until he got the opportunity, and for eight years only took the country backward. The presidency of Nigeria is like a football pitch: when you’re not playing, it’s easy to spot mistakes and criticize players for missed goals or poor passes, but once you’re on the pitch, you realize it’s as challenging for you as for anyone else. Buhari discovered this firsthand.

It’s not fair to label Tinubu as a failure like Jonathan and Buhari. Tinubu’s situation is unique and cannot be judged the same way, especially considering the poor economic state he inherited. So is his fault removing subsidy and floating the naira—policies that are good but come with their own challenges? Should he be called a failure just because the policy brings hardship? Furthermore, all the 2023 presidential aspirants, including Atiku and Obi, also planned to remove the subsidy and possibly float the naira. Lol, Are you upset simply because your preferred candidate did not lead these reforms?

Peace!

Brendaniel:
Let's even assume we are giving excuse for Tinubu , what about Buhari to Jonathan, what is the excuse?

It's ironic that, when comparing the administrations, Yaradua did not perform better than Obasanjo, and Jonathan did not surpass Yaradua's accomplishments. Similarly, Buhari failed to outperform Jonathan during his time in office. In this context, Buhari's shortcomings appear justified. Before assigning blame, it is essential to identify the underlying cause of these issues. The root of our current predicament can be traced back to Obasanjo's tenure. Despite his notable contributions to the country, we still grapple with the consequences of his decisions.

The Olusegun Obasanjo military regime introduced fuel subsidies in Nigeria in 1977. The practice of "defending" the Naira, which entails managing its exchange rate, began in the 1980s with the implementation of the Second-Tier Foreign Exchange Market (SFEM) and the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) in 1986, although exchange rate policies have since undergone numerous revisions.
As time progressed, the costs of subsidizing fuel and defending the naira became an unbearable burden for the country.

Throughout Obasanjo's tenure, his administration failed to address these issues. Yaradua tried to tackle them but encountered challenges, as he focused more on managing the problem rather than finding a permanent solution. During Jonathan's term, he recognized the pressing issues, particularly the widespread fuel subsidy fraud, and made efforts to address them. However, opposition parties exploited the populace's gullibility, hindering his attempts. Upon assuming office, Buhari faced the same challenges but lacked the courage to confront them due to concerns about potential adverse impacts on the poor. Buhari's administration failed because the problems he attempted to manage grew significantly compared to Jonathan's tenure, and they would have become even more insurmountable during Tinubu's presidency.

Had Tinubu not addressed these problems, his administration would have fared worse than the combined tenures of Obasanjo, Yaradua, Jonathan, and Buhari, as the issues have become increasingly complex and unmanageable. It is crucial not to ignore or merely manage problems but to actively seek solutions. While all the administrations that neglected these issues ultimately failed, the one leader who took action to address the root causes of our predicament is paradoxically the one we wish to remove from power.


Salam!

nairalanda1:
That does not mean your previous comment was right. If our leaders keep blaming their problems on oppostion, that means that they are admitting they are not competent enough to handle the problems they were voted for.

It would be naïve to overlook the role of opposition parties in sabotaging the efforts of the incumbent government to discredit them. This is the nature of politics.

Addressing competence, I've previously argued that democracy tends to favor popularity over competence. As a result, competent leaders are elected only occasionally, amidst a series of incompetent but popular ones, though this reality is often unacknowledged.

Furthermore, our political landscape is dominated by politicians rather than technocrats. Internal party politics often hinder the appointment of technocrats, as there's pressure for the president's choice of ministers to be comprised of at least 70% party members.

Many presidential aspirants are driven by their long-term ambitions to become president, regardless of their competence or lack thereof. Sadly, these ambitions are often pursued at the expense of the public's best interests.

Salam!

Brendaniel:
You don't need all these write up, just answer yes or no...

Has Buhari and Tinubu performed better than Goodluck Jonathan you people chased away from power because you people called him a failure?

To be candid, each leader faces significant challenges during their tenure. However, Nigeria appears to have experienced a decline in leadership quality since Obasanjo's administration. Yaradua did not perform better than Obasanjo, Jonathan did not surpass Yaradua, and Buhari failed to outperform Jonathan.

Regarding the comparison between Buhari, Jonathan and Tinubu, it's important to note that Tinubu's situation is unique and cannot be labeled a failure, particularly considering the poor economic state he inherited and his bold decisions to remove fuel subsidies and float the naira. These actions demonstrate courage that Jonathan and Buhari lacked. One thing remains certain: if given the opportunity, Obi would not surpass Tinubu in performance.

Salam!

nairalanda1:
In other words, Jonathan, Buhari, and now tinubu are and were too weak to deal with the problems they were voted in to deal with

Thanks for telling us.

Lol. Even if Jonathan, Buhari and Tinubu were unable to provide a comprehensive solution during their tenures, they has established a solid foundation upon which future administrations can build and continue the process of addressing the nation's problems. Moreover, the complex issues plaguing Nigeria require a multi-faceted and long-term approach that transcends any single political figure or election cycle.

Peace!

Brendaniel:
So has Buhari and Tinubu performed better than Goodluck Jonathan you people chased away from power because you people called him a failure?

The perception of an incumbent government as a failure is primarily fueled by opposition parties seeking power, irrespective of the current administration's efforts. They effectively convinced us that Jonathan's administration was a failure to secure our votes. Similarly, they have portrayed Buhari's administration as unsuccessful and are now employing the same tactics to discredit Tinubu. This pattern suggests that opposition parties are more interested in fulfilling their own presidential ambitions than in addressing the nation's problems.

By continuously falling prey to our politicians political narratives, we enable them to manipulate public opinion, prioritizing their greed and selfish interests over the betterment of the country. As seen in the case of Jonathan's administration, the use of insurgencies to create instability and depict him as incompetent ultimately led to his removal from office. This strategy is being repeated to target Tinubu, taking advantage of Nigeria's vulnerability to such tactics.

Despite the challenges Tinubu faces in implementing policies such as fuel subsidy removal and naira floatation, he has laid a foundation for future administrations to build upon and address the nation's problems. However, if you ask any presidential aspirant from the opposition parties (Atiku, Obi etc) if they would revert these policies should they come to power, they would say "no", as they acknowledge the need for such reforms. Yet, they still seek to remove Tinubu from office due to their own presidential ambitions, not because they are better suited to lead the country.


Peace!

Brendaniel:
Shehu Sani is indirectly telling us that Buhari was smarter than Tinubu in governance, because Buhari rejected IMF's advise while Tinubu followed their advise, now Tinubu supporters want us to believe that Tinubu is better than Peter Obi, the question to them: is Buhari better than Peter Obi?

Honestly, Tinubu and Buhari possess more impressive track records than Obi, who is being vigorously promoted solely due to the Igbos' determination to secure the Nigerian presidency by any means necessary. Northerners would rather cast their votes for a deceased Buhari than a living Obi. Interestingly, we can find discussions on Nairaland from 2012 where Igbos themselves expressed their discontent with Obi's incompetence during his governorship in Anambra. Now, they claim he surpasses a visionary leader like Tinubu, which is difficult to accept. It seems improbable that Obi represents the best the Igbos have to offer; perhaps they are just not in favor of their most capable candidates.

Peace!

Toruibestate:
500 mushroom ethnic groups you mean?


We are talking of an entire Geo-Political Zone here being deprived of being President or Vice President...

If the over 500 languages represent distinct ethnic groups, and Igbo is merely one of them, then all languages should have equal rights to fair representation in a democratic system. As a member of a minority tribe from the marginalized Middle Belt region, it's evident that we do not experience genuine democracy in Nigeria. Instead, our system more closely resembles "ethnocracy," in which dominant ethnic groups govern over the others. Following this logic, Igbos should not be resentful if they are unable to surpass Hausa and Yoruba dominance. If Igbos were leading the country today, they likely wouldn't prioritize establishing true democracy, as demonstrated by their proclamation "we are born to rule." This raises the question: isn't every tribe equally entitled to govern?

Peace!

Toruibestate:
Both are Ijaws.
Both Sowore and GEJ know me.
The both of them want to come for Presidency but no, on this one I am not putting Ijaw first.



It belongs to the right man.
Peter Obi or no one else.
Igbo should be allowed to rule if truly they have equal rights in Nigeria like it was said, or better still, give them what they ask for if you won't give them Presidency...

@Ditari of Ijaw.

Justdogood:
This is just the truth.
Simple.

If I am not good enough to rule the country, then let me go.

Your argument lacks logic. Rather than focusing on genuine democratic practices, we find ourselves preoccupied with a system that rotates the presidency among various tribes or zones, akin to a monarchy. With over 500 languages in Nigeria, it is unreasonable to suggest that any particular language holds exclusive rights to leadership. If the argument for Igbo presidency is based on rights, why should other languages not be afforded the same opportunities?

If we cannot allow each of Nigeria's diverse languages, including minority languages, the chance to govern, should the nation be divided into over 500 different entities? In which democratic country do you see the rotation of presidency among different languages or only major tribes, aside from Nigeria? This system appears to be more of an "ethnocracy" than a true democracy.

Instead, we should foster an open system that allows any competent candidate, regardless of their linguistic or tribal background, the opportunity to become president. The current practice of rotating the presidency does not reflect the principles of a true democracy.

Peace!

22. Don't ask Nairaland members for contact details (email, phone, bbpin) or investments.

Seun, could you please remove the bolded text? This is 2025.

https://www.nairaland.com/almunjid/posts/3