₦airaland Forum

The aim of the thread is to shed light on the false narratives that these foreign extremist ideologies continue to perpetuate on the continent.

It's pretty simple, we MUST bin all these foreign extremist ideologies and concentrate our focus on reality.

And the reality here is that our history comprises of agriculture, arts, architecture, astrology, astronomy, commerce, economics, engineering, fishing, law, mathematics, medical sciences, metallurgy, mining, philosophy, physical sciences, shipbuilding,e.t.c

These are our bread and butter and not foreign extremist ideologically based rhetoric, the forementioned disciplines are the things we ought to return to studying conscientiously.

Maynman:
...

You have failed to derail the thread with all the false narratives you continue to peddle.

Now, take your 'L' and go and troll elsewhere.

Maynman:
....

Go and troll elsewhere

Maynman:
Any body that has studied history will never say that. ...

Dude go and troll elsewhere. You posted proof that corroborates what I've been saying and continue to argue pointlessly.

Both , Wiktionary and Wikipedia are telling you that the Hellenist were Greek yet, for the reasons given earlier it continues to elude you.

Maynman:
No they were not!
Read up .

Dude, kindly go and study, research instead of simply plucking stuff from surface level.

Everyone who studied history knows that the Hellenist were Greek and Greco-roman.

These are the reasons we are to bin all these foreign extremist ideologies and concentrate our focus on reality.

You literally posted a Wikipedia article that corroborates these facts.

Who were the occupants of Alexandria?

Maynman:
Heard of “Hellenistic period”?

Goes to show that you didn't bother to read the post that you have responded.

Maynman:
Hellenist were jews.

The Hellenist were Greek.

Maynman:
Gnosticism is a created doctrine from Christianity.

You guys won't stop bastardising history, will you?


Not really, the people known as the Gnostic were the Hellenist and they were mainly Greek as expressed earlier.

The Roman version of 'Christianity didn't even exits during the late Hellenistic period, that's the whole point.

Maynman:
.
gnostic teachers, early church fathers use their teachings.

Yes, and doesn't that just prove that the foreign extremist ideology is a Roman mockery of the Hellenists.

There's no such thing as a Nazarene. There was gnosticism and this peaked in the late Hellenistic period.

Maynman:
There’s nothing extreme about them.

There's nothing exteme about who? About a fictional character?

Those are fictional characters, it doesn't matter whether you think the character portrayed extremity or not, the point is to bin fakery and falsehood and concentrate our focus on reality.

Maynman:
well, jesus of Nazareth is different from iesus chrestus...

It really doesn't matter, they're both representative of the same foreign extremist ideology.

It's pretty simple, we MUST bin all these foreign extremist ideologies and concentrate our focus on reality.

And the reality here is that our history comprises of agriculture, arts, architecture, commerce, economics, engineering, fishing, law, mathematics, medical sciences, metallurgy, mining, philosophy, physical sciences, shipbuilding e.t.c

These are our bread and butter, not foreign extremist ideologies, and the forementioned disciplines are the things we ought to return to studying conscientiously.

Maynman:
Iesus chrestus is a fictional character.
Iesus is a common latin name gotten from Yeshua and a lot of jews bear that.

Yeshua, Jesus, whatever you want to call that character, the bottom line is that it's solely based on fiction.

Maynman:
That’s where iesus chrestus and the New Testament was created.

Jesus is a fictional character.

The printing press was invented in 1439.

Maynman:
The “great schism” is the separation of the Roman Catholic from Protestant.

Not really, 'the schism' occurred in 1054 CE and was the separation of the Western Roman empire (Roman Catholic) from their Eastern Roman empire counterpart (Eastern Othodox).

The Catholic - Protestant split, is a more recent occurrence.

Maynman:
I meant, nicene Christianity was created in rome.
What you are talking about is “chrestianity”.

Yes, Nicene Christianity was created under the auspices of the Romans at Constantinople. i.e ala Contantine (I)

Maynman:
Christianity was created in rome.

Christianity was created by the Romans, however, it wasn't necessarily created in Rome.

I know that sounds a tad contradictory, but it isn't.

Christianity was created under the auspices of the Eastern part of the Roman Empire, more commonly known as Byzantine.

According to Roman history, there was two parts of the Roman empire, the Western and Eastern, this would later develop into what is commonly known amongst the foreign extremist ideologies today, as 'the schism'.

Maynman:
Greco Roman means ancient greeks and romans.

Yes, olden days Greeks and Roman and their contributions into what is known in Western society as Classical antiquity.

These foreign extremist ideologies of today, adopted different concepts that came out of this period.

Maynman:
The reason harmatia is used and studied in Christianity or the church is because, New Testament was written in Greek.

Not really, hamartia is a Greco-roman doctrine that was adopted by the foreign extremist ideologies.

The reason hamartia is used, is due to the fact that it implores the bearer to feel guilty, and guilt is needed so as to pitch salvation.


You can research the plight of the Panare Indians and the Missionaries who published their own version of these false narratives so as to accommodate into their story, that the Panare Indians crucified Jesus.

Maynman:
“Semitic” is a derived word by some people.
Semitic languages exist and predates Israelite!
If you look up what “Semitic language” means, they are not quoting mythologies.

I get what you're stating here, yet, it doesn't make accurate.

Again, assuming you missed it the first time.

Shem - Semite - Semetic

Maynman:
I was talking about Semitic language which is derived from phonecian, one of the earliest languages which hebrew, arabic comes from.
It was you that’s quoting stories in a book.

Ideologies, concepts, names or words don’t exist within a vacuum.

That is to say, you cannot invoke a false narrative as your source, whilst at the same time relinquish your responsibility for answering to the authenticity of such source.

Semites comes from the root word Shem.

Semitic comes from Semite.

Simple common sense logic.

If Noah is fake, then Shem is false and so is any of its derivatives.

Maynman:
In the mythology, it’s Noah.
Okay and?

Since we both agree that the Noah story is fake, since the Noah character is fake, then, Shem is false and cannot be used as a reliable source on anything that pertains to reality.

Maynman:
It goes to show the history of the Semitic language, or Semitic language does not exist?
And i never made mention of noah flood.

You don't need to mention the flood story before it can be implied that you have.

Unless you're claiming a different narrative to the ones that the Catholic Church peddled to ya'll


Since we both agree that the Noah story is fake, since the Noah character is fake, then, Shem is false and cannot be used as a reliable source on anything that pertains to reality.

Maynman:
where did I mention noah?

According to the narrative of your own foreign extremist ideology, who was the father of Shem?

Maynman:
show me where I mentioned them or said they were real.

The genealogy of Shem.

Maynman:
The noah story is copied from epic of Gilgamesh, an epic poem.

Right, since by your own admission, the noah story is fake, then that suggests that it's without merit and as such cannot be used as a point of reference nor as any type of source.

Furthermore, that renders the chart you posted null and void.

Maynman:
Prove what?

Prove the rhetoric that you're peddling.

Provide us with the proof of these fictional characters of yours.

Maynman:
Hebrew goes far beyond “Israelite”.

Prove it.

The Noah story is fake, false and counterintuitive.

Try again, this time kindly provide us with the proof of these fictional characters of yours.

Maynman:
You can’t call the hieratic script an African script. When was “africa” as a continent created?

In its original form, the term that would later be Romanised into Africa, predates Rome in itself.

That is to say, the name Africa was coined by the African.

Furthermore, it's the great people of Africa who own the Hieratic script and not anyone else.

The Hebrew Isrealite doctrine is toxic.

A doctrine that tells you to hate on Africans for no justified reason, based on a flawed and malicious premise.

My question to our Brothers and Sisters who subscribe to these type of foreign extremist ideologies is this, are you African?

If the answer is No, then we have nothing for you, the exit is that way ➡️

Assuming the answer is Yes, then kindly explain the logic behind subscribing to a foreign extremist ideology that tells you to hate on yourself

Maynman:
The Old Testament was written in paleo Hebrew, much older than arabic.
And both hebrew, Arabic, ugartic and Aramaic all comes from Semitic language.

First off, you will have to prove the credibility of the Noah story before peddling these false narratives.

Noah is a fictional character.

The Noah story is fake, false and counterintuitive.

Secondly, kindly point us towards these original scripts, what y'all peddle as paleo-Hebrew, isn't, its an African language that was operational amongst the African communities that existed in and around the Levant during the periods Before the Common Era and the early parts of the first millennium CE.

The Hieratic script is an African script and has nothing to does with any foreign extremist ideologically based rhetoric, whatsoever.

Maynman:
Yeah and it was used to translate hebrew “messiah”..

Arabic is older than the Hebrew Language, and the Arabic language isn't even considered to be ancient.

In other words, the Hebrew language is relatively new , accredited to one Eliezee Ben-Yehuda, this was a language that had its written form invented in the 1800's.

Maynman:
Don’t confuse christ for chrest.

The English word 'Christ' comes from the Greek word 'Kristos' which was adopted from the African conception known as KRST.