[s]

theInterpreter:
Someone will just wake up and start talking trash

I sorry for you

[/s]

Soyinka has been a Marxist since his days at Ibadan

The likes of Emmanuel Ifeajuna was radicalized alongside this old goat in same Ibadan into Marxist leanings which saw to the Jan 15 Marxist coup.

Wole's Pyrate Confraternity was supposed to be the future driving force towards communism in Nigeria but Rothschild had more pressing plans like controlling the newly discovered oil wells and so went with the hard approach using Khaki boys like Emmanuel Ifeajuna to usher in a Central govt.

At every critical turning point when Nigeria was supposed to choose wisely, goats like Wole have always found a way to meddle the discuss.

He was at the centre calling for Coup against Shagari and welcomed Buhari's military Junta back then and up till date refuses to acknowledge he was wrong and states that no matter what means to remove Shagari, his govt deserved to be impeached.

You only find Wole criticizing the most civil and democratic govts we have had (Shagari, Yaradua, GEJ) BECAUSE WOLE IS A COMMUNIST WHO DESPISES DEMOCRACY.

theInterpreter:
So what's Nigeria's business in all these?

Or you prefer communism?

spoken like a true village idiot.

Marxism is on the rise aka Zionism and you are asking what concerns niggerians?

All the pandering Joe Xiden is doing towards China and how all western major corporations are in bed with the CCP and their Orwellian state surveillance is lost on you abi? What of Covid?

Take the advice of the poster that asked why you must comment.

Phiniter:
how did Britain create Nigeria?

Britain did not create Nijeriya.

It was your precious Jewish slave masters in London, Bristol, Amsterdam and Liverpool that created a chartered company on the London Exchange known as ''Royal Niger Company''.

By the December of 1978, the American government recognized the Chinese Communists as the official and legitimate government of China, after fifty-five years of accepting the governments of Sun-Yat-Sen and Chiang Kai Shek as the representatives of the Chinese people.

Others did not approve of the move of the American government. One, a former Chinese citizen, Dr. Chiu-Yuan Hu, told a Congressional Committee in Washington: “To recognize the Chinese Red Regime is to discourage the people in the whole world .... It will make the world know that the great nation of the United States is unworthy to be a friend, that it sometimes betrays its most loyal allies.”

Senator Barry Goldwater was one who felt that the move was improper. He told a news conference: "I have no idea what motivated him other than (that) the Trilateral Commission, composed of bankers in this country and others, want to expand big business. This is a dangerous thing because it puts fear in our allies, especially our small allies, as to how the U.S. will keep its word.” Arizona Daily Star (Tucson), Dec. 17, 1978, p. A-ll.

To American banksters and business men, communist societies are the best investor destinations as the communist society is nothing short of a slave empire with full central authority under the control of a handful of powerful oligarchs. In short, communism that we are all to believe is the arch enemy to capitalism is actually extreme capitalism where all the wealth is controlled and owned by the state and the labor force mere slaves to be used and discarded. This is why Western banksters and businessmen like Rothschild, Jacob Schiff and John D. Rockerfeller all supported, bankrolled the communist take over of Russia in an apparent large scale heist of that vastly rich empire. Not only did they murder the entire Romanov Royal family, stole his vast wealth of cash, gold bullions and jewelry as well as estates and shares in the west but went on to steal all of the resources under the Tsarists realm .

But the final betrayal to the Chinese people occurred on January 1, 1979, when President Jimmy Carter severed diplomatic relations with the only elected government China has ever had, the government on Taiwan, and went so far as to state that the United States position was that: “there is but one China, and Taiwan is part of China.” Arizona Daily Star (Tucson), Dec 16, 1978, p. A-l.

The Nationalist government on Taiwan took the betrayal rather bitterly but stated that they would “neither negotiate with the Chinese Communist regime nor compromise with Communism.”

Both moves caused Senator Barry Goldwater to charge that President Carter's motives were economic, saying that “he did it for the big banks of the world — Chase Manhattan and the French bankers — and for companies like Coca-Cola.”

Ronald Reagan called the break with Taiwan a “betrayal.”

The hypocrisy of the entire China scenario was dramatically illustrated in May, 1979, when the New York Times ran a picture showing Commerce Secretary Juanita Kreps in China touring the Great Wall of China, and she was smiling and apparently enjoying herself. This picture was attached to and just underneath the main article on the same page that headlined: “(Chinese) Poster says political prisoners tortured, starved in Chinese ‘Eden.’ ”

The article doesn’t say whether the smiling Secretary visited any of the “tortured” and “starving” Chinese prisoners, but it is doubted.

The question as to why the visiting American journalists and dignitaries who toured China in the '70’s failed to mention the tortured existence of many of the Chinese people was partially answered by Edward N. Luttwak, associate director of the Washington Center of Foreign Policy Research at John Hopkins University, who also visited Mainland China.

Mr. Luttwak wrote an article for the April, 1977, Reader’s Digest in which he asked a series of questions:

Why have American journalists failed to convey to us such fundamental Chinese realities? After all, the miserable poverty of the country is everywhere in evidence.

Why, moreover, have previous visitors not been revolted by the schoolrooms where children are taught from booklets replete with the brutal images of harsh class-war propaganda?

Why have our "Asia scholars” failed to denounce the militarism of a system where the cheapest suit of clothing for little boys is a mini-uniform complete with rifle?

And above all, how could they have missed the central phenomenon of (Red) Chinese life: its unique, almost pure totalitarianism?

But it was too late. Secretary of State George Marshall, the Institute of Pacific Relations, and modern politicians had betrayed the only elected
government of China and replaced it with the most brutal and bloody government on the face of the earth.

China was now truly Communist.

Before the CCP under Mao overran China and seized power, the Chinese government was called the Nationalist government of China under the control of Nationalist leader Chiang Kai Shek.

Chiang Kai Shek was once part of the radical Communist Party under Mao but repudiated his beliefs in Communism after a closer look and study of the Communist terroir being unleashed in Russia. Chiang Kai Shek was so anti-Communist that he later became an ardent Christian (the antithesis to Jewish Communism).
The Nationalist Party under Chiang had made so many strides in China and many have praised it for the dramatic changes it was making in the
method of governing the Chinese people, and for the important benefits it was offering them.

One such supporter was Dr. Arthur Young, the financial advisor to the Chinese government from 1929 to 1946. He wrote: “When the Nationalist government took over, they set out on a program of financial rehabilitation. During the period from 1928 to 1937, they succeeded in unifying and stabilizing the currency. They developed quite promptly very large revenues from the customs and internal revenue with the result that the Government had a large degree of financial stability by 1937. ”

In other words, Chaing’s government was benefiting the Chinese people by protecting the value of their money by ending the destructive
influences of inflation. Also, when government functions to protect the rights of the people, and their money is stable, a middle class develops.

Professor John Fairbank, certainly no supporter of Chiang, had to admit in his book The United States and China that: “The National government of China at Nanking in the decade from 1927 to 1937 was the most modem and effective that China had known.”

However, China’s experiment with democracy started to experience exterior problems when Japan attacked Shanghai, China, on August 13,
1937. Suddenly Chiang had a two-front war: on one front he was repelling the Japanese invaders, and on the other his troops were fighting the Chinese Communists.

The attack by Japan caused the most problems, however, as the Japanese rapidly overran the principal cities and destroyed the sources of
revenue. The Chinese government, therefore, was forced to rely on paper money as their main financial resource available for the purpose of fighting the war.

The Chinese government was in need of allies, and they turned to America after Japan attacked at Pearl Harbor. Chiang sent the following
telegram to President Roosevelt on December 8, 1941: “To our new common battle, we offer all we are and all we have to stand with you until the Pacific and the world are freed from the curse of brute force and endless perfidy.”

America, in addition to fighting Japan after Pearl Harbor, was also at war with Italy and Germany and became the ally of Russia, also fighting the Germans in Europe.

America’s solution to the war, especially during the early stages, was what it called Lend Lease: the equipping of the military forces of its allies.
However, America’s priorities seemed a bit out of order, as in some cases it chose to equip its soldiers after its allies. America decided to equip its soldiers in the European theater first; its ally Russia second; General Douglas MacArthur’s military forces in the Pacific theater third, and China last. Aid to Russia’s military forces had higher priority than America’s fighting forces in the Pacific. And Chiang never received more than five percent of America’s war material during the course of the war.

Chiang, desperate for assistance "... arranged for a loan of $250 million in gold from the United States to stabilize his money. The man in charge of delivering the gold to China was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Harry Dexter White, a Soviet agent (and a member of the CFR.) Over a period of three and a half years, White shipped only $27 million of the $250 million that had been promised Chiang.”

Notice that Mr. White broke the law by not delivering the aid that Congress had voted. But the story does not end there, as: "In 1945, Congress
voted a second loan, this one of $500 million — but not one cent of this ever reached China. Again, Soviet agent Harry Dexter White was the culprit. China’s currency collapsed.”

Even with all of these problems, Chiang continued the fight against both the Communists and the armies of Japan. After the war ended in 1945, Chiang called a National Assembly on November 15, 1946, to approve a permanent constitution, which was approved on December 25, 1946. The plan was for this constitution to go into effect one year later, in 1947.

The new constitution provided for a social insurance system and for government management of the public utilities, but also contained a “Bill of Rights” to guarantee personal liberty and rights for the citizens of China. It also provided for the first nationwide election held in China (there had never been an election in China) on November 21 through 23, 1947.

The constitution also planned the convening of a National Assembly on March 29, 1948, where 1,744 delegates were to select the president and vice president of China.

Chiang repeatedly refused to run for the presidency of China, but the delegates to the Convention elected him for a six-year term by a vote of about seven to one.

But the Communists would not accept the popular mandate of the Convention and they continued their aggressive attack against Chiang’s
newly elected government

But Chiang’s enemy was not the Japanese government, nor even the Communists under the leadership of Chou En Lai and Mao Tse Tung. It
was the American government and Secretary of State George Marshall, a member of the CFR.

Secretary Marshall took measures in 1946 to impose "an embargo on the sale and shipment of arms from the United States ”

Using Marshall’s own boastful language: "As Chief of Staff I armed 39 anti-Communist divisions, now with a stroke of the pen I disarm them.”

Chiang’s elected government was doomed to failure and the Communists under Mao and Chou finally succeeded in forcing Chiang and his
government to leave the mainland of China and to move his armies onto the offshore Chinese islands of Formosa.

The pressure mounted on the American government to recognize the Communists as the legitimate government of China. This pressure was in part assisted by the appearance of twenty- nine books published during the period of 1943 to 1949. John T. Flynn, in his book While You Slept, reviewed these books and classified twenty-two of them as being “pro-Communist” and the other seven as being “anti-Communist.” The twenty-two books were reviewed with what Flynn called “glowing approval” in literary reviews appearing in the New York Times, the Herald Tribune, The Nation, The New Republic, and the Saturday Review of Literature. Nine authors wrote twelve of these books and these same nine authors submitted forty-three reviews. In other words, the same pro-Communist authors were reviewing the pro-Communist books, either neglecting the anti-Communist books or ridiculing them.

The general line of the pro-Communist books was that Chou and Mao were “agrarian reformers” seeking to change the tenure of the land from the large landowners to the poor peasants. For instance, even George Marshall in 1946 said this about the Communism of Mao and his followers: “Don’t be ridiculous. These fellows are just old-fashioned agrarian reformers.”

Chiang and his supporters were now safely ensconced on the islands of Formosa (Taiwan), and it is now possible, with hindsight, to see what type of government Chiang gave the Taiwanese, the people who were on the islands before Chiang and his followers appeared.

Taiwan developed a true agrarian reform where today seventy-five percent of the farm land is owner-cultivated. This reform was achieved
without a bloody revolution.

In addition, Chiang Kai Shek and his successors, have been elected by the people of Formosa, and Mao and his successors on mainland China have never allowed the Chinese the opportunity to freely elect their rulers.

Congressman Eldon Rudd in 1979 issued a message further detailing the differences between the mainland Chinese government of the Communists and the Taiwanese government of Chiang and his successors: “With 270 times the land area and 53 times the population, the Gross National Product of Mainland China is only 10 times the G.N.P. of Taiwan The figures I have dated illustrate beyond contradiction the material abundance created by freedom’s climate. In my view, this is the smallest and least important of the remarkable differences between the People’s Republic of China and the free government of Taiwan. The true difference is spirit — the human condition, the absence of compulsion and regimentation, the presence of individual opportunity.”

What was the cost of the Chinese Revolution spawned by Secretary of State George Marshall, Harry Dexter White, and the Communists Mao Tse Tung and Chou En Lai?

In 1971, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary issued a twenty-eight page document entitled “The Human Cost of Communism in China” that
concluded that Chou and Mao, were "responsible for the deaths of as many as 64 million people.”

In addition to the deaths of as many as 64 million Chinese, the Communist government has other areas of progress to be proud of. Valentin Chu is a professional journalist who was born and raised in China but who escaped from the Communist regime. He wrote a book in 1963 called Ta Ta, Tan Tan, the Inside Story of Communist China. Mr. Chu devotes a chapter to Communist efforts to destroy the family, from which the following was taken:

The family everywhere is man’s source of strength and courage as well as his emotional harbor at times of natural disaster and
personal misfortune. In China it was even more so. It was society itself. The Chinese Communists were acutely aware that their
control of the people could never be effective unless the monolithic family system was destroyed, along with religion and conventional
morals. This they set out to do as soon as they came to power.

Another move of the Chinese Communists to destroy the family was to move the Chinese mothers away from the home and into the fields as farm workers. As the Boston Globe put it on January 31, 1975: “Ninety percent of the women work in factories and on farms and then attend school,” which obviously leaves little time to function as wives, mothers and homemakers.

A related move, according to Chu, was the commune system, which summarily put men, women, children and the aged in segregated labor
camps, destroyed ancestral graves, and reduced marital relations to brief Party-rationed sex-breaks.

But there are some who feel that all of these costs, the sixty-four million dead, the destruction of the family, and the establishment of the commune, was worth the price.

David Rockefeller said this about the cost of the Revolution after his return from a visit to China in 1973:

Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing a more efficient and dedicated administration but also in fostering high morale and community of interest. The social experiment of China under Chairman Mao’s
leadership is one of the most important and successful in human
history.

This statement by Rockefeller was a little more than three years after Chairman Mao urged the “World to defeat U.S.” by appealing to the peoples of the world to: “Unite and defeat the U.S. aggressors and all their running dogs.”

The American policy towards Communist China was now due for a change. It was now time for the American government to recognize the
Communists as the legitimate government of the Chinese people and to break all diplomatic relations with the Taiwanese government of Chiang and his successors. On July 15, 1971, Premier Chou En Lai, on behalf of the People’s Republic of China, according to a press release issued by President Richard Nixon’s staff: “extended an invitation to President Nixon to visit China at an appropriate date before May, 1972. Nixon accepted the invitation with pleasure.”

It was no coincidence that President Nixon accepted that invitation on July 15, 1971, the very day that Radio Peking, China’s official radio station, issued the following statement: "People of the World, unite and defeat the U.S. aggressors and all their running dogs.” 68

The American press and President Nixon refused to acknowledge the hypocrisy of the Chinese government and accepted the invitation the same day they were calling for a world wide revolution against the United States.

Nixon’s support of Red China was strange, indeed. As a Presidential candidate in 1968, Nixon said: "I would not recognize Red China now, and I would not agree to admitting it to the United Nations ” And in his book. Six Crises, he wrote: "admitting Red China to the United Nations
would be a mockery of the provision of the Charter which limits its membership to ‘peace-loving nations.’ And what was most disturbing was that it would give respectability to the Communist regime which would immensely increase its power and prestige in Asia, and probably irreparably weaken the non-Communist governments in that area.”

So President Nixon went to China and opened the doors to the Chinese Communist government of Mao and Chou.

The next step in America’s betrayal of the Chinese people came in 1976 when first Chou En Lai and later Mao Tse Tung passed away. The tributes that flowed from the mouths of the world’s leaders about these two bloody butchers was amazing.

These comments were made about Chou En Lai by the following individuals:

Gerald Ford: “Chou will be long remembered as a remarkable leader.”

Secretary of State Henry Kissinger: “I admired Chou En Lai very much.”

Former President Richard Nixon: “Chou’s legacy will be that he helped end the darkness. Only a handful of men in the 20th century will match Premier Chou’s impact on world history.”

These comments were made about Mao Tse Tung:

Premier Pierre Trudeau of Canada: “The People’s Republic of China stands as a monument to the spirit and political philosophy of Chairman Mao. Canadians recognize the path-breaking spirit of community that, under Chairman Mao’s guidance, had contributed to the modernization of China.”

President Gerald Ford: "Mao was a very remarkable and a very great man.”

He wants the UN to come in and take-over Nigeria claiming the incessant state-backed Terror being unleashed by Buhari's Boko Haram and Fulani bandits.

Soyinka is such a Marxist that he can't phantom an end to the Multi-cultural cesspit called One Nijeriya as he has always kicked against Nationalist causes and now wants the UN to come over and colonize Nigeria towards preserving his precious Multi-cult society.

This has always been the plan of the Zio-Masonic Mafiya who are bent on ushering in a global communist order. The reasons why these Zionists and their Masonic tools put Buhari in power was to ensure that maximum damage is done to the Nigeria socio-economic polity to which Buhari has surpassed their wildest ambitions.


I have written severally that all the chaos going on in Nigeria is part of the Zio-Mason plot towards weakening Nigeria and turning her into a failed state towards the goal of gathering the pieces into a UN World Govt. I also stated that Buhari was chosen specifically to act as a catalyst towards Nigeria's decent to chaos and anarchy.

Soyinka keeps proving that only a dead communist is a good one. All these years he is yet to repent of his Marxist foolishness and this gives much credit to the saying that a fool at 40 is a fool for life.

Nijeriya is like communism and those who support one Nijeriya are like your regular card carrying flaming Communists who will continue to insist on the workability of the Nigerian Marxist project even though it has never worked and will never work.

I can't wait to see this old fool cross to the other side with his useless commie foolishness. Rather than see the only viable option to peace being a total dissolution along Nationalist lines, the idiots like Wole will continue to pander to their woke beliefs on Marxism and the dead weight Zio experiment called One Nijeriya.

SPITS!

The communist has spoken.

I have written severally that all the chaos going on in Nigeria is part of the Zio-Mason plot towards weakening Nigeria and turning her into a failed state towards the goal of gathering the pieces into a UN World Govt. I also stated that Buhari was chosen specifically to act as a catalyst towards Nigeria's decent to chaos and anarchy.

Soyinka keeps proving that only a dead communist is a good one. All these years he is yet to repent of his Marxist foolishness and this gives much credit to the saying that a fool at 40 is a fool for life.

[s]

theInterpreter:
rubbish
That land they live on is theirs
Nothing can change that
They've been there long enough to have 21 kings
Now fvck off

[/s]

They will be driven away just as their ancestors were chased out of Yemen and landed in present day Ogun.

The Itsekiri can not use a fraudulent land title gotten from an Urhobo yahoo boy to claim ownership of Warri.

The Itsekiri is the most useless set of people ever.

These people know they are originally from Ijebu and are the only people (other than the Fulani vermin) that are claiming ownership of the land they settled on citing a fraudulent bill of sale by one Urhobo wayo man.

This is the only thing they have to claim Warri even though the Urhobo wayo man that they claimed sold the land to them or allowed them to settle on it had no bearing towards granting anyone right of occupancy in any part of Warri especially the coastal fringes which were part of Ijaw land.

[s]

Monogamy:
Those must be Trump supporters, they are not cultured at all

[/s]

Only good kike is one with his head on a pike.

Its about to happen in the coming months when the seasonal age long Flu season begins with the coming of winter. The shameless frauds in the WHO and the weasel Faucci will have no problem declaring zero cases of flu and assigning all flu cases as Covid to which they will blame the unvaccinated for the spread and not the inefficient, and dangerous vaccines.

Our own Islamo-Marxists in govt headed by Buhari will soon make Covid vaccination a matter of public health policy. The reason he (Buhari) and every other useless stooge claiming to be a National head is still alive and in power is because they have all been towing the path outlined to them by the Zionist cabal unleashing this havoc on our earth.

Five heads of state are dead since 2019 and that of Madagascar was about to get both assasinated and overthrown. A US President was rigged out in the most sloppy manner even for CIA standards and in his place a demented crook was placed in to oversee the US gets into the globalist agenda.

For these apparent reasons, one can safely assume that Vaccine passports and certificates will soon become a mandatory item to remain part of society as contained in the secret NCDC bill currently being reviewed by the Senate.

But here you have a choice to resist those who want to impose the vaccine on you by simply writing to your organization's HR the following:

I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead.

I would be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements:

1. Can you please advise me of the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?

2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?

3. Can you please advise of the full list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?

4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?

5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT ‘experimental mRNA gene altering therapy’?

6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?

7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery?

Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions - namely that:
1. You confirm that I will suffer no harm.
2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.
3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?
I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.’


The point being though, is that they CANNOT provide that information but you’ve NOT refused…

Its about to happen in the coming months when the seasonal age long Flu season begins with the coming of winter. The shameless frauds in the WHO and the weasel Faucci will have no problem declaring zero cases of flu and assigning all flu cases as Covid to which they will blame the unvaccinated for the spread and not the inefficient, and dangerous vaccines.

Our own Islamo-Marxists in govt headed by Buhari will soon make Covid vaccination a matter of public health policy. The reason he (Buhari) and every other useless stooge claiming to be a National head is still alive and in power is because they have all been towing the path outlined to them by the Zionist cabal unleashing this havoc on our earth.

Five heads of state are dead since 2019 and that of Madagascar was about to get both assasinated and overthrown. A US President was rigged out in the most sloppy manner even for CIA standards and in his place a demented crook was placed in to oversee the US gets into the globalist agenda.

For these apparent reasons, one can safely assume that Vaccine passports and certificates will soon become a mandatory item to remain part of society as contained in the secret NCDC bill currently being reviewed by the Senate.

But here you have a choice to resist those who want to impose the vaccine on you by simply writing to your organization's HR the following:

I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead.

I would be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements:

1. Can you please advise me of the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?

2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?

3. Can you please advise of the full list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?

4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?

5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT ‘experimental mRNA gene altering therapy’?

6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?

7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery?

Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions - namely that:
1. You confirm that I will suffer no harm.
2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.
3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?
I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.’


The point being though, is that they CANNOT provide that information but you’ve NOT refused…

We are now witnessing the great shilling game to get you to take their mRNA vaccine.

If it was so good and efficient and also necessary to take the so-called vaccine, then why must they shill for it ?

In the coming weeks we will soon see how they will deploy their yeyebrities to shill hard for the so-called vaccine .

Liberty is the only thing you cannot have unless you are willing to give it to others.

Liberty is defined as rights with responsibilities. Its opposite, License, is defined as rights with no responsibilities. Another word for License would be Anarchy, or a situation where there are no rules, rights, or privileges. The strong devour the weak; the powerful destroy the powerless. In the animal world, License is defined as “the Law of the jungle.”

Those who love freedom must recognize that others have equal rights to their freedom as well, and that only by recognizing this fact will all be totally free. That means that all individuals must restrict their freedom to harm others, or none will be free to enjoy their rights to life, liberty, and property.

The Creator of man laid down some guidelines about the rights of others. These guidelines are written in the negative in at least six of the Ten
Commandments. The guideline is written "Thou shall not . . . which means that all will be free if all men confine their activities to those which do not harm others.

America’s founding fathers, when they wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, also wrote their guidelines in the negative: “Congress shall
pass no laws . . . But these restrictions enable man to be freer because man’s life would be free of governmental restraints.

Those who wrote the Constitution were concerned about the concept of equal rights. They were attempting to separate themselves from a monarchy as a form of government where certain individuals, the king and his court, had more rights than the common citizens. These individuals had superior rights because of their positions. Conversely, the common people had little if any rights. America’s founding fathers were convinced that they would not allow this inequality to occur in this country as they wrote the founding documents.

They wrote it into the Constitution that all men were created equal, that the lowest had the same rights to Life, Liberty, and Property as did the
highest. Modern man, through the misuse of government, passes laws to make men equal in all areas of their lives. This obvious misunderstanding of man's nature has caused much grief as long as man has been attempting to create government

The solitary man, alone in his environment, need not concern himself with rights and the need to create government to protect those rights. No one exists to plunder his goods or take his life. There is no need to protect his rights. They are secure.

It is only when another individual or groups of individuals join him in his solitary existence that concerns about rights become important.

Each of the inhabitants has an equal right to life, liberty and property. That right is protected as long as each inhabitant recognizes the equal right of the others. No individual nor any group of individuals has the right to take the life, liberty or property of another individual or group of individuals.

There is no question that any individual, or group of individuals, has the ability to violate the rights of any individual. The question being
discussed here is whether or not the violator has the right to do so.

If each individual has the right to his life, liberty and property, and no one has the right to take these rights, then it follows that man must have the right to protect his rights. This right is called the Right to Self Defense. Each individual has this right in equal proportion to any other individual.

If each individual has the right to self-defense and each has it equally, then each individual has the right to pool his individual right with others so that all can protect their rights from those who come to violate all of their rights at the same time.

In other words, if each has the right individually, then all have the right collectively. Such collective poolings of individual rights to self defense are called governments.

Men create governments when they pool their individual rights to self defense to create an agency that has the collective right to protect both the individual and the collective body of individuals.

Men can only grant to government those rights they themselves have. If an individual does not have a right, it is not possible for that individual to grant that right to government. Government can only have those rights that each individual has.

A good example of the philosophy that governments grant human rights to their citizens is found in the International Covenants on Human
Rights, passed in 1966 by the United Nations.

It reads, in part:

“The States parties to the present Covenant recognize that, in the enjoyment of those rights provided by the State, in conformity with the present Covenant, the State may subject such rights only to such limitations as are determined by
law....”

Animal one dash me human rights!

This document, passed unanimously by all of the parties voting, including the United States, concluded that man’s rights are granted by the
government. It further concluded that these rights could be limited by law; in other words, that which the government grants can be controlled by the granting body, the government. That which the government gives can also be taken away.

Man’s rights under this thought are not very secure. Governments can change, and with the change, man’s rights can disappear. Knowledge of this fact did not escape America’s founding fathers, who wrote in the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights ”

Here, then, is the other theory of the source of man’s rights: they are given to man by his Creator. Man’s rights are inalienable (defined as
incapable of being transferred) which means that they can not be taken away by anyone except the entity that gave the rights in the first place: in this case, the Creator.

So here are the two competing and contradictory theories about the rights of man: one holds that they are given by the Creator, and therefore can only be removed by the entity that created them in the first place; the other holds that man’s rights come from man himself and therefore can be limited or removed by man or by other men, as “determined by law.”

Therefore, the man who wishes to protect his rights from those who wish to limit them must protect himself and his human rights by creating an agency that has the power to exceed that exerted by those who violate human rights. The agency created is called government. But granting power to government to protect human rights also grants power to those who can abuse it as a vehicle to destroy or limit the rights of the people who created the government.

Those who wrote the American Constitution realized that this tendency existed when they wrote the Bill of Rights, the first ten Amendments to the Constitution. The purpose of these amendments is to restrict the power of the government to violate the rights of the citizens of the nation. The founding fathers wrote these restrictions with phrases like:

“Congress shall pass no law ”

"The right of the people. . . shall not be infringed.”

“No person shall be . . . deprived.”

“The accused shall enjoy the right”

Notice that these are not restrictions on human rights, but are restrictions on the activities of governments.

If rights are granted by the Creator of those rights, what are rights granted by government? It becomes important to distinguish between a
Right and a Privilege by defining these two terms.

A Right is a freedom to act morally without asking permission;

A Privilege is a freedom to act morally but only after permission has been granted by some governmental entity.

The right to life, then, granted to each individual by his Creator, has now become a privilege. Man lived by permission of the government, which had the power to limit and even curtail the human right to life.

The human rights that the individual wishes to protect are simple in nature, and include the right to Life, Liberty and Property.

These three rights are in essence only one right: the right to Life.

These rights are in accord with man’s basic nature. Man is created hungry and needs to produce food to sustain his life. Without the
right to keep what he has produced (his property) man will surely starve to death. Not only must man be allowed to keep the products of his labors, he must be free to produce the property he needs for his sustenance (the right known as Liberty.)

Governments do not need to take man’s life to kill him. Governments can remove man’s right to property or the freedom to produce the property needed to maintain his life. A government that restricts man’s ability to keep what he produces (his property) has an equal ability to kill a man as surely. We can see how the right to self sustenance and in essence right to life is being slowly but surely being eroded by the current Buhari APC govt which refuses to protect farmers in the rural areas from daily attacks by Fulani invaders bent on a land grabbing expansionist drive.

There are government entities that restrict man’s right to property or his right to liberty without terminating his
life directly. But the effect is still the same.


As can be discerned from the Communist, Klauss Schwabbs of the World Economic Forum, the Communists wish to abolish “private
property,” or the individual’s right to keep what he produces.

One who spoke in favor of the concept of private property was Abraham Lincoln, who said:

“Property is the fruit of labor; property is desirable; it is a positive good in the world. That some should be rich shows that others may
become rich, and hence is just encouragement to industry and enterprise. Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another, but let him work diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe from violence when built .”

If government is being used by the Conspiracy to consolidate power into its hands, it behooves those who wish to preserve their freedoms to understand the very nature and function of government. Once the character of government is understood, efforts can be directed against the increase in governmental powers over both the national economy and the lives of its citizens.

A good place to begin such a study is to examine the two sources claimed to be the source of human rights. There are only two, presuming that it is admitted that humans do indeed have rights: either man himself, or someone or something external to man himself, a Creator.

Many of America’s founding fathers were aware of the difference between these two alternatives. Thomas Jefferson, for instance, stated his
concern and understanding thus: "The God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God?”

However, the corresponding alternative explanation argues that our rights come from government, the creature of man himself. This contention holds that man creates government to give man his rights.

A stem warning for those who do not distinguish between these two alternatives came from William Penn. He wrote: “If men will not be
governed by God, they then must be governed by tyrants.”

There are four references to a Creator in the American Declaration of Independence, but certain of America’s leaders are now asking that God must be separated from the affairs of the government. If this separation is made, as Mr. Penn indicated, the people will be governed by tyrants, and future tyrants will do all that they can to separate a belief in God from the existence of government.

The objectives outlined by the World Economic Forum in their Great Reset also mirrors that of the UN Agenda 2030 to which goal is total global communism under a New World Order of a powerful central global govt.

This conspiracy has been in the works for several hundred years and their goal to create such a powerful communist global order was set for May 1st, 1976 but then came about Hitler and WW2 which set the conspiracy back a few years.

Comprehending how this conspiracy could survive for such a long period of time has been difficult but alas it is well and active and more powerful than ever to achieve its ultimate goal of global communism and the Covid debacle - which has turned science upon its own head by the corrupting lucre and blackmail the conspirators have on their puppets in places like the WHO and in virtually all sits of power across the globe, has made this conspiracy come to light.

One explanation of its lengthy existence was offered by George Orwell, the British Socialist, who wrote Animal Farm and 1984, two books on the subject of absolute power in the hands of a few.

He wrote: “The Party is not concerned with perpetuating its blood but with perpetuating itself. Who wields power is not important provided the hierarchical structure remains always the same.”

The method by which the Conspiracy recruits new members to replace those who retire or die is explained by Norman Dodd, an investigator and researcher into the existence of the Conspiracy. Mr. Dodd explained: “The careers of men are watched. The men who indicate that they would be especially capable in terms of the aims of this group are approached quietly and invited into the inner circles. They are watched as they carry out assignments and eventually they are drawn into it under circumstances which make it virtually impossible for them to ever get out of it.”

What is the ultimate goal of the Conspiracy? If total power is the final object, then, any system which maximizes power into the hands of a few is the system to be desired. In terms of government, then, the ultimate form of power is Communism. This is the seat of the maximum power over the economy and of the individual.

The Conspirators: “want big government because they understand that Socialism (and Communism as well) is not a humanitarian system for redistributing wealth, but for concentrating and controlling it. They also recognize it as a system for concentrating and controlling people .” It is common for detractors of this position to claim that the last thing that the wealthy of the world want is government control over or ownership of the factors of production. But, as we shall see, Socialism or Communism offers the Conspiracy the greatest vehicle for concentrating and controlling the wealth. This is the ultimate goal of these planners: power over not only the wealth of the world, but also the producers of that wealth, the people themselves. So the Conspiracy uses government to get control of the government, and total government control is their goal.

The method by which the Conspiracy recruits new members to replace those who retire or die is explained by Norman Dodd, an investigator and researcher into the existence of the Conspiracy. Mr. Dodd explained: “The careers of men are watched. The men who indicate that they would be especially capable in terms of the aims of this group are approached quietly and invited into the inner circles. They are watched as they carry out assignments and eventually they are drawn into it under circumstances which make it virtually impossible for them to ever get out of it.”

What is the ultimate goal of the Conspiracy? If total power is the final object, then, any system which maximizes power into the hands of a few is the system to be desired. In terms of government, then, the ultimate form of power is Communism. This is the seat of the maximum power over the economy and of the individual. The Conspirators: “want big government because they understand that Socialism (and Communism as well) is not a humanitarian system for redistributing wealth, but for concentrating and controlling it. They also recognize it as a system for concentrating and controlling people .”

Now you will understanding why western banksters and capitalists funded the Jewish Bolsheviks into power in the old USSR and why they love China and want to unveil a Great Reset aka global communist revolution as dictated by the World Economic Forum.

''You will own nothing and be a happy''

Those who seek power will be corrupted by it. They will be willing to intentionally cause depressions, revolutions, unleash pathogens into the population and wars in order to further their desire for more power.

This corrupting nature of the very pursuit of power explains why the moral mind of the individual who neither desires
power over others nor understands the desire for such power cannot fathom why power-seekers would want to create human misery through wars, depressions, disease and revolutions.

In other words, the conspirators are successful because the moral citizen cannot accept the conclusion that other individuals would actually wish to create incredibly destructive acts against their fellow citizens.

Another power seeker, the Russian anarchist Bakunin, explained that this process of corruption even affected those dedicated to freedom who were given power to protect the powerless. He wrote that "... the possession of power transformed into a tyrant even the most devoted friend of liberty .”

The delight in the possession of power over others was explained by
another observer of the power-seeking Joseph Kennedy: “I like Joe Kennedy. He understands power. Power is the end. What other delight is there but to enjoy the sheer sense of control? He would say: ‘Let me see any other motive in the people who command.’ ”

So the motive of the Conspirators has been identified:

It is Power!

Monogamy:
The promised land story caused the current problems in the world today.

All we read about is conquered the land, conquered the land without telling us the genesis of the land

The land of Cain and it descendants are the major bane of the world's problems.

There are three ways of exposing a Conspiracy:

One is for any of the participants in the conspiracy to break with it and to expose his or her involvement. This takes an extremely courageous
individual, and that type of exposure is indeed rare.

The second group of exposers are those who have unknowingly participated in a conspiratorial planning of an event but who didn’t realize it until later. These individuals, and there aren’t many in the history of the world, have also exposed the inner workings of the conspiracy at great
peril to themselves.

The third method of exposing a conspiracy is for researchers to uncover conspiratorial designs in the events of the past.

There exists a conspiracy, and that it is extremely large, deeply entrenched, and therefore extremely
powerful. It is working to achieve absolute and brutal rule over the entire human race by using wars, depressions, inflations and revolutions to further its aims. The Conspiracy’s one unchanging purpose has been to destroy all religion, all existing governments, and all traditional human institutions, and to build a new world order (this phrase will be defined later) upon the wreckage they have created.

Notice that if the Conspiracy does exist, it will do everything it can to deny the charges of both those who seek to expose it and those who claim to have been a part of it.

There are those, perhaps not knowing the importance of their contributions to the study of the conspiracy, who have added estimates of the size of this ruling group.

One was Walter Rathenau, who in 1909 controlled German General Electric. He said: “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another,
direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves.”

Another informed observer, Joseph Kennedy, the father of the late president John Kennedy, identified the number of individuals who run
America. He said: “Fifty men have run America and that’s a high figure.” 4

Dr. Carroll Quigley, a professor of History at Georgetown University’s Foreign Service School, and who formerly taught at Princeton and Harvard, has written a thirteen hundred page book entitled Tragedy and Hope. This book, published in 1966, was, according to the author, the result of twenty years of research into the Conspiracy.

Dr. Quigley concludes:

There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the
radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any group, and frequently does
so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to
examine its papers and secret records.

But Quigley took a step none of the exposers have publicly taken. He admits that he is a supporter of the Conspiracy he has written about:

I have no aversion to it or most of its aims, and have, for much of my life, been close to it and many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies . . . , but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

The ultimate purpose of this Conspiracy is power. There are some who desire this more than even material goods, although the two frequently go together. One such individual was the previously mentioned Joseph Kennedy.

Family admirer and author Pearl Buck wrote the following in her book, The Kennedy Women :
“Rose Kennedy (the wife of Joseph Kennedy) knew that the man she loved loved a power beyond the power of money. He wanted the power of government, and he would have it.”

The Conspiracy that Dr. Quigley and others saw, then, needs conspirators, and it is logical to ask why illustrious men of wealth and fortune would join such an enterprise. One who answered this question was author Blair Coan who wrote in his book, The Red Web: "The answer is quite the reverse of the question: These men (involved with the Conspiracy) became illustrious primarily because they were part of the Conspiracy.”

So those involved do not become rich and/or illustrious and then join the Conspiracy; they become rich and illustrious because they are members of the Conspiracy.

But what is their motive? What prompts men to seek wealth and position? Former Congressman John Schmitz explains that there is an
additional goal: Powerl Men join the Conspiracy to gain money and then power. Schmitz wrote: “When a person has all the money he needs, his goal becomes power.”

Benjamin Franklin explained this connection between money and power when he said: “There are two passions which have a powerful
influence on the affairs of men. These are. . . love of power and love of money When united. . . they have the most violent effects.”

However, power itself has a corrupting influence on those who seek it.

In an oft-quoted truth, Lord Acton explained power thus:[s] “Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.” [/s]

Wars start when one nation moves into the territory of another; depressions occur when markets take unexpected downturns; inflations
occur when prices are driven up by shortages; revolutions start when the people, always spontaneously, rise up to overthrow the existing government. These are the traditional explanations of historical events. Events happen by accident, there do not seem to be any causes.

But this explanation of history leaves gnawing questions in the minds of serious students. Is it possible that government leaders and others planned these events and then orchestrated them to their desired conclusions? Is it possible that even the great catastrophes of history were part of this plan?

There is an explanation of historical events that answers these questions in the affirmative. It is called the Conspiratorial View of History and it is the alternative to the Accidental View, the view that is commonly held today. It is possible, therefore, to summarize the major events of history into two alternative schools of thought:

The Accidental View of History: historical events occur by accident, for no apparent reason. Rulers are powerless to intervene.

The Conspiratorial View of History: historical events occur by design for reasons that are not generally made known to the people.

James Warburg in his book, The West In Crisis, explains the Accidental View thus: “History is written more by accident than design, often by the wholly irrational acts of madmen.”

Another who has offered the Accidental View as the explanation of the major events of the world is Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor. He has written:

“History is much more the product of chaos than of conspiracy. . . . increasingly, policy makers are
overwhelmed by events and information.”

But there are those who disagree with the positions of Warburg and Brzezinski. One, for instance, was Franklin D. Roosevelt who certainly saw
many monumental events occur during his consecutive administrations.

President Roosevelt has been quoted as saying:

“In politics, nothing happens by accident If it happens, it was planned that way.”

If harmful events are planned, it follows that the people who were about to suffer through the scheduled event would act to prevent the event from occurring if they knew about it in advance. The people expect government to protect them from harmful events.

But if the events still occur after the government officials had been expected to prevent them, the government officials have failed in their
assigned duties. There are only two explanations as to why they failed:

1. The events overwhelmed them, and could not have been prevented;

or

2. The events were allowed to occur because the officials wanted them to occur.

It is difficult for the casual observer to believe that these incredible events could not have been prevented, as humane people of conscience do not allow harmful events to occur.

If a planned and unwanted event is allowed to happen, those who planned the event would have to have acted in secret so as to prevent
discovery of their plans by those who would be adversely affected.

Planners working in secret to plan an event that the people do not wish to occur are, by definition, members of a conspiracy. Webster’s defines
conspiracy as a “combination of people, working in secret, for an evil or unlawful purpose.”

Not only must the Conspirators work in secret, they must make every effort to insure that their plans are not made public. The first task of a conspiracy, then, becomes that of convincing the people that the conspiracy itself does not exist.

This makes the task of uncovering the machinations of the conspiracy all the more difficult.

Revolutions are only possible in a democratic setting or in rare occasions, a monarchial system of govt.

The goal of every revolution is to bring about Tyranny.


To achieve this, the revolution seeks to instill anarchy towards justifying tyrannical rule.

Anarchy is a transitional phase which the revolutionary seeks to cause towards unbundling the system or govt in place.

The only real goal of the End SARS protests was to have govt backed thugs unleash mayhem towards justifying more tyrannical authority.

Take for example how the Federal Govt opened up the prisons and from there unleashed thugs and state-backed actors to unleash more anarchy. This had the desired effect on clamping down on genuine peaceful protesters and also stifle any future protests that may occur when Buhari seeks a third-term .

Mikecold:
Slave to who

I am a child of God

Go and get your pills abdul

Which God?

You can not have two masters.

Choose one, God or Judas.

[s]

Mikecold:
Abdul even your Quran says Jews are God chosen people

Jews make up 99% of Islam prophets


Joke on you

[/s]

And you are a slave to that jew rat and his lucifer god.

[s]

McStoic:


Conspiracy theories and infinitum!

[/s]

The Israeli PM, lobby groups in the US and inteligence agencies now want Joe Biden to attack Iran to deflect from his fckup in Iran.

Note that it was the Jewish media that beamed images of chaos from Kabul airport to make the US withdrawal look haphazard and started making the war in Afghanistan as a US defeat. How was the war in Afghanistan a US defeat when the US sacked the Taliban from power and chased them to caves in less than a month? How is the war a failure when the US propped up a puppet govt for 20ys?

The truth is that the US did not fail in the military objective.

The facts are that the US reluctance to engage Iran is why the Jews pushed for a Taliban take over in a Sunni allliance to attack Iran and from there get Joe Biden to use Iran to make up for his massive gaffe and the setup from Jewish media he suffered in the AFghanistan debacle.

USE BRAIN.

[s]

Mikecold:
What is Judas Abdul

Taqiya is shattered around mikecold


Get well soon, I forgot Jews hold your pills too

[/s]

Rugaria:
All I know is that no matter how bad an army of 300,000 men is, It can never be overun by an adversary of lesser number with no Airforce or Navy in about just A WEEK! Unheard of! That Army was programmed to fail.

The Taliban was propped up to replace the central govt by Joe Biden's Jewish white house.

The Afghan President was asked to vacate his office and leave the country by the same Jewish White House and the army was told to stand down and allow the Taliban of 75,000 goat herders with rusty AKs take over.

All those pics you see of so-called Taliban forces with up to date spec ops is not the regular Taliban fighter but Afghan MIlitary guys whom the US trained and equipped.

Ask yourself this simple question? Why are all Taliban soldiers with state of the art gear wearing face coverings?

This is to hide their real identities as actual Regular US Trained Afghan forces.

The reasons why the Taliban was asked to step in is because Israel is looking to have a launching pad from the northeast of Iran to invade that country.

The Judeo-Sunni Alliance towards Greater Israel and Zionist One World Govt is on full swing and Iran is the major obstacle in the region for it to take off.

[s]

Mikecold:
But it's moniker enough to claim someone isn't a Muslim

Why are you ashmed of your religion

Does this change the Islamic narrative Jesus wasn't killed

[/s]

Funny how I am now a Muslim for condemning your Jewish masters.

Me that has been posting here for ages about the Islamization agenda is now a Muslim because I am exposing the hand of Judas in the global Jihadist network.

It is you that needs to question your brand of Christianity and not me.

It is you who has to question what religion you profess because you can not be a Christian

[s]

EmmaJnr1:
online Taliban its fake news Seun do the needful

[/s]

This is why cowboys from futa jalon will continue to rule you slaves.

Your education no matter the level is not in any way or form seen in your stark ignorance and low iQ.

[s]

Mikecold:
But Abdul, your allah says Jesus wasn't killed

Which one we go believe now

Hope Jews didn't stop you from baffing today

[/s]

olofo, if you had any education or sense in that your head, from my Moniker alone you will know I am neither a northerner nor a muslim.

Google: ANTI-BALAKA

mumu