Dawatus Salafiyyah which Shaikh Muhammad bn Aliyy Jabata calls to is a blessed Da’wah. One of the basic and fundamental aspects of his Da’wah is "bring your evidence from Quran and/or Sunnah". His Da’wah is not "which scholar/Alfa is upon this or that". He aligns with the concensus of the Sahabah but disaligns from the stance of a Sahabi when it goes contrary to Quran and Sunnah. This is part of what he teaches from onset of his Da’wah after his return from Egypt. This is why any one who understands this aspect can use Quran and Sunnah with the concensus of the Sahabah to defeat any opposer even if his knowledge has not reached that of the opposer.
Shaikh Jabata sincerely calls to Islam and he does not call to himself. This why, from the advent of his Dawah in Nigeria, he let his students (all the categories they belong) be aware of the past ahlus Sunnah and the living ones among them. He encourages them to travel to learn, most especially from scholars of ahlus Sunnah in Yemen despite knowing that he does not have the same stance with those scholars on division of Bidah into two (bidah that takes one out of Islam and the that does not). His love and passion for narrations of the Messenger drove him to do so because Shaikh Muqbil (dead), who was the teacher of some of the ahlus Sunnah in Yemen was from people of the narrations.

Suddenly we began to hear that if one is going to Yemen to learn from the students of Shaikh Muqbil one has to divide bidah into the two mentioned above (even though there is nothing from the Messenger or the concensus of the Sahabah about this division). Some brothers in Nigeria sold their properties just to raise funds to facilitate their travel to study Islam in Yemen based on recommendation of the sincere adviser, Shaikh Jabata but on getting to Yemen they were confronted by enemies (majority of whom are Nigerians there) of the Shaikh's Dawah who made it a prerequisite for the prospective students from Nigeria to divide bidah and to also make a public dissociation from Shaikh Jabata or otherwise they would frustrated and forced to return to Nigeria. You know how some Nigerians who travel to the US, UK and Canada to seek greener pastures will feel after arriving any of those countries only to be told to return to Nigeria. It is this pressure of dividing bidah that has mounted on some people today, you sleep and wake up in the morning hear that so and so students have "butchered" bidah, you ask what is their evidence, Shaikh so and so said, that person said. Some of them would go as far as bringing Quran verses and ahadith that even those scholars who divided bidah before them had not used to divide. They forget their basis, Quran and Sunnah! Has Shaikh Jabata made a mistake for encouraging his students to travel there, definitely no. He is only being sincere with the Da’wah.
What is known is that each one from the scholars of ahlus Sunnah who divides bidah does not have the action and statement of the Messenger for the division and this is why all these scholars do not have a common set of evidences for this division. This difference in evidences they use is due to the fact that there is no any indication from the Messenger pointing to division of Bidah. When it comes to some of the religion, they go straight to the Allah and His Messenger to get direct but when it is about division of Bidah they to the actions of different Sahabah that do not have their concensus. In fact when they explain bidah, they use verses of Quran and aHadith that point to the fact that it is Allah that has the sole right and responsibility to make Shariah (laws) - either small or big (small or big if your mind is telling you that they are like). If this is the case, anyone that partners with Allah in what solely His is committing Shirku (polytheism). So how come the division, has Allah left some parts of the religion for people to legislate whatever they like in the religion just the way the Christians do (some use Earrings, some don't wear shoes etc)?!
Remember when the disbelievers at the time of the Messenger were not comfortable with the revelations when they were coming from Allah, they told the Messenger bring another Quran or change it. They were telling to him alter Allah's legislation but the Messenger told them that he could not grant their request because those revelations were from Allah which he also had no opinion or option but to follow them. So if Allah did not grant the Messenger permission to add or remove from the religion because it is His, who amongst Man or Jinn would He grant it?!
Personally, that aspect of the Shaikh Jabata's Da’wah that be bidah not being divided is one of the clearest ones among his stances.

[Later In sha Allah, I will still write more]

© Abu Abdillah al Abuduwiyy

Where is the number

*Khutbah jumuah sheikh muhammad ali jabata (hafidhollah)

rodu on the muqolidoon and those who say shirik asgar does not take one out of islam*
After the khutbah aja the sheikh said oh people this khutbah is on muqolid ( blindly following some one) becaus some people beieve that we CAN blind follow and ignorance person, mubtadia, or an alim salafiyyah (knowledgeable person ) even though it is against a clear prove or ijmau sahaba sahaba by using this prove.. *Ask those that know of you dont knon*
Oh my brothers in islam this ayah that is mentioned above serve as a clear prove that it is permissible that taqleed is permissible for an illitrate that HAS no knowledge nor have a power to do ijtihad then our sheikh al-banee have already explained this in his book *Asalafiyyah, aqiqotuha, usuluha* what is compolsary for every muslim is to worship Allah with kitab wa sunnah this is what is compolsary for every muslim without iktilaf (difference) between an alim, mutalim (student) and an illitrate.
The difference is in the uslub that is how will an alim know the judgement of Allah and how will the illitrate know the judgement of Allah.? .... There is a very grate difference an alim will know the judgement of Allah by learning kitab wa sunnah an illitrate who cant read or write, how will he know the judgement of Allah? When he sees the quran he cant read even the hadith he cant read? Responce!!! Is that Allah says *Ask those that know if you dont know*
*SECOND PART*
After the sheikh send salawat on the prophet he continues by saying oh my brothers in islam verilly the difference between an alim and an illitrate is NOT limited to following kitab wa sunnah but the difference is in the uslub in knowing what is compolsary to follow in kitab wa sunnah that is why sheikh al-banee said that the wassilla (channel) of an illitrate to knowing the judgement of Allah and His prophet is through an alim (a learned person) as for alim he his a wassilla ( channel) and NOT qhoyyah (purpose) (that is the scholar is NOT what to follow but to direct you to kitab wa sunnah) for the aim is to follow Allah and His messenger, so if there is any affairs that goes against this, then it is a clear misguidance.. (dolala mubeen) the sheikh continues by saying, that u dont Ask abh the judgement of Allah or His prophet but you Ask an alim his opinion saying whats ur opinion on this? Then he makes mistake for him and he will take it. And he continues by commenting on the ayah *Ask those that know if you dont know*
The sheikh said on
*what*? *on opinion of so and so*? *or madhab so and so*? *or ijtihad* so and so? Or istinbat so and so? *Or what Allah says and His messenger*
The answer to this is that we Ask about the judgement of Allah that He sent down in His book and to His prophet. Our noble sheikh said in summarry *following an alim is a wassilla (channel) not a ghoya (aim) becaus it is a channel for knowing the judgement of Allah and His messenger. Sheikh islam ibn tamiyyah in his book (ar rodu ala bakri) pg 149) he said Allah will not forgives that you associate partners(shirik) with him even if it is shirik asgar. He said "the ayah *Allah will not forgives shirik*
That is includes both shirik akbar and asgar , that Allah will not forgives both.. And some of the salaf are saying that the ayah is only talking about shirik akbar without delil from kitab wa sunnah.
The end....
I say, this is the refutation of he who thinks we must follow the scholar, like following saudi, even though it go against kitab wa sunnah like rasheed mustafa did by sending video of people eating with spoon even though there is no prove that the did but whats if they eat with spoon, does that change Allah's judgement? Wallohi kala.... The prove is one... And this is also a refutation on who believe that shirik asgar does not take one out of islam......
Written by abubilal .

*DEMOCRACY IS KUFRU*



Say: It is when the people govern themselves by themselves without a (revealed) Book or Sunnah.

Basic Principles on the Subjects of Tawheed, Fiqh and 'Aqeedah

*What is ITS hukmu ruling?*

Say: It is major Shirk (polytheism).
The proof for this is Allaah’s saying:
إِنِ الْحُكْمُ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ

"Verily, the rule belongs to none but Allaah."
Surah Yoosuf: 40
And He says:
وَلا يُشْرِكُ فِي حُكْمِهِ أَحَداً

"And no one shares in His Rule."
Surah Al-Kahf: 26

Basic Principles on the Subjects of Tawheed, Fiqh and 'Aqeedah

*What is its ruling?*

Say: It is major Shirk (polytheism).
The proof for this is Allaah’s saying:
إِنِ الْحُكْمُ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ

"Verily, the rule belongs to none but Allaah."
Surah Yoosuf: 40
And He says:
وَلا يُشْرِكُ فِي حُكْمِهِ أَحَداً

"And no one shares in His Rule."
Surah Al-Kahf: 26

Basic Principles on the Subjects of Tawheed, Fiqh and 'Aqeedah

*What is the reality of elections?*

Say: It is from the democratic systems that seek to wipe away Allaah’s true Laws. It is also an imitation of the disbelievers, and it is not permissible to imitate them. There are many dangers that can be found in elections and not one single benefit or advantage for the Muslims. From the most significant of its dangers is that it makes an equal balance between the truth and falsehood as well as the truthful one and the false one, all in accordance to what the majority holds. It also neglects loyalty and disloyalty (for the sake of Allaah). It also tears apart the unity of the Muslims and instead places enmity, hatred, partisanship and fanaticism between them, not to mention fraud, deception, trickery, dishonesty, wastage of time and wealth, the elimination of women’s chastity, and an unstable trust in the Islamic sciences and its people.

Basic Principles on the Subjects of Tawheed, Fiqh and 'Aqeedah.

This is what the munaafiqeen are calling you to, they want you to be the allies of shaytaan (their master).

Repent and return to the camp of Allah or you wait to be repented and return to Allaah without any good deeds.

*SHEIKH MUHAMMAD ALI*
*JABATA KHUTBAH*
*JUMUAH-29/12/18*

After khutbah haja the sheikh said
Oh people this khutbah is Based on eid. Oh
people Verily the eid of muslims are seven,
eid fitr, eid adha, jumuah, arafa the three
ayam tashriq. THE mubtadia (people of
bidah), the Christians, the jews, have
already increased in eid. from it is maolud
nabiy nabiy, christmas and the eid that
those Christians and muslim are
participating in the first day of their
calender (that is january) and know that
these two eid (christmas and new year) is
not in islam And its not permisible to
participate in it. Because everyone Have
their eid the kufar (disbeliver) have their
own eid the muslims have their own eid..
And it is not befitting a Muslim to
participate in this newly invented Eid …
and the prove is the Hadith of Aisha that
the prophet tell abubakr that verilly
everyone have their Eid and this is our
eid.in another narration everyone have
their Eid and this day is our eid.in another
narration oh abubakr verill this is the day
of Eid .this Hadith shows that people
during jahliyyah the kufar have the Eid
they are doing the Christian’s have theirs
and the Jew have their and when Allah
raised the prophet all this Eid have been
abolished …and non of it remain .

*SECOND PART….*


All praise is to Allah and blessings and
salutations on the prophet and the end is
for the Muslim and no one hate them
except they are dholimun ..oh people
verilly the slaughtering ,food ,drinks ,of
the Christian’s and Jews is permissible to
be eaten but if it it’s on the day of their
Eid then it is not permissible to eat their
slughtering ,food,drinks, on that day.
Abu dawud reported in his Sunnah by
thabit ibn dhahak .the time of the prophet
a man took a vow to slaughter a camel at
buwanah.so he came to the prophet and
said I have taken a vow to sacrifice a
camel at buwanah .
The prophet asked did the place contain
any idol worshipped,in jahliyyah they said
No.the prophet said was any pre Islamic
festival observed there ,they replied
No.the prophet said fufil your vow.for a
vow done at act of disobedience to Allah
should not be fufilled.neither must one do
something over which an human being
have no control .this show that any oath
make that is not in disobedience to Allah
then it is a must to fufil the oath but if it
is the place you want to do it is free from
idols or the Eid of jahlliyyah then it is
permissible to fufil the oath.this is a very
strong prove that it is permissible but if it
is in relation with those mubtadia Eid then
it is not permissible .that is why fadilatu
sheikh salih uthaimeen said in his taliq
on sheikh ibn tamiyya in his book
ikhtidohu siratu mustaqeem he said
anything in relation to maolud,Christmas
etc then it is not permissible to give,or sell
or eat them because it is in connection
with all those bidah…. Translated by
abubilal

TODAY JUMUAH KHUTBAH
BY SHEIKH MUHAMMAD
ALI JABATA.2018/11/16
After the khutbah haja, the sheikh said
“oh people verilly this sermon is about
takfir muayan (calling individual kafir
after shuroot) because their are some
people going against affirming kufr akbar,
or nifakq akbar, or dhulm akbar, or bidah
or Shirk on individual when they fall in it
after the shuroot (stipulated terms).
From them are people who knows and also
those who don’t know it is compolsary to
explain this issue. ”
“oh brothers in islam affirming kufr, Shirk,
bidah, or nifakq, akbar, or dhulm akbar,
or fisq akbar, after the stipulated terms is
Sunnah and not bidah.
For the prophet approved umar when he
called dhul khuwasiro (leader of the
khaway) a munafiq and also when kholid
ibn walid called the same man a munafiq.
(that is the prophet did not go against both
of them calling him a munafiq akbar :that
is a kafir) ”
Our sheikh muhammad Ali jabata (may
Allah be pleased with him) continue by
saying that it has already preceded you
(you already know before) that the Sunnah
of the prophet can be through his words,
actions or what He approved. And the
prophet approved umar on calling dhul
khuwasiro a munafiq (akbar) and this is a
clear prove that we can affirm kufr, Shirk,
and bidah, or nifaqk Akbar, or dhulm
akbar or fisq akbar, after the shuroot
(stipulated terms) is Sunnah and not
bidah.


SECOND PART OF THE KHUTBAH


Oh brothers in islam, umar called dhul
khuwasiro a munafiq (kafir) and the
prophet appeoved it, and the hadith is
reported by muslim
Jabir b. Abdullah reported that a person
came to the Messenger of Allah (SallAllah-
u-Alaihi-wa-Sallam) at Ja’rana on his way
back from Hunain, and there was in the
clothes of Bilal some silver. The Messenger
of Allah (SallAllah-u-Alaihi-wa-Sallam)
took a handful out of that and bestowed it
upon the people. He dhul khuwasiro said
to the prophet : Muhammad, do justice. He
(the Holy Prophet) said: Woe be upon you,
who would do justice if I do not do justice,
and you would be very unfortunate and a
loser if I do not do justice. Upon this Umar
b. Khattab (Allah be pleased with him)
said: Permit me to kill this hypocrite. Then
the prophet said don’t kill him so that
people will not say am killing my
companions.
As well as ibn Abbass called mikail enemy
of Allaah reported by bukhari in his Book
of (“ilm) and muslim, its isnad goes to
sai’d ibn jubair he said mikail said that
the musa of bani israil is not the musa that
accompany nabiy khidr and ibn abbass
said “THE ENEMY OF ALLAH LIED”
Upon this our noble sheikh muhammad Ali
jabata ended by saying “OH BROTHES IN
ISLAM IBN ABASS AFFIRMED KUFR ON A
PERSON BECAUSE CALLING SOMEONE THE
ENEMY OF ALLAH CAN NOT BE USED
EXCEPT FOR A KAFIR.”
Translated BY : ABUBILAL
ABDULKUDUS

Pls let see the pics

08091608795

Ami olohun is not truly divine he belong to sufi

Havilah93: No gadget to sell, but since I live here, I dont know if anyone has an Idea of where I can fix a broken android phone screen

go 2 Tecno care

is just funny things dats not d sign of end of time

Amin olorun is truely a devine man of God let's suppot him

It is not lndomie, it just look like indomie simple stuff.

U all olodos simple stuff ,yoruba believe dat we are going 2 die in a position either standing,siting,etc dat why dey do greet eku.eku translation mean die why siting.But in English word well_ done

leave dis man jare face us own business.

God knows who is worshiping him.4 me i dont beleive dat dis man is man of God.