₦airaland Forum

PaulAris:
Not just this year or even series alone.
I did see a movie one time, "The Perfect Date".
So the protagonist as got this bestfriend who is gay.
I mean, the sexual orientation of the guy wasn't even relevant or needed. They just wanted to make sure homosexuality was invoved in the movie, just like they put in every movie.
And it is really working and having effect on people, cause right now, most of my girls are craving for an homo for a bestie. Just imagine that.
Cause the guy was all just so soft and charming. Yuck
...
Tyler Posey I guess.
The dude was gay? I knew a lot of girls who were hittin' on that dude.
Well life isn't fair, is it.

0ppa:
I have warned you not to tag me.

0ppa:
All right, he has stove. Can she do anything to make it right? No. Why worry? Secondly, a guy's presence while cooking actually means he is inspecting the meal, right? Okay, let's assume he is inspecting it, is she is wife? Why must he trust her? What Nigerian law is against inspecting a cook, if this is the case?
If there is, let her sue him.

PaulAris:
I'm not god, so I do not judge too.
Its admiration, an human nature.
...
Indifferent too?
That has been your favourite line on here, that, I noticed, hehe!

You know, subconsciously, we are starting to accept Gayism as an orientation.
Thanks to Hollywood and their style of passing across subliminal messages.
Who knows, in the next 7 years, the Nigerian society might finally accept it.
There's so much going on.

MediaLife:
A female Pastor dies in church, tells members she will only resurrect if she receives offers.

According to the video, the pastor was seen as she dies inside the church during service and members were dropping money on her to resurrect.

Watch video:

Source: https://www.mediahelm.com.ng/2019/04/female-pastor-dies-in-church-and-only.html
Mynd44
Lalasticlala
Seun

PaulAris:
Empire huh?
Lol, the message is well recieved.
I would have thought you to have one prudish and uptight personality. Joys my heart that you're not, lol.
Don't worry, its nothing to worry bout'

[At Bold]; Interesting... so how do you view it?
Certainly not like Nigerians do, I suppose

PaulAris:
Yh, I figured out.

Only do straight huh?
The society doesn't even condone bi- or homos, so its only normal, to go for what you see.
Lol.. I need not anymore, my memory has provided me with a picture. Very naughty

MuttleyLaff:
This is interesting how and why you dont put no judgment on sexuality. Do you know that judging a person doesnt define who they are but it defines who you are, same way it does with elated177

There is a time and persons to judge though, people like elated177, Jesus would have wasted no time in hastily not judging them, He would have judged them for being hypocrites who should have known better than be predijuced and discriminative

Baddiezz, this is hypothetically speaking, if it is your mom, dad, brother(s), sister(s), uncle(s), aunt(s), nephew(s), niece(s), cousin(s) kid(s) or grandkid(s) that is part of a two easy going, ordinary consenting adults, minding their own businesses enjoying a life long caring, faithful, committed, truthful, honest, loving each other, lasting that's a lifetime life-long and loyal same-sex relationship, that is not causing damage or harm to another person, not betraying of another person, or even, not cheating on another person, and not being harmful to an object or neighbour, who love each other, enjoy each other’s company, are mutually respectful to each other, mutually supportive to each other, and all that and more, sometimes without sex necessarily being the leading or most important thing for them, would you still be indifferent huh?

Like I earlier typed, unfortunately Matt Slick the author of that post isnt on Nairaland to defend and give answers to posed questions concerning what he typed in that material. As it is, I repeat, there are too many presuppositions in the write-up. It will fall apart, like a cheap China made fabric when the threads are pulled at the seams. Also it has too many holes in the write up, to say, its competing with a Swiss cheese is an understatement.

I am not following, how do you mean "by the way you completely ignored to bring me up"

PaulAris:
Waitt.. was you referring to both sexes when you said "both"?
Oh crap, I retrace my steps.
Females only, straight and bi was my definition of "both".

So I rephrase my question, you'd swing with bi nigga, or its straight for you?

PaulAris:
Bruh? I'm too sexy for that.
...
I have no prob with both.
Its got a nice ring to it. Its wicked, its forbidden, its sexy, its naughty and its so much fun.
Not as if I've had that much experience tho.

How bout' you, do you swing both ways or you like them totally female?

MuttleyLaff:
You probably both acting under the influence of having had one too many to drink

Except you're sexually attracted to the female sex or find the them sexually attracted to, you being female, then you might not be a lesbian

Thank for bringing this to our attention from ABCthings, unfortunately Matt Slick the author of that post isnt on Nairaland to defend and give answers to posed questions concerning what he typed in that material.

I am sure, you can attest that there are too many presuppositions in the write-up. It will fall apart, like a cheap China made fabric when the threads are pulled at the seams. Also it has too many holes in the write up, to say, its competing with a Swiss cheese is an understatement.

Baddiezz, posters like , related and others dont know their onions and so cant stand the heat. Simple battery of questions quickly distinguishes the boys from the men, the boys just develop tongue ties and go hide under a cloak of silence. These guys dont know the Bible and dont do proper Bible study.

Baddiezz have you got issues with two easy going, ordinary consenting adults, minding their own businesses enjoying a life long caring, faithful, committed, truthful, honest, loving each other, lasting that's a lifetime life-long and loyal same-sex relationship, that is not causing damage or harm to another person, not betraying of another person, or even, not cheating on another person, and not being harmful to an object or neighbour, who love each other, enjoy each other’s company, are mutually respectful to each other, mutually supportive to each other, and all that and more, sometimes without sex necessarily being the leading or most important thing for them huh?
cc ,

PaulAris:
Hey Foxy,
Its kinda silly how your comment brought me here.

ABCthings:
lemme share you a view on Christianity and Homosexuality



The homosexuals and lesbians have gained considerable political and social momentum in America. They have "come out" as the term goes, left their closets, and are knocking on the doors of your homes. Through TV, radio, newspapers, and magazines, they are preaching their doctrine of tolerance, equality, justice, and love. They do not want to be perceived as abnormal or dangerous. They want acceptance and they want you to welcome them with open, loving arms, approving of what they do.

In numerous states in America, several bills have been introduced by the pro-homosexual politicians to ensure that the practice of homosexuality is a right protected by law. Included in these bills are statements affecting employers, renters, and schools. Churches could possibly be required to hire a quota of homosexuals, and "sensitivity" training courses would be "strongly urged" in various work places. There is even legislation that would force the state to pick up the tab for the defense of homosexual agendas in lawsuits while requiring the non-homosexual side to pay out of his/her pocket. Is this fair? Of course not. But fairness isn't the real issue here. It is social engineering. Think about it, the homosexual community wants legal protection for having intercourse with people of the same sex. And, if that weren't enough, it wants its views taught in schools, promoted over the airwaves, and codified in literature.

The Christian church, however, has not stood idly by. When it has spoken out against this political immorality, the cry of "separation of church and state" is shouted at the so-called "religious bigots." But when the homosexual community attempts to use political power to try and control the church and get its agenda taught in schools, no such cry of bigotry is heard from the sacred halls of the media. Why? Because it isn't politically correct to side with Christians.

What does the Bible say?

The Bible, as God's Word, reveals God's moral character and it shapes the morality of the Christian. The Bible has much to say about homosexuality:
1.Lev. 18:22 , "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."
2.Lev. 20:13, "If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltness is upon them."
3.1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals,1 10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
4.Rom. 1:26-28, "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. 28And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper."

With such clear statements against homosexuality, it is difficult to see how different groups can say the Bible supports homosexuality. But they try by redefining love, marriage, sex, homosexuality, etc., in order to accomplish their goal. The truth is that God created man and woman, not man and man, or woman and woman. Nevertheless, the Bible is a powerful book, and because of that the homosexuals often try and make the Bible agree with their agenda. But it doesn't work. The Bible does not support homosexuality, as we have seen from the scriptures above.

Unlike other sins, this sexual sin has a judgment administered by God Himself: He gives them over to their passions (Rom. 1:26-28). This means that their hearts are allowed to be hardened by their sins. As a result, they can no longer see the error of what they are doing. Without an awareness of their sinfulness, there will be no repentance. Without repentance, there will be no forgiveness. Without forgiveness, there is no salvation.

Should homosexuals be allowed to marry one another?

In this politically correct climate that relinquishes morality to the relativistic whims of society, stating that homosexuals should not marry is becoming unpopular. Should a woman be allowed to marry another woman? Should a man be allowed to marry another man? Should they be given legal protection and special rights to practice their homosexuality? No, they should not.

The Bible, of course, condemns homosexuality. It takes no leap of logic to discern that homosexual marriage is also condemned. But our society does not rely on the Bible for its moral truth. Instead, it relies on humanistic and relativistic morals upon which it builds its ethical structure.

Homosexuality is not natural. Just look at the male and female bodies. They are obviously designed to couple. The natural design is apparent. It is not natural to couple male with male and female with female. It would be like trying to fit two screws together or two nuts together and then say, "See, its natural for them to go together."

Homosexuals argue that homosexuality is natural since it occurs in the animal world. But this is problematic. It is true that this behavior occurs in the animal kingdom, but it is also true that we see animals eating their prey alive and even their own young. We see savagery, cruelty, and extreme brutality. Yet, we do not condone such behavior in our own society. Proponents of the natural order argument should not pick-and-choose the situations that best fit their agendas. They should be consistent and not compare us to animals. We are not animals. We are made in God's image.

Where will it end?

Political protection of a sexual practice is ridiculous. I do not believe it is proper to pass laws stating that homosexuals have 'rights' to have sex with one another and then redefine marriage to include their views. If they can do that, then where will it end? What about pedophilia or bestiality? These are also sexual practices. Should they, too, be protected by law? If homosexuality is protected legally, why not those as well?

What should be the Christian's Response to the Homosexual?

Just because someone is a homosexual does not mean that we cannot love him (or her) or pray for him (or her). Homosexuality is a sin, and like any other sin, it needs to be dealt with in the only way possible. It needs to be laid at the cross and repented of.

Christians should pray for the salvation of the homosexual the same way they would any other person in sin. They should treat homosexuals with the same dignity as they would anyone else because, like it or not, they are made in the image of God. However, this does not mean that Christians should approve of their sin. Not at all. Christians should not compromise their witness for a politically correct opinion that is shaped by guilt and fear.

In fact, the following verses should be kept in mind when dealing with homosexuals.
•"Conduct yourselves with wisdom toward outsiders, making the most of the opportunity. 6 Let your speech always be with grace, seasoned, as it were, with salt, so that you may know how you should respond to each person," (Col. 4:5-6).
•"But the goal of our instruction is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith," (1 Tim. 1:5).

You do not win people to the Lord by condemning them and calling them names. This is why God says to speak with wisdom, grace, and love. Let the love of Christ flow through you so that the homosexuals can see true love and turn to Christ instead of away from Him.

Objections Answered

1) If you want to say homosexuality is wrong based on the O.T. laws, then you must still uphold all of the laws in Leviticus and Deuteronomy.

The Old Testament laws are categorized into three groups: the civil, the priestly, and the moral. The civil laws must be understood in the context of a theocracy. Though the Jewish nation in the Old Testament was often headed by a king, it was a theocratic system with the Scriptures as a guide to the nation. Those laws that fall under this category are not applicable today because we are not under a theocracy.

The priestly laws dealing with the Levitical and Aaronic priesthoods were representative of the future and true High Priest, Jesus, who offered Himself as a sacrifice on the cross. Since Jesus fulfilled the priestly laws, they are no longer necessary to be followed and are not applicable now.

The moral laws, on the other hand, are not abolished because the moral laws are based upon the character of God. Since God's holy character does not change, the moral laws do not change either. Therefore, the moral laws are still in effect.

In the New Testament, we do not see a reestablishment of the civil or priestly laws, but we do see a reestablishment of the moral law. This is why we see New Testament condemnation of homosexuality as a sin, but not with the associated death penalty.

2) Homosexuality is a sin if committed outside of a loving, committed, relationship. But a committed homosexual relationship is acceptable to God. This is a fallacious argument.

Homosexuality is never defined in the Bible in an acceptable behavior if it were practiced by individuals who had a loving relationship with each other. Homosexuality is always condemned. Homosexual acts are not natural acts and they are against God's-created order. As stated above in the article, male and female are designed to fit together -- in more ways than one. This is how God made us, and he made us this way so that we could carry out his command of filling the earth with people. Homosexuality is an aberration of God's created order and makes it impossible to fulfill the command that God has given mankind.

Whether or not a homosexual couple is committed to each other is irrelevant to the argument since love and feelings do not change moral truths. If a couple, not married to each other but married to someone else, commits adultery, yet they are committed to loving each other, their sin is not excused.

If homosexuality is made acceptable because the homosexual couple "loves" each other and are committed to each other, by that logic we can say that couples of the same sex or even of different sexes who love each other and are committed to each other in a relationship automatically make that relationship morally correct. The problem is that love is used as an excuse to violate Scripture. Second, it would mean that such things as pedophilia would be acceptable if the "couple" had a loving and committed relationship to each other. Third, the subjectivity of what it means to "love" and be "committed" to another person can be used to justify almost any sort of behavior.

3) Where homosexuality is mentioned in the Bible, it is not how we relate to it in the 21st century. It meant something different to the people in Biblical times and has nothing to do with modern-day homosexuality.

The four Scriptures listed above refute this idea. Let's look at what they say and see if there is some misunderstanding: The first Scripture in Leviticus says that it is an abomination for a man to lie with another man as he would lie with a woman. Obviously, this is referring to a sexual relationship, and it is condemned. The second Scripture in Leviticus says the same thing. The third Scripture in 1 Corinthians outright condemns homosexuality. And finally, Romans clearly describes a homosexual act as being indecent.

There is no mistake about it, the view of homosexuality in the Old Testament as well as the New is a very negative one. It is consistently condemned as being sinful.

Whether or not people in the 21st-century think homosexuality is acceptable or not has absolutely no bearing on whether or not it is sinful before God. God exists, and he is the standard of righteousness. Whether or not anyone believes this, or believes that morality is a flowing and vague system of development over time, has no bearing on truth. God has condemned homosexuality as a sin in the Bible. It is a sin that needs to be repented of, the same as any other sin, and the only way to receive forgiveness is through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ.

4) The sin of Sodom was actually the sin of inhospitality.

This is a common error made by supporters of homosexuality. The problem with this explanation is that it does not account for the offering of Lot's daughter to the men outside the home, a sinful act indeed, but one that was rejected by the men outside who desired to have relations with the two angels in Lot's home. Gen. 19:5 says, "and they called to Lot and said to him, 'Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have relations with them.'" Those men wanted to have sexual relations with the angels who appeared also as males. Does it make sense to claim that God destroyed two cities because the inhabitants weren't nice to visitors? If that were the case, then shouldn't God destroy every household that is rude to guests? Gen. 18:20 says that the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah was "exceedingly grave." Not being hospitable to someone has never been considered an exceedingly grave sin, especially in the Bible. But, going against God's created order in violation of his command to fill and multiply the earth in the act of homosexuality is an exceedingly grave sin. In fact, we know that it is exceedingly grave because in Romans we read about the judgment of God upon the homosexuals, in that he gives them over to the depravity of their hearts and minds. This is a serious judgment of God upon the sinner because it means that the sinner will not become convicted of his or her sins and will not repent. Without repentance there is no salvation, and without salvation there is damnation. Therefore, the argument that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because they were not hospitable carries no validity.

by Matt Slick

toprealman:
Is it your travel he travelled? How does that bother you?

mosho2good:
The current Bride price for Nigeria Ladies In 2019 from the Ministry of Women Affairs;

GUYS, TO MARRY DON CHEAP NOW O THANK GOD. LADIES, Please check your name and know your worth.

1. Patience #17,600
2. Esther #7,200
3. Margret #28,000
4. Cecelia #9,800
5. Alice #15,000
6. Victoria #300bn
7. Felicia#46,000
8. Twins #82,000
9. Charity #3,200
10. Shola#62,000
11. Grace #21,000
12. Susan #free
13. Tina #6,350
14. Loveth #98,000
15. Blessing #8,980
16. Doris/Dorcas #32,140
17. Juliana #17,300
18. Emmanuella #81,000
19. Joy #92,460
20. Cynthia #24,600
21. Racheal #2,600
22. Abigail #17,600
23. Jennifer #29,000
24. Rose #61,000
25. Wumi#82,750
26. Tabitha #79,250
27. Peace #Free
28. Ruth #1,200
29. Janet #24,960
30. Sarah #5,500
31. Banke #33,200
32. Gloria #41,000
33. Tomiwa#37,300
34. Lina#99,780
35. Ifeoma # Free
36. Derin / doreen #49,000
37. Favour #50,880
38. Gladys #10,000
39. Miracle / marvelous #37,500
40. Happiness #46,000
41. Lara #59,000
42. Vera #63,500
43. Becky #4,600
44. Lola #16,000
45. Judith #2,500
46. Hannah #3,200
47. Florence #800
48. Dammy #21,000
49. Queen #200,000
50.tosin #45,000
51. Ibunkun /bunkumi #11,000
52. Freedah #free
53. Dolapo#700
54. odun#56,400
55. Norah/Dora #32,640
56. Destiny #79,200
57. Caro #6,700
58. Mariam/ Munirat #49,980
59. Hauwa #free
60. Aisha/Amina # 1 carton of ice fish
61. Vivian #7,000
62. Juliet #18,000
63. Chidimma #2520
64. Kofo #85,000
65. Shakirat #7,120
66. Olamide#3,250
67. Islamiat #12,000
68. Aminat #8,000
69. Priscilla/Praise #19,250
70. Ronke #820
71. Oyin #105
72. Goodness #250
73. Bidemi #300
74. Bukky #3,500
75. Pelumi#320
76. Stella #3,650
77. Rejoice #5,600
78 precious #broom
79 .toyin #Free
80. Amaka #70
81. Chidera #500
82. Sonia #750
83. Olayemi #300,000
84. Sandra #free
85. Ope #50
86. Bola #200
87.shade #40
88. Deborah#400
89. Kate #1000
90. Temi #10
91. Iyanu#Free
92. Bose #OnCredit
93. Olaitan #270
94. Ifeoluwa #OnCredit
95. Faith #4900
96. Hope / Ireti #309
97. Victoria #100m
98. Ayomide#80
99. Toyin #2egg & 1 indomie
100. Lydia #OnCredit
101. Glory #OnCredit
102. Comfort #Coke&gala
103. Janet #Shawarma
104. Christanah #Goatmeatpeppersoup
105. Favour #20
106. Mercy #90
107. Elizabeth #ChewingGum
108. Rebecca #Suya
109. Ella #Popcorn
110. Hellen 6kg cylinder
111.eniola 1 carton of biscuits
112. Adeola #4bagsofpurewater.
113. Rose 1 big fanta
114. Bisola 1 pack of minimi chinchin
115. Toyin #2000
116. Teemah #10 pure water
117. Seyi #100
118. Tope 2lolipop
119. Pamilerin 2pant

MuttleyLaff:
Tut tut tut.

MuttleyLaff:
Really? Are you now?
How did it happen that you are financially down?
Do you still have the neck chain, top and bottom from your NL profile DP?

MuttleyLaff:
[img]https://s1/images/stirringMuttleylaff.gif[/img]
Literally? How? What's the matter? What happened?

MuttleyLaff:
I know you that, if you ever let your head down, it will be just to admire your shoes but as for me, if and when I look down, it's to see how I am to help up

MuttleyLaff:
Nahin oo

Foodforthought:
Not trying to be holier than thou but why does GOT portray 2 many sex scenes, even incest and women-degrading nudity? It does not really make it exciting!
I feel the show would still be compelling and exciting without the whole sex scenes

delugajackson:
That's our future Evans. I never expected anything less considering his pedigree.

If he were a lady, then we all know the implications. Afterall, our very own Hoe-gina Daniels is taking up from where her mother stopped. We really need to watch out for this guy.

armzyville:
Nawa o for nairaland MODS ..I posted this gist first but it was not pushed to front page...

Kelvin CX:
your DP tho