Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,163,064 members, 7,852,604 topics. Date: Thursday, 06 June 2024 at 09:32 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Barwaaqo's Profile / Barwaaqo's Posts
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 10 pages)
Foreign Affairs / Re: Grabbing Africa's Seeds: USAID, EU And Gates Foundation by barwaaqo: 12:11am On Apr 17, 2015 |
Why African Farmers Do Not Want GMOs Corporate voices and their allies are calling for the promotion of genetically modified seeds - and changes to African laws to enable their spread - as a solution to low food production and hunger in Africa. In October, the World Food Prize was awarded to three scientists, including two from agribusiness giants Monsanto and Syngenta, for their breakthroughs in developing GMOs. The editors of The Washington Post recently appealed to "give genetically modified crops a chance" in Africa and called for an open debate. The Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa, a network of small holder farmers, pastoralists, hunter-gatherers, indigenous peoples, citizens and environmentalists from Africa, is pleased to include the voices of African farmers in that debate. The promotion of GMOs as solution is too often disrespectful to African culture and intelligence and based on a shallow understanding of African agriculture. It is based on the image that is held by many Westerners who see Africa as poor, destitute, starving, disease-ridden, hopeless, helpless that needs to be saved by a white angel from the West. That image allowed colonialists to rationalize their scramble for Africa, and that image is being used by neo-colonialists to rationalize their scramble for African land and natural resources. Those promoting the false solution of GMOs are recommending that African farmers develop a long-term, perhaps irreversible, cycle of dependence on the interests of a small handful of corporate decision-makers to determine what seeds, with what genetic characteristics, and requiring what chemical inputs, will be produced and made available to Africa's people. This is a pathway toward profound vulnerability and centralized decision-making that flies in the face of the best agricultural evidence-based practices and sound policy making. The evidence and our experience with farmers clearly points to a more rational and appropriate path: investing in a transition toward more sustainable and agro-ecological farming systems that trust in the wisdom and capacity of tens of millions of African farmers to control, adapt and make decisions about their genetic resources, as the pathway toward greater well-being and resilience for Africa. What is the story after 20 years of GMO cultivation in the United States? Farmers who took on herbicide-tolerant GMO crops are now struggling with the cost of combating herbicide-resistant super weeds. Some 49 percent of US farms suffer from Roundup-resistant super weeds, a 50 percent increase from the year before. As a result, since 1996 there has been a disproportionate increase in the use of weed killers - more than 225 million kilograms in the United States. Meanwhile, farmers who took on pest-resistant GMO crops are struggling with the cost of secondary pests unaffected by the built-in toxins. In China and India, initial savings from reduced insecticide use with Bt cotton have been eroded as secondary pests emerged. According to the African Centre for Biosafety, in South Africa, single-trait Bt maize (meant to produce toxins to kill pests) has developed such complete insect resistance that it has been withdrawn from the market. In past seasons, extensive product failure meant that farmers were compensated for spraying insecticides on their crops to avoid economic loss. This failed technology will now be introduced to other African countries under the auspices of the Water Efficient Maize for Africa project being promoted by Monsanto and the Gates Foundation. India has just placed a 10-year moratorium on planting its first genetically modified (GM) food crop. Mexico has banned the planting of GM maize, Peru has placed a 10-year moratorium on the import and cultivation of GM seeds, and Bolivia has committed to giving up growing all GM crops by 2015. Last year, China announced a move away from widespread adoption of GM crops for at least the next five years, in favor of developing more sustainable high-yield non-GM crops. Consumers more or less everywhere have been consistently hostile. In the UN Conference on Trade and Development's 2013 Trade and Environment Report, titled "Wake-up before it is too late: make agriculture truly sustainable now for food security in a changing climate," the authors recommend that to meet future challenges, a "rapid and significant shift from conventional, monoculture-based and high-external-input-dependent industrial production towards mosaics of sustainable, regenerative production systems that also considerably improve[d] the productivity of small-scale farmers" is needed. Genetically engineered crops have nothing to do with ending world hunger, no matter how much GMO spokespeople like to expound on this topic. African farmers should be supported in developing and spreading a proven, sustainable farming pathway to feed our people and achieve food sovereignty. Their voices should be given precedence in the debate above the propaganda of corporations, whose goal is to sell more GMOs and chemical inputs. |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 8:07pm On Apr 11, 2015 |
Small markets make it difficult for investors and businesses to make large scale investments and are thus a constraint to the economic development of states. As a consequence of the significant limitations placed on free movement of goods the potential for intra-African trade remains significantly untapped and pan-African business underdeveloped. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Grabbing Africa's Seeds: USAID, EU And Gates Foundation by barwaaqo: 8:05pm On Apr 11, 2015 |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Grabbing Africa's Seeds: USAID, EU And Gates Foundation by barwaaqo: 7:58pm On Apr 11, 2015 |
Patenting seeds pushed by regional organisations in Africa |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 1:19am On Apr 10, 2015 |
Ngugi wa Thiong’o “Our lives are a battlefield on which is fought a continuous war between the forces that are pledged to confirm our humanity and those determined to dismantle it; those who strive to build a protective wall around it, and those who wish to pull it down; those who seek to mould it and those committed to breaking it up; those who aim to open our eyes, to make us see the light and look to tomorrow and those who wish to lull us into closing our eyes” Wish to lull us into sleep |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Grabbing Africa's Seeds: USAID, EU And Gates Foundation by barwaaqo: 1:17am On Apr 10, 2015 |
The article mentioned only a 'few' africans are present at these meetings but the fact that any african would be present at such a meeting is beyond baffling to me. How do you trust a foundation linked to mass sterilization with something as integral to survival as food? What possibly could be gained that couldn't easily be taken back with such a control on your food supply? It's nothing more than a methodical attempt on our livelihood and a catalyst for the total recolonization of africa. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Massacre Of 147 people In Kenya: Face Behind The Attack by barwaaqo: 11:43pm On Apr 05, 2015 |
More security maybe |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Grabbing Africa's Seeds: USAID, EU And Gates Foundation by barwaaqo: 10:00pm On Apr 05, 2015 |
Agreed. This is incredibly questionable. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Grabbing Africa's Seeds: USAID, EU And Gates Foundation by barwaaqo: 7:31pm On Apr 05, 2015 |
.. |
Foreign Affairs / Grabbing Africa's Seeds: USAID, EU And Gates Foundation by barwaaqo: 7:31pm On Apr 05, 2015 |
Grabbing Africa's Seeds: USAID, EU and Gates Foundation Back Agribusiness Seed Takeover The latest salvo in the battle over Africa's seed systems has been fired with the Gates Foundation and USAID playing puppet-masters to Africa's governments - now meeting in Addis Ababa - as they drive forward corporation-friendly seed regulations that exclude and marginalize the small farmers whose seeds and labour feed the continent. A battle is currently being waged over Africa's seed systems. After decades of neglect and weak investment in African agriculture, there is renewed interest in funding African agriculture. These new investments take the form of philanthropic and international development aid as well as private investment funds. They are based on the potentially huge profitability of African agriculture - and seed systems are a key target. Right now ministers are co-ordinating their next steps at the 34th COMESA (Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa) Intergovernmental Committee meeting that kicked off March 22, in preparation for the main Summit that started yesterday and ends today. COMESA's key aim is to pave the way for a "Continental Free Trade Area (CFTA) in 2017 under the auspices of the African Union" with uniform regulations, including on agricultural products, seeds and GMOs. A recent meeting on biotechnology and biosafety was held to establish a "COMESA biotechnology and biosafety policy implementation plan" (COMBIP) to roll out from 2015-2019, "leading to increased biotechnology applications and agricultural commodity trade in the region." But read between the lines and its real purpose was to facilitate the planting and commercialization of GMO crops in Africa all at one go, instead of country by country. USAID Regional representatives for East Africa, based in Nairobi, were present to monitor the process and ensure the desired outcome. And on the agenda for the main COMESA Summit is the approval of a 'Master Plan' for the implementation of the COMESA Harmonised Seed Trade Regulations agreed last year in Kinshasa. The regulations, according to the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa, "will greatly facilitate agricultural transformation in the COMESA member states towards industrialization of farming systems based on the logic of the highly controversial, failed and hopelessly doomed Green Revolution model of agriculture." They "promote only one type of seed breeding, namely industrial seed breeding involving the use of advanced breeding technologies. The entire orientation of the seed Regulations is towards genetically uniform, commercially bred varieties in terms of seed quality control and variety registration." No place for small farmers! "What is very clear is that small farmers in Africa, seeking to develop or maintain varieties, create local seed enterprises or cultivate locally adapted varieties are excluded from the proposed COMESA Seed Certification System and Variety Release System, because these varieties willnot fulfill the requirements for distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS). "Landraces or farmers' varieties usually display a high degree of genetic heterogeneity and are adapted to the local environment under which they were developed. In addition, such varieties are not necessarily distinct from each other." COMESA's key agricultural objectives are to raise production by 6% per year, "integrate farmers into the market economy", make Africa a "strategic player in agricultural science and technology development". To this end USAID is funding COMESA programmes for 'Coordinated Agricultural Research and Technology Interventions' and 'A Regional Approach Towards Biotechnology' - in other words, to create uniform corporation-friendly regulations for seeds, agro-chemicals and GMOs across the region. More than 80% of Africa's seed supply currently comes from millions of small-scale farmers recycling and exchanging seed from year to year. This seed meets very diverse needs in very diverse conditions. Farmers know the quality of 'recycled' seed, selected and saved from their own crops. It is cheap and readily available. New varieties can be introduced through informal trade within villages and beyond. This system may not be perfect, but it has been broadly functional for generations. The so-called 'formal' seed sector is a relatively new addition in Africa and has a narrow focus on commercial crops, especially hybrid maize. This commercial seed may offer yield advantages, but only in the right conditions, e.g. when coupled with continuous use of synthetic fertilizer, irrigation, larger pieces of land and mono-cropping - the Green Revolution package. Seed production in the formal sector goes through a number of stages, starting with breeders' and pre-basic seed which has high varietal purity; then foundation / basic seed, which is a bulking up of the breeders' seed; then larger quantities of certified seed are produced for retail sale to farmers. In most countries in Africa, the public sector was responsible for certified seed production and distribution. Lack of resources, especially following structural adjustment imposed by the World Bank and IMF in the 1980s and 1990s, reduced the effectiveness of this system. As a result, availability of certified seed was sometimes limited and farmers often found it difficult to access this seed. Farmers continued relying on the tried and trusted seed saved on their farms and exchanged with one another. The new commercialisation agenda The new commercialisation agenda is based on the premise that the public sector is inherently incapable of meeting farmer requirements for quality seed. This agenda is led by USAID and other G8 countries especially through the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition, and philanthropic institutions like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) working hand in hand with multinational corporations (MNCs) including Monsanto, Syngenta, Yara and others. The EU also funded a key programme, now concluded, the 'COMESA Regional Agro-Inputs Programme' (COMRAP), to the tune of €20 million, which aims to "reach farmers in each country to improve their sustainable access to agro-inputs and services", "strengthen the capacity for the improvement of seed quality" and "harmonise seed trade regulations throughout the COMESA region". The first line of attack was to argue for the privatisation of certified seed production and distribution, ostensibly to generate competition. This was identified as a profitable niche in a sector otherwise characterised by low demand, partly because farmers did not have the resources to pay for commercial seed, and partly because their seed needs were already being met through existing systems of production and distribution managed by farmers themselves. Over the past two decades, a long and slow process of seed law reviews, sponsored by USAID and the G8, BMGF and others has secured this space for private companies to profit from seed production. This opened the door to MNC involvement in seed production, including the acquisition of every sizeable seed enterprise on the continent. The focus remained on hybrid maize and a few other commercial crops with high demand at national level, or niche on demand. It now appears that phase two of the commercialisation agenda is being launched. This begins the process of privatising the production of early generation seed (EGS), the breeder and foundation seed. Already plant variety protection laws are being enacted to allow for private ownership of germplasm previously in the public domain. Now Green Revolution pundits are looking for opportunities to remove public control of potentially profitable processes in EGS production. Gates, USAID and Deloitte study ways to commercialise early generation seed production To this end, BMGF and USAID commissioned US strategy consulting firm Monitor-Deloitte to identify private business opportunities in EGS production. The study was conducted in Ethiopia, Ghana, Nigeria, Tanzania and Zambia on maize, rice, sorghum, cowpea, common beans, cassava and sweet potato. BMGF and USAID have handpicked an elite group to meet behind closed doors in London in March 2015 to discuss the consultant's report and to strategise on how to open up another front in the battle to turn African seed into a profit-making venture for MNCs. What is remarkable about this meeting is that there are very few Africans present. Those who are there mostly represent private sector interests, including seed companies and traders' associations. There are no farmer representatives. This raises serious concerns about the transparency and accountability of these processes. The image of colonial robber barons meeting in secret to carve up the African continent arises unbidden in the mind. Private sector cherry picking with public subsidy The Deloitte report exposes a typical approach of private sector 'cherry picking', where private companies identify profitable activities for their own involvement. While complaining incessantly about "heavy state involvement" they still insist on selected heavy state involvement to cover unprofitable interventions so that the private sector can take the profitable activities. These include establishing systems, developing institutions, and even engaging in some productive activities where profits are unlikely but which are needed to allow the profit-making scheme to function. The report uses cowpea production in Ghana as an example of where the public sector should carry the extremely expensive breeder seed costs to allow the private sector to profit in seed multiplication and distribution. Breeder seed is prohibitively costly because of low multiplication rates and low demand. But the demand that exists is nonetheless lucrative, so the private sector wants to be involved in those parts of the production process identified as profitable. Where the whole chain is profitable, Deloitte proposes the public sector be locked out of the production process. Examples are hybrid maize or closed value chains where there is strong but limited demand and early production processes are also potentially profitable, for example hybrid sorghum for brewing. Deloitte's proposal to "channel government and donor financing into supporting mechanisms for private investment in seed production" is a route to effectively subsidising MNCs at the expense of building farmer capacity and resilience to produce quality seed to meet their own context-specific needs. Active role for farmers disregarded A potential role for farmers in production or distribution of seed is not even considered in the study, from conception to results. Indeed farmers are viewed only as passive consumers of seed produced by others for a profit. While we can acknowledge that farmer-managed systems are not perfect, these systems have survived through extremely adverse conditions. They undoubtedly form a base for seed production and distribution that can be built on. But they require support, especially from public R& and extension services. There is a growing movement in Africa to reassert the enduring importance of farmer-managed seed systems. Even under ideal circumstances, MNCs will not venture into the production of many small crops where demand is fragmented nationally but is very strong in local pockets. The MNC business model of economies of scale and standardised products cannot respond to the diverse needs of asset-poor but dynamic African farmers. Rather than engaging in partnerships with MNCs with dubious long-term benefits for farmers, it will be far better for the public sector to orient the capacity and resources at its disposal to work directly with farmers to build on existing seed production and distribution activities. 2 Likes 2 Shares |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 7:25pm On Apr 05, 2015 |
There are many African leaders who still strongly believe that the problems of Africa can solely be solved from outside Africa although they do not say it but their reliance on former colonial masters is a pointer to the fact that they do not have an independent mind of their own. Some of the problems of the continent are internally generated and add to an international economic system that is already unfriendly to Africa. The continent cannot continue to be consumers in this competitive global world but to become aggressive producers to conquer the home market in the medium and short term and begin to reach out to the wider world in the long run. A very high level of competitiveness can be attained by merging different economies for a single but greatly diversified economy of Africa. Diversification and sharing of experiences will stabilise these economies and they will be able to prevent their exploitation. Will a man be a man without a mind of his own |
Culture / Re: Why Is There No Guidance Book For African Traditional Religion? by barwaaqo: 2:21am On Apr 03, 2015 |
bilms: Too much chance of further corrupting the tradition. The only way I could endorse a universally available book on our spiritual practices would be to condense it into a very rudimentary format. I'm thinking the 42 laws of maat, convergence of mythologies, how to set up an ancestral altar and basic benevolent rituals, any more than that would be too dangerous in my opinion. 3 Likes |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 2:16am On Apr 03, 2015 |
Robert Mugabe "Get them to get out of the regional shell and get into one continental shell " What does he know 1 Like |
Culture / Re: Why Is There No Guidance Book For African Traditional Religion? by barwaaqo: 3:08am On Mar 31, 2015 |
On second thoughts maybe this universal book would be a bad idea, something like this can backfire on us! Again it just shows the wisdom of our forefathers they knew some africans just don't know when to shut up about certain things. I don't know if we should endorse something like this I mean obviously certain information isn't meant to be shared with the world. We may need to send up some praise for this one |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 2:52am On Mar 31, 2015 |
Sam Nujoma “Independence is only the prelude to a new and more involved struggle for the right to conduct our own economic and social affairs; to construct our society according to our aspirations, unhampered by crushing and humiliating neo-colonialist control and interference.” It is clear that the renewed geo-political interest in Africa, especially its natural resources and potential markets, is leading to attempts by former colonial powers to reclaim the ground we have gained in terms of African self-determination. It is important that we tap on the expertise of our brothers in the Diaspora and embark upon strategies which promote manufacturing and adding value to our natural resources. It is only in that manner that we will be able to create wealth, enhance economic growth and improve the competitiveness of our economies in the international markets. As a consequence, during the early 1920s, Africans in the Diaspora, through collective efforts, started to intensify the promotion of the ideals of Pan-Africanism which became the philosophy of Africa’s political emancipation, economic recovery and cultural revival and the empowerment of Africans to chart their own future destiny. I can proudly state that the African people did not submit to colonial subjugation and exploitation but rose up in arms to resist colonial occupation through Pan-Africanism. Hmm.. could've sworn pan africanism died with garvey. “Our efforts to promote continental integration must place education of our people at the top of our priorities, as key elements in addressing development challenges” Wonder what nujoma is trying to convey with this one? Perhaps what sam may be trying to say is that if a handful of tribes were capable of decisive change it would have happened by now and we all would see the results. Nujoma must have seen or experienced something that made him arrive at this conclusion |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 12:06am On Mar 30, 2015 |
You're wasting my time axum. |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 11:53pm On Mar 29, 2015 |
Axum I told you that if want my attention you're going to have to start talking in somal'i otherwise I'll think you are not serious! Geeri Islaamka |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 10:25pm On Mar 29, 2015 |
Sango I pray my words are understood and taken well to heart you see I'm not here to cause any more confusion than already exists! Check this out KingSango: [img]http://www.elktonva.gov/images/trashcan.jpg[/img] Love, barwaaqo |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 9:59pm On Mar 29, 2015 |
Twinkle twinkle little star.... trashing rambles straight to MARS! KingSango: [img]http://www.elktonva.gov/images/trashcan.jpg[/img] I'm starting small but don't please don't push me Kingsango |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 9:44pm On Mar 29, 2015 |
Kingsango, I'm going to have to call you a hypocrite First you say there is too much discussion going on but yet all it seems you do is talk talk talk How are good africans suppose to follow and trust you if your hypocrisy is so blatant You see sango you're not the only one with insight that extends beyond the surface. Never underestimate the power of the pan african somali. What do you know about this trash can here? [img]http://www.elktonva.gov/images/trashcan.jpg[/img] I'd advise you to confer with orunmila before you attempt to address me again because this is where I'm going to send your rambles. As the ramblings grow so will the size of the trash can Always loving, barwaaqo 1 Like |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Africans And The Sunni/shia Conflict. by barwaaqo: 7:20pm On Mar 29, 2015 |
Let a'llah sort it out it. 2 Likes |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 7:16pm On Mar 29, 2015 |
@Kingsango, we have to put the whiteman in the middle of it because he is a part of the problem. I'm wishing the best for you take some of that sango creativity to somali. axum: Every true khat chewer knows that somal'i is just fashionable slang From now on you talk to me in somali otherwise you're wasting my time! |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Rich Men In London Still Deciding Africa’s Future by barwaaqo: 4:51pm On Mar 28, 2015 |
Hmm.. |
Foreign Affairs / Rich Men In London Still Deciding Africa’s Future by barwaaqo: 4:49pm On Mar 28, 2015 |
Food, Empire and Colonialism Some £600 million in UK aid money courtesy of the taxpayer is helping big business increase its profits in Africa via the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition. In return for receiving aid money and corporate investment, African countries have to change their laws, making it easier for corporations to acquire farmland, control seed supplies and export produce. Last year, Director of the Global Justice Now Nick Dearden said: “It’s scandalous that UK aid money is being used to carve up Africa in the interests of big business. This is the exact opposite of what is needed, which is support to small-scale farmers and fairer distribution of land and resources to give African countries more control over their food systems. Africa can produce enough food to feed its people. The problem is that our food system is geared to the luxury tastes of the richest, not the needs of ordinary people. Here the British government is using aid money to make the problem even worse.” Ethiopia, Ghana, Tanzania, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Mozambique, Nigeria, Benin, Malawi and Senegal are all involved in the New Alliance. In a January 2015 piece in The Guardian, Dearden continued by saying that development was once regarded as a process of breaking with colonial exploitation and transferring power over resources from the ‘first’ to the ‘third world’, involving a revolutionary struggle over the world’s resources. However, the current paradigm is based on the assumption that developing countries need to adopt neo-liberal policies and that public money in the guise of aid should facilitate this. The notion of ‘development’ has become hijacked by rich corporations and the concept of poverty depoliticised and separated from structurally embedded power relations. To see this in action, we need look no further to a conference held on Monday 23 March in London, organised by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). This secretive, invitation-only meeting with aid donors and big seed companies discussed a strategy to make it easier for these companies to sell patented seeds in Africa and thus increase corporate control of seeds. Farmers have for generations been saving and exchanging seeds among themselves. This has allowed them a certain degree of independence and has enabled them to innovate, maintain biodiversity, adapt seeds to climatic conditions and fend off plant disease. Big seed companies with help from the Gates Foundation, the US government and other aid donors are now discussing ways to increase their market penetration of commercial seeds by displacing farmers own seed systems. Corporate sold hybrid seeds often produce higher yields when first planted, but the second generation seeds produce low yields and unpredictable crop traits, making them unsuitable for saving and storing. As Heidi Chow from Global Justice Now rightly says, instead of saving seeds from their own crops, farmers who use hybrid seeds become completely dependent on the seed, fertiliser and pesticide companies, which can (and has) in turn result in an agrarian crisis centred on debt, environmental damage and health problems. The London conference aimed to share findings of a report by Monitor Deloitte on developing the commercial seed sector in sub-Saharan Africa. The report recommends that in countries where farmers are using their own seed saving networks NGOs and aid donors should encourage governments to introduce intellectual property rights for seed breeders and help to persuade farmers to buy commercial, patented seeds rather than relying on their own traditional varieties. The report also suggests that governments should remove regulations so that the seed sector is opened up to the global market. The guest list comprised corporations, development agencies and aid donors, including Syngenta, the World Bank and the Gates Foundation. It speaks volumes that not one farmer organisation was invited. Farmers have been imbued with the spirit of entrepreneurship for thousands of years. They have been “scientists, innovators, natural resource stewards, seed savers and hybridisation experts” who have increasingly been reduced to becoming recipients of technical fixes and consumers of poisonous products of a growing agricultural inputs industry. So who better than to discuss issues concerning agriculture? But the whole point of such a conference is that the West regards African agriculture as a ‘business opportunity’, albeit wrapped up in warm-sounding notions of ‘feeding Africa’ or ‘lifting millions out of poverty’. The West’s legacy in Africa (and elsewhere) has been to plunge millions into poverty. Enforcing structural reforms to benefit big agribusiness and its unsustainable toxic GMO/petrochemical inputs represents a continuation of the neo-colonialist plundering of Africa. The US has for many decades been using agriculture as a key part of foreign policy to secure global hegemony. Phil Bereano, food sovereignty campaigner with AGRA Watch and an Emeritus Professor at the University of Washington says: “This is an extension of what the Gates Foundation has been doing for several years – working with the US government and agribusiness giants like Monsanto to corporatize Africa’s genetic riches for the benefit of outsiders. Don’t Bill and Melinda realize that such colonialism is no longer in fashion? It’s time to support African farmers’ self-determination.” Bereano also shows how Western corporations only intend to cherry-pick the most profitable aspects of the food production chain, while leaving the public sector in Africa to pick up the tab for the non-profitable aspects that allow profitability further along the chain. Giant agritech corporations with their patented seeds and associated chemical inputs are ensuring a shift away from diversified agriculture that guarantees balanced local food production, the protection of people’s livelihoods and agricultural sustainability. African agriculture is being placed in the hands of big agritech for private profit under the pretext of helping the poor. The Gates Foundation has substantial shares in Monsanto. With Monsanto’s active backingfrom the US State Department and the Gates Foundation’s links with USAID, African farmers face a formidable force. Report after report suggests that support for conventional agriculture, agroecology and local economies is required, especially in the Global South. Instead, Western governments are supporting powerful corporations with taxpayers money whose thrust via the WTO, World Bank and IMF has been to encourage strings-attached loans, monocrop cultivation for export using corporate seeds, the restructuring of economies, the opening of economies to the vagaries of land and commodity speculation and a system of globalised trade rigged in favour of the West. In this vision for Africa, those farmers who are regarded as having any role to play in all of this are viewed only as passive consumers of corporate seeds and agendas. The future of Africa is once again being decided by rich men in London. |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 4:34pm On Mar 28, 2015 |
I'm just happy somali is getting onboard with this thing 2 Likes |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 4:28pm On Mar 28, 2015 |
KingSango: Kingsango I think you have some good ideas but I'm a pan african so any methodology I subscribe to has to be built upon from that angle. The good thing about learning our history is that it allows us not to repeat the same mistakes. There were those inside and outside the movement who became jealous of garvey, combine that with the fact of whites becoming frightened by his success and it's a recipe for disaster. Divide and rule has been the key tactic in suppressing our development. The establishment won't change without a fight so any illusions of a peaceful relinquish of power should be reassessed. The notion of wanting to transition into a traditional government with the plethora of puppets in office might prove to be more than an economic challenge. Again I think you have some good ideas of wanting to enhance the lives of africans and be self sufficient but for africa to take back it's rightful place on the globe we're going to have to confront some hazards. Leave you with a bit of advice don't get yourself too concerned with what others aren't doing it can create mental instability. Instead just focus on what you can accomplish and contriving the best method to that target. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Why South Africa’s Nuclear Stash Worries US by barwaaqo: 1:52am On Mar 27, 2015 |
Good weather, food, decent jazz, accessible infrastructure, neat museums, oh the wine ! |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 1:34am On Mar 27, 2015 |
KingSango: Pan africanism was not started by garvey neither was he the first black in the diaspora to start a "back to africa movement" or to establish a pan african institution. What garvey did was advance pan africanism and there is no doubt he made the greatest contribution to the movement. Everything begins with an idea and it takes discussion to implement those ideas, garvey didn't just come on the scene one day and start buying ships out the blue it probably took an endless amount of dialogue to raise the amount of capital he did. I agree with your points we definitely need to return to traditional beliefs and eliminate the language barrier and as for executive skills and proper civil service pan africanism or not those are just the basic elements to any modern functioning society. Garvey made one point very focal and that was the desire for a united states of africa so any key points we pan africanist decide to shed light on should definitely include the issue of Land. The land will be what provides the true 'framework' for an african renaissance. You can kill an institution but you can't kill an idea, the concept of pan africanism is ancient and alive at the same time and in this information age the movement is very far from finished. And we love you too. 1 Like |
Foreign Affairs / Re: "United States Should Start Killing Russians" - Retired US General On FOX News by barwaaqo: 11:58pm On Mar 25, 2015 |
NairaMinted: None of our business let them have at it. |
Culture / Re: Why Is There No Guidance Book For African Traditional Religion? by barwaaqo: 11:47pm On Mar 25, 2015 |
Hmm .. the closest thing may be the egyptian book of the dead, much of africa's venerated doctrine was destroyed at the library of alexandria. Perhaps that would be a very extensive book |
Culture / Re: Why Can't People Embrace Pan-africanism? Why So Much Hatred On This Forum?? by barwaaqo: 11:44pm On Mar 25, 2015 |
noahklub: The problem is not with blacks embracing the bible it's a devoted army of them from lagos to new york city. If today's state of affairs is an indication of what the bible can do for our collective welfare then maybe it's better to just forget it altogether. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Why South Africa’s Nuclear Stash Worries US by barwaaqo: 12:29am On Mar 23, 2015 |
That's terrific I like it SA is one of my favorite places |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 10 pages)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 161 |