₦airaland Forum

benalvino3:
they never talk about gun laws or illegal guns when blacks are killing themselves.

There's no political capital to be gained from actually improving black communities but if you can keep the people poor, make empty promises, and use welfare as your voting subscription service, you can keep them coming back forever.

Obrigardo:
Just look at the meaningless and ridiculous question you are asking.
Why is water wet? Why is criminal trump a disgusting liar? Why did melania frump pose nude?

Hmm so it's almost like making guns illegal wouldn't stop criminals.

saxywale1:
Are you new to US politics by the way?

You can try to twist the narrative as much as you can, but majority of people in developed countries know that Words like invasion, replacement e.t.c used in describing immigration (legal and ilegal) points to the great replacement theory.

Answer the question, would you want illegal immigration to be curtailed in that scenario and would that automatically make you racist?

Don't get me wrong, there are definitely extremists and racists out there who don't want more minorities coming in but that doesn't suddenly make any discussion of the topic a dogwhistle.

That's why I brought up the topic of radical Islam, if a madman goes and shoots up a Mosque does that suddenly make all condemnation of radical Islam a dogwhistle? Does that mean that everyone against radical Islam tacitly approves of that act?

saxywale1:
I can't help you if you can't connect the dots.

So if a bunch of Chadians started pouring into Nigeria illegally to vote for radical Islamic leaders, would you want to do something about it or would that be a dogwhistle? Because the definition of dogwhistle can easily be used to create strawmen and put words into the mouth of your opposition.

Hispanic immigrants who entered legally from Cuba skew to the right, illegal immigrants align with the left. Are you sure it is purely because of racism that the right is bothered by this?

saxywale1:
The great replacement from the far right strikes again.

Where did Tucker Carlson tell anyone to shoot up a grocery store of non-immigrants?

Obrigardo:
Strict control over gun laws in NY? Shut your mouth if you have nothing to say.

I mean, the high-capacity magazine he was using is illegal in New York. Why didn't this criminal follow the law?

Snippets of the manifesto.

Obrigardo:
I'm exhausted

Democrats need total majority in Government so we can ban all guns, destroy all white supremacists enclave and reduce republicans to the dirt heaps of history.

But this occurred in a blue state with strict control. The shooter also self described as mild moderate authoritarian left.

gambojimeta:
One days befor da shootings


Kikikikikikikikikiki

The shooter self identified as a leftist, though

gambojimeta:

His manifesto is all over the place. He sells-identifies add authoritarian-left, says he's doing this to get 2nd amendment rights banned but then talks about creating a white ethnostate like Argentina of all places for fxck's sake.

Of course, the manifesto is chock-full of Nazi shxt

Dude is absolutely sick and evil. I hope he spends a very long time in solitary confinement.

AmazonTopaz:
Another mass shooting by a white supremacist in Buffalo.

Another Christchurch shooter wannabe

He's blaming the Jews for the fact that there's no Communist utopia.

budaatum:
Thankfully, I do live in one of those countries you mentioned, and if you did too I'm sure you'd know to refer to me by my preferred pronoun.

Wait, wait, wait I was specifically talking about people who claim to be non-binary/xenogender not actual transgender people.

budaatum:
And no one is calling you a pronoun you haven't asked them to call you. Not even my response was to you unless you, BasedUsername, also wish to be called Obrigado, for which you'd need to inform me.

I didn't ask anyone to call me any pronoun, people address me with male pronouns because I am male and look male. We address people by how they look. Unless you're a conjoined twin, you don't look like a "they".

budaatum:
Yet, here we are discussing people's choice of pronouns. And if we were in an institution, like a workplace, and you insist on calling me by a pronoun different to that which I have informed you I preferred, you might need to go work elsewhere when I sue the workplace for discrimination.

Barring a few European countries, Aussie, NZ, and some states in USA, most institutions would just fire you for being obnoxious and hard to work with.

armyofone:
My real goal is shared responsibility and catch those tadpoles early.

And to prevent STDs

budaatum:
I'll treat you first.

Asking you to call me "They" is like telling you to call me by my name, but if you don't like it don't call me at all.

I don't ask you to call me any pronoun. I look like a guy and if anyone calls me "she", they'll just look stupid because I'm obviously a guy.

You don't choose pronouns because pronouns are just words used to substitute nouns and this substitution is done according to context. The context has to do with gender, number, point of view, and whether the noun is animate or inanimate. "They" is genderless, third person, plural, and animate. As you can see, there's very little wiggle room to mess around with this.

Obrigardo:
You feel me. This non binary nonsense to me seems like mental illness.

More like attention seeking. At least trans people try to commit to gender, they actually put in work to pass as the gender they identify as. Non-binary people just declare that they're neither, act as their actual gender and still demand all the social clout of actual lgbt people.

Obrigardo:
True confession.

Calling a person THEY because he or she identify as "non binary" pisses me off.
It's utter stupidity, instead treat that person for mental illness or Bipolar disorder or some other type of shit

You have been banned from Twitter for this post.

jimetagambo:
Dumbolini pig liars

With the notable exception of the UK, most European countries ban abortion after about 25 weeks.

armyofone:
14-16 years old male should be taught to use condoms while female be on pills.
Do you agree?

More estrogen in the water supply? No thanks. American men are already sufficiently low-test.
They can use condoms and IUDs.

benalvino3:
Speaking fee 20k per hour. This guy is giving you good CRT. you love capitalism you become a racist. in that case, ibime is a racist. Sanpipi do you agree?

20k per hour?? Got to respect the hustle

AmazonTopaz:
Hypocrite pro-lifers claim that an anti-abortion family whatever was attacked in Wisconsin lol it has all shades of stage management all over it.

Going full-on Alex Jones on this one, aren't we?

armyofone:
Ha! It is good to like someone now.

It's one thing to like someone. It's another for a grown-ass man to gush about how much he loves some strange only lady who doesn't even know he exists. Worse still, he goes on about how he would cry if he met her. That almost sounds like a 13 year old talking about how much she loves BTS or some sh*t. Absolutely cringe.

Obrigardo:
Your perverse mind went to MILF when you saw her right? Trash boy

MILF! Did I say anything about MILF? Was that a Freudian slip??

I'm detecting faint signs of mummy issues here.

Not to kink-shame or anything but you're the one being horn.y on main here.

benalvino3:
people are gathering outside the homes of the justices because a draft opinion to overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked. Several of the Justices’ have been doxxed, attempting to pressure them to uphold the supposed “right” to the practice of abortion.

Videos show pro-abortion fanatics gathering at the homes of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

America is at a stage where the democratic party uses various kinds of tactics to sway things. this radical behavior is a danger to the states. Even Nigerian politicians don't stoop this low.

the President and his admin, along with other democrats in offices across the country have called for people to harass these justices because an election coming up in November does not seem to be looking good for them.

we have riots and destruction worth Billions and dead people because of riots the democratic Party sponsored. even the Vice president was helping to bail out lawbreakers and rioters that were arrested. Now the administration is giving people the Go-Ahead to Harrass these justices.

what a shame.

That's straight-up illegal. Let's see whether the FBI arrests anyone.

18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.

(Added Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, § 31(a), 64 Stat. 1018; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Obrigardo:
I don't know why I love this Woman with all my heart. Man, I love her so much, irrespective she's President Biden's wife and a Democrat. I would cry if I meet her. I can feel so much goodness oozing out of her.

This is just plain creepy.

benalvino3:
CNN Poll: November Midterms Enthusiasm

Before SCOTUS leak (April 28): R+11
Republicans 47% (+11)
Democrats 36%

AFTER SCOTUS leak (May 3-5): R+13
Republicans 56% (+13)
Democrats 43%

Republican Enthusiasm Advantage INCREASED by 2 points after SCOTUS leak

Maybe this isn't as much of a wedge issue as I previously thought. I saw a heat map of abortion limits in Europe and most of them (except the UK) set the limit before 24 weeks.

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/may/6/new-white-house-press-secretary-lives-cnn-correspo/

Not cool.

sanpipita:
Debates after debates just because your body isn't being regulated, just to wear mask people rioted, but pregnancy that last 9 months is apparently no big deal even if it's unwanted, note people rioted against vaccines and masks because they didn't want it.

Let's try regulate male bodies and see if some of you will have energy for these debates

Military draft, circumcision.

benalvino3:
Budaatum is for and against late term abortion. Depending on where he is debating the issue. When I pressed him for supporting such thing he complained he is not for that but look at his comment. Inhuman thing to say.

From what raumdeuter said too, one can ask why limit it to the stage of pregnancy? What of after birth and the woman does not want to take care of the kid, cant or does not have any vested emotions for the child... Is she allowed to kill the child?

The general argument for the pro-choice side is that because the foetus exists within the body of a woman, said woman has the right to have the foetus removed from her body.

In the scenario that you painted, the child has already been born. Therefore, the body autonomy argument is moot.

The way the progressives are going, though. Your scenario could actually become a thing in the next couple of decades.

sanpipita:
We are yet to hear anything from the rich dork not even a new graph, supposed humans with brains were sharing his graph other day, you wonder if it's so hard to decipher reality.

Are you saying that the right was pro-choice two decades ago?

budaatum:
And the state is the people who vote.

It's why I love democracy, based. If people vote to go bash babies heads at the bottom of a river and I don't like it I can up sticks elsewhere, or campaign harder against them.

Unfortunately, this is about me bashing a foetus that is inside me, which kind of invades on my privacy a little bit too much don't you think? I kind of don't want the content of my womb subjected to democracy is how I see it, they might come for the content of my mind next!

While this is true, there is still a case to be made that the foetus inside has a right to life. For that reason tbh, I'm still a bit iffy on late-term abortions. However, at the end of the day, women should be able to make that decision for themselves.

budaatum:
I did some research. Abortions have been reducing over the past few decades, and most abort the day or two after, and that's apart from those using barriers to conception.

If true, then this is the best possible outcome of the law. Abortion should be safe, legal, rare—and if I may add—early.

basilico:
Agreed totally. The leaked ruling says that the constitution is silent on abortion rights.
Im no lawyer by the way though I browse thru a lot of legal briefs.
IMHO the supreme court work is supposed to decide on the legality of the laws as per the constitution.
Roe vs Wade entered into uncharted territory where it created a law that abortion is a human right. I believe it is not.
An example. I impregnate a woman and I'm willing to foot all bills She decides to kill the baby without my input.
The current ruling wants states to create laws regulating abortion.

Meaning that it would most only be illegal in states where the majority want it that way.