₦airaland Forum

Trump...agaba ji amu eyi akwuna egwu

Streetinvestor2:
The two data boys above my post go nearly faint hearing this from u
The defeat in osun with over 20 apc governors and 60 billion na thr mate
Davido threatening with Trump did the magic.
The fear of trump is the beginning of wisdom to baron and data boys

The drug dealer in Aso Rock knows....only CATS don't know

Streetinvestor2:
Trump is watching the baron..lol

Bro I can't be recruited! I'm past 40yrs... happily married to a beautiful non Igbo, graceful lady with smart, principled handsome children. Tell me why I shouldn't say the truth when I see one? Biafra apart.

Now, to you and others, you are part of the problem why Biafra support grows daily. You see Biafra agitations from the angle of hustle..... not from the angle of survival.

What a pity.

Thanks for the good wishes though.

aswani:
You are better than this, may God continue to bless your (none Biafran compensation) hustle.

The UN charter Article 1 (2) and further codified in the 1966 International Convenants on Human Rights guarantees Self determination for all people in the world, blacks, whites, coloured.

The 1966 Convenants Article 1 of both the International Convenant on Civil & Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Convenant of on Economic, Social & Cultural Rights (ICESCR) states that:

“All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

That is the basis upon which all the countries in Europe was created, so why are some rogue European elites bent on keeping warring African tribes together as one?

The answer is to exploit their resources while they are busy quarrelling!

That is why you see all the countries in Europe were established along ethnic & language lines and if you want a bigger federation you join EU & Schengen!

But in Africa, allowed by their local puppets, they stood the Combe ants on its head.

We as a company is challenging that as a business model!

You can not free any one who doesn't want to be free.

Despite the well documented atrocities where British Crown starved the Irish, did you see the Scots involving the North Ireland who are part of UK?

Learn to mind your interest and allow others mind theirs before they accuse you of dominance plot.

Tomman:
Stop making it about one group. It applies to ANY ethnic group in Africa regardless of who it is. They will not want to allow, much less celebrate, independence for any African nation (in the ethnic sense), because it is how they are keeping us in slavery. And yet the reality is that most African people - including the igbos - have no inclination or desire to be free or independent because they are used to the status quo. The only time such a demand was made was 60 years ago when there was oppression of igbos in the north. And ever since then, no such desire to be independent has ever been expressed again.

The 1966 Convenants Article 1 of both the International Convenant on Civil & Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Convenant of on Economic, Social & Cultural Rights (ICESCR) states that:

“All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

That is the basis upon which all the countries in Europe was created, so why are some rogue European elites bent on keeping warring African tribes together as one?

The answer is to exploit their resources while they are busy quarrelling!

The UN charter Article 1 (2) and further codified in the 1966 International Convenants on Human Rights guarantees Self determination for all people in the world, blacks, whites, coloured.

That is why you see all the countries in Europe were established along ethnic & language lines and if you want a bigger federation you join EU & Schengen!

But in Africa, allowed by their local puppets, they stood the Combe ants on its head.

We as a company is challenging that as a business model!

Hhahahahahah

As usual, trying to deflect.

If in doubt go ask Kagame.....he felt a taste of Von Batten consulting strategies. Tinubu personally went to ask Kagame about the DC based lobbying Firm.

Bigkoko will surpass their records.... we're specialists in scrubbing archives and diplomatic vaults for hidden docs. Tell Shettima I saw his name somewhere.... European justice in transparency is blind to political influence.

You can console your self dear!

aswani:
Every single scenario here, you dreamt up, every single one.

It's you writing style so you haven't been hacked as I initially thought.

Von Batten that took Atiku's money claiming he will put Tinubu court papers in front of Trump. I raff in Chinese as the smart Ndigbo lobbyist guy just separated Atiku from his money.

Good morning.

DEAR BIAFRANS AND THE WORLD

FINLAND VS SIMON EKPA

I want to put this on the PUBLIC record.

As an international law and conflict-resolution practitioner, I am here in Helsinki following the proceedings involving Simon Ekpa in Finland with serious concern.

My purpose is to expose the hypocrisy of Nigeria and Finland to the international scene. To show that from 2016 there was violence in South East of Nigeria

But the fight against terrorism must never become a licence to weaken due process, freedom of expression, or the rights of an accused person.

Finland has its own terrorism legislation, and Finnish authorities should not HAVE USED NIGERIA FAKE EVIDENCE BUT Finnish criminal law.

The difficult legal question is whether the particular conduct attributed to an individual satisfies every constituent element of the specific offence charged, and whether the proceedings fully respect the protections guaranteed by the Finnish Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. (Counter Terror Law⁠)

What particularly concerns me is the reported level of cooperation between Finnish authorities and Nigerian authorities in this case. Nigerian officials publicly celebrated the Finnish conviction and described cooperation with Finnish authorities as an important victory. (FAKE EVIDENCE )

That cooperation itself is not unlawful. International cooperation against terrorism is legitimate. But cooperation must not become predetermined justice.

If evidence originating from Nigeria was placed before a Finnish court, the defence must have a meaningful opportunity to challenge its reliability, provenance,authenticity and admissibility.

The court must independently assess that evidence rather than simply accepting the narrative of a foreign government. This is where the rule of law becomes extremely important.I am therefore putting several questions on the record:

1. What precisely were the constituent elements of each Finnish terrorism offence?

2. Was every element proved beyond the required standard?

3. What evidence originated from Nigeria, and how was that evidence independently verified?

4. Was the defence given a genuine opportunity to challenge that evidence?

5. Were political statements, advocacy and alleged criminal conduct clearly distinguished?

6. Were the rights protected by Articles 6 and 10 of the European Convention fully respected?

7. Did international cooperation influence the prosecution in a manner that could compromise judicial independence?

8. Can Finland demonstrate that the same legal standards would have been applied irrespective of the accused person’s political identity or the political pressure surrounding the Biafra question?

These are not questions of ethnicity. They are questions of law, evidence, due process and justice.

I reject the idea that the Igbo people should be collectively associated with FAKE terrorism of NIGERIA GOVERNMENT. (AG A MALAMI)

The political aspirations, grievances and historical questions surrounding Biafra must not be confused with criminal responsibility for particular acts.

At the same time, Nigeria should not use the Biafra cause as a justification for killing CHRISTIANS or committing violence.

My position is therefore simple:
Prove the crime.
Prove every legal element.
Test the evidence.
Protect the accused’s rights.
Then deliver justice.
That is the standard Europe demands from itself. That is also the standard Africa deserves.

I will continue examining the Finnish legal framework,the evidence relied upon, the role of Nigerian authorities and the compatibility of the proceedings with European human-rights law.

This is not about protecting one man. It is about protecting the principle that no African, no European and no human being should be convicted because of politics, ethnicity or international pressure.

JUSTICE MUST BE BLIND, AND THE LAW MUST BE THE SAME FOR EVERYONE.

~Dr. David Nyekorach-Matsanga
Pan-Africanist |Peacemaker | International Law

Scotland is on gear to a second referendum to excise it self from UK

Hahahahahahahaha.......

I have identified a swedish pro-democracy institute I will send a strongly worded letter concerning the risks pose by Tinubu and his gangs of election riggers to the Nigeria democratic process

Home and across the Atlantic, letters will continue to fly

Stale bread

everyone knows the crook in Aso Rock...
Meanwhile, we are talking of guarantees for free and credible elections

Thiefobi1:
How can Nigeria vote for a man who send his driver to deliver 250m anambra stolen funds daily to his warehouse in Lagos.

President Tinubu till 2031.

The question for Nigeria
The ultimate choice may therefore be less about Britain versus Israel and more about whether Nigeria can reform itself sufficiently to make secession less attractive.

Can Nigeria create a federation in which its constituent peoples feel genuinely represented?

Can southeastern Nigeria receive credible political, economic and security guarantees?

Can the federal government address grievances without conflating peaceful self-determination advocacy with terrorism?

And can Biafran advocates demonstrate that their vision is inclusive, democratic and capable of protecting minorities as well as the majority?

Those questions will matter far more than any foreign headline.

Because Somaliland has shown that international recognition of a disputed territory is no longer an entirely theoretical proposition.

But Biafra will ultimately have to answer a harder question:

If independence is the destination, what kind of country would Biafra actually become? Christian? Jewish? Secular?

That, rather than whether Britain has finally lost its influence — may be the question history eventually asks.

Israel has a historical connection to the Biafra question. This isn’t entirely new.

During the Nigerian Civil War, Israel’s position was complicated. Historical research indicates that Israel maintained relations with the federal Nigerian government while also providing assistance to Biafra through third parties. Declassified material has been cited as evidence of Israeli efforts to balance relations with Nigeria against sympathy and strategic interests relating to Biafra.

In other words, Israel has previously viewed the Biafra conflict through a strategic rather than purely ideological lens. The British treacherous backstabbing during the conflict might also be a reason for Israeli recent position. The British Govt allowed the Soviets to provide MiG fighters and bombers piloted by Egyptian aircrew, designed to give them real life combat experience as the Arab world worked the Soviet to attack Israel in 1970s.

That makes today’s renewed discussion particularly interesting. But today’s geopolitical environment is radically different from 1967.
Israel now operates in a Middle East–Red Sea strategic environment in which access, intelligence, maritime security, regional partnerships and competition with hostile networks all matter.

And Nigeria is Africa’s most populous country, one of the continent’s largest economies, a major oil producer and a strategically important state.

Any Israeli engagement with southeastern Nigeria therefore has to be understood within a much larger geopolitical picture.

“Judeo-Christian idea?"
This is probably the most controversial part of the argument.
There are increasingly political narratives describing southeastern Nigeria as a predominantly Christian region whose population faces insecurity, marginalization and political grievances. Some Biafran advocates have sought to connect those grievances to the wider international debate over Christian persecution in Nigeria.

But describing a future Biafra as an “independent Judeo-Christian enclave” is an interpretation or political proposition — not an established Israeli policy. There is also a danger in reducing the Biafra question to religion. Biafra shall be a secular country where traditionalists, Christians, and Jews can practice in total freedom.

The historical Biafran conflict was fundamentally entangled with ethnicity, regional autonomy, political power, economic control, security, oil and the legacy of colonial state-building. Today’s violence in Nigeria is similarly complex. It involves jihadist insurgency, criminality, communal conflict, separatism, political grievances and disputes over land and resources. Treating everything as a simple Christian-versus-Muslim conflict risks obscuring those realities.

A future Biafran state, if it ever emerged, would also have to answer difficult questions about its borders, minorities, citizenship, resources, ports, security arrangements and relations with the rest of Nigeria.

Those questions cannot be solved by religious identity alone.

But what about Britain?
This may actually be the most interesting part of the story.
It would be premature to say that Britain has “lost” Nigeria.

In fact, Britain and Nigeria continue to maintain a substantial strategic relationship.

In June 2026, the two governments held their fourth UK–Nigeria Security and Defence Partnership Dialogue. Britain reaffirmed long-term support for Nigeria’s armed forces, including training, technical advice, maritime security cooperation and assistance concerning threats such as drones and improvised explosive devices.

So British influence has certainly not disappeared.

But influence is not the same thing as control.

Nigeria today is far more geopolitically diversified than it was in the decades immediately following independence. Abuja maintains relationships with Britain, the United States, China, Russia, Israel, Turkey, Gulf states and numerous African partners.

Nigeria is no longer simply operating inside a British strategic orbit. Except in the oil & gas sector where British Govt maintains exclusive hold and right of first refusal on any significant project.

And that is perhaps the real historical shift.

The “post-British Nigeria” question
The deeper question may therefore not be:

“Has Britain abandoned Nigeria?”

It may be:

“Has Nigeria finally become too strategically important and too internationally diversified for any former colonial power to determine its internal political future?”

That is a very different question.

Britain can maintain defence cooperation with Abuja. Washington can pressure Nigeria over religious freedom. China can invest in infrastructure. Turkey can expand its influence. Gulf states can pursue economic and strategic relationships. Israel can explore opportunities in Nigeria and the wider African theatre.

None of these powers individually determines Nigeria’s future.

And that means the Biafra question may increasingly become internationalized in ways that were difficult to imagine a generation ago.

Somaliland is the warning — not necessarily the template
The temptation is to say:

Israel recognized Somaliland. Israel is now discussing Biafra. Therefore Israel will recognize Biafra.

Meanwhile, Biafran separatism has returned in different forms.

The UK government’s 2026 assessment notes continuing separatist activity in southeastern Nigeria and identifies IPOB as a proscribed organization, while also documenting the existence of different factions and political visions within the broader Biafran movement.

That fragmentation matters.

There is no single universally accepted Biafran political authority capable of negotiating on behalf of every community that might be included in a proposed Biafra.

So, is Britain finally being “weaned” out of Nigeria?
Perhaps, but not in the simplistic sense.

Britain remains deeply connected to Nigeria.

What may be changing is something more profound:

Britain is no longer the only external power with the capacity to shape Nigeria’s strategic environment.

And if Israel or another major power — begins openly treating Biafran self-determination as a legitimate international political question, Abuja could find itself confronting an entirely new diplomatic landscape, whose capabilities they can not match.

That would not automatically produce an independent Biafra.

But it could change the conversation.

The most consequential development may therefore not be an Israeli declaration of recognition.

It may be the gradual transformation of Biafra from an issue Nigeria has historically treated primarily as an internal security and constitutional question into an issue that foreign governments, international media, religious organizations, diaspora movements and geopolitical strategists increasingly discuss.

That is a very different battlefield from 1967.

And it is one in which London no longer has the field to itself.

Like Somaliland, Like Biafra?
Has British Influence Over Nigeria Finally Weakened as Israel Signals a New Interest in Biafra?
For decades, the Biafra question has been inseparable from the history of British involvement in Nigeria.

The British colonial state amalgamated diverse peoples and political systems into one federation, and after independence, Britain remained deeply invested in Nigeria’s political and strategic stability. During the Nigerian Civil War of 1967–1970, London supported the federal government, while France and a handful of African states moved in the opposite direction and supported or recognized Biafra. British arms supplies to the federal side became an important part of the war’s international dimension.

That history matters today because the geopolitical environment around Nigeria is changing.

And suddenly, another question deserves attention:

Could the old British geopolitical architecture around Nigeria be losing some of its influence while Israel and other outside powers begin looking at the Biafra question through an entirely different strategic lens?

The comparison with Somaliland is provocative, but not entirely without logic.

Somaliland changed the conversation
In December 2025, Israel became the first UN member state to formally recognize Somaliland as an independent state. That was a major diplomatic development because Somaliland had declared independence from Somalia in 1991 but had spent decades without formal recognition from a UN member state.

By April 2026, Israel had gone further and appointed its first ambassador to Somaliland.

The significance is bigger than Somaliland itself.

Israel demonstrated that it was prepared to break with the traditional international consensus on territorial integrity when it believed that a new relationship served its strategic interests.

The African Union, for its part, has maintained that Somaliland remains part of Somalia and has rejected unilateral recognition.

The Israeli government Recognition does demonstrate something important:

African territorial questions that were once treated as essentially frozen may no longer be completely frozen.

Somaliland’s historical trajectory is fundamentally different from Biafra’s. Somaliland was a former British protectorate that became briefly independent in June 1960 before voluntarily entering a union with Somalia in July of the same year. It subsequently declared its independence in 1991.

Biafra, by contrast, emerged from Nigeria’s Eastern Region (South East & South South Nigeria) in the midst of an enormous political and humanitarian crisis and declared independence in May 1967. The resulting civil war ended with Biafra’s reintegration into Nigeria in January 1970. Estimates of deaths during the conflict range enormously, from roughly as many as 4 million, including an estimated 3.2 million citizens starved to death.

Yet there is one striking similarity:

Both cases challenge the assumption that post-colonial African borders are permanently immune from revision.

That assumption has been one of the foundations of African diplomacy for decades.

Is Israel actually supporting Biafra in face of Radical changes in UK, with the Israeli prime minister openly calling the island nation an "Islamic country with nukes"

There are now reports circulating in Nigerian and pro-Biafran media about an Israeli strategic adviser, Noga Arbel, discussing Biafra and calling for Biafran freedom. One Nigerian report says a programme aired on 14 August 2026 was interpreted by IPOB as an Israeli media endorsement of Biafran independence and a demand that Britain end its support for what IPOB describes as Nigerian “colonialism.”

But there is a crucial distinction between an Israeli commentator, adviser or media personality expressing sympathy for Biafran self-determination and the State of Israel formally adopting Biafran independence as government policy. The day the Jewish State of Israel recognizes Biafra right to exist based on the 1966 UN Charter on self determination, it's simply game over for One Nigeria because the IGBOS in the face of formidable international support are ready to tackle the Brits and Nigerians once again.

At present, the evidence does not firmly establish that Israel has formally recognized Biafra, promised diplomatic recognition, or announced a policy of creating an independent Judeo-Christian state in southeastern Nigeria. But as well experienced consultancy Firm, we know how Israel advances it's interests.

G-d forbid Igbos share the same country with yorubas after the failed British experiment..... There are few suggestions that has capacity to infuriate me, this is one of them. Stop it

Mind you the first document attached is a secret document which we obtained….and which we are currently at the Swedish Supreme Administrative Court to compel the Swedish govt to declassification the full Biafra Files which we tracked to a Swedish archive.

The Swedish govt hides the full file under National Security and Secrecy laws which we want the highest court in Sweden against Govt issues to set aside.

We see no reason why the Swedish govt will hide a file of over 59 years linked to a former Republic of Biafra under National Security and Secrecy laws excepts the contents are hot and explosive! Which the ones we have obtained proves.

Good question…. Before I answer your question…. We are working on a smaller project to see if bribes changed hands during Shettima visit to Sweden in the summer of 2024…. We have obtained documents and currently analysing them.

Now, concerning the subject. Given the odds against the Nigeria state at imprisoning Simon Ekpa in Finland or expelling him from Finland since he’s an EU citizen, the Nigeria State embarked on a clandestine plot with Shell Plc & Bp Plc to influence the Finnish govt to do it’s bidding.

The perfect tool they used in this regards, happens to be a Finnish Billionaire called Mika Anttonnen whose company the St1 Group has mutual oil interest with Shell Plc & Bp Plc. The Finnish billionaire helped Shell Plc and Bp Plc to whitewash it’s assets in Sweden, which includes a refinery in Gothenburg (St1 Refinery AB) and lots of petrol stations in Sweden, Finland, Norway etc.

Infant, based on our research, we discovered that Shell & BP used the Finnish billionaire to whitewash its Nordic assets due to Transparency threats…. Some of the documents we obtained shows what appears to be a collusion between AB Svenska Shell, Shell Plc, some powerful elites in Sweden, the British govt and the Nigeria military govt of Yakubu Gowon in 1969.

AB Svenska Shell is Shell Plc branch in Sweden then, and has the registration number of 556050-2378 and the St1 Refinery AB also has the registration number 556050-2378. By corporate law we are looking at the same entity! Meaning the public information of an acquisition was infact a fallacy designed to fool regulators and the public!

To prove this, the St1 Group wrote to us that they’re a Finnish Company that began operations in 1997, but we discovered one of it’s companies in Sweden was registered in 1947….:and has the same registration number with Shell Plc branch in Sweden.


So it wasn’t all surprising when Shettima visited Sweden in 2024 and Simon Ekpa got a hammer from the Finnish govt soon afterwards!

I have attached three documents for you to feed your curiosity!

One, part of the secret British documents we obtained.

Two, registration extract showing the Finnish company which the company claimed began in 1997 was registered in 1947.

Three, when we caught them, the Finnish founder tried to change signature, to avoid criminal liabilities!

Sirianese:
What does it have to do with Mullah Shettima

Why Ekpa is imprisoned in Finland at a glance.

We're at the Concluding phase of Project 12 | Corporate Complicity, Hidden Assets & the Human Cost of Conflict.

We are nice so we'll mail a copy to the Finnish PM office, the Finnish judiciary & media houses in Finland to learn what they failed to see.

Bigkoko:
In case monitoring spirits are in doubt…. Here an e-complimentary card!

Crazy how the oil cartels and their swedish collaborators are freaking out!

It actually gives me joy

Keep firing of your letters to Donald Trump..... that's a great way to stop criminals from perpetually sizing power

Tinubu has no path to victory if people stand guard on their votes

Yesterday was wholesome. We had Rupert and Dr. Goldstein online!

Take advantage of our offer

Yesterday Inaugural webinar was superb

He was part of it until his fat dancing uncle secured 2nd term, then egbon-nnaa suddenly, magically doesn't want to be part of it because he is expected to deploy same energy in coming months...

My dear no kee yourself for them ohhhh.

It appears Ekpa will prevail against his accusers

“I brought no one ! No one defended me ! I backed my family on my own !! You guys r ruthless n disgusting! Eeewwww ! I have done my job ! Nigerian politics is evil AND I DONT WANT TO BE A PART OF IT TILL GOD HELPS US !“

Words from Davido!

Did I not tell y’all?

So I’m no Longer EyePOB? Hahahhahaha ndimadu sef.

Zik love the Crown…. I loathe the Crown.

FSBoperator:
You are a prodigy of Zik because everything you style yourself as is Zikist

When I forgive I simply hand over the issue to our family deity to handle..... . It usually just costs a keg of palm-wine, some kola-nuts, alligator pepper and a fowl the name of the person who offended me and a spiritual Summon will go LIVE.

If I can't reason with you or sue you in the court of men, I simply summon your spirit in our family deity. Fair and square. I don't have time for quarrels or confrontations. You and spirits go dey battle am

Bigkoko:
See how desperate the oil cartels and the collaborators in Sweden are!

Before you assume I’m cocky, proud or thinks too highly of myself, if you as a black person , especially our black babes, tries to be friendly with me in Sweden and I don’t accept your green light. I’m not dismissive of you but simply taking precautions.

I know a lots of blacks are being blackmailed by the very system or their controllers due to lapses on their own part, like crimes they have committed, addictions, joblessness etc. Hence, I stay on my own and do things with only vetted friends and people in my professional cycle. Even in my cycle I still use goat eye dey look everyone.

Yesterday in my cycling routine in Stockholm, i ran into a Ghanaian, or succinctly put, “a Ghanaian “ placed on my cycling route to provoke me into argument or street brawl.

I met him during some tough times in Stockholm. I do give him money when he ask me because he was in a very terrible state and had some addiction problems.

I also do sometime send him on errands to help me give gifts to someone. He does it with all pleasure and gratitude.

Then I noticed a changed as more people of lower social status I talk to started acting strange….I immediately knew the oil cartels and their collaborators in Sweden have reached them. No worries I simply cut off.

But this Ghanaian was very important to me, I gave him gifts for someone before cutting off…. Unlike him, He refused to extend the gifts , won’t reply my messages and even when i said I will involve the police….baba No bulge. Of a truth, he has been quite faithful in delivering previous gifts for me more than four times. I had two options Report to police or forgive.

Now if you know me well, I hardly forgive people especially when you purposely do stuff to hurt me or set me back. But in the case of this Ghanaian I knew the cartels were teleguiding him or using him to provoke me. As usual with me, I study any unusual behaviour for better decision making, then I saw a loophole and knew I had to forgive him, as he is being blackmail.

I instantly knew They want me to threaten him via WhatsApp and possibly in their own desperation Kai him, then they will say na e follow black naim kpai am because of personal dispute …lol.

Then show the a message. But I’m a million steps ahead of them. I forgave him the gifts and to stop thinking about it, I blocked him on WhatsApp. I told some few contacts and they said that’s the right thing to do.

Then he magically appeared on my cycling route in upscale Stockholm, directly in front of the bicycle lane. I don’t change my cycling route for some professional reasons. So they knew exactly where I will ride through.

It’s been months, since these gifts things happened ….so when I suddenly saw him in appear in front of me, I stopped to exchange pleasantries and asked why he didn’t extend the gift or return it or reply my messages….

To my shock……baba begin dey threaten me, that he has live in Sweden for 20 years, he can do me this and that…..bla bla bla….. me wey get hot temper. On a normal day…..hahhahahahhaha. But she I know the voice of Jacob and the hand of Esau when I see one.

I simply confirmed my suspicion that it has been the oil cartels and their collaborators in Sweden all along!

I simply gave him a big smile and rode off! They failed yet again. I won’t be distracted by foolish things. By blocking him months ago, it means I forgave him and cut off as well. They can place even the devil on my cycling route…..they will still fail.

As the District Court vice tighten on the Oil cartels and their Swedish collaborators, they better know that I cannot be distracted by mundane stuff’s I have let go.

Yes they guess rightly, I hardly forgive, but in certain situations you forgive lesser criminals to maintain your focus and grip on bigger criminals!