₦airaland Forum

Basic123:
What are Northern Islamic Schorlars teaching their people for God Sake?

I am a muslim and this is against Islamic teaching!...Infact Islam discourage abusing non believers God talkless of killing them!

“And do not insult those they invoke besides Allah, lest they insult Allah in hostility without knowledge.”
— Qur'an 6:108

Okay,let now say,they offend your God and uiu feel offended? What did Allah ask you to do?

“And if you pardon, it is closer to righteousness (piety).”
— Qur'an

You pardon and pray for forgiveness.

I think they just infuse their own natural aggressiveness into the religion!

Why are you using taqiya?

Why are you lying?

Do you want me ro give Quranic verses that support what the muslim hausa is saying is true?

Do you need sahih hadiths that proves the muslim cleric teaching are from Islam?

I have evidences from the Sirat, should I show u?

Careful habibi with the next words from you because I am knowledgeable in Islam and arabic

Rashduct4luv:
Are you speaking Chinese?

No aramaic( Christain lexicon liturgy)from where Quran is gotten from.

Do you want to know more?

Rashduct4luv:
Change of heart as regards what?

Iran is majority Shia and is influenced by them.

Tell me one good thing about Islam that is so maverick and marvelous that others should join and that makes you proud to be a Muslim?


Can you?

Awon iya Aye



I greet una well o

to you who thinks we that is Sounding warning of islam---islamist devastation are paranoid


see for yourself

the ANSAR ( moderate good muslims) will always protect the MUHAJIRUN ( those willing to kill for Allah muhamed or islam)


Be wise

It could be possible

But

Is fake news

Fake story


It happened in SE


From gunmen to Unknown gunmen

Gabrielshow26:
😂 That's the only option he has🥱. He just has to diminish the Hadith and in doing so, made Mohammed, fallible, as regards his revelation🥱. What a Muslim 😂! I will address his errors later on.

The guy couldn't even show any evidence of hijra from mecca to medina

Only speculation conjectures and wishful thinkng all thanks to the AI -----but infact the Ai rather implicated him the more showing Quran silence or should I say incoherence

Infact the AI showed that Quran that was said to be clear needs 200 years later words of men to white wash it.

And his discussions from AI shows more loopholes that islam bluer prints like hijra were later men idea

What a douchbag

Where in the Quran can I find Hijra from mecca to medina?

Since it is an important event that started AH


Can you show me one unequivocal unambiguous statement from the Quran that muslim refugees moved from mecca to medina?


Shukraan

Explore2xmore:
At this point, the disagreement is not about whether the Qur'an shares motifs with earlier traditions as that is already conceded. The issue is what that fact actually proves.
Resemblance does not imply dependence. The same evidence,shared narratives, cultural proximity, contemporary accusations is equally consistent with two explanations: direct borrowing, or independent revelation engaging a shared world. Both predict identical surface features, so similarity alone selects neither. A transmission chain is required to close that gap. None has been provided.
On Dhul-Qarnayn, structural overlap in a journey narrative is historically unremarkable. What matters is theological content and there the divergence is fundamental. The Romance elevates a ruler toward semi-divine stature; Surah Al-Kahf presents power as contingent, morally governed, and subordinate to divine permanence. That is not borrowing, it is the opposite ideological conclusion drawn from a shared narrative form. The plagiarism hypothesis has to explain that divergence, not just assert proximity.
On copied errors, the argument requires three things: a specific source error, a Qur'anic retention of that same error, and absence of reinterpretive transformation. None of the three has been supplied.
On Arian and Nestorian influence, those systems contradict each other on questions both treated as salvation-critical. If the Qur'an borrowed from both, explain how that produced coherence rather than inherited their contradictions. Selection and harmonisation describes exactly what independent engagement with a shared environment looks like and you have restated the alternative hypothesis while trying to rebut it.
On the asateer witnesses, those same voices attributed the Qur'an simultaneously to sorcery, madness, and human instruction which are mutually exclusive claims. You are citing the one accusation that serves your conclusion while discarding the rest of their testimony. Apply a consistent witness standard or the selective citation carries no evidentiary weight.
What has been established is shared environment, motif overlap, cultural proximity. What has not is a transmission chain, textual dependence, or evidence that uniquely supports borrowing over the alternative.Possibility of influence has been shown. Necessity of derivation has not. That gap is where the entire case sits. The gaps are visible to everyone reading. Fill them or concede them.

3 gbosa for AI


All that you posted from alhaji Ai do you even know the meaning or phrases of words used

You implicated yourself the more

Shall I show you?

@Gabrielshow26 I stopped replying that toddler with Ai phone when in trying to defend an open post he spill more beans


The AI he is using is exposing him the more

Is this what Islam is

Make up a lie and call it a claim( when talking to naive people)

Make more lies to defend the claim ( when confronted with the truth)

Then deny the lies to defend the lie ( when you hit them with there source + more truth )


Is a shame

That there is no equivocal unambiguous statement from Allah in the Quran that Muslims refugees went on Hijra from mecca to medina?

What a time to be alive


Him don through Hadith under the bus

Chaiiii


To the MOD continue removing my replies you should thank God I am born again .... I would have sent a distant cousin to visit Alusi okija on our behalf

Are you working or eating mama thank you?

Are u paying house rent from your sweat?

If that girl becomes pregnant can you dance for joy or run away?


Pampers and NAN 1 and school fees for creche no be here o

With the way Nigeria economy is like the hierarchy of Iran leadership.


Una still dey talk of cheating?


Wahala dey o

Seun



See wetin ya minister of dumbo MOD moved to front page?



Chaiiiii

One thing I found at about coded hidden Muslim is that they can't go a day without blaming PAUL the APOSTLE.

Now for the points you made and claimed to be true----would you ike me to refute them with sola scriptural evidences, historical evidences and the very words of Yesua el messiah and his disciples?

After it will expose you as a liar, antichrist agent, and a Muslim.


Shall we habibi

It used to make sound at night -----

[quote author=ChristianMuslim post=139312020][/quote]On ?

The difference is


Water in a cup ----almost free
Water in nylon ------#50 per sachet
Water in a bottle.-----#300 per bottle


Same Water but the CONTAINER CONTENT exhibit the value higher

Now Water in a bottle

From the road side #300
From restaurant #500
From lounge #2,000

In this case LOCATION has amplifies the value higher.

Why are the following obi and kwanlwaso around like that 17 reps


I think the APC should ban them

Don't look into the mirror in the night


The person you will see dosent resemble you.

AlabiKILLER2023:
I have been complaining of slow business
Poor sales

A new filling station just opened opposite my shop today

They're also selling engines oil

The usual practice is bike enter refill and cross over to my shop to buy oil

But now it's no longer like that

This is a hustle I put more than 1.5m
Right now nothing is going on
If feel that I've wasted my money
9
Guys what do I do right now

Them open new filling station beside them also

So you mean Nigeria is hell fire?


APC una see una life

But

Tinubu will win 2027
Jagaban

honesttalk21:
The term tawhid isn’t required stated; the doctrine is. The Qur’an states God’s oneness directly. Quran 2:138 is about sibghah being divine imprint (fitrah), not self-worship; that reading ignores basic Arabic please use your claimed expertise to show differently.
On w-h-d, it means oneness, not part of. No classical lexicon supports that claim except again you show now.
The use of We is a known Semitic register; clarified by singular statements like I am Allah (20:14).
Uthman's standardising recitation isn’t erasing a different Qur’an. No alternate text has ever been produced. I asked you to provide yet you still can't

Song: jumping Jumping you are jumping

Shame just dey catch me for you
So you no know anything----haaa

Ok let's start here since you want to lie about the standardisation of the Quereyana

1. Did Uthamn satrderdised the Quran? Because there were variants---- different Quran in reading?

2. After standardisation did he burnt the others?

3.the Quran verse about breastfeeding and others lost---- yes or No?

4.we have 30 Qurans in circulations today
Example haffs , warsh , Duri and others --- yes or No?

5.Did Allah gave Uthamn the right to standardised the Quran ?

You stop saying you don't know arabic--- that line don cast.

I pray AL RABB will reveal YASU AL MASSIH IBN ELAHA to you through Ruuhil-Qudus

honesttalk21:
Still repeating the same demand while unable to meet it from your own sources? You said the Israelite migration from Egypt to Canaan was well documented — that is how Yahweh rolls, point A to point B — yet you cannot produce a single Biblical verse stating that explicitly. Try it. One verse, precise and unambiguous, naming both locations as origin and destination in one statement.

That is not a defence of the Qur'an but your own standard applied consistently for your book. When you can meet it from your own scripture you can justifiably demand it of Islam otherwise be quiet so we don't confirm in the words of Abraham Lincoln.

Now I know you don't even know the Quran not to talk of the Holy Bible--- so I have Ben talking to a child depending on Ai
Even your Muslim brothers are ashamed you asked that question.

The HIJRA journey from Egypt to Canaan—popularly called the "Exodus"—is a central theme of the Old Testament. God’s promise to deliver the Israelites from slavery and bring them to a "land flowing with milk and honey" is repeated at several times.

Pinpointing the point A Egypt to point B canaan in clear terms without vague empty incoherent cut and join.

This your question showed I have been talking to a toddler ... now I will indulge and lecture you to see that Our LORD GOD YAHWEH is precise clear detailed.


​Here are the key Bible verses where God declares move from Point A to point B
​1. The Call of Moses (The Burning Bush)
​This is the first time God explicitly outlines the plan to Moses.
​Exodus 3:8
​"So I have come down to rescue them from the hand of the Egyptians and to bring them up out of that land into a good and spacious land, a land flowing with milk and honey—the home of the Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites."
You say what ?Mon Dieu see detailed precise coherent instruction... YAHWEH you too much, abeg Clap for my God jare


​Exodus 3:17
​"And I have promised to bring you up out of your misery in Egypt into the land of the Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites—a land flowing with milk and honey."
See levels , kilode see levels ---see unambiguous unequivocal statement from my YAHWEH, can your god do that?

​2. Formal Confirmation to Israel
​After Moses expresses doubt, God reaffirms His covenant using His formal name (Yahweh).
​Exodus 6:6–8
​"Therefore, say to the Israelites: ‘I am the Lord, and I will bring you out from under the yoke of the Egyptians... And I will bring you to the land I swore with uplifted hand to give to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob. I will give it to you as a possession. I am the Lord.’"
Ogini ogini ogini ogini too much God, you wish it was like this in ya Quereyana? See God speaking with evidence....see evidence not tasfir not white wash not dem talk say he talk say---MY YAHWEH IS AWESOME...say it...say it

​3. During the Journey (Reassurance)
​As the Israelites moved through the wilderness, God reminded them of the destination to keep them focused.
​Exodus 23:23
​"My angel will go ahead of you and bring you into the land of the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Canaanites, Hivites and Jebusites, and I will wipe them out."
Kilode kilode evidence yapa... otipoju ... make una clap again na , even if your god no get him own evidence

​Exodus 33:1
​"Then the Lord said to Moses, 'Leave this place, you and the people you brought up out of Egypt, and go up to the land I promised on oath to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, saying, "I will give it to your descendants."'"
I love my God the creator--- the owner---his words are clear too much clear. Baba God I worship you.
Make I stop here jare my God too get evidence

​tenQ antislam Gabrielshow24
Abutwins doffman seun


NowBack to the question show me from the Quran where Allah SWT in an unambiguous unequivocal statement says Muslims refugees moved from mecca to medina?

honesttalk21:
That standard isn’t how ancient texts works. Even the Exodus isn’t one neat verse stating a move from Egypt to Canaan in one sentence; I will appreciate you show us otherwise. It’s spread across multiple books and assumed as shared memory. The Qur’an too does the same in its own style seen in expulsion (59:, reception (59:9), flight (9:40), and defined emigrant helper groups (8:72). That’s a consistent migration pattern, not silence.
Demanding one modern style line is importing a format the text doesn’t use. We all now see it’s not absence but a different narrative method and your inequitable demand.

So no evidence

You don't even understand what you are saying contradicting yourself--- trying to defend a vague book.
Historical context will give the name of the place point A to point B---- Quran failed woefully and you are here trying to help and white wash it ----in so doing expose more lies of the Quran Allah and the 200 years later commentaries.

Since you have no evidence--- kindly move along


In zaik naik voice--show me an unequivocal unambiguous statement from the Quran where I can find muslim refugees moving from one point A mecca to point B medina?

honesttalk21:
Overruled!

These six points fall apart for the same reason which is bad Arabic, mixed categories, and claims with no real evidence.
Tawhid as a later technical term is not in the Qur’an, though true but the doctrine is everywhere. Your God is One God (2:163), Allah is One (112:1), Do not take two gods (16:51). The label came later. The belief was already there.
The root w-h-d does not mean part of or one of. That is simply false Arabic. Across the major lexicons, it means oneness. Wahid is one. Ahad is one. Tawhid is affirming oneness. Anything else is made up.
The tashahhud is not prayer to Muhammad pbuh. Sending peace is not worship. In Islam, greeting a prophet is not the same thing as calling on a god. Mixing those two is basic category confusion.
Best of creators does not mean Allah is one creator among many. In Qur’anic Arabic it means Allah is above every lesser form of making. Same with they planned and Allah planned that is divine counter-planning, not deception as a flaw.
Allah saying We is not plurality. That is the royal plural normal Arabic usage for majesty and authority. The Qur’an still states plainly: Indeed, I am Allah (20:14). Singular, clear, direct.
Then Uthman did not burn the real Qur’an. He standardised the written copies to preserve one agreed text across dialects. That is preservation, not suppression. If another real Qur’an existed, produce it. That is manuscript, chain, text. You and no one else can.
So all six claims fail the same way being weak Arabic, weak logic, and zero hard evidence. Once the language is read properly, none of it stands.

The truth keep coming out.


1. There is nothing called tawheed ------ don't tell me about concept ---- the word tawheed is not in the whole Quran, and you agreed.

2.Allah can claim alot of things but when we look at the Quran is another thing-----or muslims are saying one thing about Allah declaration without letting us know the other part-----which is Allah praises himself and worship himself in the Quran 2 vs 138.

3.TAWHID means part of----one of-----unique among.

4.allah using we US to describe himself---muslim call it royalty----- but royalty means that the speaker is speaking on behalf of his cabinet or royalty which points back to compound unity.

5.Uthman standardised the Quran ? Why ? Because he needed to get the real Quran out infact he burnt them : you forgot to tell us that muslim was the 1st to burn the real quran --- and he died like a chicken.
STANDARDISED means there was a problem of different Qurans which shows the parroted lies uncorrected Quran

All these shows that your points are baseless and empty claims : I showed evidences