KINGinVAHALA:

Hehehehe, just leave them bro, that's what fear does and they always tell you they aren't afraid.

The only people afraid of you are little girls in Romanceland.

When known folks quote you with scathing invectives you hit the ban button calling for the Mods to come help you.

Slaveinvalha, do you deny you have never threatened Nairalanders of killing them? Biafranbushboy, can you deny you have never threatened the life of Nairalanders privately?

It may never have occurred to you how criminal your actions are in reality. You think this is about Mr Nairaland, right?

Just one more threat of life or bodily harm offline from either of you, then I will make you realise there's no hiding place for you.

Mindfulness:


Have you chilled out a little? Good, we can now continue.

Turkey, country that occupies a unique geographic position, lying partly in Asia and partly in Europe.

https://www.britannica.com/place/Turkey

Only a relatively tiny part of Turkey is in Europe.

Geography 101.

Yet another classic show of illiteracy!!!

How has what you just wrote different in structure form mine? Oh, just a tiny part of Turkey is in Europe, and she's a European country despite her mixed race!!!

Clown.

And I saw you asking Timbuktou if he could prove if Germany hid her rape figures!!! Did your really asked that ?
As in you deny Germany did not legalise abortion and hid those figures in one of the Darkest moments of her nationhood?

Well, you're a black woman in a fundamentally racist country, you shouldn't know much.

Mindfulness:


Quote or remain silent.


You didn't even know that Turkey is the country with the highest number of Syrian refugees and you are still acting like you can discuss anything else than marriage and feminism.

Mumu, Turkey is geographically in Europe for starters.

Two being the gate way into Syria and Europe, most refugees get stuck there trying to make it into Europe proper.

You can't really sound smart without telling lies by devilish omissions.

I now see that the only way you could fall a victim to intellectual hoodwinking from a kid is because you aren't smart yourself.
Your carefreewannabe moniker was a true reflection of your penchant for carelessness and poor judgement. Mindfulness is an after thought after been burnt repeatedly by the flames of mundanity; you're a quack. Please watch your death and exhumation now.

Mindfulness:


The moment you start, is the moment you will be mercilessly ignored.



Germany did what European countries are obliged to do. There is something called Geneva Convention which clearly states that HUMANS are to be granted asylum under certain circumstances but since people ignorantly believe that immigrants are taking their jobs, they voted for Brexit.

[b]The Geneva convention does not endorse large and unprofiled immigrants. Western countries and developed countries still turn down asylum seekers and refugees even within the limits of the Geneva convention. Matter of fact a considerable number of EU member states decried and rejected the Syrian refugee and criticised Germany for its LARGE scale and open door policy of handling the refugee situation of Syria.

Was Markel not soundly criticised in Germany for her stüpid acceptance of undocumented, unprofiled Syrian?. Matter of fact a new movement was formed about keeping and safeguarding German heritage and customs. I don't do Google, I would gladly point out that group whose emergence came about because of Markel's stüpid asylum policies the sorts the West is yet to see since World War 2. Let me ask you this; did Markel not face staunch critism FROM HER OWN PARTY because of her sentimental handling of the refugee situation? Bwahahaha, dummy.

Go fix your false hair and do your phoney nails. I will crush you with facts. Lonely, idle woman who strangles Google for argument purposes and you know nothing. Loathsome daft!!!

Did Great Britain refuse accepting refugees? Nope they didn't. The smart Britains simply said they are going to Syrian and airlift refugess directly because most extremists have made their way with the refugees into Europe's doorsteps!!! Smart move.

Oh, girl. You be ignorant mumu. Category A Olodo.

Wowo dollard![/b]

Mindfulness:



Now Germany can relax agian. Britain is an agining society with low birth rates as well. Let us watch the decline now.

Lying quack! Dullard and petty insecure, lovelorn, Beldame seeking solace in false submission to hide under intellectual acclamation. Take it:

the UK's population is rising fast, whereas Germany's is falling fast;
the dependency ratio (the proportion of expensive older people in the population relative to able-bodied, tax-generating workers) is rising much quicker in Germany than in the UK.

You're just too ashamed to own up, too insecure to face defeat

Mindfulness:



And let us watch how Frankfurt will flourish as Europe's new finacial centre.

Voodoo goat! Are you using your sentiments as factual projection? Dullard. The UK economy is service and financial driven and oriented. Germany is purely industry and manufacturing. What sleezehole were you projected from?

The UK will continue to be the biggest financial and military player in EU and Europe. Olodo again.

Mindfulness:



The suicide bombers from France:

Fabien Clain - of French nationality
Abdelhamid Abaaoud - Belgian-Moroccan born in Belgium
Salah Abdeslam - Belgian-born French national of Moroccan descent


All of the known perpetrators were EU citizens and not refugees but even if they were, you simply don't condemn a whole nation for what a few did. Who was calling me ignoramus again?

[s]London attacks:

Mohammad Sidique Khan - born in England
Shehzad Tanweer born in England
Germaine Maurice Lindsay - born in Jamaica
Hasib Mir Hussain - born in England

[/s]
Next time you make an assertion, prove it.



It's here for the world to see who the true ignoramus is.

Why did you leave out Chakib Akrouh? And you conveniently left out Omar Ismail Mostefai

Did you forget Samy Amimour. All Arab Europeans but went to Syria and came in with the refugees!

Did you forget the simultaneous and coordinated and premeditated New year attacks across major Western European cities, where Syrians emigrants molested and fondled the breasts of European women in broad day light?

Listen, mumu, don't let the new moniker fool you. I will so hammer you with facts your head will need pain relievers to deaden the realisation that you're a very big fool.

Now go change your hair colour with another fake one. Stop pretending to be an intellectual.

I have to warn you, I am not TV01. I have a thin tolerance for silly questions. I take it out on the poser mercilessly.

Mindfulness:


Source which proves that Merkel plans to "naturalise most of those aliens". i am waiting. Oya!

Girl, you're truly ignorant, little wonder you love using that word. Germany has one of the largest dependency ratio in Europe with massive population decline owing to low birthrate. She needs able-bodied influx of people to beef up the work rate and productivity of the economy. The Syrian crisis was an opportunity in a rare moment in time.

Lazy bone you. Do read up and let Google breath!!!
You don't want to see the large quantity of water being used by Google staff to cool off their servers and CPU, yet you keep sending people there to foster your silly little banters and encouraging dumb kids like the rebel thief to impersonate with Google.
The UK is set to become EU most populous country, Germany has to improvise.


http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34172729

Mindfulness:


And you are as xenophobic as N. Farage.
Was London attacked before or after Merkel let refugees in?

I alluding to the Paris attack/bombing not London. So I stated "French bombers" Go read the post again. Hallucinatory ranter.

Mindfulness:


Are we to close all borders because every Muslim is under general suspscion now?
Let us please deport all Nigerians as well, they may all fight for BH.

sentimental and stüpid question

Mindfulness:
with no correlation




You are in no way qualified to make this judgment as you have just shown.
First inform yourself properly and profoundly and then talk.

Mindfulness, aka carefreewannabe, I didn't make any judgments. The people of the United Kingdom voted to be out of the EU, and as I opined they voted rightly. What judgment have I passed?

Befuddled ewu. Ignoramus. Incorrigible quack!

Mindfulness:


Have you cared to check how reliable those sources are or have you just dismissed them on grounds that they go against what you feel is desirable?

You don't have a prayer, banter-lover. You should have asked me if I checked Google about flying pigs.

Mindfulness:


The EU parliament is elected by and for the people. It's ironic that people complain that the EU is undemocratic when voter turnout was at less than 50% (42.61% to be precise) in 2014. You don't want to vote but you shout democracy, what now?

Most people don't even know how laws are passed in the EU and look like cars when asked what the institutional triangle is but will repeat like parrots what Boris and Nigel have told them.

What you have written above is only half true and would you have known better, you would not have made such claims.



Another statement that is based on ignorance (no offense). Refugees are not even allowed to leave their state within a country, much less cross borders between countries.



This is the biggest lie ever. Immigrants contribute more to the economy than they take out and they create more jobs, directly and indirectly and an aging society like the British one will increasingly depend on immigration.

Not immigrants are responsible for the low standards in your country but your past governments who failed to make medium-term and long-term investments.



Live free? You are no longer free on this continent. Going back to nationalistic concepts is a regression into 19th century thinking. It's as ridiculous as tribalistic thinking on the African soil.



You better continue else you will be eaten up by rising nations with which you won't be able to compete - God forbid - if you indeed become little England.

You're the ignorant one, dear. Makel plans to naturalise most of those aliens and they will eventually have free movement across the entire EU.

Besides what's to stop those extremists sneaking across borders once inside Europe? Was not one of the French bombers from the refugees? You're as sentimental as Markel.

I don't care much for the UK, but opting out of the EU is one of her best decisions ever!

Mindfulness:


In all fairness, everyone on this forum quotes whatever fits their standpoint without questioning the reliability of the sources as long as they buttress his or her opinion. I remember someone quoting 5 or more websites to prove he was right. I took the time to check the soucers and I wasn't surprised by what I found there. The institutions that sponsored the research had ulterior motifs. Objectivity was far from what research should be about.

Even politicians use statistics and 'expert opinions' as it suits them. It's difficult for someone who has not been trained in empirical social research to distinguish between valid, representative and reliable research and research that does not meet the criteria. And I have seen it severally here.

In this day and age, you can find anything to prove your or disprove someone else's claims.

In all fairness everyone has used online sources, citations, and excerpts to back up points honestly at some point.

But smothering Google for days to come up with a reference that African women don't bear their husbands' name is displaying public nudity without the grace of shame.

Coming online with sources that say Africans accepted and endorsed homosexual tradition as a norm is a bewildering discombobulation bodering on witchcraft.

The taboo Africans hold for some certain practices have not been whitled down with time or colonialism.

We understand the "child" seeks the validation life has denied him here but to try to do the absurd is desperation and lunacy in full hoist.

TV01:

So a long wordy post, strategic use of smileys, snide invective, overweening self-congratulatory smugness, and - so far - 6 affirmatory smileys. Your candidature for the NL hall of fame seems assured, even if only in the family section. But not so fast sir;

Historically in the West, a woman would have a label - "Mrs" - that signified her marital status, and a name - "her husbands surname" - that identified her with a particular man.

Historically amongst the Yoruba, a woman would have a title "Aya" - that signified her marital status - and a name "her husbands first name" - that identified her with a particular male.

Pray tell, what was you point again? Particularly in light of the OP? The OP is clear, it is feminist ideology that is driving moves away from this norm. Especially via legislative intervention - thanks Crackhaus, I honestly was not aware.
http://time.com/3940094/maiden-married-names-countries/


Mindfulness, more thought, and consideration before posting please. First, kindly refer to the link above. Especially referencing Quebec and Greece. Second, if women were free to adopt any naming convention they choose post marriage, why would a law be needed? It's not as if it would expand choice? Ergo, the law - again refer to the link - can only be about restricting choice. Which is one of the lies of feminism, in that it belabours the point about choice for women, but in actuality, it restricts choice by ideological diktat.

If we are talking anecdotally, it's interesting to note that many in this same West, and, who have no truck with, religious or cultural norms, marry and take their husbands surname - especially when children appear. They typically cite the unity and fullness this engenders. Some are now denied that choice by feminist driven legislation. How ironic.

As a man, the woman that will be my wife will take my name. End of. If she wants to bear her fathers name, he may as well marry her. The name change signifies her moving from his authority and responsibility to mine. Not that it's crucial in and of itself, but fitting. It also signifies some of the marital obligation and responsibilities that fall on the husband.

Likewise for offspring, my children will carry my name. End of. Even if FIL has no male sons, it is solely within my gift, if I choose to name my family or children to honour him. And I won't - at best one of my children will bear his name as first name. Men are and should remain jealous and territorial. She and they are mine .

And at days end, where has the convention ever been that a man drops his surname upon marriage - an anecdotal question .


TV

TV his very self Nice illustration. Logical and factual submissions backed by well constructed phrasing.

But, if I may add, do not quote or trade points with that 19 year old shamer. He will never own up to fact even if you turned it into a shade and put it on his face!

He has, with false airs and emboldened ignorance, argued here the West aren't pressuring by lobby, grants, aids and diplomatic manoeuvring, African countries into accepting homosexuality at an institutional level. That's the "child" for you.

For an African born and raised in Nigeria to submit that wives don't use their husbands names pre-colonial era is just proof internet access is as devastating as it is expedient for growth.

The boy asks of Google subjectively and gets the "facts" he wants to argue with.

The ability to sieve facts and truth from the pool of information online is as alien to him as sky-diving is to Nigerians.

I have found him arguing too that homosexuality is also an african accepted convention too.

One schooling as it stands is enough.

Evathyst:
O boy! Shey you wan end agarawu career ni?


I don laugh so tey spit don dey comot from my eyes....



Please take a pity on the poor boy wey no get helper. Lolz. Nairaland dey sweet die!

Agarawu23 na retired bus conductor. Na for small-small girls body his talent dey show.

agarawu23:
Mtcheew. Coward

Brain-dead Muppet! I unleash my handle you'll disappear or burn in the flames of ignominy and disgrace.

Here's your chance to spar with me facelessly.

Regurgitated guttersnipe

agarawu23:
I don't reply nitwits with alt monikers. ..

Show me your REAL face

So upon all D monikers person fit choose na Aga-ra-wu you select?

Ur brain most really be functioning as slow as a 1865 locomotive. Single-digit-processing morofoko

Why e be say na only nika u dey wear sef?

House boy mentality never commot for ur body. Eramefefe

agarawu23:
Smh

No need for any mumu interview. We should just do this shyt and end it once and for all.

The interview is an opportunity for some ediot to start asking silly questions.

Agarawu, the dullard. Of course the interview will only expose you as Captain Airhead

Dygeasy:
I asked him to stop because Tosyne2much and Wristbangle were already making plans to commences their own interviews which is more recognized since they've been doing it and they were working with me.

same thing inferred!

Tosyne2much and wristbangle acted on your behest!!!

In essence, you only delegated the duty. They carried it on your behalf. It was you.

crackhaus:

Why did you bother?

Only a toddler will not know how the US tries to hoodwink other countries into accepting homosexuality.

The "kid" is under the illusion of false internet bravery and misconception.

Ishilove:

I belong to the 5%

If I had my way I will not change my name because it is brand

Every married woman should change her name to her husband's. Bearing your maiden name will not only confuse your lineage, it would become open grounds for invest in large, itinerant families.

KINGinVAHALA:

Tinubu is still walking free and living like a king despite all the rumoured corruption cases on his head. lol

Cheers Bro!

cc tomakints, temitemi1, caseless. You guys should please check your mails.
Good pm guys!

Tinubu has not been indicted or found guilty by any body or institution.

You have been found guilty of breaking campaign rules yesterday and a two weeks ban was pronounced on you.

The correlation with your case with that of Tinubu is a logical fallacy. You're dumb bro. No wonder you resorted to cultism to give your life a meaning.

And you led poor Refiner to her Campaign death with your dumb strategies. Any other person would have taken her to greater heights given her looks. But not you.

Featherbrained blackguard.

KINGinVAHALA:











Hi guys, please do endeavour to check your mails, I have replied.
Good pm!
cc Pennah, Randy91, emeijeh, yuneehk

This is the guy Dygeasy announced to be suspended for two weeks for breaking rule 2 of the pageantry rules yesterday. He is still here free and campaigning.

What a mess!!!

LordScent:





....... Brother please tell me what you wrote is just a "phrase in passing"

Hmn, Dygeasy indicated again.

darkenedrebel:


Bla Bla. Provide hard facts, not figments of your imagination. Only reason you think I am not to be argued with because I am exposing the loopholes in your wrong-headed assertions.



Keep this up and you just might win yourself a Nobel Prize for 'always taking off point' before December



As I said I was only making instances, however tangential they might have been. Any smart person would have gotten the point, rather than acting persnickety over details.



You quoted me first. I should be the one telling you to go away. . . . . . .


wait for it . . . . . .


Be gone!!

You are here again with your plans. Before anything let me point you to hard facts.

When Nigeria enacted the anti-gay laws, the BBC reported that Nigerians who didnt support gay was a whooping 89%, then it asked the question why would a country so overwhelmingly against homosexuality pass the law?

And the BBC answered that question all by itself: because the West is trying to arm twist African government into accepting it as part of fundamental human rights .


When Ghana sought to pass the antigay laws, David Cameron the disgraced UK prime Minister told Ghana in no uncertain terms that food grants, aids and benefits will be stopped!!! More than 70% of Ghana's budget is dependent on Western aid.


Darkenedrebel, I know your sole purpose is to get warm and comfortable with elderly women so you can scam and betray them like you did in Romance section and got busted. The shortest way to achieve this is to support and endorse questionable polices and conventions.

You claimed to be 19 years of age, but a close look at your activities shows you stalk and suck up to older females in their 30's.

You don't know anything beyond movie lines and Google abuse.

In 2014 gays in great Britain were just 2% of the population yet they are forcing Africans to institutionalise gay. That doesn't tell you anything of course.

You're only looking for a dollar from some lonely, love-beaten elderly woman here.

Cc Crackhaus
Francis18
Joseph1832
Iamord

ITbomb:
Who taught them this?
First time I saw this, I was alarmed but now I'm scared

modern parents have become part-time parents, delegating parenting to house helps and nannies who see these kids as mere duties to be done for monthly pay.

No nanny would censor movies or phone convo from these kids or teach them morals. It's the 21st century where we will pay away our morality as a price for the pursuit of economic aquirement.

darkenedrebel:


Where and when did I mention anything about opinion or advise? I was only debunking her ignorant and faux pax claim that the OP has no right to talk on marital issues because he is single. Besides, what makes you think the OP was giving an advise and not merely airing his opinions.

Because you do copy and paste, you will so soon forget your post. You worthless sufferer of retrograde Amnesia!!!

Ishiløve says people who aren't married aren't really qualified to offer advice on marriage!!

You dunderheaded waste-pipe, seeking to prove her wrong said this: "Have you ever been to Sambisa forest before? I'm as sure as eggs is eggs that you haven't. But that doesn't deter you from getting a word in edgewise when matters bordering on terrorism are being discussed, does it?"

Were you really stating a civilian would proffer advice on a military matter to professional soldiers who are trained for combat or you were saying a civilian can air his opinion or views? Because Ishiløve was talking about advice. But you are helplessly confused with uncorrelated analysis.

This discuss has stuffed your brains with mental workload too burdensome for your weak cognitive structure. You're confused as a dazed boxer!!!

darkenedrebel:



It's only google-smart people with superficial knowledge that never fail to remind others that they have superficial knowledge. It's called insecurity and paranoia.

Your opener, proclaiming a civilian should proffer advice on military matters when someone was talking about the quality of advice non-married people can give to married people leaves you looking like an empty clown with 5 minutes worth of Google knowledge!!! Shame on you.

darkenedrebel:






Going by your logic it is impossible for a civilian to offer advise on how to squelch the insurgency simply because he hasn't experienced it first-hand? You lack intelligence.

The military is a professional discipline!!! Boko haram insurgency is a 21st century terrorist insurgency cell network. It's not just a military matter, it boarders on high level military intelligence, planning containment, infiltration, Short distance accurate level combat where conventional warfare has been proven ineffective. Saying a civilian, a lawyer, or doctor, or a political scientist or engineer or like yourself, a student should proffer advice on this matter makes you the breathing exemplification of a buffoon and an ignoramus of unparalleled capacity.

You're a first class ïmbecile suffering from an overdose of Google medication. Fool of quackery. Internet nuisance!!! Blasted retrograde!!!

darkenedrebel:


And what do you mean by imaginative thesis? People grew up among family members, they witnessed the relationship between their father and mother and also between parents of other children in the locale they reside. They read books. They see things. So it is not imaginative but something that has been experienced.

You keep broadening the gap so that you can fit in. Going by your logic, everyone can proffer advice on marriage!! Because every one has a family and has relations who married. But churches are setting up pre-marriage classes for couples before marriage. No wonder you said in Quora , 15 year olds are giving advice on adult issues!!! LWKMD!!! Befuddled schmuck!!!

darkenedrebel:




What you need to learn is how to comprehend sentences and how to refrain from quoting people when you have nothing sensible to say.

Goodbye.

[/quote] Logic and you have never seen eye to eye. You broke a simple post into 4 segment because, as always, your insecurities and shallow knowledge bank always spur you to fight and fight where there's no fight. You will always seek to leverage your real life failures on the internet.

Olodo wacko!!! Petty thief!!!

Mindfulness:


Well, according to the OP it's the woman who has to lure and manipulate the man into having her way like men are some sort of animals controlled by their s.exual organs.



But her opinion is less important according to some dogma, right?

Argumentative!

Timbuktou:


Coming from someone who has marriage experience, emotions tend to run high when both parties feel they are in the right and will not be outdone by the other. There's something about familiarity that neutralizes manners and we are all prone to a momentary lapse in judgement.

So, while you may be right, it may interest you to know that the biggest turnoff in a woman for a man is manliness. Most men aren't gay.

Words of wisdom there. These she-men with wisdom as worthless as discarded tissue won't learn. Later they be wondering why men are so stubborn and unyielding.

Cutehector:
Wat sort of arrant fuckery is this

Messt@rdd you hang onto front page like an asthmatic patient hang onto an inhaler but your brain is so filled with sawdust you have nothing reasonable to say always!

Cutedullard!!!

You often begin your argument with cheap label and blackmail. Any man who doesn't see issues with you is a misogynist

EfemenaXY:


You're slowly but surely turning into a narcissist. And a misogynist.

Why do you automatically assume that if there's a problem in a union, it must be the woman's doing or better still, she has to take full responsibility for ironing things out? Why then is it called a union?




You use the wrong language and tone here:

~ Fighters. Who / what is the man born to fight? His wife? Society?

No wrong language there, madam. Men are innate fighters. Men are genealogically wired to dominate his environment. Men will always fight to change culture, trend, technology and civilisations. Marriage is part of culture and society. Every true woman knows she can get what she wants from her man, only the genetically malformed ones fight and pretend to be men.

EfemenaXY:



~ Dominate. Dominate who? The wife? Is she a foot mat / footstool to be 'dominated'?

Men are head of home and society. They put their lives on the line more than women do.Greater responsibility equates to leadership. This is not a cultural positioning. It is designed by evolution.

EfemenaXY:


Point of correction:

~ Not all men own the house or worse still, pay the rent. There are tons of families out there where the man does absolutely nothing and the buck is passed onto the wife who stoically carries on running that ship (a.k.a paying the bills) without so much of a mummer, covering his shame, while the outside world assumes this domineering, "fighter" of a man is captaining the ship.

Stop lying to yourself!
What is the percentage of women who are the main breadwinner in their families when the husband is alive? Very insignificant. Need I remind you that once a woman becomes the main breadwinner, she nags and boasts about to shame the man within her close circle?
Women aren't born to be the main breadwinner. Statistics abound that shows women are less happier when they provide more in the home than the husband does!!!

EfemenaXY:



~ Re: the underlined bit of your post, you're simply reaching. One'll be hard pressed to find a woman who does such. You're watching too many movies. You know very well that what really happens, the main bone of contention for many WORKING WOMEN with young kids, is the expectation that they go out and hustle like a man and contribute financially to the upkeep of the home, and yet on returning home after a hard day's graft, expected to tie wrapper and enter the kitchen to pound yam and cook fresh Egusi soup while the pot-bellied-football-watching hubby yells for her to take the kids away and demands she hurries up with serving his food (on her knees).

Another sentimental crap painted with Nollywood phantasies to cajour up cheap emotions of scorn and contempt.

EfemenaXY:



Re: the bit in green - seriously? Is that a threat? Meant to shake up the wife? Lol!!

You tell me!

EfemenaXY:





Because if he uses half his brain and puts himself in her shoes and does the right thing - without having to be schooled like a two year old, then there wouldn't be a need to nag will there?

Another cheap rant from an online ranter!!! And the wife just discovered all of a sudden she's married to a man with a 2 year old cognition? You're obviously a nagging woman.

EfemenaXY:



Mtcheeew!!

Because he is what? The beginning and the end of the woman's happiness?




And when he wants something done, how does he / how is he supposed to "cajole" / pamper his wife to do that? Without of course accusing her of lacking proper home training as per she should know what to do without having it spelt out to her?

Biko 5minsmadness, go 'n get married make we hear word.

When are you getting married yourself?

darkenedrebel:


Have you ever been to Sambisa forest before? I'm as sure as eggs is eggs that you haven't. But that doesn't deter you from getting a word in edgewise when matters bordering on terrorism are being discussed, does it?

You don't have to be married to qualify to venture one or two things on marital issues. All you need are your two eyes and two ears to observe your environment and the behaviour of the people living in it, and a functional brain of course to try to make sense of the oodles of data collated.

So this you-must-not-talk-about-marriage-because-you-are-single rant is not only ridiculous but also very unintelligent and retardëd.
Go to Quora.com and see how 15, 16 year olds comment maturely on adult issues. Dey there make shoe dey wear you.

And Catholic Reverend Fathers are one of the most brilliant persons in the world. They are typically voracious readers, majority of them are bilingual too and are more than qualified to proffer marital advisement to couples that seek it.

And Mr. OP, your post is like scalars. . . .magnitude with no direction.

She said advice and you're talking opinion
The internet is where people with superficial knowledge brandish shallow advice from Google. A non-soldier can air his opinion about sambisa, but a foot soldier who had seen combat will give advice and vivid experience about sambisa. He would tell from experience and happenings, not imaginative thesis.

Learn the difference.