Bonechamberlain's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Bonechamberlain's Profile › Bonechamberlain's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 (of 167 pages)
new year baby |
ok |
good for the year. they would continue to bomb themselves till they repent |
ok.... but let peace reign for once in the north |
that's why the transformation and the fresh air should continue until it drives some people to exile |
adisasegun:what do they dump there |
I don't think its as a result of pressure from the u.s that Nigeria abstained. I think Nigeria has a good relationship with Israel and wouldn't want to jeopardize that. in future Israel would return this favour. especially now that this country is getting to 2015 |
seems Nigeria doesn't want her good relationship with Israel to be put in jeopardy hence abstaining from voting. the Palestinian have been suffering for decades. I guess some powers doesn't want peace in that region as it would not suit their economic interest |
UN Security Council vote on Palestinian draft resolution YES Jordan China France Russia Luxembourg Chad Chile Argentina NO United States Australia ABSTAINED United Kingdom Lithuania Nigeria South Korea Rwanda The UN Security Council has rejected a Palestinian resolution calling for peace with Israel within a year and an end to Israel's occupation by 2017. The resolution failed to muster the minimum nine "yes" votes required in the council for adoption. The motion received eight "yes" votes, including from Russia and France, two "no" votes from the United States and Australia, and five abstentions. Riyad Mansour, Palestinian ambassador to the UN, criticised the world body for the failure of the vote. "The Security Council has once again failed to uphold its charter duties to address this crises and to meaningfully contribute to a lasting solution in accordance with its own resolutions," Mansour said. "This year, our people under Israeli occupation endured the further theft and colonisation of their land, the demolition of their homes, daily military raids, arrests and detention of thousands of civilians including children, rampant settler terrorism, constant affronts to their human dignity and repeated incursions at our holiest sites." Following the vote, the US, Israel's closest ally, reiterated its opposition to the draft resolution. Samantha Power, the US ambassador to the UN, said the resolution undermined efforts to "achieve two states for two people". "It is deeply imbalanced and contains many elements that are not conducive to negotiations between the parties including unconstructive deadlines that take no account for Israelis legitimate security concerns," she said. Palestinian statehood The resolution had called for occupied East Jerusalem to be the capital of Palestine, an end to Israeli settlement building and settling the issue of Palestinian prisoner releases. The resolution also called for negotiations to be based on territorial lines that existed before Israel captured the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip in 1967. Israel had said the Security Council vote, following the collapse in April of US-brokered talks on Palestinian statehood, would deepen the conflict. Ali Abunimah, co-founder of the Electronic Intifada, derided the resolution, telling Al Jazeera it undermined Palestinian rights, including the rights of refugees and the future of Jerusalem. "This was a terrible resolution which was unaninimously opposed by every major Palestinian faction, it contained so many compromises in an attempt to avoid a US veto that it was weaker than existing UN resolutions," he said. The Palestinians, frustrated by the lack of progress on peace talks, have sought to internationalise the issue by seeking UN membership and recognition of statehood via membership in international organisations. Several European parliaments have adopted non-binding motions calling for recognition of Palestine. The Palestinians had warned that if the UN resolution failed they were prepared to join the International Criminal Court to file suits against Israel. Source: Al Jazeera |
Iamsynord:then you haven't been to enugu . even with limited resources Sullivan chime did a great job. with the monthly igr and Lagos state allocation Lagos can do more. beautifying one section of the state doesn't make him the best. though I must give him credit he is one of the best in Nigeria |
Vikkie14:u just explained it the way u understood it. illiteracy I meant was on the part of who ever placed that advert not on the whole of Ibadan. i never mentioned ibadan in my post so i don't know how u came into conclusion that I was referring to the whole of Ibadan. pls learn to read and understand very carefully before quoting someone |
musiwa97:pls I don't understand ur post. are u a Nigerian |
.. that's what illiteracy has caused in Nigeria |
OK they seem to always be one step ahead of boko haram, that's because their master France knows about the boko boys and their movements and would always give them intelligence neglecting Nigeria |
good.. the woman is a performer but just like Evey other politician in Nigeria she wanted to take her own share of the national cake but wasn't smart enough as she was caught even though what she was accused of was infinitesimal compared to what others do.. thanks to APC media propaganda she was fired... |
that nemesis |
true talk.... and all this their fake show of wealth is what is making the youth of these day rush into entertainment. thinking it would make them rich overnight not knowing its all fiction they watch on TV and social media |
in Nigeria it can't happen.... not under this fake imported democracy we re practicing... no past leader can be probed in Nigeria as a result of the massive corruption in this country. the leader who may start the probe must eventually be probed when he steps down. be rest assured he or she must be found guilty of a crime or corruption |
[quote author=Krisddon post=29306273][/quote]that's the problem with u semi illiterates on nairaland. u saw a fact presented with empirical evidence, if u re to criticize let it based on facts with evidence too. and I believe u saw the source thisdaylive.com. so channel ur irrationality towards the source and not the op. gratias. |
[quote author=Krisddon post=29306273][/quote]that's the problem with u semi illiterates on nairaland. u saw a fact presented with empirical evidence, if u re to criticize let it based on facts with evidence too. and I believe u saw the source thisdaylive.com. so channel ur irrationality towards the source and not the op. gratias. |
runzlord:wats the essence of the lame thing u wrote, its either u re not matured or u re a semi illiterate that can't distinguish between making constructive statement, sticking to the issue at hand and using abusive words. sorry |
runzlord:. |
runzlord:u are very funny, I am not interested in unnecessary show of wealth.... my privacy is as important as destroying book haram. |
Silkmoth33:Hahahahahaha... please explain the non English in English |
runzlord:if that's the way she decides to live her life, good for her. I choose how I want to live mine. gratias |
• Military blames sabotage in run up to electionswww.thisdaylive.com/articles/how-30-boko-haram-insurgents-overran-1-000-troops-in-mubi/197884/ |
runzlord:I shouldn't be revealing my most expensive item to a stranger ![]() |
tclever:bless u too o ![]() |
the watch isn't even unique.... if I must wear a watch of that amount it must have.... 1) weather situation, (2) accurate date and month, (3) automatic update of the correct time, (4) GPS tracker.. (5) Bluetooth device.... (6) twenty years life span... etc |
wow congrats to her |
Russia, the United States, oil and power play (my opinion) Since the end of the cold war, the United States of America had this super power mentality that they should not be challenged and no one should rise above them. To achieve this was easy, expanding (NATO) the security bloc consisting of nations who in papers and television are independent countries but in real sense are controlled in one way or the other by the U.S. NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Alliance), was established to curtail the might of the soviet union as Europe after the second world war felt threatened by the large and powerful forces of the soviet union also known as the red army. The Soviet Union in response created the WARSAW pact consisting of puppet countries of the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe. Europe felt threatened as a result of what the soviets where doing in East Germany trying to impose communism at all cost in East Germany which was antithetical to European culture and the enduring anti-communist propaganda by the U.S. NATO consisted of mainly of countries in Western Europe while WARSAW consisted mainly of countries in Eastern Europe. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, most countries left the Warsaw and the U.S saw this as an avenue to continue their anti-communist propaganda and use the breakaway countries that form the defunct Soviet Union to monitor its greatest threat RUSSIA. Russia seemed to be the only country from the defunct Soviet Union and also in the world giving the United States sleepless nights, majorly as a result of its stockpile of nuclear weapons which is the largest in the world. Russia also saw the U.S as a major threat to its national security as most nations formerly under the Soviet Union where beginning to join NATO and embracing capitalism. The U.S had to allay the fears of Russia by promising them that NATO wouldn't get to their borders. The United States renegade on its promise when Georgia, which is very close to Russia tried to join NATO. Russian president Vladimir Putin responded which led to 5 days of war between Georgia and Russia, and also led to some parts of Georgia breaking away from Georgia and aligning with Russia up to this day South Ossetia and Abkhazia formerly under Georgia before the war are independent of Georgia and fully backed by Russia. As a result of the foreseen trouble Georgia have since not been admitted into NATO. With Russia growing influence and power, the United States felt it was better to bring down Russia by all means. Ukraine was used as the bait. The United States engineered the ousting of Russia friendly president Viktor Yanukovich and supported Ukraine’s bid to join NATO knowing full well that Russia would never allow that in fact Ukraine means more to Russia than Georgia. Now the game plan is working perfectly; Ukraine is in chaos, Russia has annexed Crimea drawing criticisms and even sanctions by America and its allies and most recently which is very strategic the dwindling oil price. Oil accounts for roughly half of Russia’s export. the united states knows that without large revenue from oil, Russia would be unable to carry out prolonged military conflicts and the economy would be bad which in turn would make Russian citizens stage protest against the Vladimir Putin regime which may lead to the resignation of putin (practically impossible) or his defeat in an election(almost impossible). The united states have began the process of fracking (the process of drilling and injecting fluid into the ground at a high pressure in order to fracture shale rocks to release natural gas inside) which has seen them gradually abandoning importation of oil in the international market and has led to the decline in the price of oil as demand is very low. Also stringent economic policies in Europe and probably china have lead to the low demand for oil. One major way for the price of oil to be high is by oil producing countries reducing their level of oil production as to make the commodity scarce thereby increasing the price. OPEC in their last meeting didn’t agree on price reduction as Saudi Arabia the organisation biggest and powerful oil producer stated that it would not reduce its production. Saudi Arabia is a major ally of the U.S in the Middle East most especially the Arab world. Reduction of oil production would make oil price soar and in turn could enable the dwindling Russian rouble and its economy get to its feet which is not what the U.S desires at this time, so no one should expect the Saudi’s to reduce its oil production they are in it with the U.S. At the end many countries would suffer as a result of one country trying to undermine another country. Also the it is likely that if the U.S achieves its aim of making Russia bend the issue of fracking may be kept aside as there are great dangers involved in fracking. If the U.S truly doesn’t want to encircle Russia it should not be so concerned about Ukraine joining NATO as it would do the same thing Russia is doing if Russia tries to enter a military alliance with Cuba and installing high tech weapons and equipments in Cuba. No nation would want to see a country it shares its borders with going into an alliance with its perceived enemies. Europe, especially Western Europe should be cautious because if a war breaks out in Europe, Europeans would suffer the most and not their pay master America who would be so far across the Atlantic Ocean in North America trying to keep its country intact at the same time sending its soldiers and war machines to Europe for their destruction. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 (of 167 pages)
look for some other word to comment. Just because you aint living in Ibadan doesn't mean those living there are dullard or illiterate. I went there frequently, so forget about illiteracy. Iwo-Road is just a melting point of all road users in SW going to Lag
what is the price of the most expensive item youve bought