₦airaland Forum

CoolUsername:
I won't try to deny the fact that many conservatives are ass-backwards in their attitudes and policies.

there's hope for you yet

basilico:
People who go to church regularly in my opinion are less likely to be criminals. Maybe you have some stats to disapprove this Share it

"in my opinion" he says

basilico:
[s]The left is godless . They push deviancy while the right prefer their siblings go tochurch.
is this an arguement to start.[/s]

All according to his holiness saint basilico right?

basilico:
Demonstrate one single lie by Tucker Carlson. Only one. And in the process state the most truthful host and I will dig up tens of lie of your trusted media host

One truthful reporter challenge You have failed to name. Instead you accuse Tucker of being a racist , non believer in electoral results.
show one clip where he lied .
Name the most truthful reporter and I will tear him to pieces

i know this is belated but need i mention the current dominion lawsuit?

basilico:
Why does Joe Biden not appear on Tucker Carlson for instance? Tucker would shred him to pieces. Or Sean Hannity. He only goes to friendly lefty media who ask softball questions. Oh and when he holds a presser he has a list of activists/journalists to call

Should I cry for your ignorance and lack of objective reasoning ?

sorry, is tucķer Carlson actually a journalist? Someone who goes ballistic whenever a guest doesn't go along with his scripted performance and openly calls out his hypocrisy! Is that the person you want conducting an interview, you want pushback into his personal safe space where he does his brainless monologues without pushbacks where he can frame the narrative whichever way he feels his brainless viewers want? You must really hate tucker Carlson

basilico:
The media called it a horse paste but in reality it is a human drug that has treated a myriad of diseases including river blindnes in Africa. The Japanese discoverer was awarded a Nobel prize in 2015. It has a horse component. When Dr Fauci & Co declared war on IVM ( so that the Big Pharma could sell the vaccine) pharmacists could not dispense it So many people ended up buying the horse paste
My misgivings is that media as I put in that video is a well orchestrated choir churning out lie after lie . Notably the top 5 media companies have never said anything positive about Trump , cut him some slack after 24/7 negative news coverage he still managed to win the elections and increase his votes by a record count . How JB got 81m will one day unravel just like we shall know who killed JFK.

Ivermectim question was to test you how much of main stream media lies you have consumed. Good advice as I demonstrated. Anything on the news Take it with a pinch of salt. There is lottso manipulation., For instance today the buzzword for what the powers are using is misinformation or disinformation whenever the narrative does not go their way. Be cautious Dont let evil media ruin your mind. what the hell was Brian Stelter doing at Davos chairing a panel on misinformation for instance?

ivermectin's specific use is for combatting parasitic infestations not viral infections! If you can't tell the difference between a parasite and a virus then you very well belong in your Republican camp of alternate realities so please stop spewing your pseudoscientific garbage here, it's irritating

Raskimonojendor:
^^^^^^^ Gay arsehole e.t.c. what's the obsession of these "wanna be" right wing posters with gays and arse holes. Lol

closet fantasies, as a man speaketh, so is he

basilico:
Being woke . Science now has redefined the numbers of genders to I think 72 so far. why does science redefine gender but cant do the same with age?
That would be good for paedos because they would be able to ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

you must be proud of yourself! Being a regular Republican echo chamber, i guess you have your definition of being woke as wokeism and CRT are currently the Republican phantom bogeymen but unfortunately for you, on average across party lines being woke has positive interpretations and connotations so continue with your unsuccessful efforts, the next election will enlighten you better

IjeBos:
It was a US project. But I do think Nigeria should be more closely aligned with the US. But, look at the views even in this thread. And instead we are aligning with China and Russia?

Nigeria should align with Nigeria i.e non-aligned, pity we don't have capable leaders currently, we only have yes men who only go abroad (cap in hand) to have terms dictated to them by various power blocs like servile dolts

IjeBos:
Been thinking about US power. Was in Panama and I was impressed with the level of development. When I visited the museum I realized it was largely due to the Panama Canal which the US completed/owned (great impact of US economy and International Trade) up until Carter negotiated to give back to them in 2000. Didn't know any of this. The whole Panama locks (way or raising/lowering ships for the two differing levels of bodies of water) was very impressive. Anyhow, thought of our Politics and whether the US could do anything like that nowadays. I think the US considers Ukraine in the same vain (necessary for economic development). Learned most of this during a guided tour of a museum and the Locks, so if I'm off let me know. Pics below.

it was/is about American interests, panama was a province of Colombia whose armed secession America supported and funded for American maritime interests, building the canal was an overt act of imperialism and there was little to nothing benevolent about it. It could only take a Jimmy Carter to recognize America's moral injustice and hand over the canal to Panama. Same thing i think Russia is trying to implement with Ukraine in the crimea vis-a-vis securing their Mediterranean fleet via the black sea. I don't see them having America's Panama success though, and today, after Iraq and Afghanistan, i don't see the U.S being so overtly imperialistic as it was back then, it's no longer the wild wild west of days of yon

IjeBos:
It's actually not just an attempt to bully me. And, by saying that it's like you're purposefully covering your eyes. He does it to other people as well. And it's destructive lies he makes up. And that's the only reason why I decided to push back more. But honestly, it's allowed to happen because he feels comfortable here, and has the likes of basilico, ben, etc. to support him. And the majority of posters here, don't push back when they do. So, this forum and thread has allowed his bullying.

then you should understand it's and it's fans and enablers worth as far beneath you and treat them accordingly. If you think failing to engage it implies it has the superior more convincing argument then you aren't giving we the relevant section of the readership the benefit of your better judgement on our abilities to exercise our intellect in knowing who's sane and those who are wilfully stup|d! You're intelligent fellow and it saddens me to see you bogged down in an exchange unworthy of your intellect, it's an easy mistake to make with the obstinate idi0ts running amok on this thread without moderator supervision, heaven knows i have been bogged down too numerous times, but fact is, like the Republican coons they champion, their arguments don't have to follow logic and make common sense, they just have to frame it in their convoluted logic and have you engaged in terms of their framing and next thing you know you've wasted a good portion of your valuable time debating nonsense with them while they pivot from issue to unrelated issue while claiming they're all related

budaatum:
The only person he's bullying here is you. Most of us deal with its childishness by ignoring it because it's attempt at bullying is inconsequential and ineffective.

Most don't read what it writes, nor your responses to it. It will burn out once you stop fuelling it with your attention and time.

the bolded tight there, astute observation! My visits to this thread are patchy and rare but the few periods i have interest in the discourse here i refuse to waste reading absolute and utter nonsense from nonsensical monikers

hedonido:
One has to be mentally disturbed to project a BAT victory when it is clear the man has zero appeal to the average non Yoruba voter. I don't understand you pseudo-'enlightened' creeps.

Who would vote for someone like this really? At least Buhari had his unassailable 'integrity' selling point that guaranteed him votes from the entire North to the South West. What does BAT have that would give him votes outside the South West? Is it his drug dealing reputation, extreme corruption, dubious personality and background, obvious signs of age and drug induced dementia and mental degradation, or what exactly? Or you're merely expecting his 'structures' to buy votes, coerce votes or manipulate votes? If this is the expectation, shouldn't you lot be ashamed of yourselves and hide your faces in shame rather than insult our sensibilities with stupid forecasts?

How do you win an election when you are not popular on the strength of your own personality with the average voter across geopolitical divides?

Even the best of you in spite of your intellectual pretentions haven't been able to explain how it would be possible for a discredited and obnoxious entity like BAT to inspire the votes of the average non Yoruba Nigerian. Instead you're relying on magic from compromised governors. Just makes no sense. That's why I'm disappointed that old folks like Naptu or Jarus can't hide their jaundiced faces rather than come out in the open to display weakly disguised Yoruba awalokan motivated nonsense.

Shame on you all.

as in ehn...
I lack words to describe the thingly veiled partisanship disguised as pseudo intellect basing it on trends that have no basis in logic today

KingOfAmebo:
Senselessness, after destroying the bank building did they get the new notes? NO. will the banks open even if new notes are available now? NO....its gpnna take months for banks to open in Benin after this destruction leaving these senseless people more stranded.

no, according to what i just read it wasn't about collecting new notes, it was about being able to deposit old notes so i totally understand the frustration

Ruthless70:
If someone speak about Obi either true or false, without confirmation U will say dey should dismiss it...

But when same is spoken about other candidates U will believe..is that not bigotry.

without confirmation? are you in Nigeria or are you from Jupiter that you claim we need confirmation to refute this? Obi has never bothered to reply him because there has never been any need! Just so you know that meeting was initiated by Deji and other people who took part revealed minutiae about the exchange and that's why we know Deji is a cashtivist and a hack who received the shock of his life from an atypical Nigerian politician in the person of Peter Obi who refused to give shishi! His life has never remained the same as his credibility tanked worse than a punctured submarine

Digitron:
Even though I am a stunch Obedient and a firm believer that Obi will win, this poll is faulty.

Nigeria is too diverse to relly on a 1000 response to guage the mood of the nation. Any poll that wants to be taken seriously must gather data from at least 1000 people in each LGA which is about 774,000 people.

That is the only way to have a reliable poll

they already admitted as much that the sample size is too small to draw genuine statistical data from, this is just for inference

IjeBos:
There goes your Tourette's.. 3 more Kikikis. It seems the more upset you get the more Kikikiki's come out. Ahhaha You are a weirdo.

Here's another definition I found online. So it seems you are also a "dumb bitch" (apologies for the use of that word). Men don't speak like that. It's ok to come out fam.

lols, so it even gets more interesting

IjeBos:
My man. I told you you couldn't help yourself. 2 Kikikis and a homosexual reference. The trifecta. You really do have tourrette's.
I had to google kikiki (men don't use that ish), and what do you know. Even the word kikiki is something homosexuals use. Just come out already. It'll be ok.

Lols, one learns something new every other day, can't say I'm surprised about this revelation though, the fixation of this character on the sexuality of others now makes more sense if viewed from the context of him trying to suss out people of similar orientation to himself using code words

Obrigardo:
Seems you did a number on that idiot who just can't get enough of you lol

one can't cure stup1d! I tried but the stup1dity from them is genetic and beyond my efforts

lhordspy:
This is getting very interesting. Very very.

We all remember how it started, when Peter obi stood on the altar of a church and said to the congregation.
''Church take back your country"

The exact same word the old brutal church crusaders used during the darkest bloodiest religious cleansing that took place centuries ago. The same few set of words that triggered the religous cleansing that took thousands of lives. My brother and sister here we go again !

I just hope when the other religion start taking up the trend, no one will cry islamization or bigotry then.

Shalom/Salam.

if an honest imam says to his worshippers "mosque, take back your country " it still translates as a vote for peter obi and the labour party because that admonition is not a religious admonition but a sociopolitical and patriotic admonition! For you to interpret otherwise only speaks to how dull or how fanatic you are

Olasyke:
I don't think he should go for those jobs.
He should keep on looking. God would definitely provide a befitting job for him.

For the people quoting me, it's obvious you can't tell I'm being sarcastic.

I mean, I don't know why person go see a 2.4 million naira job and still be pondering on what to do.

2.4m here is net meaning for a year at 200k/month, it is not good enough for a family man but beggars don't choose, it is better than having nothing

seanwilliam:
I can bet my life that Russia can’t single-handedly defeat USA

quite right, U.S is too much sef, Britain and France combined will singlehandedly defeat Russia on the seas without help from any other party, if you know you know, it is empty barrels that make noise

Ibime:
You can only foam at the mouth and rant endlessly.

Whether someone is male or female does not have any impact or bearing on what a lawmaker or politician can action. I am here to discuss politics, not whether you have permission to call Michelle or Michael a man, woman or donkey.

You are in Nigeria, an ultraconservative country with anti-gay laws and Bobrisky has not been stopped from calling himself a woman. James Brown and Denrele have not been arrested or prosecuted for anything along that line, it's in Yankee you want to come and violate human rights.

It's better you stick to campaigning whether they can be banned from competing in female sports. That's an actionable policy that many will support, but you cannot throw anyone in jail or make them fall foul of the law for what they choose to call themself.

Keep foaming at the mouth like the usual Trumpanzee manchild over shit that doesn't matter.

lols, this got me

benalvino3:
So much brainless
hahaha, dude, you are as stupid as a can of worms.

why you are a fool, you are asking for charges but there can be facts without charges. if you cannot get this, you can keep dancing like a monkey. you are only fooling yourself.

bwahahahahahahahahahaha
olorun oh
Just when i thought you couldn't get any dumber you just had to prove me wrong did you?
Quick question, did you fail use of English in school?
Because your confusion confounds me, as in..........what exactly is in my different posts in which charge is referenced that you just posted contradicts each other you brain fart?
You had to dig up my earlier posts to reaffirm that even subconsciously, even before i had to verify to you the relationship between charges and facts in more precise terms, i had already laid down the rules of their relationship in imprecise terms but you rush here thinking that there is something i posted earlier that contradicts my latter assertions so idi0t, what exactly is the colour of your confusion? Is it CRT black?or Appalachian redneck white? because your point is poìntless!
At this rate at which you are clinging to "charges" as a deflection we might soon be arguing about use of English while you still refuse to provide FACTS that the FBI conspired with Facebook and Twitter to censor a hunter Biden laptop story

benalvino3:
fool, he worked for the FBI... because you are brainless you are coming up with stupid excuses



keep dancing like a monkey.

Also, have you lost your dictionary? You may want to look up the word "agent"

Rudy Giuliani was/is trump's lawyer, the kraken lady was trump's lawyer, even Michael Cohen was trump's lawyer, they've been sued, litigated, incarcerated in Cohen's case on account of actions they took in defence of trump while in service to trump, "they not trump!" Point is, even as attorneys, you're not allowed to tamper with evidence or breach certain guidelines in service to or in defence of your client, if you do and you are found out, the crime/offence is on you, not your client. You're culpable, your client isn't! The lawyer was culpable, the FBI isn't! Do you get that dumbo?
Interestingly, you're not talking about a Clinton lawyer that was charged because he was acquitted or you will also be hear accusing Clinton too.

I repeatedly find myself forced to explain even the simplest of things to the brain dead dodo benalvino3, eveytime i log into nairaland and check my mentions hoping for something interesting or challenging i get this pathetic excuse for a lump of clay who would argue even the most straightforward truths just to pull one over the libs, you're an idi0t benalvino3, it just took me too long to realise this

IjeBos:
Is that what you got from that article? Holy Shit. It's like you read the English words on the page and your mind translated them to something else.

FACT, benalvino3 is a colossal dunce and he specializes in dubious inference devoid of actual facts hoping he will make his arguments sound less stupid or himself smarter, usually works with his brainless fanbase but the discerning few know better, infact what is gleaned from the trial showed that the FBI itself was a victim of misinformation but the idi0t benalvino3 would have us believe that since they put FBI before lawyer then it was the FBI that was culpable. And this case was so serious that the lawyer only got probation go figure

benalvino3:
I have removed all the irrelevant crap you just wrote and focus on how you are dancing like a bonobo
dancing around your word salads. you need charges for something to be fact. so much sense.

take SBF for example, he did not do any fraud if he is not charged right
you can dance and adjust your blunder as you go... you are brainlessX, you are dum.....

"We"? or you are just ignorant on this one?


YOU ARE BRAINLESSX... you don't have sense.

you braindead dodo! FBI attorney, not FBI agent! Not at the instigation of the FBI as an institution! I already saw this as the lame raft you will cling on to to save your brainless argument, even special counsel Durham knows the distinction that you the chairidi0t of association of headline readers does not and that is why his three year investigation is a colossal failure like you

benalvino3:
See as you they dance like monkey.

You tied charging an org or person to facts. Now you they dance around legally provable facts. Na you know why you use word salad.

How can you be so confidently idi0tic?
Of course that has been my point from the get go and no, it is not legally proven facts, rather it is "legally provable facts!" because experience has shown that trump and his idi0ts like you talk big game outside the court but go missing in action in court, refer to my exchanges with coolusername before you and then you on before now on the standard of the facts i repeatedly over and again requested foŕ, that you only realise this now speaks to the gargantuan levels of your stupidity! Good grief

[s]has there been a case where someone or org was charged then the charges were dropped?
has there been a time when someone was charged and the court finds him not Guilty and he was vindicated?
How you tie charges to facts is why I call you brainessX

Who will charge the FBI and why will they be charged?[/s]

Did you just really type all these? just say you're an opinionated idi0t without saying so, you are so stupid you want to make it out that i implied it is all about charges when my assertion is that it is all about facts and charges are synonymous to the strength of your and your confidence in your facts, you think that if you take semantics and make it about charges then everyone will forget you are yet to provide a single fact in your allegations that the the FBI conspired with and censored a story on two SM coys, nice try but fail! You've only verified your excellence in stupidity!
I hope that explains your confusion about the relationship between charges and facts and saves you the unnecessary effort spent on deflecting so you can remain focused on the fact that you like the Republican led Senate enquiry are yet to provide any fact with a legally actionable backbone

I don't know where you are getting Trump's DOJ and admit LOGICALLY stating the FBI was not part of the effort to shut down that story. Mark Z... is saying they were involved, and on Twitter, Musk has revealed they were involved. You are just here feeding your bias.

Oh shut up you blithering idi0t! "Part of the effort" does not cut it, censorship and conspiracy are definite and deliberate acts and that is what i have with forbearance been asking you to prove since while you've been dancing around definitions of censorship, facts and charges since. Irredeemable dullard!
Fact! Trump and his attorney general bill Barr appointed a special counsel Durham to investigate and bring charges against the FBI in 2019 on their mishandling of the investigation into suspected collusion between the trump organisation and the Russians in 2016 so that there is evidence for you that it is possible to investigate and charge if you believe you have more than mere suspicion or allegation of foul play though in this case 3yrs after no charge has yet been brought against the FBI or its agents which goes to show my point that establishing a fact in the court of law requires a certain standard, a standard you're unwilling to meet even halfway.

mumu, again, charge, in this case, cannot be linked to Facts. the DOJ and FBI will not charge themselves... How much of an embarrassment can you be to yourself?

Sorry idi0t! It can if you had any! There's no guarantee of a guilty conviction but at least it will show your confidence in your facts that you were willing to subject it to the legal test

based on all the corruption that has been demonstrated by the FBI and DOJ, you are expecting them to Charge themselves. wow.

idi0t! The DOJ has what they call special counsel and they can investigate and charge anybody except those currently with immunity with nonpartisan fervour if any prior investigation found any evidence to warrant their necessity

benalvino3:
You can write a book or yap all you want... Mark z... Said the FBI was part of it. From what musk have released and from what we know of the testimony from Jack Dorsey, one can say Mark Z... Only saying the modest of the FBIs involvement.

Capital NO! If the "one" in the bolded refers to you benalvino3! You're too partisan and too brainless to be granted that much leeway! Best you shut up and reduce your ignorance by listening to others

You have made it know that evidence to you is a charge on the fbi. We know they lied to the FISA court to spy on trump, and many wrong doings that are criminal and yet they are not convicted rather. .. By your logic there is no evidence that they lied to the FISA court.

Your bolded is wrong, i have made it known that charges are highly synonymous with high confidence in the veracity of the "FACTS" of the claims/allegations.
And as to the rest of your rubbish, no we don't know whatever you claim! We don't know that the FBI as an organisation lied to the FISA court if they are who your "they" refers to and it is not for lack of trying by trump, bill barr, the then and current DOJ!

Special counsel Durham was appointed to that effect to uncover more to the alleged conspiracy against trump and charge those found culpable, i know you know this because in 2019 i remember an earlier version of your moniker was one of those celebrating this as the first step in the Republican response to the Mueller investigation on this same thread, but like all other Republican political red herrings, there was little or no substance to the allegations, three years after, after lots of taxpayer funds wasted, three charges, two acquittals, one sentenced to probation and no charges against the FBI and no further charges expected you all kept quiet hoping if you don't talk about it the rest of us will forget about it
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/11/18/trump-special-counsel-investigation-mueller-00069578

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/donald-trumps-3-year-probe-into-2016-conspiracy-reveals-little-evidenc

Point is, facts will always trump your fictions and spurious allegations

Charging someone or not charging someone does not indicate facts or lack of fact.

So much brain less

Charging someone or not indicates the presence or absence of facts and secondly your confidence in the veracity of your facts! Point is, Everything revolves around FACTS! Something you know you never had hence your rigmarole of of dancing around every other technicality except the facts

basilico:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fze0btPLCBc

FBI stone walling .

that is your opinion and as such subjective, my opinion is that a partisan senator gaetz is trying to brow beat an FBI official into accepting his accusations as actionable fact and my opinion is also subjective so let's focus on facts then,
Fact, the FBI official repeatedly responded that when the FBI can establish actual evidence or facts, they don't come to Congress to yap about it, they go to court, they are not in court against the hunter Biden currently, neither did they do that when trump was president and bill Barr head of the DOJ, the logical implication is that despite gaetz's yapping, they can't establish his allegations for a fact.
Fact, hunter has been investigated by the FBI and the state of Delaware before and no such charges as gaetz insinuated was brought against him or his father Joe

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/federal-prosecutors-weigh-tax-and-gun-charges-against-hunter-biden
So basilico, facts don't care about yours or my opinions, so we should learn to distinguish between them

benalvino3:
Like a fool, he is asking of a charge against the FBI. Unless they are charged it did not happen.

Way to shift the goal post brainlessX

establishing legally provable facts in civil and/or criminal allegations naturally lead to prosecutions or charges in court, the absence of a single charge against the FBI and/or Facebook and Twitter concerning conspiracy and censorship even after a Republican led congressional hearing under a Republican president and DOJ naturally and logically concludes that "there was no fact attached to these allegations" or there was no meat on this bone! so dimwitted dolt that you are, regret though I do the necessity of having to explain everything to you like I would a retard, charge in this case is linked to establishing for a fact the allegations of conspiracy and censorship against the FBI and SM coys!. Case in comparison, criminal trump and his trump organisation are facing many charges in court because prosecutors believe they have "FACTS" that will corroborate their accusations in court so yes, no charges no conspiracy or censorship you simple minded dolt! Even civil charges zilch so therefore zilch conspiracies and censorships

basilico:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62688532

Mark Zuckerberg says Facebook restricting a story about Joe Biden's son during the 2020 election was based on FBI misinformation warnings.

The New York Post alleged leaked emails from Hunter Biden's laptop showed the then vice-president was helping his son's business dealings in Ukraine.

Facebook and Twitter restricted sharing of the article, before reversing course amid allegations of censorship.

Zuckerberg said that getting the decision wrong "sucks".

"When we take down something that we're not supposed to, that's the worst," Zuckerberg said in a rare extended media inter

good, good, you're learning, you're taking a smarter tack than the self opinionated dolt called benalvino3 and quoting directly from the report. Now my question for you is this, all the excerpts you quoted, singly or combined together, do they validate a charge of either conspiracy and/or censorship against the FBI and both Facebook and Twitter? Mind you I am asking of "charge" not "allegation", one is legally actionable the other not so much.
Also forgive me this one foray into whattaboutism, if I concede to you the allegations part from a conservative perspective, in what terms will you then describe the actions of fox entertainment network over the years of refusing to carry news items like the January 6 hearings, anchors and hosts advising and conversing with the then President Trump on policy issues and framing of news items? Will same conspiracy and fraud accurately cover these same allegations/charges? Or do your standards apply only to one spectrum of the news outlets?