kreezBreezy:


pls is it possible to apply without nysc certificate? in other words, did u upload ur nysc cert? thanks

shutupareyouGOD:
abeg have they answered you. please get back to me because i need to know before i purchase the pin.
thanks

greatKCforever:

Guy, apparently you need either of GRE and GMAT . Also you need either of TOEFL and IELTS.
Some schools might actually not require TOEFL since Niaja is an English speaking country and it depends on the school and how you table the matter to them.
GRE boosts your chances of studying abroad. I am actually preparing too for the exam and also thanks to a thread , I got fab study materials.
Send a blank mail to selfstudy.version2@gmail.com to get study materials too

shutupareyouGOD:
Please to the previous beneficiaries, is this compulsory at the application stage.
Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) (USA).
G.R.E (Graduate Record Examination) (USA).
GMAT - for Management related courses (USA).
International English Language Testing System (IELTS) (UK).
that's all I'm lacking and stopping me from applying.
Thanks for your awaiting response

Unblockable:
Such a disheartening news! RIP to the gallant officer.

When Jonathan was there, whenever such things happened, I was always vexed. I always prayed that those (Boko Haram) guys be defeated. I never tried politicizing the war against Boko Haram even when it was obvious Jonathan wasn't ready to tackle the menace.

However, I'm surprised today that when any news of a fallen hero arises on this forum, people tend to celebrate it because of their hatred for Buhari. Buhari didn't say they've been fully defeated. But it's audible to the deaf, visible to the blind, perceivable to the anosmia and vocal to the dumb that the man has really tried. People have gone back to their villages which they deserted during Jonathan's tenure, some of the Chibok girls have been rescued. Do we expect the Boko Haram not to carry out any attack at all? For Pet' sake, this administration has done well in the fight against insurgency.

BrainnewsNg:


It won't work

Thats BB OS 10

Try and upgrade

Bigchief46:

You are wrong dear, it was a unanimous decision of ALL the seven Judges. It is really simple if you have a little knowledge of the law. The Supreme Court has always been VERY CONSISTENT and the last hope of the common man. Many issues are involved here and this is not really the place or forum for such conversations, but I will address very briefly just two points. Proving malpractices in election Petitions means getting witnesses in each Polling Unit in respect of which there are allegations to give evidence. Obviously, in Governorship & Presidential elections where there are thousands of Polling Units, it is difficult for a Petitioner to do this. Moreover, where the allegations involve criminal conduct, the standard of proof is higher: beyond reasonable doubts & this is not easy at all. The reason is simple: elections hold in Polling Units & not in Wards, LGAs or States & so a Petitoner who brings just one or two witnesses to testify as to what happened in an entire Ward or LGA will fail. The important thing is that these principles are the same for every Petitioner, whether PDP, APC, APGA or whoever. The second reason which has presented itself for the first time in the 2015 elections is the issue of Card Readers. Card Readers are not part of our electoral laws. There is no mention of it in the ELECTORAL ACT or THE CONSTITUTION. No doubt it is a commendable innovation that will reduce rigging but INEC blundered by not getting the National Assembly to legislate it into law by amending the Electoral Act to include it as a means of accreditation. For that reason, the only means of accreditation recognized by law is manually by use of Voter's Registers. Now the decisions by the Tribunal & Court of Appeal in the River's case was largely based on Card Reader data & I can bet my last naira that the SC would have held just as they also did in the Zamfara Governorship case, that you can't annul an election due to failure to use Card Readers or inconsistency in the data. Mind you also, the SC has expressly held in a long line of cases over many years that you cannot annul the election of a person declared winner because of actions he is not responsible for; Neither Wike nor PDP conducted the accreditation of voters; INEC did. If INEC decided to use manual accreditation instead of the Card Readers in some places according to their own guideline resulting in inconsistent accreditation figures against number of votes cast, you cannot blame Wike & nullify his election. Finally, you heard it here first: the Supreme Court will also affirm the election of Dr. Okezie Ikpeazu of Abia State annulled by the CA based only on spurious allegation of over-voting based on Card Reader data instead of Voters' Register data