₦airaland Forum

illogicalgoat01: Furthermore, you talk like a local person. How can someone compare UAE, Kuwait and Saudi to the west? Google the most advanced countries and the most female friendly countries and see whether you will find any of these three in the top 10 rankings.

UAE, kuwait, saudi arabia are infinitely better than any country i have been in the west. the most advanced countries? advanced has different meanings to different people.

if your "advanced" means kids going to school with kalashnikov to shoot their mates, where homosëxuality is legal, where teenage pregnancy is very high, where rapë statistics are high, where divorce rate is 50% then you lack moral values.

BABE3: and you know what?
The concept of polygamy cant work if the women themselves don't agree to it.

the dynamics are very vast these days. gone are the days women ran after married men because of dependency. these days, women(including europeans) are doing it for other reasons apart from religion & gold-digging.

If the man brings home a second wife and the first wife leaves coz she's not comfortable, that's monogamy. If the man brings home a third wife and the second wife leaves, that's monogamy. And so on. The man will be forced to be monogamous if women don't like polygamy.

don't mind the moaners.
all those wives abiola had were forced into the marriage. fela married about 32 women in a white wedding sometime ago, he must have held all of them with a revolver to follow him to church.

It's the women that have the final say, so why cry foul?... please what's the problem here?

women who do it know why they do it......this is another excuse by a top female professional working for the home office in britain.

‘I don’t have time to have a bloke around all the time. I just want to see him maybe twice a week, so it works perfectly if he’s got another wife who can take care of all his cooking and cleaning.’”

and yet illogical boy says polygamy is anti-women? never met anyone so low in IQ in my entire life.

BABE3: In this day and age where more women are getting comfortable with being "side chics" and baby mamas, I wonder why polygamy is causing this much debate. Aren't those concepts similar to polygamy?


Polygamy is all about choices; a choice for the man to acquire more wives; a choice for the first wife to get a divorce if she's not pleased, and a choice for the other wives to embrace polygamy.

don't mind that troll who cannot tell his left hand from his right. the level of stüpidity some people exude is baffling!

logicboy01: Logic, reasoning and effectiveness determines whether something is right or wrong. Biblical Jewish tradition was barbaric, so no need to reference them

you are a cretinous vermin!
biblical jewish tradition is barbaric by whose standards? what a sheep!

Bigamy is the act or condition of a person marrying another person while still being lawfully married to another spouse. It is illegal in the United States. The crime is punishable by a fine, imprisonment, or both, according to the law of the individual state and the circumstances of the offense.[4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygamy_in_North_America#Legality_of_polygamy_in_North_America

you are a rank idïot!
men are living with multiple wives in europe. it's the ceremony that is illegal, not the act. muslims in the UK have more than one wife in their homes & they practise their polygamy openly.

It was an analogy as you rightly noted. Being in a polygamous marriage as a woman doenst make the woman a slave. I was only showing you how someone can choose something bad for themselves (a freeman choosing to be a slave). Furthermore, any woman in a polygamy has a slave-like mentality (not that this is different from being an actual slave). Any woman with dignity would not choose to be shared like a toy at the whims of a man. However, some are forced into such marriage and feel chained in bondage to their situation. (eg poor women who need the financial security).

your propensity to stretch the borders of daftness is unrivalled. i said so - your lack of exposure is your biggest challenge, not polygamy. you have deludedly concluded the only reason any woman would marry an already married man is because of dependency.

the former wife of the london mayor(boris johnson) married an islamic polygamous man.
this was her reason - I realise that I am unlikely to conceive children [at my age] so we agreed that, so long as he chooses a good partner, then I am happy to live together in an extended family

Saudi Arabia, UAE and Kuwait are better than western countries? Wow, you are indeed very very very local and ignorant. Please google the human development index and see how advanced countries rank. Saudi doesnt allow women to drive. grin grin

if they aren't better, why are the western folks there? a chunky percentage of the people doing menial jobs over there are western folks. their health sector & oil sector are ridden with western folks. they are very rich, little or no drug problems & homelessness is almost nonexistent like you will find in many western countries today.

FALSE. Polygamy is illegal in the UK. The law does not recognize such marriage. Try filling "married" in your tax forms as a second wife and see what happens

like i told you, it's the ceremony that is illegal in the UK. any man can marry 22 wives in nigeria & ship all the women to britain & leave with them till the day he dies.

Nihilist: Coogar, like I said before, Ferdinand does not look bad because he plays for QPR.

QPR look bad because he plays for them!

See ESPN's take on Rio

of course, QPR(without rio) made the top 4 the last time they were in the PL. they only got relegated because they fixed matches, isn't it? i am sure if terry moves to QPR tonight, they will keep clean sheets till the end of the season.

StarBoard: I hope you mean what you say, because I'm not sure Peter crouch can take Vincent Kompany over the distance that Nani or Diouf did.
I'm glad you mentioned short-distances.

he will.....because he has a world class ball controlling skills. peter crouch has one of the best first touches as an english player & his close control ability is second to none.

he would remove kompany out of the way with ease. no defender is immune to getting punished. the difference is - defenders from top sides can always count on their strikers to score quick goals & destroy the morale of their opponents so you are more likely to see a demoralised crouch against man city because stoke would have conceded 3 goals before crouch has even warmed up.

logicboy01: You see your foolishness?
No one is arguing that a woman cant choose to be in a polygamous marriage!!

so what's your argument?

The argument here is that polygamy is a wrong and anti-woman choice. Here is my argument again (please, read before you criticise)

you are a consummate rëtard!
who determines what's right from what's wrong? wrong in whose eyes? even the jewish tradition allowed polygamy until the romans occupied israel.

Feminism is not fighting for polygamy or illogical choices. It is fighting for gender equality and women's rights or freedom. What an individual woman chooses to do with her freedom is her own choice. If she chooses to be in a polygamous marriage in an advanced society, she will face the legal consequences.

which legal consequences? aren't there polygamous wives in america? aren't there polygamous wives married to one man in britain? your lack of exposure is your biggest challenge, not polygamy!

Guy, thanks for exposing how you have been the illogical one.

you are a rank idïot!
being someone's 2nd wife is equivalent to being a slave? you are a disgrace to formal education. if you pull up another daft analogy in the middle of an intelligent discourse like this again, i will tear you apart.

Again- polygamy is a wrong choice. A man is not equal to two or more women. It is not surprising that the societies that allow polygamy are usually backwards and patriarchal socieities.

UAE, kuwait, saudi arabia, etc allow polygamy and are better than any country you can pull out in the west. what has polygamy gotta do with the backwardness of a society?

Take the top ten advanced countries or the top ten woman-friendly countries; none of them allow polygamy. CASE CLOSED!

there are polygamous families in britain!
and the only thing you should close is your stupid mouth that has shytë falling from it. if you cannot grasp the concept of polygamy, you should excuse yourself & scram out of here.

ElFenomeno1: Thank you Coogs!

over short distances, crouch is as fast as any of the headline strikers in the premier league. his gangling stature is very very deceiving....and he has a long reach with his octopus-like limbs.

StarBoard: crouch's best asset is his aerial ability.
Crouch on a footrace? I'd like to see that.

http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/1378675-peter-crouch-and-the-15-most-awkward-soccer-players-in-the-world/page/2

raumdeuter: These strikers you mention are fast.
Crouch is one of the slowest strikers in Europe. He is so slow His shadow outpaces him and has to wait for him at the bus stop while Grouch catches up
If this Couch can outpace Rio, then Rio should report to the nearest old peoples home

RVP is fast?

StarBoard: Wait,
See the people you are comparing. They at one time had elements of pace and could leave anybody behind.
Peter Crouch leaving me behind? Rio should do the honourable thing like Gary Neville did 2010/11 and retire mid-season.

peter crouch is deceptively quick on the ground. his legs also guarantee a long reach & he would get the first contact on the ball before any defender. he left top defenders like thiago silva & nesta for dead at san siro in 2011.

To answer you, ghosting is easing past someone as if he/she were not there.
Rio has been pants this season.

and i am saying any defender would be pants at QPR. neuer was germany's #1 in 2011 while he was at schalke & he conceded 7 goals in a tie against a weakened united side. was neuer really poor or the overall strength of schalke was pïss-poor? make your deductions.

how many goals do you think gary cahill would still be conceding if he's still at bolton? i am sure you would say 25 clean sheets per season. dayo would also expect QPR not to have conceded any goal this season if they had david alaba in the heart of their defence. football is a team game, people.

Check the afore-mentioned Spurs QPR game at WHL. As per Harry, enough said but on paper I think the QPR side should be doing more than they are at the moment

their team is weak from the midfield to the defence. if the midfield is weak, the defence would be far too exposed & after a while, the pressure would tell. that's what football is all about.

StarBoard: Rio has been on the decline since Berahino left him for dead at OT vs West Brom last season.

RVP left terry for dead in 2011/12. diouf left kompany for dead 3 weeks ago. nani left kompany for dead in 2011/12. should we buy caskets for these defenders?

are strikers not meant to be faster than any defender?

logicboy01: Why not ask why I said it is anti-woman
You people just abuse without looking at the logic behind someone's statements.

that's because you are chatting nonsense....

It is anti-woman because it inherently posits that a man is equal to two or more women.

you are the one that contrived to pull the above out of your rectum. so all the women that willingly spread their legs for 2face & had his babies were forced to do so? didn't they know about the other women in his life?

you must be joking......

I wonder, are you guys not the same people that complain about islamic courts making the testimony of one man equal to that of two women?? Yet, you find it okay to put the union in equality (marriage is 50/50 the woman gets half and the man gets half) in polygamy as one man to two women or more?

life is about choices & that's exactly what feminism has been fighting for. if a woman wants monogamy, it's her choice. if she prefers polygamy, it's her prerogative. she's not forced into it. if it's uncomfortable for her, why marry a man with 3 wives & then turn around and claim to be a victim?

Jesus christ!! some people and hypocrisy

my $5 says you don't know the meaning of the word hypocrisy. you are just letting out hot air. if a woman walks freely into a polygamous setting then it's none of your business.

Nihilist: What job?

When Peter Crouch outpaces you as he did Rio 2 weeks ago, then you know that it's time to retire from the game and never look back...not even on TV

and peter crouch won't outpace terry? when cesar(brazil's #1 goalie) was at QPR, how many goals did he concede?

you people just argue like kids. you can bring any top defender in the world to QPR, he would get destroyed because the team itself is wack.

nothing to do with rio.....

damiso: I don't even know what to say ( type )again sef after seeing my mentions. I wanted to ignore my mentions but somehow I just feel thats not right.

TV01 I do wish you could indeed borrow that leaf and try to realise that we are all different and as such will have different views on issues.I do know our beliefs and in this case your faith colour our worldviews but the Christian thing to do in most cases would be to let go of old issues and resentments and treat each new case on its own basis. I don't think the "plagiarism" dig had anything to do with this thread and if it was about anything in the past I think you need to let it go.

Efemenaxy I know you have unfollowed this thread but I hope you read this. My asking the question again after TV asked was innocently trying to see what you felt about males in any caregiving proffession not just childcare or early years teaching. I did feel you were questioning my maternal instincts by continously questioning me about my opinion that I felt male child care workers are not necessarily a bad thing. It was never my intention to debate on this thread as like you said its everyone's prerogative to do what they think is best for their children. My intial post on this thread even put my hands up that I did buy into stereotypes and felt a bit wierded out when I felt my 3 yr old was going to be taught (not even cared for) by a man.I asked that question innocently and felt you would answer it based on the fact that you were the one who started the debate by continously questioning my views and using outliers to define my stance.You do know it was not in anyway meant to be malicious or cause a ruckus. I state my opinion on NL and its just how I feel on issues and not necessarily the right or correct one as most life issues sometimes never have absolutely right or wrong answers.

I know we can't get on with everyone (TV you are right I dislike rofo rofo and even in real life try to avoid uncessary conflicts) I hope all the bitterness hate and dislike esp for people we might pass on the street without recognising can be put to bed.

damiso should just apply to the UN after this post. with this skill of yours, you are the only one i know as of today that would bring peace to gaza.

ayinba1: Take his name to mean "illogical". Trust me.. you'll find out shortly.

never read anything more stüpid in my life. on which planet is polygamy anti-women? the irony is the username like you quickly observed. logicboy? he should be called doofus-boy.

iamaromolaeran: sup lyricist

i have not written in ages......i have been too lazy lately. i want to battle yeyenatu though in igbo language. she's been running her mouth on me these days. i think i should put her down.

teddybiyasi: devil may care
just tell me ya hood

i ain't telling you.

ayinba1: @Topic
What a way to honor your late father!!!
SMH

the boy is a möron!
i never knew diabetes is caused by extra-marital affair. if the man had died of magün or he got shot in the mistress' house then one can understand his logic but diabetes?

how come men who don't cheat still die of the same ailment? nigerians & their backward reasoning. just because the mistress said what she said doesn't mean she had a hand in his death. what will be will be. the man was diabetic - nigerian hospitals must have murdered more than 10 million diabetic patients through their incompetence.

teddybiyasi: were do you base in UK

make I come storm your hood when I'm doing my masters

you? my hood?
you would get eaten up here. the last ibime showed up.....his phones, wallet, belt & stocking cap were taken from him by the boys on the block.....

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/1/285x214/93718_1.jpg

homesteady: the match that I said had 1.2 billion views started by 3pm

it didn't have 1.2 billion views, it said there's a potential & it was a drunk commentator that said so, it's not official.

even if it started by 3pm, it's an anomaly. la liga games don't usually start by then & tv broadcasters buy these games in bulk on 3-year contract.

they just don't buy the games in retail like tom-tom.

homesteady: I thought the highest was 1 billion?

yes, the highest was one billion. just telling you unknown teams like man city have garnered more views than el-clasico.

Sir Alex Ferguson labelled his side's clash against the Reds as the biggest club game in the world. And it's easy to see why.

Here are some global statistics compiled by The Daily Mail newspaper.

211 - The number of countries that the Barclays Premier League is broadcast to around the world. Which means only 27 countries in the world don't get the television feeds - Afghanistan, Turkmenistan and Ukraine among them. However, places like Cambodia, Fiji and Madagascar get to watch the live games.

500 million - The number of people around the world who managed to catch Manchester United's 1-1 draw at Liverpool on Saturday. The record audience for a Premier League match stands at one billion for the clash between Arsenal and United in 2007.

70% - The percentage of the 2.08 billion football fans that actively follow the Barclays Premier League, translating to a total of 1.46 billion people.

4.7 billion - The total global audience for last year's Barclays Premier League, with 3.9billion people watching from their own homes.

643 million - The total number of homes that receive broadcasts of the Barclays Premier League, accounting for 3.9 billion viewers. A further 777,000 fans watch from outside their homes. (Asia - 1.3b; South & Central America - 879m; Europe - 761m; UK - 629m; North America - 140m)

http://www.foxsportsasia.com/football/premier-league/news/detail/item691758/

Around £100m of that was spent by NowTV to secure the rights for Hong Kong, Showtime Arabia stumped up around £60m for the Middle East and North African market and WinTV spent £50m to show games in China.

The continued growth and huge appetite of the Premier League's worldwide audience is the reason foreign broadcasters are prepared to spend such huge amounts to show English football.

The potential is vast - an estimated audience of one billion watched Manchester United's match with Arsenal in November 2007.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_prem/7232378.stm

as you can see, 1 billion watched a premier league game in 2007. it didn't say the potential to watch, it quoted in past tense "watched".

afrodoc2: DK and this his anti-EPL trolling.
Criticizing EPL defenders when good defending has been banned in the Burnthisleaguedown for years.

the guy just talks nonsense -
this is why this whole collective sharing of the TV deal hurts united the more. imagine if we had £180m awoof every season to buy olayers, a bayern fan won't have the gall to say rubbish at premier league clubs.

all the best players in the world would be in the top 4 clubs.

teddybiyasi: coogar how's your children plus wives

you are not serious - teddyinzaghi

damiso: If you read my stance on my other posts my arguments on why I think not only males could be predatory was that abuse on children especially those who could not speak was not only of the s.exual kind.

children who couldn't speak can even be abused sëxually. just like you asserted, there are sickos all over the world. if a sicko takes digital images of a child to share in those sick child pörn sites, surely, the sicko has abused that child sëxually.....it's still pëdophilia!!!

barackohandso: The el-clasico, not the whole of la liga in general has more viewers.

they don't....the highest they have posted is 400 million. the manchester derby(title race match in 11/12) posted 650 million viewers.

el-clasico is not prime time in far east asia. they usually start around 6-8pm GMT which is like 2-4am in asia. no TV station would pay for such. it's bad market.

raumdeuter: How was Cahill doing his job when Robben Gomez and Ribery couldn't hit shots on target or when they couldn't even score from a penalty?

you are a fool - 22 shots were blocked by the chelsea defence marshalled by cahill. only 7 of the 43 shots attempted got to cech, that proves cahill outfoxed your entire attack.

numbers don't lie.....
gomez, ribery & robben couldn't hit targets like they normally do cos they were never allowed time to measure their shots before taking them. they were put under immense pressure.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/1744683_image_jpeg9f360c5ab7736510df54c882e9dbf188

all the small white arrows you see are cahill in action - snuffing out your attack before it got near petr cech. that's world class defending. 43 attempts & only 1 goal? bayern are a useless outfit!

The job of a defender is to reduce the number of shots taken at his goal yet Cahill was watching while the opponent were making his box their playground.
No wonder Cahill isn't even considered for the team of the season. Never mind calamity Koscielny

you are starting to talk like a fool - no defender can stop shots - the midfield does such jobs. a striker can take shots from 20 yards in front of the defence - how are the defenders meant to stop that? are you a camel?

iamaromolaeran: aii sure.....I won't.....

teddybiyasi: Wednesday
kk normal 24lines
like daylight
no fantastic issh oooo cause I hate stretch ooooh

[img]http://lolcow.farm/pt/src/1409709604732.gif[/img]

homesteady: lmao so do you really believe 1 billion people watched the battle of the emirates because they did not say it had the potential? did they go from house to house to count the people that watched the game?
its just estimation...

it's digital viewing - with the interactive red button on remote, sky can have a rough estimate of how many viewers saw that game. even if it's an estimate - same ish applies to the 400 million views link someone posted earlier.

la liga has nothing on premier league when it comes to global audience. don't even argue that outside - you could get slapped!

raumdeuter: Because EPL best aint shit anywhere in Europe. WHen was the last time an EPL player made it to Europe shortlist of best players in Monaco?

what has that gotta do with anything? more english clubs have won in europe than any other league. that's their quality. chelsea cannot buy aguero from city like bayern stole lewandowski from dortmund.

You just threw logic out of the window, If Bayern strikers had 40+ goal attempt and one goal then its due toBayern strikers poor marksmanship or Cechs extraordinary effort

it's only because you are a fool that you can deduce the above. bayern had 43 shots & cech made only 7 saves. more than half of those shots were blocked. so was cech the one making the block or bayern munich suddenly became west brom that cannot finish a scoring chance?

If Cahill did half a decent job they wont be taking shots at his goal every 3 mins like you opined

so na cahill go stop shots taken outside the box? your football knowledge is in the pits.

raumdeuter: Would he be in top form every season? Not forgetting he had many injuries that season Mention one defender who was nominated every season

terry 03/04, 04/05, 05/06
vidic 06/07, 07/08, 08/09
rio 06/07, 07,08, 08/09

kompany never won it 3 times consecutively so how is he the best defender in the league. the aforementioned players have won in europe & show themselves to be quality. kompany has none of that - so what's your claim?

Bottom line EPL top players like Kompany, Toure etc get rimmed for fun in Europe

and yet the almighty bayern couldn't break the defence the combo of luiz & cahill on their home soil.

homesteady: www.thescore.ie/live-barcelona-real-madrid-1148910-Oct2013/

the link said it had a potential audience - it never said 1.2 billion people watched the game. the highest el clasico has garnered is 400 million.

premier league took it to the billions in 2007 & there are credible sites that can back that up not some idiötic blogs that a drunk blogger put together.

raumdeuter: Kompany despite making it as EPL best still gets rimmed everywhere in Europe

Same with Yaya Toure EPL best getting sodomised by all and sundry

Are the same Yaya and Fernandinho not protecting him when he gets to EUrope and he's turned into the continental LovePeddler?

you are defeating your own logic here....
if kompany is the best, he won't be södomised in europe. cahill is above him & he ate all your strikers at allianz arena in 2012 final as proof.

bayern had 40+ goal attempts on the night - they had only one goal to show for it.

raumdeuter: I disagree

2010/2011 season he was nominated when his team finished 3rd.

2011/2012 season at the time of his nomination I am not sure Citeh was even top of the table since they only won it on the last day. They were even able to get to the last day top because Manure had an epic collapse to Everton

Last yr he made the team again at a time when Chelsea and Liverpool looked more likelylike they would decide the winner between them

Last yr Only 2 teams from the champions made it, Compared to 3 from Liverpool, 2 from Southampton and 2 from Chelsea

why wasn't he nominated in 12/13?

homesteady: 1 billion kwa? any source to validate this screaming lie?
Who doesn't watch El classico? you talk of Asian? Barcelona has a very large fan base in Asia, especially the die hard ones!

google is your answer. type it out & see several links that would pop at your eyeballs.

more people saw that match on TV than the world cup final in germany the previous year. the battle between fabregas & anderson.

there can never be a match like that again in the PL & the match didn't disappoint.

raumdeuter: Kompany has made 3 of the last 4 EPL team of the season

by the virtue of the club he plays for - which has finished comfortably above chelsea & arsënal in the last 3-4 seasons. you said it yourself that he's a nobody outside the premier league.

WHich of Koscielny, Cahill and Terry has made it to the list 3 times in the last 4 seasons

but these are the ones that have shook europe. cahill reduced your strikers to pub players in the 2012 CL final. terry has won the UEFA best defender about 3 times now. isn't that a bigger achievement than kompany?

EPL raters have Kompany consistently as tops and he is regularly molested by his European opponent regularly.

his club is strong in the league but naive & inexperienced outside england. kompany isn't that good. the likes of fernandinho & yaya toure protect him. it's like saying joe hart is better than cech or begovic!

I can say even Brigit Prinz would sodomize him steadily yet he's EPL best defender of the past 5 season

i dunno where you got that from. show us any link where kompany was rated the best defender in the last 5 seasons?