₦airaland Forum

this woman should be stoned to death...

at her age, she went to see a man in his hotel room. she was offered alcohol, she was asked to sit on his lap and she was asked to kiss. she obliged and she had sëx with the man and now she's trying to tarnish his image?

i really dunno why people or the media give mentally-deranged women like this the audience to spew nonsense. i am surprised she's not claiming she was räped. what kind of people are going to nigerian churches these days? whöres disguised as virtuous women!!!

i don't believe a single atom of this story - it's a smear campaign!

El Guapo: [color=#0066ff]Coogar, tepid defending can have a team lose a game, lose 3 points and lose a grip on the title chase. It must not only be reserved for big games.


If u'd Crucify Luiz for the horrendous display in the first 45mins against Utd that scuppered our title chances then theoritically u'd have to Crucify Bouhlahrouz for his Ojoro dance against Keane/Spurs that led to our defeat at WHL in 2006.

Cole's Pakuromo dance against Sunderland in 2010 - Seasons we failed to win the title.[/color]

the season is a marathon race - you can't just highlight inconsequential matches and berate players for their errors in those games. usain bolt can screw up in the qualifiers or the heat - he can even afford to come 2nd or 3rd in the semis.....but he dares not screw up in the final.

luiz picked the wrongest moment to screw up. that goal was scored in the 36th second of the game. what chelsea would have wanted was to sit tight and keep a clean sheet in the first 30 mins then wear united down but that early goal ruined ancelloti's game plan and effectively cost him the league title & his job!

nateevs: Coogar.
The City of London/Council/Mayor whoever it is that makes the final decision to sell the Power Station will certainly not give a rat's ass about who just won the league. The is the UK.

obviously, i was only pulling y'all legs.....lighten up, bro. monday is not here and you are already twitching like a computer glitch.

nitlad: I believe you are just trolling, innit?

you have a much better bargaining power as the champions of england.

So this is enough reason to blame Luiz for every goal Chelsea concedes?

every player commits errors on the pitch - the key is don't ever get caught committing errors in high-profile games that swing the title.

Vidic is one of the major reasons the waste-pipe FernanDUD Torres cost £50 million.

that's not true - torres had become the 3rd best player in the world before this particular incident. torres scored 33 goals for liverpool the previous season. his price-tag had skyrocketed before vidic got cleaned out by nando.

Should he also be blamed for all the goals Manure concedes because Torres consistently plastered his face with eggs?

the difference is - united still won the title that season and vidic's error was quickly forgotten. with luiz, his error was the reason chelsea lost the title in 2011.

has anyone blamed terry again for the red card he foolishly copped at the nou camp? chelsea went on to win the tie & they even won the CL in the end - terry even lifted the cup...

had chelsea lost to barca that night, terry's contract would have been torn and he would have probably been sold to QPR.....smart players know how to pick the games they can screw up.

elampiro: Our midfield was better by a thousand mile in 2007/2008 than 2006/7. When Hargreaves came we were able to beat Chelsea since Mourinho took over, we beat Arsenal with style then won the UCL.

stop lying - mourinho had already left chelsea by the time we played them in 2007/8. stop lying - united beat mourinho's chelsea in 05/06 via fletcher's goal!

When we beat Arsenal in 2008, Hargreaves was in the score sheet from a free kick. When we beat then 4-0 comprehensively in 2008 FA cup fixture, Fletcher scored two while Anderson started. For the first time in a long while we became comfortable playing against big teams.

another lie from the pits of hell - united were beating arsenal home & away before hargreaves & anderson came to united. we beat them 4-2 at highbury in 2005. which comfort is this liar talking about? getting spanked by chelsea in 2007/8 @ the bridge was comfortable? losing to west ham and city(home & away) was comfy?

the illest verse of all time...
beasts from the east - canibus

this verse was from lost boyz's album in 97. you get everything from this. mad knowledge, sick metaphors, multis, quotables, brilliant punchlines. this was the golden age of rap. i doubt anyone can put pen to pad and write something this morbid ever again in hip-hop!

Canibus brings the sickest drama
Fierce enough to pierce the thickest armor
I smack bïtches who try to suck dïck through the condom
Playing with the mic is something I won't do
My only concern when I approach you, is to roast you
I smoke you and whoever you standing close to
And make every man in your crew deny that he knows you
Defeating niggas like Segal, Steven
Putting Emcees in positions to prevent them from breathin'
I'll make you question any and everything you've ever believed in
By peeping your deepest secrets like psychic readers
What's the matter with ya'll, I splatter ya'll
Against the muthafückin wall with these raw lyrics I catapult
None of ya'll got the bälls big enough to battle
I go On & On like Erykah Badu
A hundred times nicer than the best is
Twice as African as KRS is, who wanna test this?
Fück y'all you don't impress me and no one can test me
An emcee so ill, I got AIDS scared to catch me
All that shït you poppin' will stop, when I put you in a headlock,
And apply pressure until I crush your muthafückin noggin
I grab mics and push niggas to the left
So fast their hearts end up on the right side of their chests
My hypothesis, is that nobody can see this
Lyrical genius, i got it sown like a seamstress
But if you want to battle, I'm down
If you got nine lives, I'll take eight of them off your hands right now
Step up and get your neck cut from ear to ear
If you survive then you can cover up your scar with a beard
I'm the illest from Queens to the new Jerusalem briddicks
Anyone who ain't feeling my shiddit can suck my diddick
You need to quit it, if you ain't spittin'
More than 50 bars per minute cause you ain't in lyrical fitness
Kickin' boring raps with metaphors that's wack
All of ya'll muthafückas need Nordictrack
To get ya weight up, fückin with Canibus you get ate up
Beat down and sprayed up, just for bringing my name up
Been rockin' longer than niggas twice my age
Back in the days before Bob Marley was rockin' a fade
Before Honest Abe signed the paper that freed slaves
Before Neanderthals was drawing on walls in caves
I existed, in the garden of Eden gettin' lifted
Stickin' dïck to Eve before she was Adam's mistress
Before Christ created Christmas, I been in lyrical fitness
The Canibus is spittin' til' he's spitless
50 bars of total sickness, you won't forget this
I'm puttin' every wack emcee alive on my shït list
Verbally vicious, telekinetically gifted
Took you a minute to exhibit that I'm sick with it
Now you tell me who you think is damaging shït
Going once, going twice
Sold! to that nigga name Canibus
Me and Mr.Cheeks, A-Plus, and Funk Doctor
Hopping out the Huey helicopter to suey chop ya.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx1crp46Oy0

nitlad: Abegi make we hear word o jare.
Ibime is chatting nonsense. Blaming Luiz for Chelsea's defensive woes, conveniently ignoring other important factors like the ones Nateevs stated above. I'm sure Ibime also thinks Luiz scuppered Chelsea's chances of landing Battersea Power Station.

i am sure david luiz could be directly linked to the fact that chelsea lost battersea power station. all he had to do was prevent hernandez from scoring & chelsea could have won the league that year......as champions of england, chelsea could have had more bargaining power to secure battersea power station but luiz let hernandez räpe him to score in the first minute of the biggest game that season.

https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lkwac8zYOe1qa756q.gif

ancelloti was so pissed, he took him off @ halftime...

https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lkwahfe1Py1qa756q.gif

if elampiro takes a lie detector test, the machine would blow. lies roll of off his mouth like tissue paper. i don't know how an individual would wake up & decides to just lie to win an argument.

scholes + carrick partnership is as good as scholes/keane. they brought out the best in ronaldo in 06/07. the football was the best we played that decade. scholes had just come back from his double-vision eye defect that kept him out of most of 05/06 season and he played a blinder in 06/07.

Ibime: You are a bloody liar who will resort to all manner of falsehood to make an argument.

Okore was clearly marking Lukaku. The video is there on YouTube for anybody to see the falsehood Nateevs is trying to twist.

The same Okore pocketed Chelseas mega million pound attackers with not a single shot between them nigh on 70 mins he was on the pitch. If Luiz was playing for Villa instead, they sure to concede 3 goals with his PlayStation tendencies, recovery jogs and poor positional awareness.

We don't need to make up lies to show where Luiz was disgraced in matches. We all know who (Hernandez) did you know what to you know who (Luiz) . . but let's keep that between me and you!

hahahaha - that's some jigga & nas ish!

Afam4eva: Oya, what's the capital of Ogun state? Pls don't say Ogbomoso

abeokuta - i have been to olumo rock. i have attended the ojuode oba stuff in ijebu with the kukus. like i have said, i would sell you in ogun state.

Origami III: Yours or you rented it?Are your from ogun state?Is there any airport even airstrip in ogun state?

my house! what is rented? am i too young to own a house or what are you driving at?

elampiro: 1. Hernadez was a minus one the that final. It was a fatal error playing him. He was too young and inexperience for the occasion. He was caught offside a million times. That's my point.

rooney was the minus - useless offensively & defensively. hernandez was the arrow head - he needs sweet delivery to function. rooney's passes to him were too late or overhit. defensively, rooney didn't even bother pressing busquets. he just stood like a fool that he is...

2. What do you mean by 'exactly my point?' You think I am lying? I even under stated my football life.

pathological lying....

3. Arsenal and Chelsea were the teams we had problems with until Hagreaves and Ando came. Even Scholes and Carrick could not fly past them. Remove Totteham and Liverpool, we always beat them before Carrick arrived, so it was not a big deal.

this is a dirty lie - arsenal were beaten home & away in 04/05, we took 4 points from them in 05/06. where's the problem?

3. AC Milan 3-0 win was too comprehensive for any excuse. In the run in to 2008 CL triumph injuries were part of it, but it didn't affect us. Brown went in for Vidic while Hagreaves played for Brown in some key matches, I think even against Barca. Rooney was out too against Barcain the 2nd leg. Due to Hargreave availability, United were able to rest key plays against Roma in Old Trafford.

the defenders on the night were oshea, brown heinze and evra. rio/vidic and neville were missing in the first leg. the 2nd leg was even worse - vidic was rushed back from his injury and rooney had no strike partner - it was giggs doing the support striker in both legs....

in 2007/8, the scale of the injury we had in the defence cannot be compared to the previous season. rio was present in the game we lost vidic to injury. vidic played 9 CL matches in 12. so where's the comparison? i dunno why you like to argue over things you lack knowledge of......

nitlad: Shut up. Nor be una fault nah... Na dat epileptic Gary Neville put word for una mouth. Olosi.

you better listen to ibime.....he thinks luiz is irresponsible and i share his opinion. he's better as a midfielder than a defender. hernandez became a legend in this league for the act of sodomy he committed against david luiz!

Afam4eva: I would like you to move to Ogun state so that your orientation will change. You have stayed in Mama charlie land for too long. Things are working in Nigeria now. Come back home.

see this one - i will sell you anywhere in nigeria. you think i am one of those people who doesn't travel to nigeria? be deceiving yourself.

Pataki: Amosun is already busy dualising idi-aba axis. Already there is a road that leads from Kemta Housing Estate into Obantoko. With all these in place, it makes room for easy movement into Ibadan avoiding the hassles of Adatan/Asero axis.

You have a house in a prime location. Finish it up and let it out. You would be smiling to the bank soon.

Up APC!!!

time to move to my duplex on bisi onabanjo way..... ogun state, here i come!!!

lmao @ afam hiding my post.

elampiro: 1. Hernadez was just to run to try and beat the offside trap on the night. But we was always offside, he couldn't beat the trap.

rubbish....
hernandez was to beat which trap? so hernandez's role in a big match was to beat offside trap and rooney was to beat 2 centre-halves? sometimes i doubt you even understand the concept behind football. you have a lot to learn about the game......your biggest mistake was being part of facebook forum discussing football!

2. Tonto is a virgin if she says it, is really is and can prove it. I can prove and defend anything I say here. Pictures are there at least.

exactly my point....

3. Before the arrival of Hagreaves and Anderson, what were the results between United and Chelsea, and United vs Arsenal when Carrick and Scholes played? How did they perform in Europe against big teams?

they reached the semis in europe - injuries to the entire back four lost us the game in san siro. vidic was rushed back in the 2nd leg & heinze played as a centre-half. united took 6 points from liverpool, drew chelsea home & away. that's the only season mourinho's team did not beat man utd in the league. united beat city & spurs(home & away).

how did they not dominate? they won the league at a canter. in the season hargo & anderson joined, united won the season on the last day of the season. avram grant's chelsea nearly snatched the title from united that season. united lost to chelsea @ the bridge and lost to man city(home & away).

damiso: I think ALL women (single or married) should wear long tops over skinny jeans or jeggings if they have a big back side .Seriously somethings I have seen this summer .Abeg ppl should stop assaulting our eyes.

Belly folds, stretch marks, flabby bingo arms ewww.*shudders*.gross.There is elegance in wearing what suits your body shape.

this has been the best summer for me - i quickly look away when i see flabs or disgusting cellulites. 9 out of 10 times, the women exposing flesh are qualified to do so.....

Afam4eva: Instead of steaming and ranting endlessly, it would have been easy for you to just tell me that Ogun already has a BRT scheme. I don't know what's it with some of you and being defensive all the time. Is anyone chasing you?

your fingers work faster than your brain. you have the uncanny ability to spew rubbish. your comments are always devoid of facts. you are too fond of hearsays and information contrived in a beer parlour after binge drinking.

i cannot count the number of times you have been pilloried for giving wrong information on things you are not knowledgeable about. it's better to just keep mum when you have no idea - it's part of being humble.

Ibime: PlayStation defender! No wonder JM was looking to replace him with Mangala. And little do fellas know that same Okore we are discussing is firmly on Chelsea radar and even rejected a move to Chelsea in January on grounds that he wants guaranteed first team footie.

i hope nitlad is reading this.

elampiro: 1. Despite your chart, it is still very wrong to use Rooney to mark Busquet. It will weaken our attack. Rooney had Pique, Masherano in front of him to displace before creating a chance for a goal, then he had Xavi and Busquet who could also mark him out. Asking a striker who has so much in his head to do to get past his markers, to mark a DM is nonesense. I don't believe it came from SAF. Ronaldo, Messi, Aguero, Tevez, Torres, Suarez will never be given such a task.

if rooney had mascherano and piqué to displace, who was hernandez pressing? valdez?? you should know when to give up when you brainfart.....rooney's task on the day was to mark busquets.....that was why berbatov/owen sat on the bench. rooney failed to do his task & united lost. he failed again to do it against pirlo last summer & england lost!

2. Who was talking of Yaba under bridge? I represented Lagos sate NYSC. Before then I had played in state league briefly but dropped out because of education. Two players whom we played together are still in the national league division one while some had left. Those two players represented Nigeria in U-17 and U-20 separately while they were both in Insurance of Benin, a Premier League team at the time. I can give more details but there is no need for that.

...........and tonto dikeh is a virgin!

3. Scholes + Carrick only were part of a team that won the league in 2006/7, they never convincingly dominated the big four (other three- Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool) until the arrival of Hagreaves and Anderson. Neither did Scholes and Carrick partnership triumphed of European big teams. They only did well against small teams of which some have even updraded.

they didn't dominate the big four?
scholes - 2593 mins, 30 apps
carrick - 2504 mins, 33 apps.
which other united midfielder played as many minutes as this two in 2006/7? a team that led the table for 7 months did not dominate the top four? you must be a dreamer.....

elampiro: 1. Despite your chart, it is still very wrong to use Rooney to mark Busquet. It will weaken our attack. Rooney had Pique, Masherano in front of him to displace before creating a chance for a goal, then he had Xavi and Busquet who could also mark him out. Asking a striker who has so much in his head to do to get past his markers, to mark a DM is nonesense. I don't believe it came from SAF. Ronaldo, Messi, Aguero, Tevez, Torres, Suarez will never be given such a task.

if rooney had mascherano and piqué to displace, who was hernandez pressing? valdez?? you should know when to give up when you brainfart.....rooney's task on the day was to mark busquets.....that was why berbatov/owen sat on the bench. rooney failed to do his task & united lost. he failed again to do it against pirlo last summer & england lost!

2. Who was talking of Yaba under bridge? I represented Lagos sate NYSC. Before then I had played in state league briefly but dropped out because of education. Two players whom we played together are still in the national league division one while some had left. Those two players represented Nigeria in U-17 and U-20 separately while they were both in Insurance of Benin, a Premier League team at the time. I can give more details but there is no need for that.

...........and tonto dikeh is a virgin!

3. Scholes + Carrick only were part of a team that won the league in 2006/7, they never convincingly dominated the big four (other three- Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool) until the arrival of Hagreaves and Anderson. Neither did Scholes and Carrick partnership triumphed of European big teams. They only did well against small teams of which some have even updraded.

they didn't dominate the big four?
scholes - 2593 mins, 30 apps
carrick - 2504 mins, 33 apps.
which other united midfielder played as many minutes as this two in 2006/7? a team that led the table for 7 months did not dominate the top four? you must be a dreamer.....

chaircover: I was going to upload a picture of a lady wearing a shirt and jeans, but it wouldnt upload

it wouldn't upload because it's evil.....chaircover, don't corrupt us single men o! we are allergic to massive bütts...

elampiro: These are newspaper talk. Until we get Rooney and SAF comments on the issue, it is useless.
Rooney marking Busquet doesn't make sense. Like using Suarez to mark Carrick or Scholes in a mighty match.

you are a football illiterate.....
this is why you think it doesn't make sense that rooney was assigned to man-mark busquets....

https://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/barca1-1.jpg

the diagram above clearly explained what rooney's job was to be. press busquets and disrupt the flow to xavi + iniesta + messi. that was rooney's job. fergie was clearly seen barking orders at rooney in that game. his anger was towards rooney - rooney refused to mark busquets and united couldn't stop the wave of attack that busquets was starting time n time again!

You are a coach of U-16 team what? If na that type I don coach tire na, even female teams. I don't know your level, but if it's a local stuff I have done it before. I even functioned as coach/player. Anyway kudos! It's a commendable step. Who knows?

this is an organised non-league football stuff, not some freelance nonsense you see in yaba bridge.

Anyway no need to argue this for too long. But if SAF deemed it fit to upgrade our midfield while we have Scholes, Carrick and Fletcher in 2006/7 by adding two players in Hargreaves- a good tackler and Anderson- a driving player and sometimes confronting, why will any suggest in 2013 that we revert to the Scholes + Carrick style of 2006? Most teams are now so fortified in midfield with the right mix. We cannot be laggards (or laggardback lol). Hope you won't pull up a stat of 1956 and ask us to return there?

no one said anything about reverting to scholes + carrick in 2013. we are just correcting you that scholes + carrick once ruled this league against some of the toughest premier league opponents particularly mourinho's chelsea squad that had ballack + essien + makelele + mikel obi and won the title. united did not need a hatchet man to win the title then.

that united side led the league from october 2006 till may 2007. mourinho couldn't do anything to stop that united dominance and carrick/scholes were the most used midfielders that season in a 4-4-2 system.

xynerise: No woman can seduce me with her eyes.

The part of pastors wives, being a pastor's wife doesnt guarantee a good woman. Besides, we have fake pastors

so if a pastor is fake, his wife could also be fake? i like this comment.

chaircover: You guys are really funny . . .
A woman that wants to seduce you can do that with her eyes, not to talk of body language . . . before you even see jeans.

the general idea is - her jeans brings the boys to her yard. if it's low-rise with her thongs popping out then it's a green light.

I was at one of my friends birthday party 2 weeks ago and the invite said "Strictly blue Jeans & a touch of yellow" Kulyie for don die cos I saw ladies in their 50's rocking Jeans. Even pastors wife join

i am sure all these women wore big tops convering their bütt. these are not the ones naija men are antsy about.

kulyie: so that means babes like mercy johnson dont appeal to you.so you will rayher go for the likes of ashant with a cute face

i wouldn't touch mercy johnson with a 12-foot pole....

back to the issue i think every woman regardless of marital status looks good on skin tight jeans however women that are 53 upwards should please desist from it

if 53 upwards can't wear it, why should 23 wear it?

chaircover: LOL so you were only causing trouble as usual

i am a peacemaker - ask ileoba.

The bum is the bum . . whether under jeans, velvet or lace. Jeans does not add to a bum neither does it remove inches from a bum and anyone with any sort of imagination can tell the size of a bum even if I the bum was wearing a kaftan . . no one can hide a bum that refuses be hidden

no way - the jeans give you a clearer view of the shape. it's like comparing HDTV to iro & buba(black & white TV)

chaircover: LOL @coogar and pals.
So if the butt isnt the issue as you are a face man . . . then what is the problem?

i am not the one complaining - i am just holding the brief for the married men in naija who do. i can't be bothered about what my wife wears - trust is the key!

. . and NO, a married woman shouldn't deliberately seduce a man.

this is the dilemma....
since we can agree most married women pack a humongous backside, they probably don't know they are seducing the men even when walking innocently. so married women should take extra-caution not to mislead men when cat-walking.....

chaircover: I didnt quite catch your question . . are you asking Should a married woman wear skinny jeans or should a married woman deliberately sway her hips to attract male attention?

the latter........

Its funny people should pick on skinny jeans, beacuse go to any owanbe party and you will see that many of the ladies there are wearing see through lace or lace with lots of holes, but is it because its sewn in iro and buba style that coogar and pals dont take any notice?

coogar and pals?
i am not the conventional nigerian guy. big bütts don't appeal to me at all. the cuteness of the face is my number one priority. what's the point of a big bütt and a falafel face?

chaircover: When you guys sag showing your dirty boxers. We look and take our eyes away. You should do the same

there's nothing sëxually attractive in sagging - most ladies even despise sagging. meanwhile, the bütt of a woman is visually-appealing to men and women know this so they sway hips to make the rump shake when walking......

question is - should a married woman be doing this?

chaircover: No I wouldn't, because I wouldn't feel comfortable with it and I will be pulling the top down every few seconds.

thank you!
now, that's the point some naija men are trying to pass across....

chaircover: Excuse me??

My trademark dressing style in Nigeria is a pair of skinny jeans, A Hawes and Curtis shirt and heels.

Its comfortable and that is my style.

but the hawes & curtis covers your backside which blinds all the prying eyes. would you wear a skinny jeans with a top showing midriff?

chaircover: You mean pankake butted women shouldnt wear skinny jeans?

too big or too flat is not good - it's unforgivable!

[quote author=A-town]Going by the last arguement we had, i know you will never succumb. Anyway as far as SONY is concerned overall sales in the US is unit cost x number sold. Whether 1 out of every 12 people in the UK has it does not matter in this case.
Using your own numbers and assuming the PS4 sells the same way 399$ * 13.5 million is way more than 349pounds x 5million.
At the end of the day, it's all about profit. You could have simply won this arguement by combining the UK and Europe vs the US, then maybe you would have had a chance[/quote]you like arguing against logic....
europe and UK will get it 2 weeks after US and they would pay £349 for the console in comparison to USA's $399. obviously, their bulk of their sales is in europe - not in the USA, which defeats your argument that they make more money in the US.