Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 6:13pm On Apr 30 |
Reloadedisraelp: Many people don't even understand this sc judgement..... The matter go long till almost election day .... Be jubilating what u don't know about.. the matter still dey pending for court.  Leave those followers of 3rd class graduate. They never see anything yet  |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 6:11pm On Apr 30 |
koning: Ever heard of democracy?. It's a game of numbers. There's no association of persons where agreement is 100%.
Election will be held and INEC is compelled to accept the executive that was elected.
APC, Tinubu and co still have one trump card they could use. But i will not reveal it here. All the SAN's on both sides are capable.
However, besides party politics, BAT is in charge of the security and unity of Nigeria as a nation. He must hold that high in any thing he and APC want to do. But the Supreme Court just told you that courts have no power in the internal affairs of parties. So which court will compel INEC to do anything concerning their internal dispute? Do tell. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 6:08pm On Apr 30 |
fredoooooo: They send them baxk to the court that make the decision .. as expected ... its going to be the same judgement No it is not. By the time the court even determines that, the time permitted for primaries and submission of candidates would have elapsed. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 6:06pm On Apr 30 |
HIGHESTPOPORI: Same Inec chairman that is fighting for his job? Dey play.You think tinubu and Inec can hold this country to ransom INEC chairman will serve out his two terms of ten years complete. President Tinubu did his research before choosing him. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 6:04pm On Apr 30 |
Yinkson69: It's not a care win yet. I think a trap has been set for ADC with this judgement. Why are you letting the cat out of the bag? INEC portal is still empty for ADC. Mark is a goner. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 6:03pm On Apr 30 |
demstone: ADC LEADERS ND FOLLOWERS ARE NOT SMART AT ALL
THEY CNT EVEN SEE THE TRAP
THE MORE THEY LOOK THE LESS THEY SEE Leave those dundees. |
Politics › Re: Dear Peter Obi, Don't Let Them Decieve You, Run As Atiku's VP - Opinion by Cyberterror: 6:02pm On Apr 30 |
Why are you begging like this?  Peter Obi the agulu fraudster has made it very clear that he is not running as VP again. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:59pm On Apr 30 |
onuman: Your wish: an independent umpire to take sides with one of the competing teams. In what akwaya do you live in? You see that you are not making sense. But you want INEC to take sides with Mark. On what basis? |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:56pm On Apr 30 |
koning: That's why you have party congresses. Both camps will have to secure enough members to their side to be elected as party executives. The party constitution will guide how the dispute will be resolved.
Same as in your village community association.
Every party has an internal dispute resolution mechanism. That will be applied. So when a resolution within the party is not or cannot be reached, what should INEC do? |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:55pm On Apr 30 |
HIGHESTPOPORI: Stop crying all over the thread,we can feel your pains,as far as supreme court as set aside the judgement of the appeal court that made Inec to remove mark name.David mark won You are the one crying, following my comments up and down. INEC will not upload David Mark and his associates to their portal. You can take it to the bank. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:54pm On Apr 30 |
onuman: What business has INEC in the internal politics of a political party? Constitutionally, they are empowered to be the referee in politics of the country. They monitor and guide parties to abide by the electoral act. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:52pm On Apr 30 |
Hangulsaram: Are you alright, how can INEC decide who the authentic chairman of a Party is or should be? Because the Supreme Court just gave them the freedom to. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:51pm On Apr 30 |
Daguccizgreat: Go school you no gree I go school, only that I no graduate with 3rd class like one dundee failed politician. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:49pm On Apr 30 |
maestroferddi: Go and play with your toy cause you are sounding like a hapless little child.
INEC will do the needful, oga....
They have no elbow room to do rubbish again... You are sounding pained. INEC holds the cards here. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:48pm On Apr 30 |
qtx: If that is true, INEC should not have waited for the court's order of "status quo ante bellum." The Supreme Court has made it clear that INEC should not obey any court order at all regarding the internal affairs of a party. Simply because it is INEC's prerogative to be the arbiter. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:42pm On Apr 30 |
koning: The matter is NOT justiciable. It's not a matter for the courts. No court will handle it again. That is what the supreme court judgement implies in my own view. Exactly! So who settles a dispute in a party now that the Court has washed its hands off? Do tell. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:40pm On Apr 30 |
DMerciful: When you're in a hole, stop digging Unfortunately for David Mark, he is in that hole. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:40pm On Apr 30 |
Solowande: wetin u dey talk? Before this whole court brouhaha, didn’t INEC recognize the David Mark–led NWC? You see what I have been saying. INEC alone has the power to recognize the party leadership and now that there is a dispute, it can take a stand. INEC alone has that power, not the courts, so says the apex court. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:36pm On Apr 30 |
famology: Fergie001 break this judgment down in plain terms as regards ADC leadership as of today. That one you are calling is charge and bail. He can't help in this matter. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:36pm On Apr 30 |
koning: Nafiu Gombe Bala, Dumbebi Kachikwu and the rest of the former executive members of ADC were present when the David Mark led executive were elected. They participated. Even collected monetary settlements. They were satisfied until APC, Wike and Tinubu came with bullion vans.
They were obviously recruited by APC, paid handsomely to do a hatchet job. These are mere sentimental opinions that cannot withstand legal scrutiny. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:34pm On Apr 30 |
Adonkia: Can you please explain how? I have done that. Follow the thread. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:34pm On Apr 30 |
blackgold2018: exactly and he knows revolution can cost him both loosing lagos President Tinubu holds both Abuja and Lagos firmly. 2027 is a walkover for him. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:33pm On Apr 30 |
maestroferddi: Oga wake up and smell the coffee....
The so-called judgement of yesterday was a hastily procured ruling in a futile bid to second guess the decision of the Supreme Court.
That verdict has no legal legs to stand on against basic judicial scrutiny...The tail cannot wag the dog.
As soon as the substantive matter of the leadership of the party has been determined, any other incidental matter will become an academic exercise. Dey play. Come back if INEC uploads Mark and his associates on their portal. Mark is a goner. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:31pm On Apr 30 |
Aiel123: @Fergie001
What's your take on yesterday's federal high court judgement on ADC in relation to the SC ruling? Who assumes the chairman seat? That one is charge and bail. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:29pm On Apr 30 |
zeyt: I am very happy now. Tunibu should not stipple oppostion this rugged way. With this ruling their is hope for democracy to florish in Nigeria. Dey play. Wait for the coming hours for legal reactions. Even Mark cannot celebrate. He knows he is in deep trouble. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:27pm On Apr 30 |
1bunne4lif: Myou get sense at all? Question for your momma. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:27pm On Apr 30 |
koning: Where did you learn your law?
Do you have details of the judgement?
INEC has zero rights in deciding who is or will be the chairman of a political party. If the supreme cannot make that decision, how on earth do you think INEC can. It's strictly an internal affair of any association of people. Internal affairs of which people exactly? Those members supporting Mark or those members opposed to him? This is where INEC steps in to take a stand. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:25pm On Apr 30 |
Justnation: You are wrong, the courts equivocaly said that party affairs should be left to the party members.
INEC under amupitan is a bonafide member of APC and not PDP, therefore they can only interfere with APC internal affairs and not PDP or ADC Which of the party members? The ones with Mark or the ones opposing him? You see where INEC comes in? |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:24pm On Apr 30 |
robosky02: Inec does not have power to decide party chairman only to conduct elections You are wrong. In the coming days, you will see INEC take a stand. Just keep watching. ADC currently doesn't have a recognized leadership. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:19pm On Apr 30 |
Justnation: INEC is not a member of a political party and therefore cannot decide its leadership. Stop spinning lies Yes they can if the leadership is in dispute. That's what the Court has basically said. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:16pm On Apr 30 |
Mynd44: No. The judgement of yesterday has not been vacated yet The case is about whether the courts can intervene in political parties' internal affairs. It is not whether INEC can intervene, which they can based on their constitutional mandate. |
Politics › Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Cyberterror: 5:09pm On Apr 30 |
The court never said that David Mark is the authentic chairman. INEC still has the constitutional right to decide the authentic ADC leadership. |