₦airaland Forum

a

this oneolajire where did you get all these lies from. even you yourself know you are wrong. All these points you gave are very baseless. Why do you assume when you have never in your life attended a meeting or assembly before. You base this nonsense on info from wikipedia. I am sure you don't even read our journals. So i would advice you to stop this. Just attend our meeting and meet someone to study the bible with you. I can bet you that your eyes would be opened .

to find more information about the anointed ones ask any of the witnesses in your area

jesus christ had always existed o. Jesus christ also helped in creation alongside his father. get more info when you read our publications. Brothers no need arguing. Because we are achieving no purpose. We have been sent out to preach and teach honesthearted ones. Those who value the good news. Those bearing fruit. This is clearly a waste of time as these one's are here to argue.

Jehovah's witnesses today do not have any human leader. Our only leader is the head of the christian congregation, Jesus Christ. So Charle's taze russel is not the leader.

Anas09:
And the activities of evangelical Christians are not banned in those same countries? But evangelicals still send people there. They kill us, but we keep going. These are people who are not afraid to die for the gospel.

JW waits in the sidelines for the evangelicals to make converts then they come in and confuse.

Jw hardly have any redemptive mesaage to deliver to a lost sinner, none whatsoever.

I almost was lost into you guys. At the brink of it, God saved me.

you and i know these are lies. You clearly have no proof whatsoever.

DoctorAlien:
Isa. 43:11 wasn't talking of a Saviour for the Jews alone, we know. Yahweh says only He can save; How then is Jesus Christ also Saviour?

Isa. 45:5 says apart from YHWH, there is no other GOD. How then does YHWH say to Jesus Christ, "Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever..." Psa. 45:6?

you must be an atheist

more comments guys

more comments guys

roll in comments guys

guys check it out.

Reuben Abati, former media
aide to ex- president,
Goodluck Jonathan has
revealed the two biggest
‘wars’ the erstwhile
administration fought while in power just days after ex- First Lady got embroiled in a
financial scandal . Abati described every day of
facing then opposition party, All
Progressives Congress (APC) as
similar to going to war. Reuben Abati has revealed two
big wars Jonathan fought in
power. “It was a very political period,
with a very vibrant opposition
that challenged every little
effort by that administration. It
was like going to war. Coming
out from the warfront, when you get back home, there
would be memories, there would
be experiences; but at the end
of the day, we thank God for
the opportunity,” Abatti
recalled. READ ALSO: Fani-Kayode embarrasses GEJ’s aide’s
publicly for supporting Hausa
people The former editorial board
chairman of The Guardian
newspaper said the two biggest
fights Jonathan government had
with the opposition was over
Chibok girls and deregulation of downstream sector. Abatti however exalted the
latter, saying it was much
tougher than the former even
though Jonathan was constantly
under fire for several months
over his inability to rescue the missing Chibok girls for up to a
year after they were abducted
by Boko Haram insurgents. Former president Goodluck
Jonathan fought many wars in
power He said: “Well, politics is war by
another means. One of the
toughest moments was after
the deregulation of the
downstream sector. You know
that marked a turning point for the Jonathan administration in
January 2012 when we had
Occupy Nigeria’s protest and all
that. “And trying to explain
something that you would think
was very simple to the public
and straightforward enough
was a problem because the
opposition was ahead in imposing a certain prejudice.
Ironically, a new administration
came in and did exactly the
same thing. READ ALSO: Anti-corruption war: How Patience Jonathan
initiated EFCC probe – Lai
Mohammed “Then, you begin to ask
yourself: the same people, the
same issue, but in one instant it
caused so much problem and
resulted in long-term loss of
goodwill for one administration; but with another administration,
the people just accepted it. I
think it is something we can
interrogate on another level. “The Chibok girls’issue was
another turning point. But the
very first was the deregulation
of the downstream sector. That
is what we call it officially, but
you call it removal of fuel subsidy.” See what the former president
has been up to lately after his
many wars in power Goodluck Jonathan’s comment after
meeting with 2 former heads of
state (photos). http://davesblog.over-blog.com

Buhari was elected president in
2015 by a broad coalition of
interests. Capitalists, socialists,
unitarists and regionalists all
united to ensure that he won
the elections. By all accounts, it appears that
the regionalists and capitalists
are unhappy with his
performance to date. They
seem to imply that he deceived
them either actively or passively by playing along with
their plans. They claim they
were led to believe that he
would place the private sector
at the heart of his governance
strategy but his actions to date have been a betrayal of
that promise. READ ALSO: 2 prisoners who turned leaders of Nigeria As 2019 approaches, how can
the ‘free marketers’ ensure
that they won’t be deceived
by another ‘socialist’
masquerading as a capitalist? I think the answer to the
question requires us to apply
ourselves more rigorously to
the manner in which we select
candidates. In the US and UK, the
candidates present manifestos
but there is also an implicit
understanding that elections go
beyond the manifesto. A critical
analysis of the candidates’ personality must also take
place. Their reasoning is simple.
Circumstances change so it
possible that a manifesto
becomes redundant but what
won’t change is the person
who is in charge of government. For example, a manifesto might
have promised that Sunday
Oliseh would be sacked as
Nigeria’s coach but the promise
would be redundant because he
resigned. That is why analysts in
advanced democracies go
beyond manifesto promises.
They seek to understand a
candidate’s ideology, his
decision making processes and his character. They are the
things that will determine how a
he reacts to unforeseen events
when he gets into office. For example, David Cameron is a
capitalist by ideology and
Jeremy Corbyn is a socialist by
ideology. So it’s logical to
assume that if confronted with
the fuel subsidy problem, Cameron would have opted to
remove the subsidy whilst
Corbyn would have insisted on
retaining them. READ ALSO: Atiku presidential ambition 2019 kicks off In the Nigerian case, these
issues are more critical because
the President is so powerful
that no godfather can control
him. Therefore once he moves
into Aso Rock, his decisions will be a reflection of his core
principles. This is why it was no
surprise that Buhari balked at
the decision to float the naira.
It went against his core
principle, socialism. So in 2019, it will not be
enough to say, Elrufai promised
X or Atiku promised Y. We must
ask ourselves, what would
Elrufai or Atiku instinctively do
when confronted with a crisis? Are they democrats by instinct?
Are they diplomats by instinct?
Are they capitalists by instinct?
Are they compassionate by
instinct? In summary, I think the 2015
error was the failure of
capitalists to consider the
personality and ideology of
Buhari before they chose to
support him. It will never be enough to read and analyse
manifestos. We must always
delve into the personalities of
candidates and understand the
core of their ideologies and
characters. Source http://davesblog.over-blog.com

simply click http://davesblog.over-blog.com

get fresh news at http://davesblog.over-blog.com/

more comments