₦airaland Forum

nateevs:
Yeah. Just to show how intelligent "YOU" are. I made that comment immediately I saw it happen in real time.
I must have finished composing it just around the celebration which may have lasted about a few seconds at least.
According to you though "the commentator was even yelling it" . . . . In real time?
You only got to know today the commentator was even yelling it . . but only in the replay.
This is a classic case arguing by force. Job of the jobless!

Nateevs do you tell lies for a living?

Match kicked off 4pm according to NL records evidence below

nateevs:
Here we go.

Nani scored on 37min that must have been around 4:37

Below was a quote made by Nateevs after the first half

nateevs:
End of first half. 3 things.

1. Meireles is not a DM.
2. Lampard has gone from grace to grass. Slowest player on the pitch by a mile.
3. Ramires should not be in a Chelsea shirt.

NOW TEN MINUTES AFTER THE END OF THE HALF, NATEEVS MAKES THE FATAL GOOF OF BLAMING LAMPARD FOR MATAS INCOMPETENCE.

As at that time, anyone watching the game must have seen the replay about 5 times. 1 real time, at least 3 replays and half time replay again.

Yet he still chose to blame Lampard for Matas error.

Today December 11, Nateevs came forth to tell us that

I must have finished composing it just around the celebration which may have lasted about a few seconds at least

When that post was made over 20mins after the goal

I ask once again, [size=18pt]NATEEVS DO YOU TELL LIES FOR A LIVING[/size]??

You are absolutely clueless when it comes to football analysis, below average when it comes to following an argument Now you have been found to be a LIAR

Nateevs, is this what you have been feeding us on NL for the past 5years that you have been a member?

nateevs:
Absolute ! This is why I came back . . .

So I ask at what point did "everybody" know?
And if truly "everybody" knew, why is it only being pointed out now?
Why didn't "everybody" point it out on match day?

Are you telling me you get every single player right on matchday?
So if "everybody" did not see it on matchday?
Why is Nateevs being seen as the "only one" who didn't see what "everybody" saw ?


You can't even see what I am getting at. . . Like I told you, I have a job.
I cannot continue arguing with you. It's fruitless. I doubt anyone gains anything debating with you. . . You phucking troll.

How could anyone who watched the game (unlike you) tell us it was Lampard instead of Mata when the commentator was even yelling it.

So because no one mentioned that Mata was at fault meant no one saw it?

EL classico was played Yesterday, No one on the matchday thread mentioned who pass the ball to Xavi for the second goal, means in a few weeks time we can come back Sunday Oliseh who made the pass??

Nateevs you are not only hilarious, you lack the basics to make an intelligent argument. With every post you keep digging yourself further in the ditch of ignorance


Thats the only thing I have to tell you. Watch games and learn

nateevs:
Show me one post that very day that picked out in real time that it was Mata and not Lamps.
At least it was out there for everyone to see, why is it only brought up today to win points when "it was clear for everyone to see it was Mata"
You probably never even knew anything about that goal until today.

So whats the point you are making here? You always struggle to make sense, Maybe they would tell us what you exactly mean because we have been told that what you type most times doesnt reflect what you are trying to say most times.

You blamed Lampard for Nanis goal yet on looking at the goal we all saw Mata was at fault, Or did someone go to rig the video and replace Lampard with Mata to make him look bad on that move?

You were called out for erroneously (as usual) blaming lamps for a goal MATA caused instead of admitting your mistake like you have done 100 times on this thread, you went on ranting.

How does the fact that I knew something about the goal before today affect the fact that you goofed like you always do GUFFANTI?

nateevs:
At the time Mata was taken off against Newcastle, he had made 5 passes that on another day would have led to a goal. Today, Dayo is taking this position. .


Why is he asking this question when on the matchday, this is what he was saying?

Do you have a problem with comprehension?

Did you finish secondary school?

My stand on that day and even now is that both Lamp and Mata were taken off for the same reason.

Even though on the matchday in your amateur way couldnt understand the sub by the coach until we had to split your head to educate you.

dayokanu:
How come a player who assisted, completed a million passes was yanked off

And when he left the team started scoring

So can we say Mata too was hindering the team performance?

When you have a question mark behind a statement Nateevs what does that mean?

You dont understand football and you cant even follow an argument

Do you need coogar to translate everything for you?

How come a player who assisted, completed a million passes was yanked off

And when he left the team started scoring

So can we say Mata too was hindering the team performance?

coogar:
taken off because they were not effective. . .

Mata was taken off cos he was doing nothing on the pitch and villas-boas was vindicated.
immediately Mata got hauled off, chelsea's game play became more effective and they got 2 more goals.

we all know the only reason lampard would not complete a match is because of injury or red card.
so why was Mata taken off?

Vs Newcastle Until Mata was taken off Chelsea didnt extend their lead

coogar:
to be fair to nateevs, that was not what he meant.
he meant lampard was hauled off in the 60th min of a game without him being injured!
it's unprecedented!

nateevs:
Lampard benched 2 games in a row, Chelsea win 3-0.
Some people are going to die. . . Hehehehe.

This was what he typed maybe he meant something else

Are you saying Nateevs couldnt put his thought into words

El Classico yesterday Ozil and Diarra yanked off around 60th minute

In Nateevs language: They were both benched

Quote from: nateevs on September 18, 2011, 05:01 PM
{Lampard} just watched Nani run past the midfield to score as he kept jogging. Meireles was showing Nani to his right leg. . .

Anyone who has watched Nani for a minute knows he can pull that sort of magic out. Do not show him his right leg. Mikel will never do that. And all because Lamps didn't close up.

Third goal . . I can't even begin.

Lampard out!

I told you all that its either Nateevs doesnt watch games or he is totally clueless about it.

How can anyone blame Lampard for Nanis goal when everyone knew Mata was the main culprit for that goal

This is pathetic.

I never knew soo much goofs were flying from nateevs on this thread

When I see his lenghty essays I usually thought he knew what he was saying

Just this week he claimed Lampard who played 60mins was benched against Newcastle

3 points clear at the top of the table

Full time

Mario Gomez MOTM

Foul on Badstuber

Bruno Labbadia is irate

Now Kroos needs to move more into the attacking 3rd since Gustavo and Tymo are on

Gustavo caught on the ball

Robben out for Boateng

Yellow card to rafinha

Come on Robben hit the target at least

Badstuber yellow.

next moment shields a ball into safety

Mario Gomez on the top of the bayern 18 breaking up a counter, seconds later he is taking a shot at the Stuttgart goal

What a stud

Robbery tries the Old Trafford trick again

Didnt come off

Nice cut back from lahm

Toooorrrr

Marioooo Gomezzzz

A fierce drive from Kroos saved

2nd half resumes

ikeyman00:
@@@@

ahhahha any suprise where this [b]back stabbing trai[/b]t is coming from

ngbatti ni is this how that republic will be attained?? for where

Probably the same backstabbing traits of Walter Ofonagoro and Uche Chukwumerije

Half time

1-1

Robben booed in the stadium, Not unconnected with the Molinaro red card

I think Juup should remove Muller soon for Olic , He is on a yellow and the ref might want to balance things

Stuttgart are going hard on our guys

Second yellow for Molinaro

Red card

Boka trips Ribery, Free kick

afam4eva:
I think when they say they'll kill muslims, they're not referring to the fake ones. They're talking of those who inherited islam from their forefathers.

We were all idol worshippers in the time of our forefathers before foreigners came

Gomez with a beautiful pass to Muller, Keeper saves

Yellow card Molinaro