₦airaland Forum

It was a demon who started the evil conversation and who dropped the first Lie the world had never had before

Kemical23:
I'm not Satan, I just hate how you guys use this Christian stuff to deceive gullible citizen..

See your partners, all of them have encounter with the same Spirit, very funny....

Has it not been said that we live in a wicked world in which wicked people are always seeking to deceive others? And check it, most deceits of people re based on breach of Trust become the most wicked and successful lies are those which contain Truths in them.

So, all it takes is for people to be careful and do their due diligence, And people do that already which means that anybody who claims to be deceived is lying as they are the ones who deceived themselves as they did not get what they thought they could get even though they knew that it was not True, just like Eve

Kemical23:
Just trying to make sense by all means telling you 'Christianity is a scam' is now from slave master how...

So it is the white people that tell me Christianity is scam by printing a booklet just like the bible... Funny people

Were you the first to say this? Is it not your white slave masters who said it first and then here you are chanting it?

martinskelly:
I used to tell people these statements including my family;
It's better I believe, trust and hold on to God and die and realise that there was no God, than to assume that there is no God and die and found out that there is indeed God.

This is a very weak reason and actually it is based on self deceit and self preservation. Which means that, you still do not believe God.nor that the Bible is His Word.

So, you are trying to play safe meanwhile, you are only deceiving yourself.

And this is why a sharp atheist would tell you that you are no different from him and that you are still going to hel just like him and it is True.

Kemical23:
oga go and take pracetamol, you didn't have any encounter anywhere..

Almost all the pastors uses the same line to deceive they members, encounter this, encounter that..

See yourself, were you there to see that he did not have any encounter? See how you are an agent of sata..

Kemical23:
are you there when Jesus says it or you heard it through your slave masters...

This your anti Christianity is it not from your slave masters that you are chanting from?

Moresalt:
Sisters, girls and young ladies, sorry to interrupt, but this might be especially for you.

Listen, if you love Jesus and want to fulfil His perfect purpose in your life, please RUN away from Male "best friends/besties/buddies", or male Mentors/Fathers or spiritual daddies whatever they call it. Or at least keep a reasonable distance as much as possible when it's not easy to escape them...

Do they not already know?

essentialone:
Please, explain

1) Yes because he has a right to tell you to not to do so and if you obey, then he has done it.

But if you disobey, then you know what may happen.

2) He has no right to tell you such because it violates natural rights.

3nity7:
I am a Christian I believe in Holiness but it is not abstaining from women or sex that will make you successful. From my observation I know folks who womanized and still womanize but are making it their numbers while those who abstained are struggling. It is a mystery. The Op case is one in a million.

Urgh! Not again. You knew that you would not like the Truth, but why ask for it?
You are just in denial for I was even specific on what you should check but because you real eyes that what I have said is True is you have just raised the case of the rich womaniser whom we have all seen whose beginning you never cared about, as you run from the Truth you yourself have also noticed. Well, nothing i can do about that as you can't wake a man pretending to sleep.

Gabrielshow26:
I hinted at it, but you seem to have a habit of reducing multifaceted, lifelong concepts into something simplistic. Marriage is based on a comprehensive covenant[
agreement; sex is the physical seal of that agreement.To answer your question: sexual consent is not the same as marital consent. Consenting to a physical act is temporary and specific. Marital agreement is a public, binding commitment to a shared life and responsibility. Reducing marriage to mere sexual consent strips it of the actual covenant, vows, and enduring commitment that Scripture requires. 🤦🏾‍♂️

Life is simple and it's points are very clear. But because people are not used to having a clear mind they see fibrous roots only hence you think multifacetedly.

Meanwhile, you ended up still affirming my point in saying with more words than what I said directly which is that "sex seals the contract/covenant of marriage" aka "sex is marriage" for short

And since you admit that marriage is a contract, in your words "covenant[
[i]agreement" then, it means that once you consent to sex, you have consented to marriage and are married.

And this thread shows that i am not the one who made and set down this Law, that sex is marriage, it is God. I only found them and put them together in this thread.

And your problem is because you are labouring under today's world full of disobedience to God in the abundance of fornications and men doing as they please. So, you are thinking that you are the one who determines marriage and that therefore, you have a right to consent to sex but not to marriage.

Wrong! This is a thought born out of the worlds disobedience and disregard for God's Commands and Natural Law..

For in the past, men and women did not come close to each other UNLESS they want to marry. And
once you are even seen hanging around a certain girl, it means that you want to marry her and you must marry her her. You see this in old movies

And this is why for anyone who truly wants to walk with God, he must find go and find "the ancient paths" when God was in full Rule.

Jeremiah 6:16
16 Thus saith the Lord, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein.

3nity7:
okey, I would like to know more.

Because of work I forgot to give you the second part of what you should check which is, in addition to the first part i told you, check and see what happens to boys who do not follow girls, see how their lives have been from when you know them till now. (Truly not all of them are successful but check how many are vis a vis the other group)

adebayo201:
God bless you sir.

He should get a competent lawyer to sue the bank and the force. What nonsense!

Who told you his 3 lawyers have not tried doing that?

3nity7:
okey, I would like to know more.

If you want to know first point is track the lives of your mates (neighbours) and classmates who FIRST started having sex and see where they are now and how their lives have been so far. (Out of all your guys see if you would find more than 3 who had a good life then who still have it even now)

Then, check and see if you won't see the same thing happened to all your elder brother's mates and peers.

Ugh! Dem go break you tire. All these is just initial gra gra unless of course, you are already on Satan's side, then they won't even attack you.

Yes!
And
No!

Gabrielshow26:
Exactly... At best, the concept is a hasty generalization on the op's part.

Something else comes before Sex. At least some sort of agreement. When there's no agreement it's devoid and can't be termed marriage. The agreement guarantees commitment. The sex just guarantees pleasure which is a reward🤷...

Thus, Scripturally, sex isn't marriage. It's agreement. Our union with Christ is because we agree with him. Furthermore, two can't walk together if they don't agree. If two are walking together without agreement then it is just a hostage situation with extra steps and a very confused pace🤧...

If it is was fallacious on ground of generalisation you would have pointed out the faallacy.

Secondly, which of the scenarios presented lacks the consent of the parties?

rjackson:
The ideal that "sex is marriage" may be a popular concept in certain places. However the scriptures make it plain that our Creator morally reserves sex only to a male and female who are MARRIED. Matthew 19:4-6 and Corinthians: 6:9.

Who else are the people marrying and the people who are supposed to be marrying? Is it not male and female?

And not male and male, nor female and female nor human and animal or plant.

ifenes:
Human emotions and imagination often make us mistake feelings for divine revelation. If God is truth itself, then the way to know God is through reason, not private experiences. A belief should be accepted because it is rational , not simply because it “feels”like God told you so.

Private experience is part of reason as private experiences have been experienced by all which is what makes it a reason understandable by all

Zooposki is this you? Short cut is not allowed

tanigororo:
E dey Pain Yu?
If e pained you, please lemme know. Maybe I can apologize

No, its not. I'm just enjoying the fact that now I see that you atheists arguments are usually fallacious, so i enjoy looking for it and pointing it out.
Bad arguments are bad.

3nity7:
what? You contacted him?

No. Just saying that this thing is still happening even yesterday

Kennatic:
You're completely right. No man can be "snatched" unless he allows himself to be.

Like you rightly said, deep down, women know this too. That's why, in many cheating situations, the first person the wife goes after is often the other woman. The assumption is usually that she lured him, even though he still made his own choices.

From what I've observed, a lot of chronic cheating is done by men who have money to spare. Cheating is an expensive hobby. A man who's struggling to feed himself and his family rarely has the time, energy, or resources to maintain a whole extra relationship, if you never chop abeg how your dick& wan take gather power rise?

Some men rent apartments for side chicks, furnish them, pay their bills, buy gifts, fly them on vacations, and bankroll an entire lifestyle. Most times, it's not because they love the side chick more than their wife. They're simply spending because they can.

The irony is that once they get bored or someone else catches their attention, they're ready to walk away from everything they invested and start the whole cycle again. That's how disposable it can become when money isn't the issue.

What's even more interesting is that many side chicks know where the line is. They may enjoy the benefits, but they also know not to disrespect the wife. If his wife calls while they're together, many will stay completely quiet because they understand that crossing that line could cost them everything, even if the call is for 30 minutes.

The men I struggle to understand are the ones who neglect their wives, abandon their children, ignore their responsibilities, and spend the little they have trying to impress someone else. To me, that's not just cheating, it's failing the people who depend on you. Those choices often come with consequences that don't disappear with time.

Like I've said all along, this is just my personal opinion.

Bros, it's not an assumption oo, it's a fact especially for men who do not want to cheat and who have organised themselves so. And of course, the man nust be compromised and "snatched" after all she plays it by flying under the rader of good sweet friendship which the man wants, needs and must take as he normally takes especially as this moment always comes unexpectedly. But it is usually short lived and momentary and this is what the man is expecting only for the sweet moments to keep going on, until it happens as the world has continuously said that it is ok to play small and that it is normal. That's one of the reason why he falls.

This of course excludes those who have already sworn that they must eat every woman they will.

TheStoriesOfMan:
I thought a man having money is respectable, not having a wife.

Wow.

There are many levels of respect and types of respect. Yes, people respect a man with money but after that it will fade unless he marries. And then when he marries a second wife, it drops

Kennatic:
Don't get me wrong, my Gee.

I'm talking about marriage, not boyfriend and girlfriend relationships.

The truth is, in most cases, these women are minding their business. We, as men, are the ones who approach them, pursue them, and eventually tell them, "I want to marry you." Once you make that commitment, it becomes your responsibility to love her, protect her, lead her, and build with her...

Ehen! I for talk

And Bros they don't stay in their place ooo. Women have only set men up to do the physical pursuing but meanwhile they are the ones who started the pursuit. That is why they are always dressed and speak in a manner that always that is meant to invite a man to have sex with them.

So, physically, it looks like it is the man who initiated everything and pursued them which is the set up, whereas it is then who are pursuing all men when you take in the fact that if they do not invite the man for sex, nothing will happen and men will continue to where they were going and this cheating and polygamy issue would not be as big as it is now.

Do you not see how they are always accusing the other woman of husband snatching? Wives and women know that in Truth, it is a woman who pursues a man when cheating occurs.

Kennatic:
A man whose head is wired right, at least in my opinion, wouldn't see the point in cheating.

If I truly love my wife, married exactly my spec, and she's everything I prayed for, then what exactly am I looking for outside? If she gives me peace, loyalty, romance, friendship, passion, and even goes the extra mile without me having to ask, why would I trade all that for temporary excitement?

Maybe other men see it differently, but for me, nothing beats emotional connection. The sweetest intimacy comes from two people who are genuinely bonded. That's what makes it special.

Like howwwwwwww am I to get hard for someone I don't even feel that way about? It just wouldn't make sense to me.


Or maybe someone can make it make sense to me.

This topic isn't gender based cos that's where everyone is getting it wrong, it's personal based. Everyone is wired differently.

Ah! Bros this is serious over over confidence. And how can you say that you are not moved by other women?

razzydoo:
Dey whine yourself.
I no get strength.
I'll help you out though. Google the phrase. Quote me after that.

Oh! You were quoting Jigger man!

razzydoo:
You don't get it.
I can't do too much explaining.

The fact that you don't want to explain shows that i got it but you are trying to change its direction

tanigororo:
Its a fact with evidence, not an excuse.
Importantly, the word infidelity doesn't apply to the Male Gender.

If it's that easy to be the man of the house, Women should marry men, and marry as much man as she can take care of.

You atheists and making fallacious arguments. What does infidelity have to do with bread providership?

razzydoo:
Triggering, ain't it?😅
You're the truth speaker. If you think deeply about it and do some observation, you might get the point.

I believe I get the point which is based on the fact people have searched tirefully for love but have not found it or at least kept it

EdiskyHarry:
Even in the olden days, that's how it was. Check all the holy books, both Quran and Bible. That's how God created men and as humans we can't question God about his decision.

This is not True,
The Bible shows us the first man who started this rubbish.

And he is still one who came from the line of committers of doing the wrong thing, that is Cain's line. And his name was Lamech, the great grandson of Cain.

Which means 4 generations after God created man, none of them did polygamy, so you are wrong to say that is how God created man.

Bendeco02:
Is a fact

Human beings are just like upgraded animals.

No male of other animals mate with only one female throughout it's existence on Earth.

On Women side; If she didn't start sex and wayward life at early age thereby getting addicted, she can stay with one man.

Some of you women need to stop measuring shoulder with men. If you can't abide by the rule or nature, you can remain single.

If you must follow another man because men are dating or flirting with more than one woman, then remain in your father's house and run your package peacfully. Marriage is not by force.

Why don't you compare men and women on other aspect?

Animals are not trained, so when you compare yourself with an animal it means that you have not been trained

donkarly:
Let’s be honest, this didn’t just start today. It’s been like this forever-check the Bible, check our ancestors. The truth is, many men aren’t wired to stick to one woman. I’m not saying it’s right, I’m just saying it’s what it is. But if a man can be monogamous, it's commended.

See, you are referring to TRAINING.