₦airaland Forum

Ken4Christ:
If Jesus came to enforce the Law, he would have permitted the woman that was caught in the very act of adultery to be stoned to death.

See, you did not see that He enforced and applied The Law of Judgement Exodus 18: 13-21, most particularly verse 21 when He said "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone".

Thus, you have nothing new to say.

LordReed:
What did you call it? Unknown Those fellows KNOW there is city enroute their destination, we on the other hand don't know anything after death.

We know you know but we know that you are using your right and power to refuse to know or pretense to not know exactly as a student can lie and deny that he does not know what happens to the food he eats. And there isn't any body in the world who can prove it to him.

Wilgrea7:
This argument really doesn't favor you as much as you think. If anything, it does the exact opposite. Especially when you look not only at the number of previous religions, but the nature of them.

Atheists and lies, same synonym. His argument has been standing and none has been able to successfully bring it down. All you people are doing is simply attack it but it has not fallen down.

Wilgrea7:
The idea that "Man" lost "God" is a concept that exists within your religion, and a (pretty inaccurate) way for you to try to describe the past based on your highly subjective worldview.

However, he chooses to describe it, is his right so it is either you give a valid objection or you have nothing to say

Wilgrea7:
As an example, I could believe in a religion that has multiple gods, and then claim that the existence of multiple religions is proof that the many gods are fighting for superiority or control over humans. It is an empty claim.

You are confusing the exercise of your right and power to believe any thing whether real or imagined with real eyeity and Truth.

You have a right to believe in one million gods, it is no one's business, but when you speak up, then you must speak The Truth.

And right now, no one asks you whether you believe in many gods or none at all, so your comment here is invalid.

Ken4Christ:
The Old testament law has been abolished. Even the Jews who were given the law of Moses are no longer under obligation to keep them. The evidences of the Scripture are overwhelming.

If you say this, then you prove you are are Antichrist.

For I have proven it to you severally rebutting all the evidence you gave until you could not answer that The Law God gave Moses is very much in operation even today. Even showing you that Christ Jesus Whom you say abolished The Law, Said ,"keep The Law to get Eternal Life." Mathew 19:17

triplechoice:
They're almost set to go back again and this time with a woman as a crew member.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220927-artemis-i-a-giant-rocket-to-set-new-space-records

The question was why did they not go since, if they in truth went the first time.

Words do express how I feel that this thread was broken by that Calabar man osong

Mikemanm:
...Was the girl wicked? No.

No wonder you people have only evil. See judgement.

Illegal1:
Frm my own experience in life,wat i can say concerning dis topic is dat"the only tin that can stop u frm been succesful in life is lack of discipline and focus...

Many have tried this option but it does not work!

lavylilly:
What's ONE habit that stops people from becoming successful?

Not real eyesing that there is no other way but walking through God's Way

Maynman:
Can’t answer an illiterate.

As is your right but we already know why you cannot answer.

Maynman:
“Hantavirus” is an illiterate.

Whatever you call him he asked a valid question you could not answer.

Maynman:
That’s what i heard too.

Why are theists so desperate?

As hantavirus asked, WHY HAVEN'T PEOPLE BEEN GOING THERE SINCE?

HantaVirus:
Nairalanders I need your opinions on this.

When the interogators asked John the Baptist if he was Elijah, John’s answer was simple and straightforward: “I am not” (John 1:21).

Later, however, Jesus said of John the Baptist: “He is Elijah who is to come” (Mattew 11:14). This seeming contradiction naturally puzzles Bible believers and gives Bible critics an opening to attack the Scriptures. Is John Elijah or isn’t he?

The Lord's statement there is simply warning us to not take John do granted because he was lowly and lived in the deserr. That John is as valuable as Elijah is.

HarlequinLekex:
DTruthSpeaker

MaxInDHouse
terrezo2002
righteousness2

The transfiguration shows you that Elijah is different from John and John tells you that he was indeed a prophet going before The Lord, John 3:28

Ah! Another sneaky evil. Short cuts! Quick quick.

HarlequinLekex:
Deut ch 22 vs 13 to the end talks about some laws concerning chastity and those who don't obey the laws are either stoned to death to purge the evil from d midst of pple. Are these laws applicable in this world.

The word is "that evil be not increased in the land"

So, think about it, was it not a great Law to have been obeyed?

People would not be killing themselves over paternity frauds and deceits, prostitution would not be because of abandonment of the girl child who shall kill because, no one can bear been fuqd for free. Then she hatches a plan carrying the child of her many patrons to another man who she deceives with love, and more evils follow.

As proven by these threads

https://www.nairaland.com/7432820/man-discovered-he-not-father#118382038

ojun50:
Make i no talk too much, na death go end this whole tin
(Quote) (Report) 237 Likes (Like) 19 Shares (Share)

https://www.nairaland.com/7433464/5-year-old-girl-abandoned-beside-osun

So, I put it to you, should it not have been applied?

HardMirror:
and it is more stupid to say because people fell for mmm they must also fall for your pastor

The record shows that I did not say that but I understand, your conscience
is judging you!

HarlequinLekex:
What is d difference btwn d old and new testaments?
righteousness2.

Almost none but

1) The old is about the testimony of the beginning of this world and all we should know while the so called N.T tells us the end.

2) The old is about God in Action and the various things He did while the so called NT shows us that God has finished doing His work and He is just looking at us as the world clock counts down.

3) in the old God Spoke while in the so called NT, God Spoke One Last Time as He ceased from Speaking.

HardMirror:
one foolishness is not justification to be all round foolish. If a person falls for mmm scam it is not a reason to know a pastor is scamming him and still fall for it. Your logic is stupid

Foolishness is foolishness and bad reasoning is bad reasoning whether they are stupid to fall for the scammers called pastors or the scammers called MMM or the scammers called yahoo yahoo and politicians.

Dabronze:
I've come to realized that moment people started believed in this so called god their sense of reasoning will be shutdown

Is it not the same reasoning you people applied when you gave your school fees of 80k to get 150k in 3 weeks to MMM?

Or use your real money to buy fake money which even told you that it is cryptic, and you say you have good reasoning.

MaxInDHouse:
Nobody is imposing beliefs it's politics which is domination! Ecclesiastes 8:9

If you say "politics is domination', is domination not imposition? Mo ti nlọ!

Osamabinladenik:
who's this drunk dude?

The one who cures people of their stupidity.

We have seen people who have been mechanics for 27years yet they know nothing.

You do not even care whether your next door neighbour has eaten not to talk about caring about the universe.

So, you just came to show that you are frustrated with life.

Maynman:
Pdp is a political party...

And political parties are made up of people who can be believers or unbelievers or anti believers or mixed believers etc.

Wilgrea7:
Once again changing the narrative from “a person" to "the person"

I have no desire to derail this thread so I'll stop with any meaningless back and forth that doesn't relate to the OP's topic.

Adios

That was the question I asked you then and you did not object about "a person"/"the person" because you knew that they were one and the same in the case, but when you saw that you were conered, then you started grasping at straws to escape.

Maynman:
“Pdp people” are unbelievers?

Would PDP reject unbelievers?

Wilgrea7:
I even went on to show possibilities of things that were not persons, but were still very much “alive" as we know them.

I did not ask you to show things that were not persons I asked

"present a valid alternative and contestant to God being the Person Who created our House called earth, if you can"

And you have been dodging since.

MaxInDHouse:
As long as they're not imposing their unbelief on others...

As sharia imposes their belief so does America impose their unbelief.

In the end, we see man doing whatever he likes and someone receiving his injustice in the power of legal.

Wilgrea7:
The persecution of unbelievers is something that stems from the alleged instructions of certain Gods in the Bible/Quran.

The Abrahamic God is the one who allegedly made these laws

Wike's persecution of PDP people in his land stems from the Bible/Quran eh?

LordReed:
You'll have to ask Wilgrea7 for the evidence of his claims. Meanwhile where have you seen me lump all Christians in the same boat?

That is not the Charge I laid!