₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
My one delight is that only a very few number of people follow you and let you fill their head with your uninformed ignorant crap!

Normal!

Is it not said "many are in the way of destruction?"

People who follow Truth and Righteousness Are Usually Few!

So, normal.

Jackossky:
Dear op, I think you have an apathy for mathematics and that is why you decided to go for law.

Not at all! I do love and respect mathematics for it is about ACCURACY AND PRECISION AND AWARENESS

EXACTLY AS LAW AND WHAT IS REQUIRED TO BE A LAWYER.

THE LAW IS VERY PRECISE.

And it is big on THE USE and this is where my suspicion of maths began ESPECIALLY IN RELATION TO RIGHTS AND WRONGS, BENEFITS AND LIABILITIES.

Through the practice of Law I observed That People Lost Their Rights and Natural Benefits Because They Have Been Tricked And Deceived By People Like Those 2 Serpents Here Into Forfeiting And Willingly Giving Up Their God-given Rights and Benefits TO THEM.

YOUR LOSS IS THEIR GAIN

And one of the things they have already planted in you to make these mistakes is found in Mathematics, To wit, Square roots, Bad Quantitative Reasoning, Mass instead of Weight and now Simple/Compound Interest.

Bad thinking makes people lose their natural benefits. And what you lose is gained and taken (STOLEN) by these same theives who teach you!

That is one of the shits going on in this world!

That's why you see the evils complaining about what I am telling you.

Jackossky:
Also, I will like for you to explain why square root seems unnatural to you while ordinary numbers are considered otherwise

In essence, it's ludicrous to adjudge that whole-numbers is what's in use in everyday life... Halves are part of fraction.

As I told the Satan above, half is reasonable and even decent.

But, being Truthful, would you be happy to receive 1/16th of an orange or 3/37 of a Plot of land?

Does it have any good use?

No.

Now let me tell you what The Law has done and what is waiting for you in these cases, IT IS TOO SMALL AND INVALUABLE THAT NO COURT ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, WOULD HEAR YOUR MATTER.

IT WOULD BE THROWN OUT!

AND NO FAIR AND GOOD LAWYER WILL TAKE UP YOUR MATTER ONLY A WICKED ONE WHO IN ADDITION TO YOUR LOSS WILL STILL TAKE YOUR MONEY TO PROSECUTE YOUR MATTER.

So I embarked on this journey to understand why People Lose their Rights.

And one of the reasons is because, THEY HAVE BEEN TRICKED INTO LOSING IT.

alfarouq:
Oga, so can you logically explain how A read as" ei" became "ah" in apple and ant and ei" in Ape

You have shown it already "ei" and "ah" definitely logically connects with the A sign exactly as Road Signs and other symbols or drawings definitely pass the same information. Eg. < and > which tells a person to go either left or right.

The point is COMMUNICATION and transfer of information.

It could be another sign if someone is creative enough to make one which would still show the logical and natural connection to the sign.

And this where "Short hand writing" does not make and have any natural sense, which as you have seen through short hand writing exams in JSS, Business Studies, everyone avoided taking the exams and you do not see anyone using it.

But contrast with the short hand which became popular with the use of phones which in secondary school b4 mobile fones, sum of us alredy had our own vasion of writing and NATURAL COMMUNICATION.

LordReed:
Dumdum, it is the crux of the matter, languages evolve by human interaction they don't give birth to you with it. Let go of your unflagging ignorance.

Dodo, it is not!

No Road!

Workch:
Where is it?

You said the sun wasn’t there hence Big Bang is a lie, how?

Since you saw I mentioned the sun, then you saw the other facts I mentioned.

So seeing you saw the other facts I mentioned you either address them or you leave them alone..

It's your choice.

Ammishaddai:
The Egyptians have lost the bulk of their history when Islam's jihad spread all over the middle east and Africa . Are you aware of this?

Plus the fact that the Egyptians Never ever record their failures of their pharoahs as a matter of tradition.

thesicilian:
Only when a man is seriously sick, can you really tell if he's truly an atheist or not. You start hearing things like, " Oh God, if you can just take this sickness away from me, I will never doubt your existence again..."

Or when they are suffering!

When God does not Answer them, then they come out Cursing and Howling like the beasts they are.

Workch:
Satan is actually nicer than the Christian definition of god

PROPHECY FULFILLED!

17 But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;

18 How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.

Workch:
When are you going to point to the lies in Big Bang theory “listed above.
What is cosmic microwave background to strt with?

I have listed the lies up pretend all you want that you are blind.

LordReed:
Budaatum just schooled you not long ago that languages evolve yet you are calling Latin natural when it too evolved from something else. You are denser than a bag of hammers.

CHANGE OF POST!

The topic is not "language evolved"

No Road.

And the thread clearly shows that your brother in evil spoke stupidly.

AYNL:
why do you think the organisation,club or whatever you support or follow is the best?
and beside,he declared himself as the "best" as the one true god,as the way,life and truth
read all other religion books and find where their gods was confident to say that
none of them could say it

Sweet!

Not One did!

The Amazing Amazing thing God did!

No other one anywhere.

It is now their followers not their gods themselves would attempt to say so.

But we All see how very very weak their claim is and will be.

Tamaratonye1:
My question to the Christians here: why are you atheistic about every other gods but yours?

Lets have an honest, logical discussion. My schedule will not allow pointless back and forths, so trolls will be duly ignored.

Simple! When you obtain a Good Thing, common good sense dictates holding on to it.

During travels if the vehicle you are traveling with is Good and Enjoyable, it is normal for reasonable people to stick with it.

Same theory applies for wives and husbands and teams.

No one changes a winning Team.

LordReed:
Damn you are so stupid how can it be natural if the form is latin? Gosh you are so unbelievably daft.

Damn how do you be so stupid to forget Latin is the Nature of another group of peoples naturally living elsewhere who have similarity with Yorubas, Edos, and co ELSEWHERE?

Huff! You lack intelligence.

No Road!

budaatum:
If I cut an orange in two and give you one half, have I given you a "Whole Numbers" or have we not "deal with Fractions"?

Satan, you could have gone straight to query here.

Why did you go for the best case you could put up?

Why not 1/19 of an orange?

Half an orange has always been a reasonable and decent natural interest. Same for half plots of land.

But did they stop at halfs and maybe quarters?

No

Look at any mathematics texts the bulk of fractions is about nonsensical fractions.

For surely, no one in the world has any need for 1/8 of an orange or 1/10 of a plot of land.

Not to talk about 3/17, 2/25 and all those unusable shit.

LordReed:
You are a real olodo who doesn't know that Yoruba alphabets are the Latin forms of the spoken language that was arrived at when Ajayi Crowther worked to translate the English bible to Yoruba. The only other written form of Yoruba is Arabic. You are an olodo quack. LMFAO!

Olodo raised to power 4, the yorubas, igbos and co had their own natural versions and duplicates of alphabets which is why they had Abeokuta long before the natives of Latin came.

Every native is independent and it is coincidence of similarity that English, Latin and Urhobo have similar A, B, C's.

No Road!

Workch:
You have not shown me the lie in the theory. I want you to point to the lie.

A Lie is A Lie because it has no proper and valid foundation and other reasons as I have said above.

Exactly like saying you are a Camry.

LordReed:
Look at this olodo, A B C are English letters, how can they be in nature. Don't be a dullard now.

See OLODO raised to power 4, does not know that it is not only English language that had A, B, C.

Our natural tongues also had it eg in Yoruba language has A for Alaba, B for Bosé, C or K for Kayode. D for Dapo.

Same for Edo, Igbo, urhobo.

No Road!

budaatum:
Why are people sending their children to expensive school when their children can be "taught A,B, C and 1,2,3 by Nature and Natural Living"?

Dtruthspeaker, why are you paying fees to send your child to school where your child is being taught what your child can be "taught by Nature and Natural Living"?

Satan has come again!

You surely know I did not say do not go to school

Or rather I said "WATCH OUT. THEY TEACH DECEITS TOO AND MAKE YOU LOSE YOUR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS!

Workch:
From your comment, you are assuming that the theory is wrong because the sun didn’t exist to produce light in the beginning?

The theory is wrong because

1) it lacks Solid and Proper Foundation As Consistent with Lies.

2) The proponents fabricated it because they

I) Hated God and His Established Solid Truths and therefore need to spoil His Work.
ii) have a great need to deceive people knowing that if people knew Truth and Upheld the Truth, they would be destroyed. Therefore, their policy of "Destroy them before they know to destroy the-evils"

Your theory!

Workch:
1. The relative amount of light elements (depends on conditions a few minutes after the starting point)

Query!
Where is the Light elements coming from before we can go into the elements? (Source of Light eg Torch Light or something light. By your theory no sunlight! So where is the light coming from?

Workch:
2. The cosmic microwave background (depends on conditions 100,000 years after the starting point)

Query!
In what cosmos or universe is this "cosmic microwave" operating from in other to affect this our present universe under study? (For surely there can not be a cosmic when and where there is no cosmic)

Workch:
3. The expansion of distant galaxies away from each other (depends on the density of matter in the universe, and on the cosmological constant, if it is not zero)

Query!
The theory is directed at explaining the Universe which I believe, we all know that the universe is the House housing the galaxies, and we are interested in the universe and us.

So galaxies is another topic of learning, tbus not relevant.

Therefore, about the Universe, do you guys have any valid explanation as to how it was created?

So far not one fact is standing!

Workch:
What is the lie in Big Bang?

1. The relative amount of light elements (depends on conditions a few minutes after the starting point)
2. The cosmic microwave background (depends on conditions 100,000 years after the starting point)
3. The expansion of distant galaxies away from each other (depends on the density of matter in the universe, and on the cosmological constant, if it is not zero)

Show me the lie here

The First sets of problems you have is that you have destroyed the basis of your thinking even before you started.

You clearly CONFESSED THE TRUTH IN
YOUR PRESENTATION IN SAYING

Workch:
The universe comes to be. HOW IT HAPPENED IS UNKNOWN.

If You Do Not Know, THEN HOW IS RIGHT AND VALID For You To Talk About What You Do Not Know?

Secondly, the word Universe.

What we call "Universe" I believe we are referring to both this House which we call earth and the things we can see eg moon, sun, stars and the wallpaper or background settings of these easily seen things.

Now the query!

Can a person measure and take hold of the whole matter of a football field without knowing the borders of it?

No! We can not. For it is exactly as no ordinary person can just go to kuramo beach to say this is the end and beginning of it, without he showing how he reasonably and practically went around the whole of the beach.

We can validy talk about the football field because we covered the whole of it.

But no one can validly talk about the universe without going around the whole of it.

So the thinkings of this thoughts on biggie are mere wishes.

And this is besides the fact that I have not yet gone into your theory up above.

Your response, if any.

SSIPON:
Every reasonable person knows that the Earth is around 4 billion years old. So when did the creation story happen? 4 billion years ago?

Every reasonable person? You mean say if I go ask okacha for trade fair, e go talk 4 billion or Mary for Ariaria?

Bros, you far from correct.

SSIPON:
You called the Big Bang unsubstantiated, I called the Talking snakes hypothesis, unsubstantiated. Na you start am first.

No be so argument they go. You stick to the issue of the thread and you no fit bring NEW MATTER for inside am.

Workch:
Please I am still waiting for the lies in Big Bang theory that you discovered.

I have asked about 10times. No one will take you seriously unless you discuss it.

Then stop raining mentions so that I can go search for the other threads.

Or in the alternative can someone bring those other threads on biggie banger for me please?

SSIPON:
Student that wants to be schooled, is calling what He wants to learn, unsubstantiated. I am only calling out your hypocrisy. You calling the big bang unsubstantiated...

I told you that I was going to bring up the threads where you people could not reasonably substantiate it and they all fled including the Op workch, but because of the mentions springing up, I could not do so.

SSIPON:
...and I am asking you for the evidence of talking snakes. Let's start from there.

The case on ground is Uncle Bang, you therefore can not bring in talking snakes especially as I, your opponent did not bring it in.

SSIPON:
Dtruthspeaker, how old do you think the earth is?

I actually don't care!

And I don't think it is important.

And I know that no reasonable person is counting.

All I care for is that this is a really really nice House.

Come to think of it, did you think to ask how old your village is or even the house you were raised in? I know you did not!

Why?

Because IT TRULY WAS NOT IMPORTANT!

ALL YOU WERE THANKFUL FOR IS THAT, YOU DID NOT SLEEP IN THE STREETS AND THAT YOU WERE HAPPY TO BE THE ONE LIVING IN IT.

THATS ALL.

I honestly think that there are so many stupid questions flying around which people have been deceived into thinking they were important.

Whereas, they are not!

SSIPON:
Congratulations, you have won the hypocrisy award. You claim that the Big Bang cannot be reasonably "substantiated", yet you claim that a snake talked.

SEE MASSIVE CONVERSION. CHANGE OF POST PLUS REVERSAL OF BURDEN OF PROOF!

THIS THREAD IS ABOUT UNCLE BANG.

AND YOU PROMISED TO GIVE ME LECTURES ABOUT YOUR UNCLE.

And I did not say anything about "talking snakes" here.

So, obviously you are FLEEING!

AGAIN!

AS USUAL!

SSIPON:
So where is the proof of a woman turning to salt?

Common do not demand the impossible. Surely I did not keep her in Storage!

SSIPON:
Like all the atoms that make her up, turning to salt in a instant?

CHANGE OF POST!

you only demanded about "Changing to Salt" not DNAs and Atoms and Neutrons and Protons etc.

SSIPON:
Where have you seen Toyota automatically changing to Powder

There is this Factory in Lagos, Amuwo where man, the creator of cars, converts his creation to powder and anything he likes.

Workch:
please can you reply me by pointing to the lies in Big Bang theory?

Erm! Let me go and check for your people's threads for your review.

Come to think of it, you ran away from one of those threads when I took on it.

SSIPON:
You do not know what the Big Bang is, so it's better you accept your ignorance, unless you want to get schooled like we did with the other guy.

I love school!

Before today many thread's have been raised up about uncle banging and NOT ONE COULD REASONABLY AND VALIDLY SUBSTANTIATE IT!

So be my guest lecturer, I am sitting with my pencil.

SSIPON:
What law of nature tells you that humans can live up to 900 years old?

The Law of Nature which States that it is Creators Who Always set how long their creations can last eg the car Porsche was built a humans lifetime.

And it does.

SSIPON:
What law of nature tells you that a single man named all the animals in the world, even the ones that went extinct before the dawn of man (I'm talking about dinosaurs).

The Law of the First, as the guy who called Motorcycles "Okada" .

The first Always sets the ball rolling.

SSIPON:
What law of nature tells you that a human can turn into salt?

Again, The Law of A Creator changing its creation from one form to another exactly as changing the Camry into powder.

No big deal for Mr. Toyoda!

Workch:
day
So in order to make the Genesis story compatible with the evidence at hand, you have to squint a lot ...

Which came first, is it not Genesis and the Bible?

So how then can be seeking to be compatible with your Lies of Big bang?

Is it not rather that big bang should allign with Genesis for it to be True?