Dtruthspeaker's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dtruthspeaker's Profile › Dtruthspeaker's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 (of 997 pages)
Not just Christians in name but all. As a Christian when you are guarded you may even see them trying to enter but you fight them off. But when you are resting and not expecting them and have no course to expect them, they also enter because normally they do not come when you until that day. That's why you see them love entering when you are in deep sweet sleep and in dreams. And juju people also try to put it in, especially those whom you did not know use juju. This is one of the reasons i raised this thread as i finally noticed that we sometimes feel an evl spirit trying to enter us when we meet some people and i also saw that they were trying to push it into me https://www.nairaland.com/8732401/people-either-juju-users-christians |
writeprof:Now you are pleading Nineveh, not knowing that Nineveh was special. Why? Did you see The LORD Tell that to the juju users of Sodom and Gomorrah l, Ammonite, Hittites, etc? Never! So why did Nineveh get such a mercy? Because obviously they were a righteous country before they started messing up causing God to send Jonah to them. Jonah 1 2 "Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and cry against it; for their wickedness is come up before me." (And, funny, this is almost the same statement The LORD used against sodom and Gomorrah, (Genesis 18:20) yet no messenger was sent to them. And as you see the people immediately repented (unlike Isreal) and that is what pained Jonah and made him jealous of them and forced him to wish peril on them. So, citing Jonah does not work and yes, Christ did as Jonah, but as you can see, the people who repent are people who hate sin and not people who are trying to force God to give them. |
Roycemadeit:If you did not lose then why did you open this thread? It is exactly like a person who has lost a case in court going to another court to make that same case in that other court. It is still invalid and punitive action would follow. Same thing here The thread shows that you are re-trying to make your lost case. Meanwhile, you lost that case because EVERYTHING YOU CLAIMED WAS INVALID FOR ONE REASON OR THE OTHER. No Argument Can Proceed On An Invalidity that is the meaning and purpose of Fallacy. fallacy /ˈfaləsi/ A fallacy is a flaw in reasoning or an error in an argument that makes it logically invalid, unsound, or deceptive. So, you are trying to deceive people. (You atheists always trying to deceive people and always arguing illogically and fallaciously) And this thread is already screaming "FALLACY", exactly like the last 2 ...and the future ones you are going to make. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 A CASE OF BAD THINKING, BAD PRODUCT! AI Overview In formal logic and argumentation, arguments based on invalidity cannot continue because an invalid argument contains a structural flaw that completely breaks the chain of reasoning. And your threads show that your reasonings are completely flawed and perfectly broken! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 So, you are not being logical here but trying to be manipulative and and appeal to people's illogical mind thereby committing the fallacy of argumentum ad passiones. AI Overview The appeal to emotion fallacy (Latin: argumentum ad passiones) occurs when someone tries to win an argument by manipulating feelings—such as fear, pity, anger,-instead of using proper evidence and logical reasoning No Road friend! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Case expunged, thread closed with vexatious costs made against the op in the sum of ₦100,000.🤣🤣🤣 |
Mattswaggz:The thread shows the op has presented some evidence as you yourself admit he presented something. Yes, we would like more evidence but he has presented the evidence he has which prima facie establishes that we should all look at the case. So, moving on, anyone who opposes the op's claim can bring a rebuttal evidence. Exactly how someone claimed that there was never traffic on Onitsha bridge and the opponent brought the rebuttal evidence. So bring your own |
uunwanaobong3:Was devil near the tabernacle? No. This is just one of the confusions dev plants in the minds of people who are not discerning |
gabzyworld:If God did this to a religious priest imagine what He has in mind for you.. Continue |
oofjm:Yes, but how you leave matters. And this departure, is certainly a message from God. |
This is clearly a message from God to Catholic churches and their priests. |
altteemy:Where people dey wey assassin go enter church, carry ladder, climb go up kon weaken nails? Only an angel can do that. This is clearly a Judgement and a message to Catholic churches and priests |
Mattswaggz:To get more evidence to prove that the op is lying after all the op has giving the evidence he has. So, if he wants to prove the op wrong he too should bring evidence of his own. It is not only a claimant that should bring evidence, the opponent too should bring his own evidence in rebuttal |
bukatyne:Do you not know Jacob's second to the last born son? The one who was vice president of Egypt? |
writeprof:Because God Said so He hates witchcraft (juju and paganism) Exodus 22:18 – "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." Leviticus 19:31 – "Regard not them that have familiar spirits, neither seek after wizards, to be defiled by them: I am the LORD your God." • Leviticus 20:6 – "And the soul that turneth after such as have familiar spirits, and after wizards, to go a whoring after them, I will even set my face against that soul, and will cut him off from among his people." |
boxypane:He don tell us Hin Mind already so e better make person know wetin go happen than to dey deceive himself |
bluefilm:Plenty! 1) With God, you don't go anywhere but with juju you must go to a witch. 2) With God you enjoy your blessings in perpetual peace but with juju, they are always afraid of who would spoil their juju or when God would remember them and destroy everything |
olyrayy:Either they are still at the beginning of Christianity or they are not Christians! |
ZolotuaLorenzo:Is it God that blessed them abi it is juju? Ever seen God bless a bad person? Never! |
peteregwu:See Red herring fallacy! Who is talking about the evil spirit's acknowledgement? Or do you want to liiie and say the evil spirit called the name of your juju priest founder Lazarus maduka? |
writeprof:Not likely! |
You are such a terrible loser and I am only going to make it worse for you because there is no valid way of rearguing a case you have lost. 🤣🤣🤣 It is permanent!! 🤣🤣🤣 And opening new threads on them won't still make them valid as you would be guilty of more fallacies in addition to the ones you committed in the main thread. Thereby proving that all these you have done was a complete waste of your time and energy FOR THEY ARE STILL INVALID AND A NULLITY just like your arguments in the threads.🤣🤣🤣 AI Overview In formal logic, legal proceedings, and structured debate, arguing outside a determined case is known as an irrelevancy fallacy, most commonly referred to as ignoratio elenchi (irrelevant conclusion) or a red herring. Why It Is Considered Wrong • Changes the Subject: It introduces points that, while they might be true on their own, have no logical bearing on the specific claim being tested. • Evades the Burden of Proof: It is often used as a distraction tactic when a speaker cannot defend their position within the established framework of the case. “You cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stay there. It will collapse.”- Lord Denning 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 |
femi4:When you repair, restore, replace and compensate a person you injured, are you not mending and atoning the injury and wrong you caused the person you injured? AI Overview atone /əˈtəʊn/ To atone means to do something right to make up for a wrong, crime, sin, or failure They end in the same place |
Now that you see you do not have any reasonable thing to say having severally tried circling back to find how to reargue your failed claim thereby committing to circular argument, now in frustration, you have now resorted to bullying me threatening that you would BLOCK ME. Argumentum ad baccullum See Pride and self importance. Why would you not be perpetually afraid of hel? There is never rest for the wicked |
FayaBall:The god don true true block me for frustrating am. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 |
FayaBall:Ah! Make hin go fight God dat one as God don take that position go. |
Truthseeker10:The thread shows that you asked about aliveness in your Eccl 9:10 post back at 9:21am where I replied that "Sure. A person held in custody is always alive and must be alive to be kept in custody.". And now that you see you do not have any reasonable thing to say having severally tried circling back to find how to reargue your failed claim thereby committing to circular argument, now in frustration, you have noe resorted to bullying me threatening that you would BLOCK ME. Argumentum ad baccullum See self importance ooo. |
Truthseeker10:If you are not partisan do you care to be sure about who will win next year's presidential election even though you know the outcomes? No. Case closed |
Truthseeker10:The thread already shows what you said and what i answered, no need to bend and repeat yourself |
Truthseeker10:Circular argument. Answered up above that 'Why does He need to be sure? If you cheat or diiiee does it affect Him? And if you do well does it stop Him from being God? No. Proverbs 9:12 "If thou be wise, thou shalt be wise for thyself: but if thou scornest, thou alone shalt bear it." YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERYTHING YOU DO IN THIS WORLD ALONE! " |
Truthseeker10:Is it now you are seeing what I said since and you even responded to? Now you are crooking to Afterthought and Circular argument! As i said you see you do not have any reasonable thing to say you have re-circled back, hence circular argument |
Truthseeker10:Omniscientnesss is about "knowing". So, the fact that God knows the outcomes, is omniscientness. |
Truthseeker10:Why does He need to be sure? If you cheat or diiiee does it affect Him? And if you do well does it stop Him from being God? No. Proverbs 9:12 "If thou be wise, thou shalt be wise for thyself: but if thou scornest, thou alone shalt bear it." YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERYTHING YOU DO IN THIS WORLD ALONE! |
Truthseeker10:I don't care. The thread shows that you added about aliveness in your Eccl 9:10 back at 9:21am where I replied that "Sure. A person held in custody is always alive and must be alive to be kept in custody.". And now that you see you do not have any reasonable thing to say you have circled back to where you asked your question, hence circular argument |
