front page worthy.

damtan:


Personally, I am tired.

I can't even log in with chrome; response being "failed to contact server" but I can login using Firefox.

If you're having difficulties, try logging in using Firefox and see how it'll go.

I can log in with opera and firefox but the website is unstable and too slow.

lanrebest:
i am having issues updating my information and saving to continue at Presenter's Details (Personal Details). This is really giving me issues for concern. kindly help out pls if you have any idea on how to fix this or if you are experiencing similar challenge. As this is the only aspect of mY business name registration left before payment.


thanks in anticipation of favourable response.

I think it is the website that is having the problem. Even my previously entered presenter details are missing in my application too and I have been unable to update it.

since the purported upgrade of the website, the cac site is a total mess. very unresponsive, slow and virtually unusable. Even some of the previously entered data are either missing or totally different from actual entered details. I nor know who send them to upgrade the site. Totally frustrating.

adokhai:
Like to register mine can I see someone in Benin to discuss with one on one?

Am in benin. I can be of help. Just mention this post if you are interested.

.look at that one saying the bottle has been contaminated. I guess his own mouth has been over contaminated. I nor talk anything.

So having strange pictures in your phone is now a crime? They should just charge him to court already. Nonsense

Last meal.

Absolutely splendid! This is brilliant. Thanks for sharing!

Rohr was ..and is still a good coach. His technical prowess (coaching is more than this alone) is in doubt though and seriously needs to attend refresher courses. I was shocked with his line up against Madagascar and his defensive approach. His problem is that he seems confused at times and very unwilling to take a risk but I don't advocate for him to be sacked because he has given us certain stability. He should be encouraged to refresh his expertise just like the NFF has rightly done.

Cherrybae:
After gunners lost to Lyon yesterday I gave up on Wenger.

This stupid foolish old man has killed gunners.

I wonder why they have refused to sack wenger.

I saw a vision....He was not their coach again when the season started.....This vision is as sure as the coming of night.

genius43:


Contact Ifedith, Mizik and co.

Thank you

Please I need to get redmi Go for my cousin in benin as a gift. Can any seller here deliver to benin before weekend? Please if you know anyone that can help, kindly quote my message and mention the person. Thanks.

..Is this really coming from a female? Marriage is not the ultimate for ladies plus All her dreams are not failed because she is not married. Be Guided.

No harm in been ambitious but it has to be done fairly and rightly

hush15:


dude, it wasn't local. verification was done against back end, else its no verification

It was local..that is why each card reader was assigned to a unique particular unit. Each polling unit data was already loaded into the memory of the card reader at INEC Headquarters before disbursement to each polling unit so that voters details can be verified without back server needed. this was why areas without internet access could be accredited and vote as well.

unitysheart:


Then it brings us to the logical question,

What happens if the result entered into the card reader is different from the electoralnlaw accepted manual election results sheet signing by party agents?

That was why I said the INEC chairman should have said the server results were not used because it was not consistent to what they had on paper rather than denying its existence.

hush15:



Its because of this comment "At the resumption of the proceedings of the PEPT on Tuesday morning, lawyer to President Muhammadu Buhari, Alex Izinyon (SAN), played a video, where INEC Chairman said his commission could not transmit results electronically, because of inadequate communication facilities/coverage in the country and the challenge of cybersecurity." is the reason why i wonder how they were able to achieve almost a 100percent voter accreditations in these communications challenged zone. If i was PDP lawyer, thats were i would i rest my case

Accreditation was done locally without need for internet connection but to achieve almost a 100 percentile voter accreditation is suspect and plainly fraudulent.

TGM2015:

Card readers are not using Internet right? Continue in stupidity and proving your technology naivety online. I will leave you with the question of whether a POS needs Internet or not, at least, that is the "most closest" example I can think of.

It is either you have choose to purposely not understand my explanation or you have no ideal what I was Trying to explain. I will do you the honour of trying to explain again without insulting you. Card readers uses sim cards which can be used to access the internet. Card readers were loaded with data for each polling unit, a reason they could not be used in another polling unit so that they can verify voters within that unit (locally) without the need for internet connection. This will also reduce the amount of time and traffic congestion that would have occurred if done centrally. After conclusion of counting by presiding officers, they can then connect to the internet and send their result to a receiving central server (PO were given username and password to do this) which was meant to collate the result from all units. Now it is possible that some units could not send their results due to network challenges or other reasons which accounted for the variation in the server result and actual physical result. If you still do not understand, then I give up on you.

smirn:

You dont even understand what a server mean in this case, the Card readers were configured as a stand alone system meaning there are not sending or receiving any code from a central data storage, they only utilizes the code or data stored on them that is why they can only work in their assigned polling units. You can remember Inec saying they need to reprogram card readers to replace the ones affected by a fire incident in one of states.
There is no way inec could have transmitted the results to a central system. It was a big blow to the PDP as they were evidently prepared to hack the system and manipulate the result. If there was even a server, how come they have access to it without the permission of the electoral body or the tribunal? We remember the PDP praying the tribunal to grant them access to inspect the voter's materials whereas they claim to have obtained a result from a server which belong to inec without any authority.
PDP and Atiku will end up exposing their dubious plan to have rigged the election before the tribunal.

I hope you know that card readers are basically POS that are configured differently? ...and that they can be programmed to store and retrieve data locally as well as send information over a network through the use of sim cards? I only wonder if you know what a server is and how it actually works because of your statement in bold. It falls short of gross ignorance.

TGM2015:

And common sense didn't tell "them" that the card reader only transmitted accredited voters details and not details of votes casted.

There was a server and that server holds information of accredited voters but Atiku's server that holds information on details of votes casted and candidates that was voted for is non-existing. That is the common sense that Atiku, PDP and all their supporters did not have.

Nigerian should be VERY grateful to God for not allowing Atiku to win because I have been wondering on how someone with no generally available "common sense" will rule a complex and complicated country like Nigeria.

you are wrong. accreditation of details of users were done locally (without internet) within the card reader.That was while card readers were not interchangeable in polling units. Results can then be sent to a central server requiring a network access.

unitysheart:


If you know much about thedatabase den it be like you allowed your bias make you dey misfire.

If not, go and read the guideline that shows that each card reader must first be loaded with data at the INEC office. Why would you need to do that if the thing dey happen automatically on the card reader?

2 things must be involved.

Its either you need to use internet at the INEC office or loading of the data is done manually.

Now let me ask you, what happens at those polling units where there's no data service available?

did it also occur to you that accreditation of voters might have been done locally within the card reader ( A reason the card readers were not interchangeable )so as to allow for a fast and easy process thereby avoiding network congestion that may occur if done centrally?.....and that results can then be transferred to the central server by preceding officers to allow for easy collation? The result on the server was different from the actual one collated manually because some units probably could not transmit their result due to network issues or other reasons.

onegig:


Sometimes it is better to slow down and read.

And because the card readers had to authenticate user details. It couldn't have been done locally i.e store user details locally?

And if your transmission of data was also correct isn't stupid and illogical to have to authenticate a single user details via a network that spans thousands of km ? And what would have happened in places where there were no networks or the traffic to the server couldnt cope with volume of requests? How was the authentication carried out then?

If your statements were also correct then why were the card readers unique and not interchangeable? Doesn't that tell you that user details were already stored locally in each card reader based on the polling unit it was going to?

You don't need to be vastly experienced in IT to make basic logical reasoning. You lots just close the other half your brains and reason along with half truths and inconsistencies.

Don't you also think that it is possible to store and access voter details locally (reason why card readers were unique and not interchangeable) while the result was sent via network since the card readers are basically POS with internet access using sim cards? Mind you..I am not interested in whether ATIKU wins in the tribunal or not as it makes no difference to me. I just don't want these people to take us all for a ride after shouting server and even budgeting for it before election only to tell us it was not used. He should have just said some polling units could not their transmit their result to the server due to network issue and that is why the result on the server was different from the actual collated result....Period.

Yusman316:

When the Smart Card Reader verified ur eligibility to vote, was there any where it indicated which party u voted for?

No it did not but presiding officers were given password and username to enter the result from their polling units into the card reader which is basically a POS with network access.

unitysheart:


You need to sharpen your IT head. It be like it don dey dull.

Do you know that a card reader meant for a ward cannot work for another ward. If all the readers are configured to access the same data why can't the card reader for one ward work for another?

you apparently know nothing about Database. You are just here displaying your ignorance.

human being head dey hungry this one to eat

garfield1:

To kill atiku's petition further

Naija na wa!

agabusta:



You interviewed most of them personally right?

Be sincere, in your own polling unit was results transmitted?

If yes, were party agents on ground allowed to confirm from the card readers what was transmitted corresponds to the actual results?

You are missing The point. Why is he denying the use?

Ijaya123:



Let Atiku lawyers argue that in court if they have all the evidences. That should not be rocket science.

I agree with you

Ijaya123:


PDP should then approach the network providers for retrieval, if they insist on the server since INEC has no server to provide.

That is not the point....It is just the blatant lie from this man that is worrisome.... In-fact, Presiding Officers during the election were given username and password to login into a portal to send their polling unit results to the server. You can confirm this from them if you know any. The question is.... why is he denying it?

Ijaya123:


Any message sent via SMS is also electronically.

which must also pass through a server....same reason your sent sms messages can be retrieved from network providers if need be.