elldeb101:
story.....Common sense in IT should tell us that the use of card reader (which was made mandatory) required a central server where data was stored and retrieved to verify voters details. IF a server was not used, where then was the card reader accessing their data from? Except he is saying that it was not used to send results..which is also a lie because most PO / APO claimed to have been given a username and password which was used to send the result from their polling units to headquarters electronically.
It would have been better if he just said the result on the server was not used because it was inconsistent or any other lie..not this one he is saying.

You dont even understand what a server mean in this case, the Card readers were configured as a stand alone system meaning there are not sending or receiving any code from a central data storage, they only utilizes the code or data stored on them that is why they can only work in their assigned polling units. You can remember Inec saying they need to reprogram card readers to replace the ones affected by a fire incident in one of states.
There is no way inec could have transmitted the results to a central system. It was a big blow to the PDP as they were evidently prepared to hack the system and manipulate the result. If there was even a server, how come they have access to it without the permission of the electoral body or the tribunal? We remember the PDP praying the tribunal to grant them access to inspect the voter's materials whereas they claim to have obtained a result from a server which belong to inec without any authority.
PDP and Atiku will end up exposing their dubious plan to have rigged the election before the tribunal.

montumonami:
Asslicker. You just displayed your ignorance

I burst your lies? Simple question, which website or domain do you transmit the results to? Lying liar

Femeto:
That one is left for us to find out.All I know is Yakubu is incompetent.

Yes since he didn't favor a different fulani man to another. Smh

Officialgarri:
The result Atiku downloaded was only a "specimen" from the test INEC was carrying out on the server.

By the time his hackers realized it was only a specimen result, Atiku had paid all his lawyers and the story of going to court was out in the newspapers already.

His lawyers can't refund him, but they assured him they could pull the case.

You are the biggest joke of the century. Lmbdo. Can you hear yourself ? The result Atiku downloaded was only a specimen from the test inec was carrying out on the server.
First, Inec denied having server
The new lie is they never transmitted the results to its server.
I can't get over your comment . You must be a comedian! Lmbdo. Hehehehehe

Ify05:
The Chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof Mahmoud Yakubu has explained why results of last general elections could not be transmitted electronically, contrary to claim by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its last presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar.

Atiku and the PDP, who are challenging the outcome of the last presidential election before the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT), claimed to have won the election by virtue of some results they got from a certain server, into which they said INEC transmitted the results of the election.

Read Also: Buhari’s lawyer to play video where INEC chair ruled out electronic transmission of results
At the resumption of the proceedings of the PEPT on Tuesday morning, lawyer to President Muhammadu Buhari, Alex Izinyon (SAN), played a video, where INEC Chairman said his commission could not transmit results electronically, because of inadequate communication facilities/coverage in the country and the challenge of cybersecurity.

Izinyon further tendered a digital video disc (DVD) which contained the interview Yakubu granted to a private television station, in which he gave details of the challenges of transmitting results electronically.

The DVD was admitted as Exhibit: P85, while the certificate of compliance, tendered with it, was admitted as Exhbit: P86.





Read more here https://thickmatch.com/breaking-didnt-transmit-results-electronically-inec-chair/

Why then did you ask for and collected huge sum of money for electronic transmission of results for the said election?

You must go to jail on behalf of your principal, the presidency.
You conducted the most rogue election in the history of mankind because of your religious beliefs.
Liar.

elldeb101:
you apparently know nothing about Database. You are just here displaying your ignorance.

If you know much about thedatabase den it be like you allowed your bias make you dey misfire.

If not, go and read the guideline that shows that each card reader must first be loaded with data at the INEC office. Why would you need to do that if the thing dey happen automatically on the card reader?

2 things must be involved.

Its either you need to use internet at the INEC office or loading of the data is done manually.

Now let me ask you, what happens at those polling units where there's no data service available?

Officialgarri:
The result Atiku downloaded was only a "specimen" from the test INEC was carrying out on the server.

By the time his hackers realized it was only a specimen result, Atiku had paid all his lawyers and the story of going to court was out in the newspapers already.

His lawyers can't refund him, but they assured him they could pull the case.

Hmmmm

There are somethings I don't understand. May be someone will enlighten me.
Atiku is in court to claim his stolen mandate. I want to believe the greatest evidence he has is the server result which he already seen and very favourable to him. Why not bring the proof out once and for all.
To me it's like asking on lapses of INEC to claim the mandate when the evidence can't be forthcoming.
INEC started this by saying there will be an election with results transmitting into the server. And later came back to say it's not possible due to some reasons.
I voted too and waited till the end of the whole exercise in my polling unit(agric ikorodu). Our card was used on card reader to affirm accreditation which means first there is server. After which again we were given a ballot paper to move to the voting area and cast the vote by thumbprinting on ur party choice(nothing electronic). Votes were counted manually and recorded in the EC8 sheet which each agents of all parties signed.
I mean why are we using collation sheet again in Abuja the declaration center? Why the waiting for states to bring there results down to abuja b4 they could be presented?
If INEC say they didn't transmit election electronically, they just showed the evidence that they withdrew it. Well may be the video was doctored.
Honestly Atiku has a good case. He should just release the central server result evidence once and for all which has he gotten already.

[quote author=Paramount01 post=80332710]


Are you there?show your evidence
A friend of mine was employed

[quote author=Gforce2019 post=80330066]

Are you the spokesperson for inec?
I smelled nonsense from your brain
Who is this animal ?

elldeb101:
story.....Common sense in IT should tell us that the use of card reader (which was made mandatory) required a central server where data was stored and retrieved to verify voters details. IF a server was not used, where then was the card reader accessing their data from? Except he is saying that it was not used to send results..which is also a lie because most PO / APO claimed to have been given a username and password which was used to send the result from their polling units to headquarters electronically.
It would have been better if he just said the result on the server was not used because it was inconsistent or any other lie..not this one he is saying.

Sometimes it is better to slow down and read.

So because the card readers had to authenticate user details. It couldn't have been done locally i.e store user details on the machine?

And if your transmission of data to a server was also correct , isn't it stupid and illogical to have to authenticate a single user detail via a network that spans thousands of km? I agine a card reader relaying information from Ibadan to a Server in Abuja. Imagine the latency and time lag. Also such cannot be on a public ip so it has to be router using private networks. Just imagine the loops it has to go through just to fetch data.

And what would have happened in places where there were no networks or the traffic to the server couldn't cope with volume of requests? How was the authentication carried out then?

If your statements were also correct, why then were the card readers unique and not interchangeable? Doesn't that tell you that the user details were already programmed to each card reader machine and was to be only used at a polling unit it wqs designated for.

You don't need to be vastly experienced in IT to make basic logical reasoning. You lots just close the other half of your brains and reason along with half truths and inconsistencies.

elldeb101:
story.....Common sense in IT should tell us that the use of card reader (which was made mandatory) required a central server where data was stored and retrieved to verify voters details. IF a server was not used, where then was the card reader accessing their data from? Except he is saying that it was not used to send results..which is also a lie because most PO / APO claimed to have been given a username and password which was used to send the result from their polling units to headquarters electronically.
It would have been better if he just said the result on the server was not used because it was inconsistent or any other lie..not this one he is saying.

When the Smart Card Reader verified ur eligibility to vote, was there any where it indicated which party u voted for?

[quote author=Ballack1 post=80333718][/quote]

All your linage are animals.. they all live in Zoogeria.

Enjoy your animalistic lives nothing do you.


Oloriburuku oloshi omo

garfield1:

That is another angle apc lawyers have used to kill the server issue.legally,only p.o are supposed to transmit and any other transmission done by any other staff is illegal and cannot stand in court.we are not arguing whether a server existed but attacking electronic transmission legally

No no no...we all know that results cant be declared from server..its illegal evdn atiku knows that...
But wot atiku is trying to achieve is for him to compare results from server to the paper results...since the same figure were computed into the system..they are suppose to match...but INEC is refusing to admit results were transmitted and also denying him access to the paper results tooo

Yusman316:

When the Smart Card Reader verified ur eligibility to vote, was there any where it indicated which party u voted for?

No it did not but presiding officers were given password and username to enter the result from their polling units into the card reader which is basically a POS with network access.

onegig:


Sometimes it is better to slow down and read.

And because the card readers had to authenticate user details. It couldn't have been done locally i.e store user details locally?

And if your transmission of data was also correct isn't stupid and illogical to have to authenticate a single user details via a network that spans thousands of km ? And what would have happened in places where there were no networks or the traffic to the server couldnt cope with volume of requests? How was the authentication carried out then?

If your statements were also correct then why were the card readers unique and not interchangeable? Doesn't that tell you that user details were already stored locally in each card reader based on the polling unit it was going to?

You don't need to be vastly experienced in IT to make basic logical reasoning. You lots just close the other half your brains and reason along with half truths and inconsistencies.

Don't you also think that it is possible to store and access voter details locally (reason why card readers were unique and not interchangeable) while the result was sent via network since the card readers are basically POS with internet access using sim cards? Mind you..I am not interested in whether ATIKU wins in the tribunal or not as it makes no difference to me. I just don't want these people to take us all for a ride after shouting server and even budgeting for it before election only to tell us it was not used. He should have just said some polling units could not their transmit their result to the server due to network issue and that is why the result on the server was different from the actual collated result....Period.

[quote author=Ify05 post=80329182]The Chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof Mahmoud Yakubu has explained why results of last general elections could not be transmitted electronically, contrary to claim by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its last presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar.

Atiku and the PDP, who are challenging the outcome of the last presidential election before the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT), claimed to have won the election by virtue of some results they got from a certain server, into which they said INEC transmitted the results of the election.

Read Also: Buhari’s lawyer to play video where INEC chair ruled out electronic transmission of results
At the resumption of the proceedings of the PEPT on Tuesday morning, lawyer to President Muhammadu Buhari, Alex Izinyon (SAN), played a video, where INEC Chairman said his commission could not transmit results electronically, because of inadequate communication facilities/coverage in the country and the challenge of cybersecurity.

Izinyon further tendered a digital video disc (DVD) which contained the interview Yakubu granted to a private television station, in which he gave details of the challenges of transmitting results electronically.

The DVD was admitted as Exhibit: P85, while the certificate of compliance, tendered with it, was admitted as
" if them didn't transmitted result online using server what is the use of my RAC TECH WHO made us not to sleep at midnight until result are collated online

Inec Na scam

bigpicture001:


No no no...we all know that results cant be declared from server..its illegal evdn atiku knows that...
But wot atiku is trying to achieve is for him to compare results from server to the paper results...since the same figure were computed into the system..they are suppose to match...but INEC is refusing to admit results were transmitted and also denying him access to the paper results tooo

Oga since the server results is illegal,atiku should forget about them.as for paper or manual results,inec has given atiku all the copies or ctc.he presented them im court

[quote author=Gforce2019 post=80334605]

All your linage are animals.. they all live in Zoogeria.

Enjoy your animalistic lives nothing do you.


Oloriburuku oloshi omo
Do you know who you are talking to?

elldeb101:
story.....Common sense in IT should tell us that the use of card reader (which was made mandatory) required a central server where data was stored and retrieved to verify voters details. IF a server was not used, where then was the card reader accessing their data from? Except he is saying that it was not used to send results..which is also a lie because most PO / APO claimed to have been given a username and password which was used to send the result from their polling units to headquarters electronically.
It would have been better if he just said the result on the server was not used because it was inconsistent or any other lie..not this one he is saying.

And common sense didn't tell "them" that the card reader only transmitted accredited voters details and not details of votes casted.

There was a server and that server holds information of accredited voters but Atiku's server that holds information on details of votes casted and candidates that was voted for is non-existing. That is the common sense that Atiku, PDP and all their supporters did not have.

Nigerian should be VERY grateful to God for not allowing Atiku to win because I have been wondering on how someone with no generally available "common sense" will rule a complex and complicated country like Nigeria.

unitysheart:


If you know much about thedatabase den it be like you allowed your bias make you dey misfire.

If not, go and read the guideline that shows that each card reader must first be loaded with data at the INEC office. Why would you need to do that if the thing dey happen automatically on the card reader?

2 things must be involved.

Its either you need to use internet at the INEC office or loading of the data is done manually.

Now let me ask you, what happens at those polling units where there's no data service available?

did it also occur to you that accreditation of voters might have been done locally within the card reader ( A reason the card readers were not interchangeable )so as to allow for a fast and easy process thereby avoiding network congestion that may occur if done centrally?.....and that results can then be transferred to the central server by preceding officers to allow for easy collation? The result on the server was different from the actual one collated manually because some units probably could not transmit their result due to network issues or other reasons.

TGM2015:

And common sense didn't tell "them" that the card reader only transmitted accredited voters details and not details of votes casted.

There was a server and that server holds information of accredited voters but Atiku's server that holds information on details of votes casted and candidates that was voted for is non-existing. That is the common sense that Atiku, PDP and all their supporters did not have.

Nigerian should be VERY grateful to God for not allowing Atiku to win because I have been wondering on how someone with no generally available "common sense" will rule a complex and complicated country like Nigeria.

you are wrong. accreditation of details of users were done locally (without internet) within the card reader.That was while card readers were not interchangeable in polling units. Results can then be sent to a central server requiring a network access.

nzeobi:
why then did you budget for server?.

And in your tiny mind all a server does is to keep election results records.

Ballack1:
White lie ...Some people were employed by INEC as ad-hoc staff to transmit results electronically to INEC server..

And you know this for a fact because...... you read a few questionable testimonies of corps members?

Yakubu is a very dumb man to even say such. Without a central server you cannot compare any information in the card reader to anything. And he should also remember his position also means no information was extracted from the card reader.

That card reader works like POS machines, which is available in shops everywhere. Anybody should go to Google or Youtube and search ''how does a POS machine work''. The card reader like POS machines are not stand alone devices. They MUST transmit information to a sever/backend/host. Otherwise, you cannot compare the captured data to anything neither would you be able to extract captured data.

[quote author=Neoteny post=80336771]

And you know this for a fact because...... you read a few questionable testimonies of corps members?
I'm telling you the truth
INEC should have based her argument on the legality of electronic transmission of results

Ify05:
The Chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof Mahmoud Yakubu has explained why results of last general elections could not be transmitted electronically, contrary to claim by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its last presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar.

Atiku and the PDP, who are challenging the outcome of the last presidential election before the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT), claimed to have won the election by virtue of some results they got from a certain server, into which they said INEC transmitted the results of the election.

Read Also: Buhari’s lawyer to play video where INEC chair ruled out electronic transmission of results
At the resumption of the proceedings of the PEPT on Tuesday morning, lawyer to President Muhammadu Buhari, Alex Izinyon (SAN), played a video, where INEC Chairman said his commission could not transmit results electronically, because of inadequate communication facilities/coverage in the country and the challenge of cybersecurity.

Izinyon further tendered a digital video disc (DVD) which contained the interview Yakubu granted to a private television station, in which he gave details of the challenges of transmitting results electronically.

The DVD was admitted as Exhibit: P85, while the certificate of compliance, tendered with it, was admitted as Exhbit: P86.





Read more here https://thickmatch.com/breaking-didnt-transmit-results-electronically-inec-chair/

You will still end up in jail someday, don't think Buhari will rule forever

No sir, you did not. You used racing pigeons to deliver electoral proceedings....

I don't blame this man, it is d chicken hearted politicians we have in this country, let d first toad fall into a pit so that others will take caution, don't do politics with bare hands, it is a war

bigpicture001:


You talk with confidence as though you built the server.....

APO1 handles card reader....PO do transmission, yes, but lots of PO' s testify to transmitting results....

Now a server link surfaces...if your so tech..y not trace its digital footprint nd stop being emotional....cuz the tech guyz around me has confirmed its a footprint from INEC server

I didn't, because the app wasnt active.

Before and after i submitted my 2 SCRs, i asked other PO's from my RA if they had same issue, they confirmed the same error message for the result app. I asked the RATECH and he said dont bother about it.

Atiku has obviously paid some POs to testify, what happened to their testimonies after cross-examination? You know.

smirn:

You dont even understand what a server mean in this case, the Card readers were configured as a stand alone system meaning there are not sending or receiving any code from a central data storage, they only utilizes the code or data stored on them that is why they can only work in their assigned polling units. You can remember Inec saying they need to reprogram card readers to replace the ones affected by a fire incident in one of states.
There is no way inec could have transmitted the results to a central system. It was a big blow to the PDP as they were evidently prepared to hack the system and manipulate the result. If there was even a server, how come they have access to it without the permission of the electoral body or the tribunal? We remember the PDP praying the tribunal to grant them access to inspect the voter's materials whereas they claim to have obtained a result from a server which belong to inec without any authority.
PDP and Atiku will end up exposing their dubious plan to have rigged the election before the tribunal.

I hope you know that card readers are basically POS that are configured differently? ...and that they can be programmed to store and retrieve data locally as well as send information over a network through the use of sim cards? I only wonder if you know what a server is and how it actually works because of your statement in bold. It falls short of gross ignorance.