₦airaland Forum

HacheNoire:
Seems you not conversant with history!

Even the almighty US negotiated with the Talibans and guess what? Trump did it!

Their most interesting part is that, the US pressured the Afghan government to released over 4000 Taliban fighters as part of the deal.

So you now agree that Talibans are Islamic terrorists.

So Talibans went to USA to fight like Islamic terrorists are doing in Nigeria?

Una life no easy

Razzness:
Lol! anytime I see this kind of news i just laugh. You see this war of attrition, is exactly the kind of war that plays in Iran's favor. They will drag the US through 5 miles of mud in this kind of war. Iran will burn the entire US gulf allies before they go down. This is a fact.

You see that Kharg Island Trump is ranting about, he will not know loss until he makes the mistake of sending ground troops.

When I even understood the US was not serious was when they burned 100-million-dollar aircrafts to rescue a downed pilot in Iran. So you wan follow pig fight but you dey fear to stain you white cloth. You never ready!

Consolation cry.

Kobojunkie:
. Why are you folks deadset on spinning propaganda with this news? It literally depicts a war against Islam, but here you are dragging France into it. Why? Is France an Arab or Islamic country? 😒😒

France is an islamic country

delpee:
Even when we were told that the kidnappers family members were arrested? That was the bargaining chip.

Their family members were never arrested. Make una stop these lies bros.

maasoap:
Ransom wasn't paid, the families of the terrorists were arrested

Make una stop these lies. Non of their family members were arrested.

Fekumzi123:
If Tinubu should loose the 2027 election then this country is finished. Let's allow Tinubu to complete the good reforms he started. Please, anybody that win aside Tinubu will make Nigeria worse.
I know you think I'm joking.
That's the design.

What is remaining in Nigeria? Tell us. What good has Tinubu and the APC brought to Nigeria and Nigerians? Have the lives of Nigerians improved since 2015 APC came to power?

Ahmeduana:
So to give him false sense of acceptance or false of superiority

Yeah

mrvitalis:
Everyone should vote Tinubu during the mock poll Abeg

Everyone should either vote for Tinubu in this mock election or boycott it.

KingOfAmebo:
You are too ignorant to know that despite Israel's "MULTILAYER AIR DEFENSE" Iran still bombed the hell out of them...

Get some education and stop disgracing yourself online, Synagogue of Satan fanboy...

https://apnews.com/photo-gallery/mideast-wars-israel-iran-photos-b125c3426e06f767d922700b26889a5c

https://www.reuters.com/pictures/photos-show-aftermath-irans-waves-retaliatory-strikes-2026-03-30/

Oh, really?

Please, tell us the things Iran destroyed in Israel and compare with the unimaginable losses Iran suffered. Place them side-by-side and check.

Meanwhile, tell us the human losses israel has with respect to their leaders and service men.

Like I said, whatever tickles your fancy is allowed here.

You know better than Iran that has tactically avoided israel in the current escalation.

Lifestone:
Show proof! Otherwise appreciate the efforts of the Team that secured the rescue

Did you read the news? Which efforts were stated in the writeup? That of the bike men who were sent by the government or what?

jaephoenix:
I am telling you whats on the news. This is New York Times, a well known news outlet(before you start shouting Fake News like your boss
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/27/world/middleeast/israel-stockpile-missile-interceptors.html

https://www.instagram.com/p/DYnOe-wGvlj/?igsh=MWtiZ2t0ejI4aGJzcA==

Bros, read what you wrote again.

If israeli defence interceptors were depleted, was it not common sense for Iran to cash-in on it and deal more devastating blows to Israel? So Iran saw that Israeli interceptor missiles were exhausted, then stopped attacking israel bah?

So with all the deep seated hatred Iran has for israel and the over $300b destruction Iran suffered, Iran saw or knew Israel's interceptors were depleted, and decided to stop or pause the war.
Please, can you help make this make sense to a sane mind

May APC, Nigeria, and Tinubu happen to the supporters of evil.

I believe that ransome was paid for their release

Israel watches US-Iran escalation, offers to join strikes but Washington urges restraint

Jerusalem is preparing for rapid escalation and possible attacks by Iran or its proxies, while the US reinforces regional forces after two American troops were killed in Jordan and another went missing

Itamar Eichner, Lior Ben Ari, Daniel Edelson, New York | published:21:32

Israel is closely monitoring the escalating conflict between the United States and Iran as American forces enter a seventh consecutive day of strikes, but Israeli officials assess that Tehran is seeking to avoid attacking Israel because of the consequences of drawing it directly into the fighting.

For now, U.S. officials have made clear they want Israel to remain on the sidelines. Israel has offered to join the strikes, but Washington has rejected the proposal, according to Israeli officials.

Any Israeli involvement would likely depend on whether Iran attacks Israeli territory. Even so, Israel is preparing for scenarios in which the confrontation expands quickly, and officials say the military has prepared what they described as “surprises” for Tehran.

The preparations intensified after U.S. Central Command announced that two American service members were killed in Jordan while U.S. and partner forces defended against Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks. Another service member remains missing.

The Wall Street Journal reported that the United States is reinforcing its fighter presence in the Middle East, sending F-16s from Spangdahlem Air Base in Germany and deploying F-35 stealth fighters from Britain. The aircraft could be used to strike Iranian radar systems linked to surface-to-air missile batteries, the report said.

The United States is also sending additional aerial refueling aircraft to Israel. The IDF confirmed Saturday that the planes would be stationed at Israeli Air Force bases.

“The American partner decided to adjust its force posture in the region, and as part of that move, in coordination with the Israel Defense Forces, it was decided to add more refueling aircraft to the existing force in Israel,” the military said.

The IDF said the tankers would use military bases rather than Ben Gurion International Airport to minimize disruption to civilian transportation and for operational reasons.
Israeli officials said U.S. crews had preferred to stay near Ben Gurion Airport because of its proximity to Tel Aviv, but transportation is being arranged from bases in southern Israel to the city during off-duty hours.

Israel prepares target list
As U.S. strikes increasingly target Iranian bridges, railway infrastructure and energy facilities, Israel has prepared its own list of potential infrastructure targets.
Israeli officials say that if Washington approves Israeli participation, or if Iran attacks Israel, the military could resume operations it did not complete before the previous ceasefire. The focus would include infrastructure, with the stated aim of accelerating pressure on Iran’s government.

Israel is also preparing for the possibility that Iran could respond through regional allies, including Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthi rebels in Yemen, or through attacks against Israeli and Jewish targets abroad.

“It is possible,” a senior Israeli official said when asked whether Israel could enter the fighting. “The memorandum of understanding is dead, and they are attacking neighboring countries, including Qatar, Jordan and Kuwait.”
“Israel must prepare for the possibility that they will try to attack us,” the official said. “But if they do, they will pay a very heavy price. We will not stop as we did last time.”

Maj. Gen. Majid Mousavi, commander of the Revolutionary Guard’s aerospace force, issued a warning Saturday to Arab governments.
“Rulers of Arab countries, take Iran’s final warning seriously,” he said.

Worldwide U.S. travel alert
The U.S. State Department issued a worldwide security alert after earlier warnings focused on the Middle East, urging American citizens to exercise increased caution around the globe.
The department cited rising tensions in the Middle East and concern that Iran-aligned groups could target U.S. interests and American citizens overseas.

“Due to heightened tensions in the Middle East, the security environment remains complex with the potential for unforeseen escalation,” the department said. It noted that U.S. diplomatic facilities had already been targeted and warned that travelers could face flight cancellations and periodic airspace closures.

One of the principal threats under review is the use of drones. Israel is considering tougher regulations and a broad ban on civilian drone operations in an effort to make hostile aircraft easier to detect and intercept.

Iran accuses US of breaking agreement
Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei accused Washington of violating the ceasefire agreement between the two countries.
“The violation of the memorandum of understanding once again proved the worthlessness of the U.S. president’s signature,” he said in a written statement.
Calling the United States “the Great Satan,” he added: “Now that the American enemy seeks to incite war, it should know that the Iranian nation and the resistance front have unforgettable lessons in store for it.”
Fighting between Iran and the United States resumed over the past week. American forces have struck Revolutionary Guard military targets as well as civilian infrastructure, while Iran has fired missiles and drones across much of the Middle East but has so far avoided attacking Israel.

Since the fighting resumed, Iran has attacked targets in Jordan, Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Oman.
In addition to strikes on U.S. bases, Iran on Saturday attacked a power generation and water desalination facility in Kuwait and a site operated by Kuwait Petroleum Corp.

The deaths in Jordan were the first U.S. military fatalities reported since the latest round of fighting began. CENTCOM said the two service members were killed while American and partner forces defended against Iranian missiles and drones. One additional service member was listed as missing.
The Wall Street Journal reported that the troops were killed at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base, where a U.S. THAAD missile defense system had previously been damaged in March.

According to the report, 16 U.S. service members have been killed since the conflict began Feb. 28.


https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hkfbkwkvmg#autoplay

gaskiyamagana:
Dey play, dey lie.

Whatever tickles your fancy

KingOfAmebo:
Ask Google how many times Israel have attacked Israel, Start from there before typing long rubbish...also ask Google what happened to Israel's 'Iron Dome' how it cannot stop Iranian missiles...

Iran have attacked Israel multiple times and NOTHING happened yet you are dillusional that "Iran is deliberately avoiding targeting Israel" stop smoking cana...

Go on Telegram to get authentic news and stop watching Western Media propaganda...

Stop displaying your ignorance here.

Israel has a multilayer air defence. Iran dome is not for ballistic missiles. There are the David's Sling and Arrow.

Ignorance no good

Godfullsam:
Why call him an idiot?

Is that how mannerless you are?

Have you ever seen a Tinubu and Islamic terrorists supporter with good upbringing?

seunlayi:
On the last point. USA fronts can cannot be limited

So you think that Iran is not avoiding Israel?

Damascus calls Hezbollah ‘terrorist militia’, partners with Iraq to stop arms smuggling

Hezbollah played a central role in supporting Assad's government after openly entering the Syrian conflict in 2013, deploying thousands of fighters across multiple battlefronts

Rizik Alabi/The Media Line | published:18:02

Syria's Interior Ministry said Tuesday it had foiled an alleged attempt to smuggle a shipment of advanced weapons through Syrian territory to Hezbollah, while publicly describing the Lebanese group as a "terrorist militia" in what analysts say marks a significant shift in the new government's official rhetoric.

The ministry said specialized security units intercepted a suspicious vehicle near the Syrian-Iraqi border and discovered a cache of long-range missiles, guided anti-tank missiles and drones.

According to the ministry, preliminary investigations indicate that the shipment was intended to transit Syria en route to Lebanon for Hezbollah. Officials said the investigation remains ongoing to identify those responsible and dismantle the broader network allegedly involved in the operation.

A Syrian Interior Ministry source told The Media Line that the seizure was "an exceptional and highly significant operation," adding that Damascus would share all available evidence with Iraqi authorities as part of a joint effort to pursue everyone connected to the alleged smuggling network.

"The investigation treats this as a cross-border network rather than an isolated incident," the source said, adding that coordination with Baghdad would focus on tracing the shipment's route and identifying all parties involved.

New details obtained by The Media Line from Mazen Alloush, director of public relations at Syria's General Authority for Land and Sea Border Crossings, indicate that the weapons were concealed inside an oil tanker officially registered as transporting black fuel oil.

According to Alloush, Iraqi customs authorities sealed the tanker after processing it as a routine fuel shipment and attached instructions prohibiting inspectors from opening it until it reached its designated destination, citing delivery procedures.

The tanker departed Iraq approximately nine days earlier, after completing all customs formalities, and joined convoys transporting Iraqi fuel to Syria's Baniyas refinery via the al-Tanf border crossing as part of an existing oil transport arrangement between the two countries.

Alloush said the shipment included large quantities of missiles and drones carefully hidden inside the tanker. He explained that the concealment method allowed the vehicle to pass multiple inspection points because specialized equipment capable of scanning liquid tankers remains limited, while the weapons had been wrapped in insulating materials and submerged beneath black fuel oil, making them difficult for police dogs to detect.

The shipment was discovered only after reaching the Syrian side of the border, where inspectors uncovered what Alloush described as a sophisticated concealment operation designed to evade customs inspections.

The al-Tanf crossing has long been considered one of the most sensitive border crossings between Syria and Iraq, serving for years as a corridor exploited by smuggling networks during Syria's civil war. Syrian authorities say border security has been significantly tightened since the country's new administration assumed power.

The Interior Ministry said protecting Syria's borders and national sovereignty remains a top priority and pledged that Syrian territory would not be used as a transit route for weapons trafficking or activities threatening Syria or neighboring countries.

In a subsequent statement, Hezbollah rejected the Syrian allegations, dismissing them as "fabricated claims with no basis in fact" that were intended to damage the group's reputation.

Iraq responded by announcing the formation of a high-level investigative committee composed of security and technical officials to examine the incident.

In a statement, Iraq's Security Media Cell said the committee would coordinate with Syrian authorities to establish the full circumstances surrounding the case and hold any negligent parties accountable "to safeguard the security and stability of the shared border and prevent any attempts to undermine national security."

The announcement comes as Baghdad and Damascus seek to deepen security cooperation along their roughly 600-kilometer (370-mile) shared border, an area long exploited by cross-border smuggling networks amid years of conflict and weak state control.
For many observers, however, the most consequential aspect of the case extends beyond the weapons seizure itself.

Daoud al-Sayed, a Syrian researcher specializing in political science and international relations, said the Interior Ministry's decision to publicly describe Hezbollah as a "terrorist militia" represents a significant departure from the rhetoric maintained under former President Bashar Assad, when the Lebanese group was regarded as one of Damascus' closest military allies.

Last month, President Trump said he spoke with al-Sharaa at the G-7 conference, and that the two leaders discussed the possibility of Syria taking an active role in combatting Hezbollah.

"The new Syrian administration has consistently emphasized that relations with Lebanon should be conducted through state institutions rather than armed groups," al-Sayed told The Media Line. "The ministry's statement reflects that policy."

He argued that the alleged smuggling operation prompted Damascus to publicly define its position toward Hezbollah more explicitly than at any point since the new government took office.

"If this rhetoric is followed by additional security and political measures," he said, "it could signal a broader restructuring of Syria's policy toward non-state armed groups and a new framework governing relations with Lebanon and border security."

Hezbollah played a central role in supporting Assad's government after openly entering the Syrian conflict in 2013, deploying thousands of fighters across multiple battlefronts. Since the collapse of the former government and the establishment of Syria's new administration, officials have repeatedly stated that all weapons inside the country should fall exclusively under state authority.

Against that backdrop, analysts say the Interior Ministry's decision to officially label Hezbollah a "terrorist militia" marks a notable shift in Syria's public discourse, suggesting that Damascus may be redefining its security and political relationship with the group.

The weapons seizure also forms part of a broader campaign launched by Syria's new authorities to tighten border security and dismantle networks involved in arms and narcotics trafficking after years of conflict that left large stretches of the country's frontiers vulnerable to organized smuggling.

Whether the investigation ultimately exposes a wider regional network remains unclear. But the joint Syrian-Iraqi inquiry is expected to determine not only who organized the alleged shipment, but also whether additional actors were involved in moving weapons across one of the region's most sensitive borders.

For Syria's new leadership, the outcome may prove to be more than a criminal investigation. It could become an early test of its stated commitment to reassert state authority, redefine relations with armed non-state actors, and demonstrate that Syrian territory will no longer serve as a corridor for regional weapons trafficking.


The story is written by Rizik Alabi and reprinted with permission from The Media Line.


https://www.ynetnews.com/article/ryrfyetefx

KingOfAmebo:
What difference does it make wether Iran last rained missiles on Israel last week or last month? Last month and last week is recent enough. The point I debunked was when you said Iran is currently avoiding to strike Israel because of US escalation....What did US do when Iran rained missiles on Israel last month...they will only bark as usual, Trump will keep threatening to level Iran once every month until Iran finally destroys ALL America's military bases in the Middle Eastern...

Once America's military bases in the Middle East are gone, America won't be able to launch attacks on Iran from these bases and won't be able to defend Israel too...Next step is for Iran to completely wipe out Israel...

This is the reason Nethanyahoo is panicking...

Iran is deliberately avoiding targeting Israel in the current conflict to prevent a broader, devastating regional war that its leadership is not prepared to fight. By exclusively striking U.S. bases and allied Arab states, Tehran is pursuing a calculated strategy to isolate the United States from its regional partners.The primary reasons Iran is keeping Israel out of the direct crossfire include:

Overwhelming Israeli Defenses: Israel possesses highly capable, multi-layered air defense systems that serve as a strong deterrent against direct Iranian attacks.

Targeting the U.S.-Led Coalition: Iran's primary focus has been targeting the U.S.-led alliance, which is enforcing a naval blockade and striking its southern infrastructure. Tehran views the United States as its most formidable adversary and aims to weaken its presence and influence in the Persian Gulf.

Preserving the Home Front: Striking Israel would almost certainly trigger a massive and devastating Israeli retaliation against Iran's own critical infrastructure and nuclear sites.

Tactical Separation: Analysts note that keeping the Israeli government out of this specific phase of the conflict allows Iran to focus its military resources on the U.S. and limit the total number of fronts it has to fight on simultaneously.


Copied from Google

Good for him.

Dem know wetin dey for him and other leaders.

If to say na israel dey this fight now, 20 Iranian leaders for done go jannah go dey stranded for virgin matter.

Tens of thousands of Iranians have flocked to sign an online petition with a rare but pointed message to the country's hard-liners: Go fight the war against the United States yourselves.

Within a day of appearing on the online platform Karzar, more than 100,000 people -- and the number continues to climb -- demanded in the petition that members of Iran's ultraconservative Paydari Front political faction be sent to the country's southern war zones -- where US air strikes have focused much of their attention to "better understand the realities on the ground."

The campaign is a response to the Paydari Front's opposition to any negotiation between Iran and the United States, which has continued even as American strikes hit Iran's southern coastal cities.

Signatories, in a rare public showing of the depth of anger over the continued fighting, argue that hard-line factions, lacking firsthand experience of conditions in the south, are making decisions from a distance that put ordinary lives at risk.

Iranian authorities say almost 40 people have been killed in southern Iran over six consecutive nights of air strikes and accuse Washington of bombing civilian infrastructure. US Central Command (CENTCOM) says it is degrading Iran’s military capabilities.

A parallel online campaign calls for prominent anti-negotiation lawmakers -- including Hamid Rasaei, Amirhossein Sabeti, and Mahmud Nabavian -- to be sent personally to Hormuz Island, which lies in the Persian Gulf, just offshore from the port city of Bandar Abbas.

Local media have also picked up on the growing discontent among Iranians over the war, especially with the destruction in southern Iran.

The Tehran-based reformist daily newspaper Sazandegi wrote in a commentary on the petition that “one cannot sit at home under an air conditioner and prescribe war” for soldiers in the scorching heat on Hormuz Island.

The campaign, it said, is less an online spat than a symbol of genuine public anger from people who've shouldered millions of dollars in power grid damage and brutal summer blackouts, and now want war's armchair theorists to face the consequences on the ground themselves.

The centrist paper Jomhuri-ye Eslami struck a similar note, writing that those who "chant for war and disparage negotiators" should be sent south themselves.

Their leaders, it noted, fled the front during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, only claiming battlefield-hero status once it ended -- a contradiction that has become fodder for satire.

Hard-Liners Grow Louder, But Do They Have Power?
Hard-line figures close to the Paydari Front have intensified calls for revenge against the United States over the death of former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, killed in joint US-Israeli strikes on February 28, while rejecting any continuation of talks with Washington.

Its lawmakers have been sharply critical of President Masud Pezeshkian, Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, who doubles as Iran’s chief negotiator, for their push to hold talks with Washington.

Paris-based analyst Reza Alijani described the hard-liners' renewed voice as an aftershock of Khamenei's funeral earlier this month, which reopened old wounds and gave them a platform to push their staunch views.

They are not a unified bloc, he said; some are rivals of the negotiating team, others hold an apocalyptic worldview aligned with Khamenei's own, while some are simply caught up in the moment. Israeli infiltration and Russian interests also may be amplifying the noise, Alijani said.

Alijani noted, however, that despite their rhetoric, this particular sect of hard-liners holds no real power at the top. After all, he argued, within the Supreme National Security Council, military, political and technocratic figures alike voted for negotiations with Washington.

Establishment Figures Split Publicly
Ayatollah Alireza Arafi, deputy head of the Assembly of Experts, urged officials to halt talks and treat the existing memorandum of understanding -- a deal signed last month that aimed to halt fighting as the two sides negotiated a peace deal -- as void.

Ali Khomeini, a grandson of the Islamic republic's founder, said recently that anyone seeking peace through negotiation is a “traitor.”

The remarks drew backlash among ordinary Iranians who are paying the price for the war and want peace.

Reformist journalist Milad Alavi wrote on X that it is the Iranian people -- not officials posturing from podiums -- who should decide between peace and war, calling for a referendum on whether to negotiate as laid out under Articles 6 and 59 of the constitution.

The people’s will “is the final word,” not comments by the likes of Khomeini’s grandson, he wrote.

Qalibaf has defended continuing talks with Washington despite the escalation, saying negotiation is not capitulation but, alongside war, part of a strategy to protect national interests.

Referencing Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei’s statement last month about the talks, Alijani argued that Khamenei is adopting a two-way approach: rejecting negotiations in principle publicly, while quietly permitting direct talks with the United States at lower levels.

Alijani said as long as that continues, negotiations will proceed even as hard-line rhetoric runs in parallel -- though Iran's infrastructure and public fate remain effectively hostage to the Hormuz standoff for now.

He expects the confrontation to end back at the table because neither side believes a military solution works, and after further retaliatory strikes, talks are likely to resume -- given “shaky support” in the US for President Donald Trump's approach while Iran also remains in dire economic straits. Hard-line voices, he said, will ultimately be reined in.

This comes as the Jomhuri-ye Eslami newspaper this week warned that news of strikes on southern Iran risks becoming as routine as traffic accidents.

It said a collapse of negotiations -- tantamount to full-scale war returning -- is precisely what Israel wants, and urged religious leaders to push talks toward success, denying adversaries any pretext.

Calls to close the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait alongside the Strait of Hormuz, it argued, betray foreign actors posing as allies -- an implicit reference to Russia -- and it urged officials to confront such infiltration directly to keep Iran from the brink of war.

The Bab-el-Mandeb Strait another major global maritime transit chokepoint between Yemen on the Arabian Peninsula and Djibouti and Eritrea in the Horn of Africa.

Analysts fear Iran could mobilize its Houthi proxy forces in Yemen to target shipping in the Bab al-Mandab Strait, through which roughly 10 percent of the world's seaborne oil passes.

With writing by Kian Sharifi


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rferl.org/amp/iran-anti-war-message-hardliners-rare-petition/33805712.html

ReturnMan:
So iran should strike isreal let Jordan, Kuwait, Uae, syria shoot down the missles?

Make dem wire these american bases so when dem go face una God isreal..
That nonsense iron dome go be bronze dome.

Israel plays active role in US deliberations on possible expansion of Iran campaign, i24NEWS told

Sources familiar with the talks tell i24NEWS that "the Americans know that if Israel enters the campaign, Iran would suffer devastating consequences"

Guy Azriel
Guy Azriel ■ Diplomatic Correspondent, i24NEWS Hebrew Channel

As the U.S. prepares for a possible expansion of the campaign against Iran, Israel is far from being sidelined. Israeli officials are actively involved in the discussions and intelligence assessments with Washington.

Sources familiar with the talks tell i24NEWS that "the Americans know that if Israel enters the campaign, Iran would suffer devastating consequences."

So far, Tehran has been careful not to draw Israel into the Gulf conflict. If that changes, Israeli assessments suggest it would likely be driven by the regime's more hardline factions. grin

The message communicated by certain officials is as follows: Israel is seen as a far greater threat to the Iranian regime than the U.S. For now, Israel isn't watching from the sidelines—it's on standby.

https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/artc-israel-plays-active-role-in-us-deliberations-on-possible-expansion-of-iran-campaign-i24news-told

Delat521:
Iran has done it,can't you see. The fact that na their papa US they fight Iran now show their level.

Can't you see how they are still flexing muscle in Gaza bombing funeral procession. Bomb defenseless civilians. The cup will soon full also. Why can't they continue fighting Iran when they first strike last year. Why chickened out begin for ceasefire.

Ole, even a common ground fight they can't against hesbollah only indiscriminate bombing of women and children.

Iran is currently withholding direct attacks on Israel to avoid triggering an all-out regional war and because its military resources are heavily constrained. Tehran is actively preoccupied with an ongoing, intense military confrontation directly with the United States, focusing retaliatory efforts on U.S. assets and Gulf states.Key factors for this restraint include:Intense U.S.

Conflict: Iran is locked in a direct conflict with the United States, involving daily airstrikes and naval engagements in the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz. Tehran's immediate operational capacity is consumed by this confrontation.

Military Deterrence and Past Losses: Previous direct military exchanges with Israel and the U.S. resulted in severe setbacks for Iran. Consequently, the regime is prioritizing its survival and is hesitant to provoke further devastating retaliation from Israel's highly advanced air defenses.

Focus on Proxy and Regional Tactics: Following the temporary pause in direct strikes between Iran and Israel, Tehran's strategy remains focused on proxy warfare and applying economic pressure on the Gulf states rather than risking a wider, direct war with Israel.


Copied from Google

NOETHNICITY:
You have no knowledge about the principles of warfare. If the USA attacks Iran directly from Isreal, then Iran will retaliate accordingly.
If anything, Iran has proven to be a nation of brave people. A country under heavy sanctions for 47yrs standing up to the great bully in this manner. If Nigeria was half as competent and as good as Iran we wouldn’t have all the problems we have today

Iran is currently withholding direct attacks on Israel to avoid triggering an all-out regional war and because its military resources are heavily constrained. Tehran is actively preoccupied with an ongoing, intense military confrontation directly with the United States, focusing retaliatory efforts on U.S. assets and Gulf states.Key factors for this restraint include:Intense U.S.

Conflict: Iran is locked in a direct conflict with the United States, involving daily airstrikes and naval engagements in the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz. Tehran's immediate operational capacity is consumed by this confrontation.

Military Deterrence and Past Losses: Previous direct military exchanges with Israel and the U.S. resulted in severe setbacks for Iran. Consequently, the regime is prioritizing its survival and is hesitant to provoke further devastating retaliation from Israel's highly advanced air defenses.

Focus on Proxy and Regional Tactics: Following the temporary pause in direct strikes between Iran and Israel, Tehran's strategy remains focused on proxy warfare and applying economic pressure on the Gulf states rather than risking a wider, direct war with Israel.


Copied from Google

KingOfAmebo:
What about the missiles Iran I have been raining on Israel? The most recent happened just last week...

Bros, Iran DID NOT LAUNCH any missiles at Israel last week.

Please, leave all those una WhatsApp group cooked up stories

Israel plays active role in US deliberations on possible expansion of Iran campaign, i24NEWS told

Sources familiar with the talks tell i24NEWS that "the Americans know that if Israel enters the campaign, Iran would suffer devastating consequences"

Guy Azriel
Guy Azriel ■ Diplomatic Correspondent, i24NEWS Hebrew Channel

As the U.S. prepares for a possible expansion of the campaign against Iran, Israel is far from being sidelined. Israeli officials are actively involved in the discussions and intelligence assessments with Washington.

Sources familiar with the talks tell i24NEWS that "the Americans know that if Israel enters the campaign, Iran would suffer devastating consequences."

So far, Tehran has been careful not to draw Israel into the Gulf conflict. If that changes, Israeli assessments suggest it would likely be driven by the regime's more hardline factions.

The message communicated by certain officials is as follows: Israel is seen as a far greater threat to the Iranian regime than the U.S. For now, Israel isn't watching from the sidelines—it's on standby.

https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/artc-israel-plays-active-role-in-us-deliberations-on-possible-expansion-of-iran-campaign-i24news-told

Iran is "winning" the war.

Iran is "world power".

Listen to Islamic terrorists supporters to your own peril

seunowa:
At least his lieutenants are advancing his mission and visions. What structure has obi built to advance his vision? Nothing at all because he is a man that lacks trust in himself let alone building a political empire...

Which lieutenants?

From 1999 till date, what have they done?

So in the master plan, he didn't add the solution?

So despite appointing who rules lagos, he cannot solve the problem.

Shame. Una no get shame.

Iran is currently withholding direct attacks on Israel to avoid triggering an all-out regional war and because its military resources are heavily constrained. Tehran is actively preoccupied with an ongoing, intense military confrontation directly with the United States, focusing retaliatory efforts on U.S. assets and Gulf states.Key factors for this restraint include:Intense U.S.

Conflict: Iran is locked in a direct conflict with the United States, involving daily airstrikes and naval engagements in the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz. Tehran's immediate operational capacity is consumed by this confrontation.

Military Deterrence and Past Losses: Previous direct military exchanges with Israel and the U.S. resulted in severe setbacks for Iran. Consequently, the regime is prioritizing its survival and is hesitant to provoke further devastating retaliation from Israel's highly advanced air defenses.

Focus on Proxy and Regional Tactics: Following the temporary pause in direct strikes between Iran and Israel, Tehran's strategy remains focused on proxy warfare and applying economic pressure on the Gulf states rather than risking a wider, direct war with Israel.


Copied from Google

jaephoenix:
Iran is attacking US bases in those GCC countries
And yes,Iran has been throwing missiles at Israel weeks back that depleted their Iron Dome,THAAD etc. They are concentrating on the US now cos that is the country currently attacking them now,Israel isnt engaged with them,Israel is busy with Lebanon
Were you hiding under a rock?

Read what you wrote again. Does it make sense?

If the iron dome and THAAD interceptors were depleted as you said, would it not have been common sense and logical that Iran capitalises on it to deal with Israel very well now?

Patnome:
They are all bunch of cowards

If Iran is very powerful as their deluded supporters believe, this is the right opportunity to attack Isreal

But they won't dare it because Isreal is far more dangerous and vicious that the USA

Exactly. You are correct.

If Iran dealt with. How can it be that Iran dealt with israel and won't capitalise on their "achievements" to deal more blows to Israel.

Bros you know wetin dey.