Empiree's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Empiree's Profile › Empiree's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 (of 775 pages)
Scholar8200, i certainly see no reason for you to remain in Christianity at this point. You can see the obvious. You guys have no merit here. As educated as you are, you should be able to figure out this whole thing already. There is NO WAY Christians can return to monotheism unless and until they return to Islam. |
Scholar8200:And you acted like you dont know about Allaha ![]() And what's the DEFINITION of Allaha? Well, here I stand, Yahweh and Allah are not the same.[/quote]He partly answered you @ underlined WORDWORLD:What is Yahweh?. Is he different from God as well? |
Scholar8200:Okay, let me keep it simple. I am not gonna waste time dealing with everything you wrote except highlighted part. You owe it to yourself to proof annunaki right or wrong. Now, let me clear bold part with my little understanding. In Islam, Quran teaches that God is One who created the whole universe including living and non-living things. Including seen and unseen like Angels and Jinn etc. We believe it is this same One God who created humans, muslims and non-muslims whether we believe Him or not. An herbalist who calls on satan etc and his/her request is answered or met, we Muslims do not believe it is satan that granted his/her wish(es). We believe it is same God, Allah. The problem however is calling God almighty and ascribing His Majestic Attributes to and through other means, His creation and assuming the creation (like Jesus etc) is God. That's where major problem is. And if you claim Allah is not the same as God (I dont know about Yahweh), then, maybe you need to do a little research what Jesus(p) called God. He didnt call Him "Yahweh" or God. He called Him [size=15pt]Allaha[/size]. I think we discussed this before. Allah is the proper and unique name for God. Jesus(p) did not speak english. Therefore, he could not have called Him God. Matter of fact, the word GOD is mockery if you spell it backward. But if you spell Allah backward you still get the same pronunciation, the same meaning. Allah Akbar (God Is Greatest) ![]() You are even making things worse by saying God is not the same as Allah which implies that Christian God is not the same as Muslim God. The implication is YOU DO NOT BELIEVE IN ONE GOD. Understand? |
AZUH: EgunMogaji:I dey poopoo for pants and shedding tears reading this ![]() With all due respect, 27m no be joke. I dont know what i would do to that effin "contractor" if he gets caught. |
![]()
|
Newnas:I want to believe you are refering to women in the videos with Sh. Hamza. Well, how can you tell they didnt have the right believe first? Cat they discuss other subjects in islam without being accused of wrong "aqeeda". Slow down buddy. A Muslim character may draw non-Muslim to Islam before tawheed. Yes, Tawheed first. That's the foundation which Islam is built. It can not be discounted. |
Scholar8200:Let's be frank with ourselves. We talking about SALVATION here. Forget about him being atheist. He did raise points that Muslims raised too. Yes, I understand atheists say some things from their perceptive sometimes that are not necessarily right. But in this thread by WORDWORLD you can see annunaki's doctrine is different from yours. Is he right or you're right?. Remember we had fair debate sometimes back and you "proved" how Jesus had "always" been God, part of God, one of the triune gods from Old Testament?. But here Annunaki said it is NOT so. You didn't succeed in the thread either. What we are saying is you guys have major theological differences. A christian can believe Jesus is God and Son of God (you) and still stay christian. A christian can believe Jesus is Son of God but not God yet remains christian. A christian can believe in trinity but stays christian. A christian who doesnt believe in trinity also stays christian. These are separate doctrines. Since God is One according to both sides, both doctrines can not be right at the same time. In Islam however, no Muslim would say Muhammad is God. The moment you say that, you are out of the fold. We do not discount that. No muslim, no matter the sects believe any God's prophet is God. We may have differences in application of Law, fiqh (jurisprudence) etc but NOT tawheed (God's Oneness) which is foundation on which Islam is built. Our point is, in Christianity, your differences are deep when it comes to foundation which Christianity is built upon. Note that Muslims dont joke with this foundation because this is, according to "Abrahamic religion", the only non-forgivable sin. |
Scholar8200, you are welcome! But why didnt you respond to Annunaki here? www.nairaland.com/3086804/annunaki-read-old-testament/4#45447102 |
Nafizzey:Be careful of NIPOST ![]() http://naijagists.com/photos-nigerian-postal-service-nipost-staff-steal-phone-sent-to-lady-from-united-states-replace-it-with-book/ |
malvisguy212: |
malvisguy212: |
Newnas:Has there ever been any muslim shuyuk who claimed this attributes?. I havent seen one, past or present. If his bid’ah does not amount to shirk, such as reciting Adhkaar that were narrated from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), but doing that in unison and swaying from side to side, then prayers offered behind him are valid, but the Muslim should look for an Imaam to pray behind who is not a follower of innovation, because that will increase his reward and is farther removed from evil.Their "fatwa" spin in circle all the time. Is this sheikh (and you) not aware of many ahadith narrations about group dhikr?. Honestly, with all due respect, this fatwa is meaningless to me. Innovation is real...yes. But how's reciting Adhkaar in unison amounts to bida'a?. I am really sick and tired of these lopsided fatawa. Highlighted indicates and encourages sticking one's nose in others business, stiffing around for "innovators". Waste of time. It encourages youths today to discriminate masajid. For your information, there are plentiful ahadith in support of group dhikr. And swaying from side to side is simply borne out of "boredom", especially overnight nafilat. If this sheikh doesnt do it or support it doesnt mean it is bida'a. Swaying side by side and chanting shahada (for instance), simply keeps you going and keep you awake. It is not bida'a unless maybe, if someone deliberately says you MUST do so every time you do dhikr. Newnas:This is rather dangerous. Did you ever read hadith narrated by Umar(ra) calling believer a kafir?. Go and read the hadith. That's your homework. ShiaMuslim:You'd respect their shuyuk. This sheikh you mentioned can not defend himself now. Even in his time, his contemporary respected him despite their differences. Hold Mr. Newnas responsible for his actions and not the predecessors even though he's influenced by them. Newnas seems to recently adopted his new ideology. Anyways, allow me to inform you that shuyuk you respect so much have absolutely no monopoly over Islam. Islam is too big for you to discard others you dont deem fit simply by their identification. |
ypeace, you understand why i said earlier they sniff neck, pigheaded people?. She thinks she understood the verse better. She has problem. Her heart is hard |
Inspiration The Girl With 4 Boyfriends . Once upon a time there was this girl who had four boyfriends. She loved the 4th boyfriend the most and adorned him with rich robes and treated him to the finest of delicacies. She gave him nothing but the best. She also loved the 3rd boyfriend very much and was always showing him off to neighboring kingdoms. However, she feared that one day he would leave her for another. She also loved her 2nd boyfriend. He was her confidant and was always kind, considerate and patient with her. Whenever this girl faced a problem, she could confide in him, and he would help her get through the difficult times. The girl's 1st boyfriend was a very loyal partner and had made great contributions in maintaining her wealth and kingdom. However, she did not love the first boyfriend. Although he loved her deeply, she hardly took notice of him. One day, the girl fell ill and she knew her time was short. She thought of her luxurious life and wondered, I now have four boyfriends with me, but when I die, I'll be all alone. Thus, she asked the 4th boyfriend, I loved you the most, endowed you with the finest clothingand showered great care over you. Now that I'm dying, will you follow me and keep me company?' 'No way!', replied the 4th boyfriend, and he walked away without another word. His answer cut like a sharp knife right into her heart. The sad girl then asked the 3rd boyfriend, 'I loved you all my life. Now that I'm dying, will you follow me and keep me company?' 'No!', replied the 3rd boyfriend. 'Life is too good! When you die, I'm going to marry someone else!' Her heart sank and turned cold. She then asked the 2nd boyfriend, 'I have always turned to you for help and you've always been there for me. When I die, will you follow me and keep me company?' 'I'm sorry, I can't help you out this time!', replied the 2nd boyfriend. 'At the very most, I can only walk with you to your grave.'His answer struck her like a bolt of lightning, and the girl was devastated. Then a voice called out: 'I'll go with you. I'll follow you no matter where you go.' The girl looked up, and there was her first boyfriend. He was very skinny as he suffered from malnutrition and neglect. Greatly grieved, the girl said, 'I should have taken much better care of you when I had the chance!' In truth, you have 4 boyfriends in your lives: Your 4th boyfriend is your body. No matter how much time and effort you lavish in making it look good, it will leave you when you die. Your 3rd boyfriend is your possessions, status and wealth. When you die, it will all go to others. Your 2nd boyfriend is your family and friends. No matter how much they have been there for you, the furthest they can stay by you is up to the grave. And your 1st boyfriend is your Soul, often neglected in pursuit of wealth, power and pleasures of the world. However, your Soul is the only thing that will follow you where ever you go. Cultivate, strengthen and cherish it now, for it is the only part of you that will follow you to the throne of God and continue with you throughout Eternity. Thought for the day: Remember, when the world pushes you to your knees, you're in the perfect position to pray. Share this on to someone you care about - I just did. Happy Juma'atul - Mubarakah. |
[size=15pt]^[/size] humm ![]() You talking to yourself or what ? |
zeyney:True but seems you dont know those people. They are pigheaded nincompoop |
But this website's view is different. In my opinion, i dont think he has medical problem. It is crush on the woman that protrudes his balls. http://naijagists.com/sexy-photo-of-adams-oshiomhole-elizabeth-ativie-fuels-prostate-cancer-rumour/ |
^ quiet unfortunate you didn't comprehend fun poked about the video. You better slow down akhi. |
abdulwastecx:Wooow, thats great. i thought as much. He later recomended aluminum parapet. Aluminum parapet, how's that from your experience ? |
abdulwastecx:The "stones" don't wash off? |
abdulwastecx:ok. now i wanted to use it for mine and my brother made inquiries but he was told it's not "advisable" bcus of putting them together. Doesn't that suggest they don't know how? |
abdulwastecx:which of the Stone Coated tiles, looks like there are two types ?. can post a picture |
Newnas:Subhanllah! What's this nonsense you typed here has to do with video i posted? smh. Sometimes you just talk and what you said is in no way correlate with borne of contention. Did you just wake up when you typed this? Jeez! |
This Movie Is Crazy ![]() But I love It https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne1uBBMzJ8s There Are Bunch Of Newnas and fundamentalist there ![]() |
If you have a little bit of aql, you would have comprehended my point. Enough said walaikum Salaam bro |
Newnas:You don't get it, do you?. It's all wrong to say I'm sufi, I'm salafi, I'm this, I'm that. I AM MUSLIM, period. None has absolute truth and all of them aren't wrong either. If you think everyone is wrong and SALAFI is the only "saved sect", you live in lala land. Looks like you just got this idea of salafi lately. Bro, take chill pill. If you want to claim salafism means following the way of aslaf, then, you gotta understand that sufis claim exact same thing. They said sahabas are sufis which means they are people of spiritual insight. They are people of "firasa". That's what they mean. They don't mean sufism as sect. But I'm aware of sufi sect which is pretty much irrelevant to me. And when is sazili, solati and adabi, become sects?. I'm learning that for the first time ![]() |
This is CLEAR INNOVATION implemented by Sheikh Albany (ra). If Sufi sheik said the same thing would he not be critisized for going against the Book of Allah? . No word, no imam, no book, no Sheik can abrogate Allah's word. Allah named us Muslims. Full Stop! What this Sheikh said contributed to menace in the muslim world today in the name of following "Qur'an & Sunnah". |
About the video I posted above by Sheikh Habibulah, I agree with him on his criticism is Sahih Bukhari. That's just common sense. Sheik did not condemn Imam Bukhari as some people said. He rather condemns collections of the ahadith with mixed up truth with falsehood. Imam Bukhari did not meet the prophet (saw). So it just makes sense that everything therein can not be perfect but that doesn't mean we have to condemn every hadith we don't understand. "Time" clears the air. We can not understand certain ahadith until certain time even though the ahadith don't always make sense to us. This means we have to wait {sometimes century }, that's, later generation may be able to properly interpret and understand those ahadith. This is correct methodology rather than rigidity as some belief. For instance, there are muslims who say "we stop where sahabas stopped". "We don't do what sahabas didn't do" and the list goes on. For example, there is a prophetic saying goes thus, "Dajjal would ride on a donkey" I'm certain that, back then, sahabas would definately thought about a "flesh flying donkey". It's now as clear as daylight that Rosul (saw) could not be taking about donkey as we know it. That's it. However, I distance myself from Sheikh Habibulah's view on the return of Isa ibn Maryam (as). He got that wrong with all respect. Sheik used the wrong methodology. The ahadith of return of Jesus, despite being mutawatir, are in harmony with verse of Qur'an (43:61). In order to understand certain verses of Qur'an or hadith, sheikh Habibulah supposed to collect all the data and bring them together in harmonious whole to derive the meaning. This is called "system of meaning". But sheik simply tagged the hadith false. I believe in the Return Of Isa Ibn Maryam (alaiy Salaam). Everything else he talks about the so called "saved sect" aka salafi is right. Indeed, if hadith Bukhari is correct 100% as some claim, why would sheik Albany found fault with them, why did he tag ahadith sahih, daef, and fabricated?. Imam Bukhari had long gone. Sheik Albany was a 20th century muslim scholar. And Allah knows best |
"لست شيعيا. ولكن إذا قلت أنا شيعي، فأنا راض. إذا كان التشيع إتباع القرآن و السنة، و حب الرسول و أهله، فأنا شيعي." [size=20pt]"I am not a Shi'a. But, if you say I am a Shi'a, I agree. If Shi'ism is to follow the Qur'an and Sunnah, and to love the Messenger and his family, then I am a Shi'a."[/size] ~ Sunnat Wal'kitab by Sheikh Habeebullahi Adam Abdullahi Al-Ilori https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL_UHo3ajNE&app=desktop |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 (of 775 pages)



