Ferruccio's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ferruccio's Profile › Ferruccio's Posts
Raine80:Yeah, yeah, let's assume it happened to you, how would you deal with it? |
ItzMePuffPuff:If her pusssy is loose, you might wanna settle for her anüs. |
Ladies, let's say, you were busy having sexual intercourse with your partner, and his p3nis accidentally slipped into your anüs during the process, would you say, "well, it's fine you can fvck me there ", or would you tell him to leave your anüs alone? |
Nigayoyo:[color=Black]The screenshot in question serves as evidence that a video of the Prophet prophesying the score does exist. It has, however, been blocked mistakenly due to copyright infringement, by youtube.[/color]
|
Nigayoyo:[color=Black]What a weak argument from the Atheist' side! Below is the evidence to fully substantiate my claim that Prophet Bushiri indeed prophesied about the loss of Scotland in the Rugby World Cup quarter finals. [/color]
|
[/quote][i][font=serif][b][color=Black] |
Nigayoyo:[color=Black]The mere fact that the video in question has been removed does not automatically render the iPad miracle fake, or staged. A video of him prophesying about the rugby score between Australia and Scotland, during a live Sunday service, just a few hours before the commencement of the match, has also been removed. But does that mean the prophecy was fake? No, because just like the Prophet prophesied, Australia whooped Scotland 35-34.[/color]
|
xpmode:[color=Teal]Perfect, bruh. I couldn't have said it better myself.[/color] |
Nigayoyo:[color=Teal]That video has been tempered with to discredit the name of the poor Prophet. I mean, it's common knowledge that people easily accept pastors, but Prophets are the most persecuted. Check the screenshot below, and you'll realize that his vids get tempered with all the time.[/color]
|
SirWere:[color=Black] Just like you've " ignorantly " and indirectly stated that evolution is a fact, and yet the only fact about evolution is the fact that it remains a theory for various reasons that I won't bother explaining, as you're too much of a dööfus to grasp anything. Stupid sonuvabïetch![/color] |
[color=Black] Let's assume for a second that God is a myth, and all of the prophets and pastors in the universe today, are " fake ". Now, the million dollar question is, from where do they get magical powers to predict the future, make the blind see, make the deaf hear, and make the lame walk?[/color] |
Lennycool:[b][color=Black] Don't allow your revolting visage hoodwink you into a misguided belief that you evolved from an ape, you witless sack of shïet!Not only did you flunk to adequately rebuff my statements, but you also never provided arguments to prove Evolution is more viable than Creationism. But what can we possibly expect from a neomort? God has never mentioned dinosaurs? Son, you're more of a dingbat than I've originally suspected. Dinosaur like creatures are mentioned in the Bible. We all are cognizant of the fact that the bible utilizes ancient names such as "behemoth" and "tannin." Behemoth- A huge or monstrous creature. Tannin- A term that includes dragon-like animals and the great sea creatures such as whales, giant squids, and marine reptiles like the plesiosaurs that may have become extinct. Job 40:15-19 King James Version (KJV) Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox. Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron. He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him. Now, in the aforementioned verse, God describes a great king of the land animals like some of the biggest dinosaurs, the Diplodocus and Apatosaurus. It was a gigantic plant-eater with great muscles and very strong bones. The long Diplodocus had leg bones so strong that he could have held three others on his back.[/color][/b] |
[color=Black] [ Should Creationism along side Evolution be taught at public schools? ________________________________________________ It's a fact universally acknowledged that both Creationism and Evolution are unproven ideas of the origin of the universe.Therefore, both are theories. There is tons of evidence in support of both theories, hence I feel that they should both be taught at school. It should be left up to the students to choose one or the other for themselves, instead of being manipulated into believing that Evolution is more viable than Creationism!/color] |
[color=Black][b] Atheists/Evolutionists Vs Christians ______________________________________________ Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." Evolutionists always manipulate reality to try and do away with creationism. For example, when you ask an evolutionist how they come up with the age of the sedimentary layers in the earth, they will always tell you they date them by the fossils found in those sedimentary layers. Then when you ask them how they come up with the age of the fossils, they say their age is determined by which sedimentary layer of rock they are found in. But how can that be? How can the rocks date the layers, if the layers date the rocks? That's what's called "circular reasoning." One minute they say the rock determines the age of the fossil, the next they say the fossil determines the age of the rock. Charles Darwin said "It is a truly wonderful fact" that all plants throughout all time and space should be related to each other"" "The Origin of the Species p 170. The evolutionist agrees with Darwin and says all life on earth evolved from primordial soup, which then somehow formed into many different species like birds, animals, plants, fish etc; and those birds, animals, plants and fish evolved into many different types of species themselves. For example, they believe a bird later formed different types of lizards, horses and dogs. They also believe that plants created everything from vines to trees to flowers, and fish evolved into dinosaurs, apes and humans. If that"s true, then I have to ask the evolutionist why is it for the last 6000 years of recorded history that not a single new species has ever been created? Scientific fact is, we still have many of the old species among us, and we know of many that did in fact become extinct. But not a single bird has been found that used to be a fish. And not a single bird has been found that is related to a lizard. If life truly evolves like they say it does, why did it all of a sudden stop dead in its tracks 6000 years ago?[/color][/b] |

You only showed a snapshot showing a title 
