₦airaland Forum

@coolsegun2002 do respond to the above .Thanks

coolsegun2002:
Have u seen this type of case in a customary court before?? Or u are just assuming......I’ve seen two different scenarios that’s why I said what I said
Scenario 1: a man and a woman living together for 4 years, no court or church document.... the love went sour and the man said he doesn’t want her anymore thinking becos there’s no document.. he can just tell her to leave.. the court ordered him to pay a one time settlement, pay her rent for two years... ...........................Under this Scenario 1,The man told the woman to leave ,There are cases a man maltreats a woman by throwing her things out which is unfair ,in the case stated it's the woman that intentionally moved out of the man's out sir ,there are many cases whereby for reasons best known to a Woman she moved out ,How about an Adulterer who finds another man ,moved out to meet such man ,only for her husband to discover an Empty Room ,You wouldn't expect such man to be responsible for continual welfare of such woman .There is no Stipulated law ,Nigerian Law is derived from British Law ,Law is Equity,Fairness and Justice ,No Gender Inferiority or Gender Pity .

Scenario 2 : is the one similar to this op...the woman dragged the family of the man to customary court for denying her part of the mans properties... and they court said she was entitled despite there was no document from court or church....they were together for 8years.......
....... Under this Scenario 2 sir ,Does the woman still lives in the man's house before His Death or she has left him ? Secondly does this woman has Children for the man ?


Back to this case....of course what she fighting for is her kids... if the family of the man has done what is right by handing over what the kids are entitled to to the woman....there won’t be issues from the woman.... ..................................That is the normal.thing now I am not contesting this ,The family must give the children there Late father's property and if they are young ,there mother takes it to keep .

I suspect the children are still young and can’t lay claim ....what happens in most cases is that the family of the man will want to cut them off especially when their mother was not around to take care of the man before death... which doesn’t nullify their union and children they had together...

....................................Some Greedy and wicked family does this ,it's wrong and am not in support of this ....

coolsegun2002:
She can still lay some claims legally.. but only in a customary court if she decides to sue the family of the man for trying to cut off...

because a man and a woman ddnt marry legally by state law does not nullify the union completely as “never happened”....living with someone for a significant number of years with or without children technically counts as civil union everywhere in the world...the fact that she has a child makes her case even stronger....

She might not have a say with ordinary mouth. but her claims are valid if she drags the family of the husband to a customary court...

. I think we should know what exactly the woman is trying to Lay claims to ,even If there was a Civil Union once Upon a time does such discontinued Civil Union Guarantees the Natural right of the Woman to Lay Claims ? Fine they once lived together and they are no more living together ,even if the deceased man is alive he won't argue or deny that they do not once had a Civil Union ..Back to the Main Point .What such a woman could be trying to Lay Claim of share to is nothing but Property left by the Deceased Man and in most Tradition a woman is considered a Property of the Deceased man ,she cannot Inherit her deceased Husband that is even if the wife still stays with her husband before He died ,The room she lives in might be left for her .This one is even a quite different matter ,the woman had left the man several years ,She has no Claim to Lay please ,It's only the Children who are the late man blood relations that she had for the man that Has right to Lay claim to there Late father Property .If after sharing the Property to the Children,they can inturn Hand it over to there Mother if they wish ,if it's money they Inherited ,it's there Choice to give it to there Mother after they might have been given by the family relatives of the Deceased .

TheRedpillguy:
Buried with the head of medusa. I don't think at your point of death, you don't want to have anything to do with a symbol of a woman with snakes for hair.

Go sit down , go and read about Versace reason for using Medusa head as there fashion symbol .That is not with snakes but Hair ,It's been changed to hair on the Logo .

sapphiere:
Where you go after life on Earth matters.
O Lord my God, any wealth that will make me miss heaven don't give me.

. And how were you so quick to know where he is going ? Over Spiritual,Over Sabi

It's your Choice Lady ....Don't Die in Silence , Staphylococus aureus and Infertility Solutions .Visit right now www.gardennaruralhealth.com

Bendusx:
Were they legally divorced, or even married?

None of the women were Legally Married in the first place to the Deceased man not to even talk of been legally divorced. They were not legally married ,They were not legally divorced .Your Comment sir ?

God Bless the IPOB on this Forum .They always make sensible Comments ,Most of there Comments are Prophetic .

Dtruthspeaker:
I praise The Lord for teaching me many many things for I found that He is The God Over The Law and He is The Maker of It. Therefore, I am taught The Law from Source!

"From the Content of your Response .If I get right it means all the 4 Children should be given One room and Parlour each as there are also 4 rooms and Parlour on the one plot .." EQUALLY. ?"- Yes, that would be the right and just decision.




On "a Woman been a man's responsibility even after she had left the man" I never said that a woman is a man's responsibility, in fact, I have never.presented my opinion on this subject until now.

My opinion is this, Under Natural Law, a man and woman are of equal standing and none is greater than the other.

But, it is seen that the woman wrongfully makes herself less than the man, thinking she is under the good graces and protection of the man, therefore, she brings little to the marriage table, while the man wrongfully bears the bulk.

This of course tilts the natural balance for this action brings in the Law of harvest that is you plant little, you must harvest little/you plant huge, you must have a huge harvest) To whom much is given, much is expected (taken)!

But where the marriage is equal, the husband is not greater than the wife and based on their equality, as they freely joined forces and resources, so also are they free to take themselves out of the union without any further liability, for where there is a liability, there must be a corresponding benefit (He who bears the risks must bear the profit).

And in a balanced marriage the liability and the profits were evenly shared, therefore, there is no talk of further liability to be placed on either party since the benefits too have been terminated.

Thus, every woman who leaves a previous marriage becomes an Independent Stranger and is liable to herself alone, (or such other person that may consent to her being a liability to him), in the absence of reasonable justifiable circumstance.

. Thanks for your Insight .I really Appreciate .You have thrown more light on this Property Sharing .The first Son of this Family happens to be a close friend of mine and he therefore told me to help him throw this on the internet so people can comments and Contribute.The first Son has indeed Shared the Apartments into 4 equally among His Brothers and Sister including him .But the Only Girl who is the Last born is Demanding for two Apartments for herself , Mentioning that the other two Apartments Apartments Should be shared among the 3 Men .She is more than 30years now ,Not yet Married .But the Men Objected to that .Funny enough she is even asking that the whole Plot of Land should be sold ,A Land where her Late father was Buried which was also Rejected by the Males,The first Son suggested Half should be sold while the other part there father is Buried be left behind ,This same Girl said No as well .This was exactly the wish of this girl's mother before she died .Well The First Son Rejected that .

brexit:
This is cheap propaganda by haters of this man, how many suya sellers video their interaction with their customers



My of my worry in this country is that people hate others without reasons and not minding the consequences of such by God



It cuts across all religion, cheap propaganda indeed

. There are Lovers and haters .U can't stop lovers neither can u stop haters ,Leave haters alone , Everyone will not love a Man .

tesppidd:
All these wailers and ipob sef.

As if Atiku, Saraki, Wike, Theodore, Dino, whom they worship and lick their feet are better than Tinubu.

. They are better oooooo .

OTA is the Industrial Hub of the West ,There are Chinese Free Trade Zone at Igbesa ,OTA Industrial Estate .So many Manufacturing Industry in OTA ,Yet they have the worst Road ,ATAN to AGBARA is Hell Fire Road ,If U hate your Car just put it on that Road and watch it destroyed before your very eyes within short Period ,. Adiyan gasline , Opeilu, Mota, Oke aro, Power line, Agbado crossing, Agbado Oja, Transformer, Railway, going inward and outward Ijaye, etc.
I can't believe a Past President of this Nation ruled within those years and does not find it deem fit to fix Roads in OTA ,Not even the one that links up to His Farm ,Just drive from His Farm Junction through the Road by the side of His farm in OTA it's shit ,That Area road in Eleidi close to His farm is an eye sore ,From the State General Hospital ,Just a little drop of Rain.,You Experience Hell on Earth driven through ,What a shame

Hoii:
The road from Agbara to lusada can cause miscarriage in a pregnant passenger

From Agbara to ATAN sir

Dtruthspeaker:
In fairness and natural justice, such sweet words to my ears, so let's go.

First, the concept of idi-igi and ori-ojori are admirable attempts by the Yoruba Peoples to do that which is right and good to deliver good justice to all who require it.

Therefore, idi-igi and ori-ojori are not the only good way of resolving the dispute, there will always be other good and fair means of resolving any dispute.

Secondly, On "How about a situation whereby the Two Women who had Children for the man had left him so long time before He Dies." Natural Law is a lover of Reasonable Freedom and the exercise of freewill, therefore, it will never Compell anyone to remain in any marriage, neither will it punish anyone for departing from the marriage.

Under Natural Law the purpose of marriage is for all the good that can come out from companionship, thus if the companions no longer want the companionship, then they shall be free to leave, without Any Wicked Consequences.

Thirdly, On "the two women was never Legally Married to the Deceased man". Under Natural Law, where a man cohabits with a woman, as husband and wife, They Are indeed husband and wife. For save for the soothing of the families affected by the Union, A marriage is formed immediately the couples Consent to cohabit together as man and wife and they Represent Same to the Whole world. (Consent makes the Law).

So under Natural Law, there is no requirement for a formal celebration of the marriage, for immediately the couples cohabit as husband and wife, Marriage is Presumed and Upheld!

Fourthly, On "He died a Single father.Leaving 4 Children behind ,3 Males from first woman ,One female from the second woman," since the women exercised their right to leave the marriage, from the period of their departure, they can not be said to be entitled to any benefit arising and due to the man since they have also relinquished their liability owed him (He who does the work, must get his wages).

However, when it comes to the fruits (children) of the marriage, different natural laws come into play.

Children are a product of the conscious act and will of a husband and wife. And children come with a liability first placed on the couples themselves, such that even if the couples, uncouple, the liability still remains.

Therefore, once children are born, burdens are placed on the couple, for it is against Natural Law to unreasonably place burdens, created by some persons, on others (society,). For it is another Rule of Natural Law that All persons must be catered and cared for.

So even though the couples are separated, they are both still responsible for the good welfare of their children.

And this is why it is immaterial that "the man died a single father". The man till his death remains liable and responsible for the good welfare of the product of his activities, both he and the mothers of the children.

So, what is the good judgment on how his property is to be shared? The Just and Right and Fair Answer is EQUALLY!!!

For all the children, are children of equal standing and class, None is Higher than the other, in that they are all Equally owed the Natural Law duty of care and good wellbeing as a right from their father and a Gift From Nature.

. Hmmm! Never seen such a Brilliant Analysis of yours before .You touched every Areas of the Matter .God bless you for this Wisdom .From the Content of your Response .If I get right it means all the 4 Children should be given One room and Parlour each as there are also 4 rooms and Parlour on the one plot .." EQUALLY. ? Another area I want to argue with U is the context of a Woman been a man's responsibility even after she had left the man ,Thought the man responsibility has to be on the Child only ,U mean when a woman leaves a Man to marry another man ,Such woman would still be catered for by the man he left when she is already a responsibility of another man .?

November ,December ,May Almighty God save Us all ,Armed Robberies is prominent in those two Months,Guys need Money for Christmas/ end of the Year Groove etc .We are in the Era of No Police ,Crime/ Robbery would have free Operations .

ILovedemmanna abi na wetin be him id ,sarrki ,Hellnus etc abi na hell fire where are u all .Under your Darling Daddy Adminstration ,All these are Happening ...U can't keep quiet ooo U must say Something.

nairavsdollars:
Yeye man. Okonjo Iweala will shame you at WTO just like Akinwunmi Adesina did

. What has the issue of Iweala and Adeshina got to do with rescuing of an American Citizen ,Are U pained or what ? Off course Our Naija Life may not Matter to U ,it matters to them especially when a US Citizen is held Hostage in a foreign Land .

tobechi74:
You need free legal advice. Go to office and consult one eh,Osho free

. Thanks for the Insult.

ILoveDemMANNA:
He did not say anything outta the ordinary, because this insecurity issue is what our country has been facing right from our ought to be celebrated democracy since 1999, which insurgency became worse starting from 2003.

Something urgent must be done to STOP this now.
There was a time in this nation that people up North, even up to Abuja couldn't go to their place of worship, both churches and mosques, all because they don't know when the next BOMB/EXPLOSIVE WILL BOOOOOOMMMM!!
Things now can never be compare to the days when people see plastic bags on the street and everyone run helter skelter.
We will get there gradually.
The foundation has been destroyed.

and still even becoming more worst till now bro

Lawyer and Elders in the House .

Uzomacharles:
Bro

I advice you go to Facebook and look for Canadians groups and join...

Better Be Active And Post Reasonable Posts And Dress Well(Comfortable)...

90% of them hate BLACKS

. Thanks bro.Would try that ,No Unreasonable posts at all ,No Gangstars dressing as well.But that 90% of them hates BLACKS got me bodered ,Well no problem .

Openbusiness:
Canadian man kee u dia. After chopping 9ja men money finish u wan run? U lie, u goin no where

.

Uzomacharles:
OP if you see any just let me know

. Bros if I see any ,I just have to start relating ooo ,I am sorry I won't let you know because I only need just one ...Meanwhile you too can search if Probably you are better in search than me and you get many ,You can spare me just only one if I have not gotten .Thanks