₦airaland Forum

It's crazy how Mbappe at 27 still have zero Balon dor. No one could have predicated that outcome after 2018 world cup. Yamal better sit up and remain focus rather than crowning himself and clowning around. He should get rid of all those shenanigans.

Gucciboy:
Hazard was never world class , never got good numbers to make him a balon d'or contender and finally he was a just good player.

Hazard was loved for his dazzling skills that's it.

No objections from me.

Gucciboy:
A world class attacking player is a player that can register 40 goals plus assists across all competitions like mbappe,Salah and Harry Kane normally do consistently.

These metric is for attackers So NONE ARE WORLD CLASS

You are just digging a pit for yourself. Hazard never got that figure in any season at Chelsea. By your definition he was not world class. Drogba only got that amount once at Chelsea so once again another of your legend that wasn't world class.

Shegzdave:
So Osihmen is not world class enough to you?

You are an Arsenal fan ryt?

I have never seen Timber have a bad game or any winger who have constantly gotten the better of him. Whenever i have watched him he has always physically dominated any winger he's up against. is he really that good or the few games I have watched arsenal is skewing my perspective.

andrewbaba44:
Please you guys shouldn’t be biased

How many players can you even call world class
Here ?

They are many potential world class talents in that list and that's why clubs have paid those big bulks.

mosdii:
Judging the various teams in the just concluded summer transfer market, I think Liverpool did outstandingly in the window.
They got good players that they actually need to boost their team and maintain stability and they are favourites to retain the title.

Arsenal on the other hand, did the most in the market. They actually bought players that they were in dire need of and for the first time, has a better chance of winning the title due to the perfect signings they made.

Manchester city will always be Manchester city but I feel they bought players that are personally good but not collectively known as regards teamwork. They bought players that don't necessarily fit their system if you look at the clubs these players were signed from. For a very long time, we haven't seen Man city being so clueless in games.

This is a bit premature as we are just 3 games into the season for a team with little to no pre season games for preparation. The new players we brought in will definitely elevate us once they get use to the system and their fellow players. We can already see how Rodrigo return has stabilized our midfield. Cherki, Donnaruma, Foden, Guardial etc are yet to even get going. I repeat no team will be able to compete with city for the league title once we are in full gear and in top shape. Not Liverpool, Arsenal and definitely not Chelsea who haven't won a league title or finished top 2 in over 7years.

Cc Android17

What's your take on City interest in Rodrigo if Savinho is sold for £70million. I don't rate him that highly and with such big fee plus wages he will demand to start every game. I really want to see more of Cherki, Marmoush, Bobb and Foden. I would rather keep Savinho who is clearly talented but needs room to improve. Savinho only season in la Liga at 19 he had 19 goals and assists. Rodrygo's best season is 17.

Cc Fbs

Replace Leao with Piccoli.

Golden boot: Haaland

Most assists: Cherki

Young player of the season: Lewis Skelly

Best signing: Rejinders

Biggest underachievers: Newcastle

Flop: Palmer

Champions: City

AbokiWam:
He was involved in 100% of the goals

Good, that's all I needed from you.

timbros:
He assisted 3, agreed.

Good, you have accepted he created 3 of the 7 PSG goals. That's all I needed.

AbokiWam:
Palmer had 3 goal contributions.

But someone assisted him for his goals.

All together, goals plus assists, the final had 6 goal contributions

So Palmer had 3 goal contributions for the 3 goals scored meaning he was involved in 100% of the goals Chelsea scored. Yes or no?

timbros:
Why are you arguing something very plain? Raumdeuter is completely correct.

When a player is said to have Bleep goal contributions for the season, it simply means his total goals and assists for the season.

Most goals have 2 contributors - the scorer and assister.

If all those PSG 7 goals in contention have assiters, then it's a total of 14 goal contributions. Dembele's 3 assists is 3 goal contributions out of the 14. If, for example, Kvara scored 2 goals and 1 assist, it's another 3 goal contributions etc etc..

This thing is very clear na.

Ok let's see how smart you are. Out of the 7 goals PSG scored in finals Dembele created 3. Do you agree or object?

AbokiWam:
His theory is correct in a way

You can't say you want to allocate 50% for dembele's involvement in goals using assist to give him the percentage.

Then again skip assists when you want to talk about a bigger picture

Cant believe this is the best you could come up with.

What is the meaning of goals?

What is the meaning of goal contribution?


Out of the three goals Chelsea scored at the final against Psg how many did Palmer contribute? Just answer that question.

AbokiWam:
Very Correct Sir

What is correct in that post. You are reading non sense yet you are shouting very correct sir. In the screenshot below how many goal contributions did Palmer get in that game and did he contribute to 100% of Chelsea goals?

It’s surprising how much the Club World Cup has elevated Chelsea and Marescas standing. I don’t see them anywhere near a title race. They will be lucky to finish top 4.

raumdeuter:
If you want to take 7 goals, then Dembele scored 0 out of 7 which is 0%

If you want to take contributions to goals by counting assists as a separate category, then tits 7 goals, 7 assists and Dembele has 3/14 ~ 20%

PSG scored 7goals and Dembele provided 3 of those 7. Take your L and rest. Ogbomosho mathematician.

raumdeuter:
7 goals means 7 goals plus 7 assists = 14 goals contributions

If out of 14 goals contributions your best attacker delivered 3. then...

7 goals means 7 goals and Dembele contributed nearly 50% of those goals in 3 finals. Keep your Ogbomosho maths to yourself.

raumdeuter:
3 goal contributions in 14 goal contribution. for the supposed best player/attacker in the team

What is this one saying.

raumdeuter:
Final of the CWC, Super cup final, CL final

PSG played 3 finals he didnt score 1 goal as an attacker. when his team scored 7 goals

He had 3 goal contributions in those 3 finals. That means he contributed nearly 50% of those 7goals. You really have no point.

raumdeuter:
Many other websites have others. E.g BBC for example had Van der Ven as their best players

Is bbc a sport analytical website? You were talking about Uefa doing polling boot award yet major sport analytical sites also had him as best player. Rest with this agenda

Club world cup:
Quarter final vs Bayern...1 goal

Semi final vs Madrid.....1goal and 1 assist.


Champions league.
Final vs Inter....2 assists

Semis vs Arsenal.....1 goal and 1 assist

Quarter vs Villa.....2 assists

Round of 16 vs Liverpool.......1goal.

Supercup vs Tottenham.....1 assist


You cannot even use performance in big games to run an agenda against Dembele.

raumdeuter:
In the key games in the CL he didnt do much to justify being the best PSG player,
In the key games in the CWC he didnt do much to be the best PSG player
In the Super cup yesterday he didnt do much to be the best PSG player on the field

Name those key matches in the champions league and CWC that he didn't do much.

raumdeuter:
What did Dembele actually do to be the best player on the field. Its not an agenda its to show the weirdness of the award sham that has been going on for a long time

So even sofascore and whoscored that had him as the best player are also weird?

raumdeuter:
As in the nature of polling booth awards

Dembele won the player of the Match today in this same game we watched

https://x.com/FabrizioRomano/status/1955742650382082070

This your agenda against Dembele is weird.

Altern8tor:
Ok

Good boy.

Altern8tor:
Liverpool not at ur level,,yet u came 2nd runners up behind them.... Delulu

Who won the league 4 seasons in a row? I thought as much. No one is on our level and we shall reclaim our title with ease.

Ihebu4chelsea:
Lol, so you really believed City signed Haaland for 50m? Same Dortmund that sold Sancho for almost 80m, That Lamba too Loud!

Did Sancho have a release clause like Haaland

Enzo5:
so Oscar bobb is better than savinho?

Bobb has more potential. Savinho decision making and finishing are bad.

Realtord43:
you are selling Grealish, Mc attee and Savinho, there is no way you won't need atleast one player for cover up

Marmoush and Doku for the left wing, Oscar bobb, Foden, Cherki and even Bernardo on some occasions for the right.

Emaprince:
Who be you?

The CITy that got easily dispatched in CWC?

This is not the time where they seemed like the biggest fish in the ocean.

They are on same level with all the top teams now...and they can also drop points against the middle table teams.

In a cup competition, any team can be dispatched. Is that suppose to be a valid argument or mockery?

To place City on the same level as clubs that have not lifted the league title in over a decade is pure delusion of grandeur. Liverpool remain our only genuine challengers and even then they are still not on our level.

Realtord43:
City selling Savinho and now going for Simon, So we might end up with Garnacho then

We will not be making any additional attacking signings even should savinho be sold. Oscar bobb is ready.