₦airaland Forum

BlackDBagba:
What's on her head?

I'm confused too. Looks like a birds nest

Datazone:
They are indeed terrible. They are taking this land grabbing too far and this will be their demise. The days of sponsored killings are over - Tompolo and Jonathan. A new man is now the C-in-C.

#CrocodileSmile go reach them if dem Bleep up.

Ijaw has no land. They belong on water

historyworld031:
1) The fulani have actually been very subservant to european countries and arab countries. They are a people who have the reputation of doing the bidding of the white whom they serve in a master slave relationship.

2) You have to try and be honnest with yourself, throwing insults shows that you are talking out of sentiments. Then you go on with your sentimental guess work about the size of oyo and so on. The size of the Benin empire is on pre-colonial maps and available for all to see.

3) You keep calling Benin by "bini" for what reason exactly ? I still can't figure.


4)Then you go and claim oyo empire (there is still no proof that oyo were ever an empire).

5) Good work at trying to glorify the fulani in order to make the defeat of oyo (which had to run away from its capital and establish itself in a forrest) look like a glorious thing.

6) The Benin Kingdom fought many wars and one of those was against the fulani jihadists and Benin won. I know you believe that if your yoruba people can't do something, then surely nobody else can (sentiments).

7) I don't see the point of talking to you, you lack self awearness and you know nothing about history.

8 ) by the way nice work at attributing each black african islamic kingdom to the fulani, it really show your kind of "historian", the kind who thinks all black muslims were fulani.

Bad grammar. Historian extraordinaire

SicilianMafia:
[s][/s]

Stop talking trash!!

I believe you are the one talking trash

macof:
European sources are largely not "eye witness" accounts. The concept of historical document belongs to the topic of Historical Source which can be either primary or secondary category. Africa lacks written records therefore the concept of historical documents are majorly considered secondary source

direct me to any reputable historian who has ever debunked oral traditions as a valid source in African history, it is in fact impossible,
Types of Historical sources include ; texts, objects, abstracts and oral
oral and abstract sources will always be included as a source especially in africa

And just because something is written doesn't make it historically accurate, hence the need for Source scrutiny

Are you answering this copy and paste individual? Historyworld031 has no knowledge of anything. Unfortunately, he unintelligently cannot discern so.

Someone who is asking why you refer to Benin as Bini has no knowledge at all, and I believe should be ignored