₦airaland Forum

Idehn:
The joke was not directed at Rhino in the first place. Like I said before, it was a joke about thehomers and purely thehomers question.

Keep lying. It is easier to admit that you goofed. You were both trying to make Rhino look stupid but the joke ended up on you. You both exposed your lack of intelligence, simply in a bid to showcase rabid and unintelligent atheism.

Are you a nine four year old? There is no need to throw a tantrum on the internet. It is hard enough to understand you with your. . . unique use of the English language.

I use that "unique" way of expressing myself when i am trying to make someone see his own stoopidity. Too bad: and you were the one talkinh about sarcasm flying over people's heads. SMH.

Anyway, the first conclusion applies to things that do not already exist and would need to come from nothing in order to exist. Such things logically do not exist and never existed if the original premise is true. As I said, the Universe does not fit it. We know the Universe exists.

Nonsense. Tomorrow you go pretend say you dey use ya head at all.

If the 1st conclusion applies to things that do not exist, and would need to come into existence, then the correct conclusion would be that something else preceded and triggered their existence - since the premise is that something cannot come out of nothing. Therfore they had to emerge from something.

You mean like the Universe in another form. That would still technically be the Universe.

This is very stoopid and illogical because things do not emerge from themselves. So the universe in another form is not what makes the universe. That is simply a question of form. The real question is how the universe (in any form whatsoevr) came to be in the first place. Going by the first conclusion, it follows that something else (external) to itself must have triggered it.

The the big ba.ng also relies on the conservation of energy/mass/momentum too. Even it necessitates that energy/mass/momentum already exist in some state prior to the expansion of the Universe. Hence, the Universe in another form.

If it had always existed in that other form, then what triggered it to change form to this current form. Magic, abi. I tire for una o.

Its like you dont stop to think. What was theer before the universe in its present form? Science says a single dot. If that single dot had existed for all eternity, what and why does it change form? What exactly causes that. In other words what causes the big b.ang.

But the most critical question is what caused that single dot which the universe supposedly came from. Since something cannot come from nothing, what caused it. if you say it has always been there, where is your evidence for that. Also if you say it caused itself then you have run foul of logic. there is nothing that comes from itself.

This definition is completely subjective. If this is what you mean when you say God you will need to elaborate way more. Unless, you believe every human on earth has the same notion of what it means to be perfect in power, wisdom, goodness.

Fine. However, you do realize people believed the Sun to have had more than natural attributes and powers and required human worship. The same for the moon, the ocean, mountains, volcanoes, lakes, rivers, forest, talking burning bushes and the countless other things. Do you consider all these things Gods?
Again, this is entirely subjective. You need to elaborate way more than this. My family members are all people I would say have supreme value. Would you consider them Gods?

This definition is fine but it could be applied to anyone. Any president, king, emperor, dictator, and or despot qualifies as a God under this definition. Is this really what you mean when you say God?

Fooolishness again. If I yab you, you no go gree. Did u not see where i told your atheist freind that you useless people will come again and start asking me which of these definitions is God? ? ? Did I not say that it should be clear which one it is - in the context of an atheistic discussion? ? ? ? ? Is atheism the negation of powerful rulers?Is it the negation of "valuable entities" ? ? ? Of course the definition that is apt ifs the first one! I knew it, i predicted it, that una go talk trash again, and see amm.

Ya brain dey inside ya yansh jaaaare, you no even intelligent, ONE KOBO!

Beaf, just answer the question from deepsight; NA BETA TIN WEY ABATI YARN?

As in, to dey receive all those people, na hard work be that?

^^^^^ Very thoughtfully put!

Na wah o, i dont know why beaf cannot answer such a simple question! His fanaticism makes him miss the issue entirely!

Damn! some people are really full of empty hot air! Yoo got nothing to say, do you? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Now u are asking for which dictionary to use. Is it not plain as day-light, except you are a double headed f.ool and boundless illiterate of Olympian proportions, that since we are writing English, then you should seek an English dictionary.

This just shows and confirms to me just how empty these atheists are. How they twist and turn around meaningless arguments. For crying out loud, he first asks for a definition of God. When referred to a dictionary, he is asking "which dictionary"? Who really has time for such tomfoolery as this? Very soon this nincompoop will ask me what a dictionary is.

Since you are too lazy to find a dictionary, as I am in a good mood, I will find one for you.

Merrian Webster

god noun \ˈgäd also ˈgȯd\

Definition of GOD

1. Capitalized : the supreme or ultimate reality: as a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe

b Christian Science : the incorporeal divine Principle ruling over all as eternal Spirit : infinite Mind

2: a being or object believed to have more than natural attributes and powers and to require human worship; specifically : one controlling a particular aspect or part of reality

3: a person or thing of supreme value

4: a powerful ruler
See god defined for English-language learners »

See god defined for kids »

The last part of the merrian webster definition has a link to "God defined for kids'. . . . . .maybe that is the one you should look up, as that is what will be okay for your evidently imbecilic and infantile mind. . . . . .,there is also a link for “definition of god for English language learners”. . . you cud try that one since you obviously don’t understand English yet. . . .

Amongst the 4 definitions provided for adults above, pls do not embarrass yourself any further by claiming that you do not know which one applies to a discussion revolving around atheism? ? ? ? ? Because I know that is the next imbecilic thing you will ask!

So you have definitions from a dictionary above now. . . . .it was anyhow an id, iotic question to ask foir the definition, as the definition is common knowledge except for those who wish to waste time arguing for argument sake alone.

Now that you have the definition, punk, what else will you ask me to define? Huh? Shall i define “nairaland” for you? or what a forum is?

Goat.

thehomer:
And here ladies and gentlemen is a classic example of an oxygen waster. I really hope you learn to develop some interpersonal relationships.

Nonsense. if you are looking for definitions, go to the dictionaryt. if you cant do that, then it is YOU who is the waste of time and space, you cretin.

Simple thing - Rhino pointed out that your gospel is that of nothing to something. In other words that what you espouse is the idea that things may come out of nothing. you missed that that was what he was saying. That shows your shallow intellect, and you are here bandying insults and looking for who will play definition games with you. I say again, go to the dictionary! Infantile Clown!

Osanobua, o , wetin be dis? no be una dey ask for definition? Dictionary dey now, try am.

I ain't looking for any definition so i dont need a freagin dictionary. na u dey ask for definition, so plssssssssssssss try a dictionary!

useless time-waster

thehomer:
But for you to claim God did anything, you would first need to show the God you're talking about.

^ abeg use dictionary joooor. u tink say i get time. nonsense.

Na wah oooo, see stooooopidity in broad day light, chai.

Idehn:
First, I know what Rhino.5dm said. I was making a joke based on thehomers question. Apparently sarcasm is wasted you.

Dey dia dey lie. If you know what Rhino said, then there was notin to be sarcastic about.

Second, until you actually define what a "God" is, there literally is nothing to be rejected.

u norr get dictionary? Use am now?

Third, from what mankind has observed about the nature of the Universe(conservation of energy/mass/momentum) it seems to have always existed in some form or another. Even if you are arguing from the premise that something could not have come from nothing, the logical conclusions are these:
A) The Universe never existed
B) The Universe always existed

Since A is obviously not true, it must be B).

FOOOOOLISHNESS on the streets of ashkelon! How on earth does the something and nothing argument lead to a conclusion that the universe never existed? It only leads to a conclusion that sometyhing must have preceded it, where ya brain dey?? Inside ya yansh

The second concusion you have up there is c.rap, because what we know about the big b.ang rebutts that s.hit.

Bros, i norr get ya time.

thehomer:
I wonder what this gospel of nothing sounds like. Could you explain it to me?

Idehn:
Oh I can tell you. I posted an example below.
It is really is a strange thing when someone preaches a gospel about nothing. It is as if it never happened.

Men, see DAFT atheists. Una be morons sef. Can you no read? The fella did not say "gospel" of nothing, he said "gospel of nothing to something, in oda words, that since u reject gods existence den you are saying the universe came out of nothing. he ended describing that as voodoo, which it is! Awon ode oshi. Olodos!

Did you read the article at all? I am sure you did not!

Great article by Chidi Amuta on the many flip flops of the Kano Prince called SLS, ever so foolishly worshipped by Nigerians. . . .

The most amazing thing about this is the fact that in the midst of all the drama, there was someone calm enough to be taking pictures.

See am here, authentic, confirmento -

^^^ What's your take?

Recently I met a couple who have declared that they do not want kids. They say that kids are an awful nuisance, and that they simply want to enjoy one another without kids.

I was shocked.

[size=20pt]CALM DOWN FOLKS AND GET NEWS FROM PROPER SOURCES: THE 700 EXPLOSIVES WERE DYNAMITES BELONGING TO A CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - [/size]

http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/-intercepted-dynamites-belong-to-construction-firm-/95106/

Was it?

Sanusi is a joke really. His mismanagement of the economy, tripling of unemployment and martial-brigade approach to central banking bespeaks a primitive barbarian. He knows nothing about central banking, he is all flash, but you see, the world loves a flasher, thats why he's clearing awards even abroad. In terms of substance, he is zero, and he has actually done a great deal of harm to the Nigerian Economy. He had no blue print for his so called reform and everything is just as the spirit moves him. that's no planning, that's no regulation, he just wakes up and does stuff as he pleases. this is the mediocrity that is celebrated in Nigeria, sadly.

Well that is one view, but sincerely the idea that a state of emergency automatically suspends the state government is wrong. there is no such thing in the constitution. that is a militaristic impostion of obasanjo

Negro_Ntns:
Can u all just give him a slack and let him do his job?

This is an incredibly st.upid statement. Do his job? ? ? What does his job entail? Security of lives and property no? Is there any situiation that would make a better case for a state of emergency than the carnage already going on? ? ? Why does the constitution vest the president with such powers if he will never use itr regardless the level of murderous crisis? You have no respect for human life.

Blackteeth:
Poster shut the hell up. Go and be president let me see what you will do.

If you had lost anyone to Boko Haram's rampage, you would not make this idiotioc statement

Can anybody proffer just one good reason why Pres Jonathan has failed to declare a state of emrgency in Borno State? ? ?

I knew it. Everybody knew it.

Are you watching cnn right now? DSK is likely to be released on self recognition as the prosecution have now expressed doubts about the woman (victim's) credibility. It has come to light that she had $100, 000 in her account which she cannot explain, she has lied about a previous rape case, in falsely seeking asylum in the states, has a history of drug abuse, and has been contacting a prison inmate regarding how to deal with DSK. Addittionallky she was using 5 different mobile lines. , . the list is endless. . .

Poor DSK. . . maybe its not too late for him to still contest the French presidency

Abeg moderator, front page jaare!

lol

lolest

dem plenty ooooo

lolestestt

belif it or not its true. . . .

Check out the house in the link above, where did he get the money, props like that in banana island are going for almost 1 billion

lol