₦airaland Forum

eepeepook:
Either posted the same comment twice or this is another account based abroad. Terrorism stemmed from people believing the system in place would never favour them. Thus they chose to take by force. If payment of monthly benefits was a thing, robbery statistics would reduce by a little close to half.

You are wrong on[b] the bolded[/b].
You just defined agitation or militancy, and not terrorism.
Terrorism is generally independent of the system. In fact, an example is Nigeria, in which the majority of terrorists come from individuals from Niger, Chad, Guinea, and the Sahel region. The system that cooked them is religion, and not the Nigerian system.

On the italicized and bolded,

I laugh

Bandits do collect millions, even billions, and yet they are still bandits. And somehow, you believe that giving them 30k monthly will stop them from wanting to collect billions? Come on, guy.

A good example is how the sections of the American community in which blacks and immigrants dominate, with more than 90% use of social benefits like free food, free housing, etc., via EBT cards, usually are the sections with the highest crime rates. I mean, you go to the whites communities who work for their money, and there is no crime. While you go to the black community who don't work for their money,a and there is perpetual crime.

You think economics and its social thread are a joke?

RandDigital:
Not all government money comes from personal taxes. A society with less poverty is safer, healthier, and more stable. Unless you're ok with world poverty like most African politicians.

There is absolutely NOTHING like free money.
Money is worked for.
And sorry, African politicians are not "ok with world poverty." They just don't have the brains to address the poverty in their country. That is why they ALL fall back to dishing out cash to people who don't deserve it, exactly how you recommend.

Notice that the West doesn't give cash to people who don't deserve it, only when they want to keep them in perpetual and generational dependence, like the black community of America with their EBT cards.

When America wants to give real money, it gives tens of Billions of dollars to the Fords, General Motors, and Bentley. They know who deserves money. That is why Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, etc., are still third-world countries and, in net economic terms, are worse than most African countries, despite their flashy cars, streets, and buildings.

eepeepook:
Hopefully our government will follow the initiative.

Follow suit to do what?
Hand cash to undeserving people?
Deserving only because they are citizens?
Meaning you want to take cash from the people who have worked for it as tax, and hand it over to the people who haven't worked for it as social grants?

Do you even know what a socialist economy ends up becoming?

PDPdestroyer:
How he wan take market Obi if he no discredit every Tinubu’s policy

The way you beg for attention, eh!


I truly hope you are loved at home.
The absence of which causes behaviors like this: excessive demand for attention, whether good or bad.


As in, you really take the pains to go online, design a poster, make AI images, etc. all because you want someone to mention you and start a conversation. Dude, it's not easy.

Na still SAED

No mind them.

Good News for Nigerians: released students

Good news for Bandits: Cash Out!

BATified2023:
there's a sharp difference between activism n been stupid, sowore doesn't know the difference so he's just creating nuisance.

He just want to b seen as talking everytime irrespective of whether what he's saying makes sense or not

A time will come,
When you return to your 2014 status quo,
Where will you do your own "creating nuisance"

And my prayer is that, at that time, let there not be a "ood-Luck Jonathan" to accommodate you like before,
But an Abacha.

Victorodehankel:
I think it's wrong to generalize the north as a single monolithic entity, we have a vast majority of people in the north central who don't buy into the islamic extremist idea and are mostly christians

Then they can exclude themselves.
But as you can see, the core north will NEVER exclude itself in this.

Kukutente23:
Could it be that Tinubu's nursing a malignant and highly infectious STD that he doesn't want Remi Mama Alakara isonu to know about
How can you be borrowing so aggressively locally and internationally and yet precious little is seen to be going on?
You can't even fund the budget!!
Tinubu should come clean. Oko oloyun might have a cure for what he's wasting dollars on

You are very intelligent.
I like your deep analysis.

One thing I can guarantee you:
Jeehardeest are actually cawards.
They have fears too.

Arm the citizens, watch as jeehard takes a back stage.

Kachalla Tinubu may not be happy as this guy is exposing the Nigerian government.

mascot87:
Na all this kind nonsense dey deceive Peter Obi but no wahala.

Forget this poll:

Do you really think that in reality, any Ijaw man will vote for Bola Tinubu?

Trust me, if Obi is not on that ballot, we will all be on holiday in Ijaw land than vote for Tinubu, and if it is a crime not to vote, then we'd better be called criminals.

temmybaba:
How is workforce group GNLD bro…. Chai I for talk say you no Dey ok but I no wan abuse elderly man… I guess u no really hustle for jobs for in lagos .. u for know them .. for ur info … they handle nestle PT and ET entry test now

Wise man,
Go ahead and apply.

Sladem05:
Inferiority complex? Me I like the truth but you don’t. You’ve spent this entire argument deflecting entirely from all the main points cause you cannot handle the truth. The truth is that this America got humbled by a much weaker foe. It’s been having that for god knows how long. I am not on anyone’s side but I am very happy to see an arrogant country like the US get humbled. America is Rome before it collapsed and what you spew is no different from the usual western rhetoric
‘We don’t lose wars but interest’

‘We won the battles thats all that matters’

I have heard all this bs before

Iran is Byzantine
Until it rose!

nurey:
Stop giving out false information. The company I work for uses Google form for recruitment, even for internal recruitment.

Google form is not synonymous to GNLD

Guys, avoid these dude.
Mostly these ones countering my comments.
Avoid whatever they post and whatever jobs they promote.
They may be a syndicate of not just GNLD but also kidnappers.

XTruth:
Lol beruit is still called Hezbollah stronghold.

Shit you don't even know the you are fighting.

Fake jew.

If it is their stronghold,
Why can't they easily over throw the government?
Abi they like the government ni?




Original Iranian.

donslmnstvn:
No wonder they said ignorance is really a disease. Stop writing about what you know nothing about all in the name of you writing.

Workforce organization are very legit, I know how many people they have helped in getting a decent jobs including me.

Get enlightened bro

Please everyone,
take note of this guy,
He is the leader of the GNLD guys.

XTruth:
Lol that's your fantasy.
The same bunker buster they use in Iran missiles cities and there were still firing missiles from those cities.. Lol Iran was able to reach enrichment up to 60%... And you think if they ever wanted to get a nuke they won't have.

Una just funny. I understand the hustle continue by if you nor see the visa nor mad enter road oo.

Trump know why he rush get peace deal.

Ok, that is true, USA rushed and made a deal because Iran was about to take over Los Angeles.
Iran won. I agree.

Saturnalia:
I don’t believe anything Amerika says.

I know you support everything that ISIS does.

Sladem05:
What? You are just a fool. Never comment on geopolitics. Bro has resorted to whataboutism😂 cause he can’t disprove that the US didn’t achieve a single objective in this war.

Seems like you easily get angry.
It's only an inferiority complex that makes a man this easily angry, oh.


I just agreed with everything you said, and now you claim it is "whataboutism."
Do you even know the meaning of "whataboutism?"

I just said I agree with you that ALL the nuclear facilities of Iran are not destroyed. They are still above the mountains, and some that were even built in the high seas have even grown larger.
I also agree with you that all their navy and air force are still intact.
I also agree with you that all their industrial complex for the production of missiles and drones are still intact.
I also agree with you that Iran still has the ability to project power, not terrorism, all over the Middle East.

I agree with you
What again do you want?

FineUsername:
Why always Google form? Don't they have a dedicated website link for recruitment?

Its GNLD
Avoid them.
Stay safe.

JayB11:
Its an international NGO, the pay will definitely be good. Please apply guys.

You are the poster and the GNLD manager.

Guys, avoid this job.
This is NEOLIFE and GNLD.

They will harvest your information and spam your emails.

heysquare:
Just pray that or advice US to stay out the war and see what Iran would turn Israel to. Even Trump knew this and he said publicly that Iran can wiped out Israel out of map because of it's size

Oh yes, even Israel knew that if Iran had developed their nuclear weapon, that was the goal.
But USA decided to step in with their bunker buster to rewind time back to 50 years for the Iranians.

But without the nukes, which in any way, Israel wouldn't have allowed them to have it,
Iranian supreme leaders and generals would still be running around tunnels like rats.



Or what will they have wiped Israel with?
Missiles? Or Air Force? Or Navy? Which one?

Sladem05:
No cause ultimately you have failed to prove how the US didn’t lose the war. You have not meaningfully debunked a single claim i made. Not a single objective did the US achieve in Iran not one.
As the Ukraine War has shown, aircraft carriers and huge warships are just targets. Iran’s cheap drones proved that in this war too. What is the point of having an overstretched military is a flex?

America is a paper tiger. The country has not won a single war on its own since WW2 not even one 😂😂. The US just picks on weaker countries and still looses 😂

So, I thereby agree, and I am fully convinced, that the USA lost the war, and has conceded Texas, and Miami to the Iranians.

Sladem05:
Not interested that they spent 20 years in Afghanistan and Vietnam each just to lose? I swear they dropped you at birth. How can somebody be this demented? You are a fool. They wasted trillions of dollars of taxpayers hard earned money just to lose to a bunch of farmers in Afghanistan and Vietnam. Abeg go hide. You are deluded if America wanted to fight. Wars im Afghanistan and Vietnam showed tbe limits of American power. The US is not the all powerful country people thought it was.

The closure of the strait of Hormuz is not just a threat to Americans but the entire world. Gas prices shot through the roof cause of this war. The US lacks both the political and military means to open it.

And the Iraq war was not a solo US victory. It was a combined effort. It was not just battles that brought Iraq down. They suffered 12 years of sanctions which would wreck their industrial complex, US had far better tech, much of Iraq never supported him. They lost that war in most ways you possibly could.

Take a look at the bolded.

It sounds familiar.
When we were little kids, a child started throwing such tantrums when he has nothing left to respond to.



If you think America is a paper tiger, let Iran fly one air force plane to Washington, D.C., or move one naval ship towards Pearl Harbor. Let's see.


But I bet you, America had its ships right at the nose of Iran.



Now, I want to be that type of paper tiger.

BigYash:
Poor man on faceless forum. You be 🤡

Good.
From now on, behave well.
Don't go around saying what you don't know.
Be a man. Only women talk like that.

educatedfool:
You keep saying "Facts," but your list contains opinions, disputed claims, and exaggerations.

Let's deal with actual facts.

First, military success and legality are two different things. Killing senior officials through surprise strikes does not automatically prove strategic or moral superiority. It simply means one side successfully carried out an operation.

Second, there is no credible evidence for your claim that "90 Iranian generals were cleared in the first 30 minutes." Repeating an unverified number doesn't turn it into a fact.

Third, despite all the rhetoric, Iran has generally responded by targeting military installations, intelligence sites, and strategic infrastructure rather than publicly adopting a policy of assassinating the elected leaders of other countries in their homes. Whether one agrees with Iran's actions or not, there is a distinction between attacking military objectives and deliberately targeting political leaders.

Fourth, if Israel's position were as comfortable as you portray, it would not require continuous U.S. military, diplomatic, intelligence, and defensive support. Israel has formidable military capabilities, but U.S. backing remains a central pillar of its security.

Finally, wars are not judged by social media victory laps or casualty lists. They are judged by whether strategic objectives are achieved. If either side still possesses the capability and willingness to continue fighting, declaring total victory is premature.

So don't call it "facts" when much of your post consists of disputed claims and selective omissions. Facts require evidence, not confidence.

"....They are judged by whether strategic objectives are achieved."



Please list just one strategic objective (strategic or non-strategic) of Iran in this war, apart from survival?

The term "strategic objectives" in war is a term of recent coinage, born by the US need to align with its internal political pressure where a loud minority of immigrants and their online grifters made the majority believe that there is no need for a war. And so, the government had to say, "This is not a war, but an operation with strategic objectives of... nuclear program,...missile production facilities,...drone production facilities,...ability to project strength."

You just want to use that term to judge America by it, but you unfortunately failed to realize that if you apply it to Iran, it falls flat.

All wars are judged by one measure: "surrender or total obliteration of the enemy."
Iraq, Afghanistan, Japan, Vietnam, Nazi Germany, Libya, etc.
That is how wars are judged.

Even though we very much agree that such a system is changing, with the increase in religious influence in warfare, in which people measure victory by loss. Such that a Hamas, Hezbollah, IRGC, etc can be losing men and land, but as far as they still poke out their head to inflict anyloss, no matter how small it is, they refer to themselves as winners. They even refer to their loss as martyrdom. In that case, victory will now soon switch to total obliteration. If not, they will regroup again, even after 30 years, return, and claim that they have always been victorious. I bet you, if the Shah of Iran is mistakenly made to take control of Iran for 1 day, you will understand the meaning of total obliteration of the IRGC. It will be deadly. It will be bad. Because he knows what Jeehard is. He knows that it can stay low for 50 years and still rear its head. The US doesn't know.

Sladem05:
You are grabbing statements out of your ass. Who said Egypt became a superpower?

The Suez Crisis was when Egypt nationalised the suez canal in 1956 but Britain and France tried to stop them but they gave up due to American and Soviet pressure. That war confirmed that the British and French were no longer the undisputed hegemon. The same with this war in Iran almost exactly 70 years later with the US unable to defeat Iran confirming that America is not the world’s superpower anymore 😂

I have heard that americope too many times. ‘We don’t lose wars, but interest’ sure you lose interest in a 20 year war😂. A war that you still couldn’t even incapacitate the enemy and the enemy ends up stronger than before you left😂

Oga go and hide. You know I nothing about geopolitics.

1898 was not the year the US became the world’s superpower either but when the US was a world power. That didn’t happen till 1945 the end of WW2. The word ‘superpower’ was coined to describe the USA and USSR at the end of WW2 and beginning of the Cold War.

Nobody is saying these wars are making the opponents world powers. Who gave you that idea. These wars be it in Suez or Iran both confirm the decline of these empires.

Iran is not even a peer to either US, Russia or China not even close. It is a middling power at best but it has managed to clip the wings of the dying American eagle 😂😂😂

"Britain and France tried to stop them"
"British and French were no longer the undisputed hegemon"


I like how you like making yourself happy.

Well, it was Israel who went on to stop Egypt, and then France and Britain joined.
Just as Israel rose to stop Iran's nuclear program, the USA joined.

If you like, make yourself happy by excluding the Lion from the hunt and focusing the camera on the foxes.


Second, I am sure you don't know the meaning of a "hegemony." If you do, you won't ascribe it to TWO entities.
Assuming you now know, if America became a "Superpower" before the 1950s, how come it was a war in 1956 that made Britain and France no longer the undisputed hegemon? You see how you are contradicting yourself?


And yes, I mentioned Egypt because I want you to understand that small-scale sea piracy does not, in any way, position Iran as a superpower. They are only lucky that America has a lot of influence on the Arab states due to its ability to pressure them to tamper with justice with ease.



America would have just released Israel to do what Israel was doing to Egypt before France and Britain joined

educatedfool:
Oh, I almost forgot...

Last year we were told Iran's nuclear program was "completely and totally obliterated."

This year we're told it had to be "obliterated" again

And somehow, after being "obliterated" twice, the United States is still sitting across the table negotiating with Iran over... its nuclear program.

That's fascinating.

If it was truly "obliterated," what exactly are they negotiating about? Ghost centrifuges? Imaginary uranium? Invisible enrichment? Or maybe "obliterated" doesn't mean what you think it means.

It's funny how the story changes depending on the audience. One day it's "mission accomplished," the next day it's "we need another strike," and then it's "let's negotiate a deal."

Oh yes,
I think you don't understand English too much.
Mut "obliterated" means obliterated anytime it is being called upon in the future.

Negotiations on the Nuclear issue are based on powder that lies in the ruins of their obliterated nuclear facilities, and also on their innate pursuit to obtain it. The US knows that it is more costly to come around to carry out the same process in the future than it is to just give them a reason not to even want to build it.

And yes, if Iran starts building again today, which they surely will, they will need another strike.
And that strike will be said to "obliterate" it.
Simple English, bro.

XTruth:
Lol reason they are asking Facebook to help them delete missile impact footage lol

Ok, I agree.
They told them to delete the footage that took out Netanyahu and gave him 7 fingers.



The funny things that make you guys happy.