₦airaland Forum

CaptainFM1:
Super falcons need to realize that the rest of Africa have woken up. Someone need to point it out to them that 2027 world cup qualifications is tied to this wafcon tournament.

Dem know. But water don dey pass their garri. Dem dey panic mode for this match, If they are lucky to escape the second half onslaught from the Zambians, dem go enter their cruise mode from there.

I blame NFF for what these girls are going through. While other African teams were busy playing friendlies the NFF Chairman and his team of clueless clowns were busy feeding fat in Abuja.

And if any of the players complain, they victimise her. Until these crop of NFF officials are voted out, Nigerian football will continue to struggle.

This is going to be a very long match for Demehin.

Now, long match for Nigeria

Wait, what is the red card check for?

Were they not even on the same line?

Win or bust against Zambia. A draw or defeat, and we can kiss World Cup qualification goodbye.

Nnadozie looks completely out of form at the moment.

That said, the Super Falcons haven't won any of their opening WAFCON matches since 2016, yet we've still gone on to reach at least the semi-finals every time. Hopefully, this tournament won't be any different.

TheStoriesOfMan:
That means by your analogy, the Vatican City has more Muslim population than Christians right?

I don't understand how Vatican City entered this conversation. We're discussing Israel, the claim that it is a Christian country, and why some Christians are so quick to defend the actions of the Israeli government, even when they believe those actions amount to genocide.

Benjamin Netanyahu is not a Christian. In fact, he recently made a remark about Jesus that many Christians have found dismissive or offensive, yet there was little widespread outrage from the global Christian community. That inconsistency is what I find puzzling.

As for the holy sites, many have been rebuilt, restored, or relocated over the centuries for historical, political, or practical reasons. So I'm not sure what point you're trying to make by bringing up Vatican City. Vatican City is the seat of the Roman Catholic Church, located in Rome, Italy. It has nothing to do with whether Israel is a Christian country. Please explain the connection you're trying to make.

To be clear, I have no issue with eliminating terrorists. However, punishing or displacing an entire population because some among them are terrorists only creates deeper resentment that can last for generations.

Let's bring it closer to home. In Nigeria, we have herdsmen involved in violent attacks, bandits, and terrorist groups. Does that make every Fulani person a criminal who deserves to be wiped out? Of course not. Likewise, the fact that some individuals engage in internet fraud or drug trafficking does not make every Igbo or Yoruba person a criminal.

We should avoid condemning entire ethnic or religious groups for the actions of a minority. That is both unjust and dangerous. If we stay silent—or worse, justify injustice when it happens to others—there is no guarantee that one day we won't find ourselves on the receiving end for one reason or another.

GeneralOuki:
Learn. That's what any right thinking person who values education would do.

I don't need to be told what I already know, and it wasn't even a direct reply to my comment. I hold a BA in History and Diplomatic Studies, so I am well aware of Nigeria's relationship with its neighbours, as well as the complexities and challenges involved.

Nigeria may be facing many problems, but for someone from Cameroon to claim that he is shocked by the level of development and sophistication of Nigerians and Nigerian cities comes across as condescending. While we share a border, the reality is that Nigeria and Cameroon differ significantly in terms of population, economic influence, regional leadership, and global presence.

zegxy:
lol, speak for yourself, he is doing the Lord's work in your life. Not in the life of people. Period. How many of the so called Muslims in Nigeria aren't hyprocrite ? Na Jews wey no concern you, u carry their matter for head. let me heal your ignorance, Israel is the only country in the ME where Christianity is the fastest growing religion unlike you terrorist Iran wher christain was the majority of the populace before the Satanic mullahs got into power

Keep wallowing in your ignorance.

Firstly, I am a JP.

Just like in Nigeria and many other parts of the world, religious leaders and political elites often work hand in hand, sometimes influencing people who accept what they are told without questioning it. I do not simply accept information at face value; I take the time to verify and cross-check things. And when my curiosity gets the better of me, I go straight to the source.

Stats don't lie. For a country people claim to be a Christian country, the Muslim population dwarf their Christian counterparts by over times ten.

emapeteum:
So the American evangelists that are supporting don't also know that the Jewish state doesn't believe in Christ yet, though we have a remnant who believe? You sound childish and less exposed. I

Very hilarious. “Less exposed,” you say? While I hate to brag or engage in a mudslinging contest, just for the sake of this argument, let me state that I am a JP — self-sponsored, not government-sponsored.

Just like in Nigeria and many other parts of the world, religious leaders and political elites often work hand in hand, sometimes influencing people who accept what they are told without questioning it. I do not simply accept information at face value; I take the time to verify and cross-check things. And when my curiosity gets the better of me, I go straight to the source.

Stats don't lie. For a country people claim to be a Christian country, the Muslim population dwarf their Christian counterparts by over times ten.

SixSeven:
What we don't know is more than what we think we know.

We have much in common than you think - wetin consain us with Cameroon? Their president is also the longest serving ruler in Africa and an inspiration to some people

As a country, no, we don't.

Nigeria has experienced several military coups, yet no single military ruler remained in office for anywhere close to forever. Unlike some countries, we've developed a political culture where leadership eventually changes. So the idea of a civilian staying in power indefinitely simply doesn't fit Nigeria's constitutional and political history.

The only civilian president who seriously attempted to push for a third term was Obasanjo, and Nigerians across the political spectrum stood firmly against it. That tells you a lot about the country's attitude toward constitutional term limits.

The worst that could happen with whoever you're referring to is that they serve their final constitutional term and then pack their bags afterward.

So I reiterate: although Nigeria and Cameroon share some historical ties—just as we do with Chad, Niger, and Benin—we're no longer the same people. We've evolved into different nations with different political cultures. Nigeria is significantly ahead in terms of economic size, regional influence, and cultural impact, and I don't think it's accurate to treat both countries as though they're on the same political or economic trajectory.

SixSeven:
Do you know why they say Atiku is not a Nigerian but from Cameroon?

Part of it is our shared history. The original 19th-century Adamawa Emirate was a territory that covered parts of northeastern Nigeria and much of what is now northern Cameroon. Colonial partitioning by the British and Germans split the historic region right down the middle. Later, following a UN plebiscite at independence, parts of British Cameroons voted to permanently join Nigeria, which is why those borderlands and the shared culture are part of Nigeria's Adamawa today.

Let me humor you. Political scientists often recognize the NCNC as Nigeria's first political party with a truly national and cross-regional appeal, rather than just being localized to Lagos. What is the meaning of NCNC? National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons. Founded in 1944 by Herbert Macaulay and Nnamdi Azikiwe as a joint nationalist front to fight British colonial rule.

So Mr Political historian and scientist, what do you want me to do with this info now.

Bluntemperor:
You are too funny 🤣 because you are blind with your religion ideocy and you better wake up to the reality.
The Great American People - Mostly Democrats in Nature will always rise above Mamdani - fake and false pretence- as time will show again that he is likened to A Bat 🦇 that hides its character.
The Americans Also known to understand that Christianity is a Way of life instead of being a terrorist Sympathetisers!
They will always Check mate him!

Funny enough, the Israel that you lot blindly support doesn't even believe in what Jesus Christ stood for. I was genuinely shocked when I walked the streets of Israel. The only reason they're so welcoming to visitors is because of the revenue they generate from tourism.

And what's so Christian about many Americans? They often use religion as a political tool. The funniest part is that some people genuinely see Trump as a devout Christian. The man couldn't even quote a Bible verse when he was asked to. 😂

As for Mandani, if there is a fake and false pretence there, he will be rewarded by the electorates by showing him the door. no biggi with that, palin and simple. But for now, he's doing the Lord's work in the lives of ordinary people.

If no be craze, why anybody wan dey compare Naija with Cameroon in the first place?

My problem with some of these content creators from other countries is that they build their careers on the back of the Nigerian fan base, and once they're established, they suddenly turn against Nigeria. The same audience that gave them relevance becomes the one they start taking shots at. It's a pattern that's becoming too common.

Mamdani is a man loved by the majority of New Yorkers. Even many of his critics who aren't billionaires are beginning to warm up to him and his socialist policies. He is a man of his word, and he keeps delivering.

My only fear is for his life. Netanyahu-led Israel has a reputation, in my view, for taking out strong voices they perceive as being against their interests, wherever they are. Charlie Kirk comes to mind. In my view, he appeared to be safe until he began criticizing Israel's interests, particularly its actions in Gaza. Whether or not the two are connected is something people will continue to debate, but it's one of the reasons I worry about outspoken figures who take strong public positions on the issue.

There is also a reason bills that support what many describe as Israel's genocide keep sailing through both houses of Congress, often across the political divide—a lot of people in those houses are in AIPAC's pocket. Especially now that America has a willing POTUS who seems prepared to go along with almost anything to cover his own back, in this administration, anything goes.

But you have to give it to Mamdani: he has stood tall against bullies, both in government and among billionaires. Although Mossad is another beast entirely. That's their MO, as I see it. They first create enough dissenting voices against what you stand for, and then find a willing mind to take you out.

I love this man and his ordinary-man, people-first politics. He's doing great. But he must tone down his comments on Israel. Like he said during his campaign, he has no interest in governing Israel—he's vying to govern New York, not Israel. He should keep it that way.

Charlie Kirk died, and the world didn't stop, neither did it end. People have moved on. The opposition press will keep trying to get him into trouble with the tone and direction of their questioning, at least until this corrupt and remote-controlled Donald Trump government leaves office—if it ever leaves.

Mamdani is a man loved by the majority of New Yorkers. Even many of his critics who aren't billionaires are beginning to warm up to him and his socialist policies. He is a man of his word, and he keeps delivering.

My only fear is for his life. Netanyahu-led Israel has a reputation, in my view, for taking out strong voices they perceive as being against their interests, wherever they are. Charlie Kirk comes to mind.

There is a reason bills that support what many describe as Israel's genocide keep sailing through both houses of Congress, often across the political divide—a lot of people in those houses are in AIPAC's pocket. Especially now that America has a willing POTUS who seems prepared to go along with almost anything to cover his own back, in this administration, anything goes.

But you have to give it to Mamdani: he has stood tall against bullies, both in government and among billionaires. Although Mossad is another beast entirely. That's their MO, as I see it. They first create enough dissenting voices against what you stand for, and then find a willing mind to take you out.

I love this man and his ordinary-man, people-first politics. He's doing great. But he must tone down his comments on Israel. Like he said during his campaign, he has no interest in governing Israel—he's vying to govern New York, not Israel. He should keep it that way.

Charlie Kirk died, and the world didn't stop, neither did it end. People have moved on. The opposition press will keep trying to get him into trouble with the tone and direction of their questioning, at least until this corrupt and remote-controlled Donald Trump government leaves office—if it ever leaves.

That's one of the reasons I'm usually cautious about attending large public events, such as the Carnival of Cultures or Christmas festivities in Berlin. Sadly, in recent years, we've seen several incidents where extremists have driven vehicles into crowds of people celebrating.

It also raises an important question: if the authorities already know who some of these high-risk individuals are, why are they sometimes only monitored instead of being removed from society when the law allows? Leaving dangerous people at large can create opportunities for them to radicalize or influence vulnerable individuals, who may then carry out attacks on their behalf while remaining off the authorities' radar.

Svoboda:
Obj is an old man and has played his part. That his word doesn't move a needle in Ogun is subjective. It's like saying Gowons words don't move a needle in plateau. Obj clearly has no indictments and forfeited nothing to a foreign country. I am not also bothered by his personal life and relationships with his family. That's seperate from having a criminal record.

You just keep weaving it around Tinubu. I didn't even mention Tinubu in my initial write up. The man, Obasanjo, is the topic here- his achievement as a representative of the Yoruba nation. I am talking about his influence in Ogun, and by extension, the South West since he left office. The annoying part is how he tries to rewrite history...paint himself as someone without any blemish.

Svoboda:
There's no greater and more accomplished personality than Obj in the entire southwest. History has been so generous to him and his life continues to reflect that testimony. Tinubu may try all he wants, but Obj bests him in every aspect.

In fact, pairing Tinubu against Obj can as well be seen as a slight on Obj, if you factor in Tinubus dodgy history, and the numerous unfilled gaps in his life's story.

Nobody disputes those facts, but non of those facts dismiss who he is or the frail influence he still wields in Ogun politics. He is an elder statesman and a former President, but his words doesn't move a needle in Ogun politics, and does not erase the controversies and alleged wrongdoings of his time in office, including accusations made by his own sons. When Tinubu eventually leaves office, both his achievements and his shortcomings will likewise become part of his name and legacy.

Sheuns:
Obj did not impose his daughter on Ogun people as a sitting president.

Iyabo has been a senator once and it was between 2007 and 2011. I never knew Obj was still president then. Also the people willingly voted her.

That he refused to support Awo and Abiola ambitions doesn’t mean he’s against them. He has a choice to support whoever he wants to. You don’t have to tell him to support someone simply because they are from the same state or speak the same language. During Obj’s tenure as president, they were several Yorubas appointed by himself into his cabinet.

If a governor was impeached, how’s that the problem of the president? Is he the one running the state house of assembly?

The man doesn't want any Yoruba man to be above him. Bossing people around is what he enjoys.

Well, he had a hand in most of those impeachments.

You're only being wise by half. One of his last acts in office was imposing his daughter as a senator and foisting the ailing Yar'Adua on the country.

Little wonder his daughter's political career fizzled out shortly afterward, leading to her disappearing from the political scene for about 16 years, only to return arrogantly to harvest where she did not sow.

Sheuns:
Why does he need to single-handedly produce a local government chairman or a governor?

That a man chose not to be an emperor like Tinubu doesn’t make him less relevant. It shows he allows people to do their things themselves.

This kind of mentality of yours is what led to many willingly giving themselves as slaves to Tinubu.

Also who are the illustrious sons of Yoruba land that he worked against?

If you're not well-informed on a topic, it's better to ask questions before making assertions. There's a difference between having the political influence to make something happen and having the political will to do so. It's not that he never tried, but the people of Ogun State simply have never trusted him to that extent.

It's interesting that you're trying to portray OBJ in a positive light simply because he now criticises his successors. This is the same man who imposed his daughter on the people of Ogun State politically as a sitting President; the same man who privatized the Operation Feed the Nation initiative and acquired it himself, resulting in what is now Obasanjo Farms; the same man who relied on Maurice Iwu and the INEC of 2003, an election deeply flawed (sometimes results released before election day); the same man who pursued an unsuccessful third-term agenda and still denies it; a leader who rarely accepts responsibility for his own mistakes.

His presidency was also marked by an unprecedented wave of unresolved political assassinations and the removal of elected governors through controversial impeachment processes. Need I continue?

To answer your question directly: yes, he was antagonistic to the political aspirations of both Obafemi Awolowo and M.K.O. Abiola.

If you're not well-informed on a topic, it's better to ask questions before making assertions. There's a difference between having the political influence to make something happen and having the political will to do so. It's not that he never tried, but the people of Ogun State simply have never trusted him to that extent.

It's interesting that you're trying to portray OBJ in a positive light simply because he now criticises his successors. This is the same man who imposed his daughter on the people of Ogun State politically as a sitting President; the same man who privatized the Operation Feed the Nation initiative and acquired it himself, resulting in what is now Obasanjo Farms; the same man who relied on Maurice Iwu and the INEC of 2003, an election deeply flawed (sometimes results released before election day); the same man who pursued an unsuccessful third-term agenda and still denies it; a leader who rarely accepts responsibility for his own mistakes.

His presidency was also marked by an unprecedented wave of unresolved political assassinations and the removal of elected governors through controversial impeachment processes. Need I continue?

To answer your question directly: yes, he was antagonistic to the political aspirations of both Obafemi Awolowo and M.K.O. Abiola.

Knowing what we know about where his business interests are and where he chose to retire, it is difficult to justify the lack of significant federal projects in the South-West during his administration. If the North was where he believed deserved greater attention, why didn't he simply choose to retire there?

Chief Olusegun Obasanjo is politically mischievous and calculating. He actively worked against some of Yorubaland's most illustrious sons and has always been uncomfortable with anyone whose influence could rival or surpass his own.

Perhaps that explains why he has never commanded any real political structure in Ogun State. He has never been able to single-handedly produce even a local government chairman. Despite serving as President, he struggled to deliver his own polling unit, ward, or local government consistently.

He also has a history of reshaping narratives to suit his position. A notable example is his continued denial of pursuing a third-term agenda, despite the overwhelming public record and widespread belief that such an effort was made.

Trust him at your own peril as a Yoruba person. Adárà ni tá máa dára nílé. We know our own.

He has consistently acted in ways many perceive to be contrary to Yoruba interests. So don't blame us when many Yorubas are neither fond of him nor take him seriously. Our views are shaped by what we've seen over the years.

Knowing what we know about where his business interests are and where he chose to retire, it is difficult to justify the lack of significant federal projects in the South-West during his administration. If the North was where he believed deserved greater attention, why didn't he simply choose to retire there?

General Olusegun Obasanjo is politically mischievous and calculating. He actively worked against some of Yorubaland's most illustrious sons and has always been uncomfortable with anyone whose influence could rival or surpass his own.

Perhaps that explains why he has never commanded any real political structure in Ogun State. He has never been able to single-handedly produce even a local government chairman. Despite serving as President, he struggled to deliver his own polling unit, ward, or local government consistently.

He also has a history of reshaping narratives to suit his position. A notable example is his continued denial of pursuing a third-term agenda, despite the overwhelming public record and widespread belief that such an effort was made.

Trust him at your own peril as a Yoruba person. Adárà ni tá máa dára nílé. We know our own.

He has consistently acted in ways many perceive to be contrary to Yoruba interests. So don't blame us when many Yorubas are neither fond of him nor take him seriously. Our views are shaped by what we've seen over the years.

yarimo:
apart from travelling overseas no any steps from Bago and if their is mention it here

Okay then. Apart from his recent actions, which I really love, I don't know much about him.

yarimo:
how is he against terrorism? The same Niger state people are killed everyday and Bago is only interested in traveling out of the country

Are you in tune with the steps he's taking to tackle banditry heads on?

yarimo:
Bago the worst governor of Niger state in history

Because he's against terrorism or because he's pro-Tinubu?

I knew Trump was going to embarrass himself, again. Very anyhow POTUS 😂

The same thing he did when Chelsea won the Club World Cup.

I knew Trump was going to embarrass himself again. Very anyhow POTUS 😂

So Trump will be presenting the World Cup trophy to Spain—a country he seems to hold in such disdain. The irony is hard to miss.

Well deserved victory to Spain!

Merino, Raya, and Zubimendi...congrats boysss!!!!

Thank God for football, Enzo Fernandes for be one cruel street thug. Very aggressive and mean player.

So Trump will be presenting the World Cup trophy to Spain—a country he seems to hold in such disdain. The irony is hard to miss.

These people are animals.

What I witnessed the other day was horrifying.

On a packed underground train, I saw a man slip his hand under the short skirt of a young white woman. It happened so quickly that I barely had time to react. The first time, she adjusted her skirt, probably thinking it was accidental. Then he smelled his fingers, licked them, and deliberately did it again as the train reached the next stop. The lady jumped away and looked around, trying to figure out who had touched her. She looked shocked and on the verge of tears, as if she was struggling to process what had just happened.

I wanted to intervene, but I also feared for my own safety. Some of his like move around with sharp objects, and would resort to violence without hesitation.

Political realignment