haekymbahd:
Bro you know nothing about your religion why not become Muslim since you are studing Islamic scripture more.

For your information

The four canonical gospels—Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John—were all composed within the Roman Empire between 70 and 110 C.E (± five to ten years) as biographies of Jesus of Nazareth. Written a generation after the death of Jesus (ca. 30 C.E), none of the four gospel writers were eyewitnesses to the ministry of Jesus.

To he gospel writers were anonymous no one truly knew about them.


it amazes me that you don't know that this verse you quoted was a corrupted verse.


Although the vast majority of later Greek manuscripts contain Mark 16:9-20, the Gospel of Mark ends at verse 8 in two of the oldest and most respected manuscripts, the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus. As the oldest manuscripts are known to be the most accurate because there were fewer generations of copies from the original autographs (i.e., they are much closer in time to the originals), and the oldest manuscripts do not contain vv. 9-20, we can conclude that these verses were added later by scribes. The King James Version of the Bible, as well as the New King James, contains vv. 9-20 because the King James used medieval manuscripts as the basis of its translation. Since 1611, however, older and more accurate manuscripts have been discovered and they affirm that vv. 9-20 were not in the original Gospel of Mark.

In addition, the fourth-century church fathers Eusebius and Jerome noted that almost all Greek manuscripts available to them lacked vv. 9–20, although they doubtless knew those other endings existed. In the second century, Justin Martyr and Tatian knew about other endings. Irenaeus, also, in A.D. 150 to 200, must have known about this long ending because he quotes verse 19 from it. So, the early church fathers knew of the added verses, but even by the fourth century, Eusebius said the Greek manuscripts did not include these endings in the originals.

Furthermore, the vocabulary is not consistent with Mark’s Gospel. These last verses don’t read like Mark’s. There are eighteen words here that are never used anywhere by Mark, and the structure is very different from the familiar structure of his writing. The title “Lord Jesus,” used in verse 19, is never used anywhere else by Mark. Also, the reference to signs in vv. 17-18 doesn’t appear in any of the four Gospels. In no account, post-resurrection of Jesus, is there any discussion of signs like picking up serpents, speaking with tongues, casting out demons, drinking poison, or laying hands on the sick. So, both internally and externally, this is foreign to Mark.

While the added ending offers no new information, nor does it contradict previously revealed events and/or doctrine, both the external and internal evidence make it quite certain that Mark did not write it.

haekymbahd:
Prove it please were Mathew, Mark, Luke, and John disciples of Jesus while on earth. Did they witness crucifiction, did they see Jesus ascending to heaven?

Were they present when Mary gave birth to Jesus?

Was any of their name mentioned in the Gospel which they wrote?

haekymbahd:
Khadija and waraqa what religion were there from. Also are you telling no Jew or christians right from the time of Muhammad ever converted to islam stop deluding yourself

it seems you don't know me yet, nice education I couldn't read any the copy and paste were too much.

Now let me start asking you questions..
From your post above are you saying Mathew, Mark, Luke and John were eye witness ?

haekymbahd:
I just searched through your topics why are you so obsessed with Islam shey na Muslims wey talk say make your bible dey corrupt.

You seem like someone seeking for a partner in crime I think that would make you feel better right well whether you like it or not.

The Quran is one and recited in different ways as approved by the prophet himself.


Kindly explain why RSV is accusing your widely accepted version of Bible before I can even take you serious

RSV preface

Yet the King James Version has grave defects. By the middle of the nineteenth century, the development of Biblical studies and the discovery of many manuscripts more ancient than those upon which the King James Version was based, made it manifest that these defects are so many and so serious as to call for revision........




Compare RSV and KJV version e.t.c of your Bible and still compare both to the Greek version and still compare all to the early manuscript? Couple with the fact that no disciples of Jesus wrote the gospel that author's claim it was from eye witnesses which they didn't mention any nor documents they copied from and we still have cannonical and non cannonical Gospel also the Catholic bible is even still more than the protestants, also the earliest cannonical which is gospel of Mark has been discovered to be fabricated in the early manuscript it stopped at Chapter 16 verse 8 and it not it up to verse 20 how did that happen only God knows. Even Jesus was not even alive when the cannonical were written to verify it and endorse it, the earliest cannonical was written 70+ A D, and we still don't know the full names of the authors of both cannonical and cannonical Gospels or who they are is this not amazing



Can you tell us the source of your Bible, the chains of narration and how KJV got corrupted that it needed revision?


@innotutorial

haekymbahd:
I just searched through your topics why are you so obsessed with Islam shey na Muslims wey talk say make your bible dey corrupt.

You seem like someone seeking for a partner in crime I think that would make you feel better right well whether you like it or not.

The Quran is one and recited in different ways as approved by the prophet himself.


Kindly explain why RSV is accusing your widely accepted version of Bible before I can even take you serious

RSV preface

Yet the King James Version has grave defects. By the middle of the nineteenth century, the development of Biblical studies and the discovery of many manuscripts more ancient than those upon which the King James Version was based, made it manifest that these defects are so many and so serious as to call for revision........




Compare RSV and KJV version e.t.c of your Bible and still compare both to the Greek version and still compare all to the early manuscript? Couple with the fact that no disciples of Jesus wrote the gospel that author's claim it was from eye witnesses which they didn't mention any nor documents they copied from and we still have cannonical and non cannonical Gospel also the Catholic bible is even still more than the protestants, also the earliest cannonical which is gospel of Mark has been discovered to be fabricated in the early manuscript it stopped at Chapter 16 verse 8 and it not it up to verse 20 how did that happen only God knows. Even Jesus was not even alive when the cannonical were written to verify it and endorse it, the earliest cannonical was written 70+ A D, and we still don't know the full names of the authors of both cannonical and cannonical Gospels or who they are is this not amazing



Can you tell us the source of your Bible, the chains of narration and how KJV got corrupted that it needed revision?


@innotutorial

haekymbahd:
I just searched through your topics why are you so obsessed with Islam shey na Muslims wey talk say make your bible dey corrupt.

You seem like someone seeking for a partner in crime I think that would make you feel better right well whether you like it or not.

The Quran is one and recited in different ways as approved by the prophet himself.


Kindly explain why RSV is accusing your widely accepted version of Bible before I can even take you serious

RSV preface

Yet the King James Version has grave defects. By the middle of the nineteenth century, the development of Biblical studies and the discovery of many manuscripts more ancient than those upon which the King James Version was based, made it manifest that these defects are so many and so serious as to call for revision........




Compare RSV and KJV version e.t.c of your Bible and still compare both to the Greek version and still compare all to the early manuscript? Couple with the fact that no disciples of Jesus wrote the gospel that author's claim it was from eye witnesses which they didn't mention any nor documents they copied from and we still have cannonical and non cannonical Gospel also the Catholic bible is even still more than the protestants, also the earliest cannonical which is gospel of Mark has been discovered to be fabricated in the early manuscript it stopped at Chapter 16 verse 8 and it not it up to verse 20 how did that happen only God knows. Even Jesus was not even alive when the cannonical were written to verify it and endorse it, the earliest cannonical was written 70+ A D, and we still don't know the full names of the authors of both cannonical and cannonical Gospels or who they are is this not amazing



Can you tell us the source of your Bible, the chains of narration and how KJV got corrupted that it needed revision?


@innotutorial

AntiChristian:


What do you understand from this Hadith below?

Narrated 'Umar bin Al-Khattab:
I heard Hisham bin Hakim reciting Surat Al-Furqan during the lifetime of Allah's Apostle and I listened to his recitation and noticed that he recited in several different ways which Allah's Apostle had not taught me. I was about to jump over him during his prayer, but I controlled my temper, and when he had completed his prayer, I put his upper garment around his neck and seized him by it and said, "Who taught you this Sura which I heard you reciting?" He replied, "Allah's Apostle taught it to me." I said, "You have told a lie, for Allah's Apostle has taught it to me in a different way from yours." So I dragged him to Allah's Apostle and said (to Allah's Apostle),

"I heard this person reciting Surat Al-Furqan in a way which you haven't taught me!" On that Allah's Apostle said, "Release him, (O 'Umar!) Recite, O Hisham!" Then he recited in the same way as I heard him reciting. Then Allah's Apostle said, "It was revealed in this way," and added, "Recite, O 'Umar!" I recited it as he had taught me. Allah's Apostle then said, "It was revealed in this way. This Qur'an has been revealed to be recited in seven different ways, so recite of it whichever (way) is easier for you (or read as much of it as may be easy for you)."
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 61, Number 514

haekymbahd:
it definitely conform with the third rule don't you know imam Hafs was a student to someone also he learnt somewhere and can be traced to uthman and the prophet Muhammad

This is the chain of narration of the Hafs Qiraat


Chain of Transmission of Hafs Qiraat
Imam Hafs ibn Suleiman ibn al-Mughirah al-Asadi al-Kufi learned from Aasim ibn Abi al-Najud al-Kufi al-Tabi'i from Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami from Uthman ibn Affan, Ali, Ubayy ibn Ka'b, and Zaid ibn Thabit from the prophet Muhammad.

See what you posted earlier and check the bolded names and cross check with the chain of transmission I posted.



Qiraat is a way of reciting the Quran it doesn't change the meaning of the Quranic verse. Hafs and warsh Is just like comparing British and American English it will mean the same thing the pronunciation might be different but it will mean the same thing the problem with what you posted earlier is with the translators to other language and not the Quran itself..

i hope you know that Arabic is one language where you will one dozen of different names for a single item unlike English,chinese,German or whatever language.


Advice and Advise or Organisation and Organization it still means the same thing what is the difference rather the problem you are having is with the translators..


Most importantly Hafs Qiraat was approved by the prophet himself..

haekymbahd:
Like Antichristian has said bring the differences and let us see.

You brought difference between hafs and warsh I told it was like comparing American English to British. The changes will not change their meaning but only in translation to other language depending on the translator and not the Quran itself

For a qiraa’a to be authentic it has to meet 3 conditions

1. Must conform to Arabic grammar.
2. The qiraa’a must conform with one of the mushafs of Uthman.
3. The qiraa’a must have an authentic (saheeh) chain of narrators going back to the Prophet (PBUH).


Is hafs version linked to the prophet Muhammad did he teach to recite that way yes. The chain of narration of the Hafs can be linked to the prophet himself

Chain of Transmission of Hafs
Imam Hafs ibn Suleiman ibn al-Mughirah al-Asadi al-Kufi learned from Aasim ibn Abi al-Najud al-Kufi al-Tabi'i from Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami from Uthman ibn Affan, Ali, Ubayy ibn Ka'b, and Zaid ibn Thabit from the prophet Muhammad.


Any Qiraat that doesn't follow this rules is not authentic... Definitely Hafs Qiraat is linked to prophet Muhammad himself and it is widely accepted Qiraat in the Muslim world

AntiChristian:


Bring us the differences and let us see!

The Qur’aan was revealed in seven dialects as was narrated in the saheeh hadeeth of ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab (may Allaah be pleased with him) from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). This was narrated by al-Bukhaari (2287) and Muslim (818); these were the dialects of the Arabs which were known for their eloquence.

Read and digest these ahadith above and below properly! You can also consult the Holy Spirit if you need to.

Narrated 'Umar bin Al-Khattab:
I heard Hisham bin Hakim reciting Surat Al-Furqan during the lifetime of Allah's Apostle and I listened to his recitation and noticed that he recited in several different ways which Allah's Apostle had not taught me. I was about to jump over him during his prayer, but I controlled my temper, and when he had completed his prayer, I put his upper garment around his neck and seized him by it and said, "Who taught you this Sura which I heard you reciting?" He replied, "Allah's Apostle taught it to me." I said, "You have told a lie, for Allah's Apostle has taught it to me in a different way from yours." So I dragged him to Allah's Apostle and said (to Allah's Apostle),

"I heard this person reciting Surat Al-Furqan in a way which you haven't taught me!" On that Allah's Apostle said, "Release him, (O 'Umar!) Recite, O Hisham!" Then he recited in the same way as I heard him reciting. Then Allah's Apostle said, "It was revealed in this way," and added, "Recite, O 'Umar!" I recited it as he had taught me. Allah's Apostle then said, "It was revealed in this way. This Qur'an has been revealed to be recited in seven different ways, so recite of it whichever (way) is easier for you (or read as much of it as may be easy for you)."

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 61, Number 514

Bring us the differences and let us see!

AntiChristian:


The companions used to memorize the Qur’aan by heart, and a few of them used to write down some verses or soorahs on animal skins, thin white stones and the like. It was not originally verbal recitation only. When Umar reverted to Islam, he read a part of the Qur'an in written form when he caught his brother in law reading it.

At first the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) forbade the writing of anything other than the Qur’aan, and he forbade them to write down his words for a while, so that the Sahaabah would focus on memorizing the Qur’aan and writing it down, and so that the words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) would not be confused with the words of Allaah, and so the Qur’aan was protected from anything being added or taken away.

The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) appointed a group of his companions who were trustworthy and knowledgeable to write down the revelation. They are known in their biographies as those who wrote down the Revelation, such as the four Caliphs, ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas, Mu’aawiyah ibn Abi Sufyaan, Zayd ibn Thaabit and others – may Allaah be pleased with them all.


Stop the lies! It was not decades!

Zaid ibn Thabit was among the scribes as written above. The Prophet died in 632. Abu Bakr became the Caliph after him till he died in 634. The Qur'an was compiled by Zaid Ibn Thaabit on the authority of Abu Bakr the first Caliph after the Prophet. The Qur'an was then transferred to Umar the second Caliph who died in 644. Uthman became the Caliph requested for the Qur'an from Hafsah the daughter of Umar.
Evidently it was compiled within two years of the Prophet's death and not decades as you lied!

The Qur’aan continued to be preserved in the hearts of the Sahaabah who had memorized it, and on the skins and other materials until the time of the caliph Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq (may Allaah be pleased with him). During the Riddah wars many of the Sahaabah who had memorized the Qur’aan were killed, and Abu Bakr (may Allaah be pleased with him) was afraid that the Qur’aan would be lost. So he consulted the senior Sahaabah about compiling the Qur’aan in a single book so that it would remain preserved and would not be lost. He entrusted this mission to the chief of memorizers Zayd ibn Thaabit (may Allaah be pleased with him). Al-Bukhaari narrated in his Saheeh (4986) that Zayd ibn Thaabit (may Allaah be pleased with him) said:

Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq sent for me when the people of al-Yamaamah had been killed [i.e., a number of the Prophet's Companions who fought against the false prophet Musaylimah]. (I went to him) and found ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab sitting with him. Abu Bakr then said (to me), “ ‘Umar has come to me and said: ‘Casualties were heavy among the Qurra' of the Qur'aan (i.e. those who knew the Qur’aan by heart) on the day of the battle of al-Yamaamah, and I am afraid that more heavy casualties may take place among the Qurra' on other battlefields, whereby a large part of the Qur’aan may be lost. Therefore I suggest that you (Abu Bakr) order that the Qur’aan be collected.” I said to 'Umar, "How can you do something that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did not do?" 'Umar said, "By Allah, this is something good." 'Umar kept on urging me to accept his proposal till Allaah opened my heart to it and I began to realize the good in the idea which 'Umar had realized." Then Abu Bakr said (to me). “You are a wise young man and we do not have any suspicion about you, and you used to write the Divine Inspiration for the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). So search for (the fragmentary scripts of) the Qur’aan and compile it in one book." By Allah If they had ordered me to move one of the mountains, it would not have been heavier for me than this ordering me to compile the Qur’aan. Then I said (to Abu Bakr), "How can you do something that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did not do?" Abu Bakr replied, "By Allaah, it is a good thing." Abu Bakr kept on urging me to accept his idea until Allaah opened my heart to that to which He had opened the hearts of Abu Bakr and 'Umar. So I started looking for the Qur’aan and collecting it from (what it was written on) palm stalks, thin white stones and also from the men who knew it by heart, until I found the last Verse of Soorat al-Tawbah with Abu Khuzaymah al-Ansaari, and I did not find it with anybody other than him. The verse is (interpretation of the meaning):

"Verily, there has come unto you a Messenger (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves. It grieves him that you should receive any injury or difficulty...” [al-Tawbah 9:128] until the end of Soorat Baraa’ah (i.e., al-Tawbah).

Then the complete manuscript (copy) of the Qur’aan remained with Abu Bakr until he died, then with 'Umar until the end of his life, and then with Hafsah, the daughter of 'Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him).

The Sahaabi Zayd ibn Thaabit (may Allaah be pleased with him) knew the Qur’aan by heart but he was methodical in his confirmation; he would not agree to write down any verse until two of the Sahaabah testified that they had heard it from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).

This Mus-haf (written copy of the Qur’aan) remained in the hands of the caliphs until the time of the Rightly-Guided Caliph ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan (may Allaah be pleased with him). The Sahaabah (may Allaah be pleased with them) had dispersed to different lands, and they used to recite the Qur’aan according to what they had heard of the seven recitations from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and each of their students used to recite according to what he had heard from his shaykh. If a student heard someone reciting in a manner different from what he knew, he would denounce him and accuse him of making a mistake, and this went on until the Sahaabah feared that there would be fitnah (trouble) between the Taabi’een and successive generations. So they thought that they should unite the people in following one recitation, which was in the dialect of Quraysh in which the Qur’aan had first been revealed, so as to dispel any disputes and resolve the matter. ‘Uthmaan (may Allaah be pleased with him) was consulted, and he agreed with this opinion.

Al-Bukhaari narrated in his Saheeh (4988) from Anas ibn Maalik that Hudhayfah ibn al-Yamaan came to ‘Uthmaan at the time when the people of Shaam (Syria) and the people of Iraq were waging war to conquer Armenia and Azerbaijan. Hudhayfah was alarmed by their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur’aan, so he said to 'Uthmaan, "O Ameer al-Mu’mineen! Save this nation before they dispute about the Book (Qur’aan) as the Jews and the Christians did before." So 'Uthmaan sent a message to Hafsah saying, "Send us the manuscript of the Qur’aan so that we may make copies of the Mus-haf and we will return the manuscript to you."

Hafsah sent it to 'Uthmaan. Then 'Uthmaan ordered Zayd ibn Thaabit, 'Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr, Sa’eed ibn al-‘Aas and ‘Abd al-Rahmaan ibn Haarith ibn Hishaam to copy out the manuscripts. 'Uthmaan said to the three men who were from Quraysh (the tribe of which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was a member), “In case you disagree with Zayd ibn Thaabit on any point in the Qur’aan, then write it in the dialect of Quraysh, for the Qur’aan was revealed in their tongue." They did so, and when they had written many copies, 'Uthmaan returned the original manuscripts to Hafsah.

'Uthmaan sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'aanic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt.

The Caliphs, Zaid ibn Thaabit and many other were scribes. They didn't forget anything from the Qur'an. This your comment is a lie and unproven!

Yes, he was. Even Allah said he was in the Qur'an. And all of his contemporaries knew he was unlearned.

Yeah, we can. Because even till today hundreds of thousands still memorise the Qur'an without any mistake. Yes, they wrote exactly what they heard! They are not inspired but blessed with accurate memory as seen also in the Hadiths!



They need not be inspired to compile the Qur'an. And more so, the Qur'an has already been completed and memorized by a lot of companions. Muhammad was inspired and the companions wrote down the inspiration accurately!

Related ahadith.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 61, Number 509:
Narrated Zaid bin Thabit:
Abu Bakr As-Siddiq sent for me when the people! of Yamama had been killed (i.e., a number of the Prophet's Companions who fought against Musailama). (I went to him) and found 'Umar bin Al-Khattab sitting with him. Abu Bakr then said (to me), "Umar has come to me and said: "Casualties were heavy among the Qurra' of the! Qur'an (i.e. those who knew the Quran by heart) on the day of the Battle of Yalmama, and I am afraid that more heavy casualties may take place among the Qurra' on other battlefields, whereby a large part of the Qur'an may be lost. Therefore I suggest, you (Abu Bakr) order that the Qur'an be collected." I said to 'Umar, "How can you do something which Allah's Apostle did not do?" 'Umar said, "By Allah, that is a good project. "Umar kept on urging me to accept his proposal till Allah opened my chest for it and I began to realize the good in the idea which 'Umar had realized." Then Abu Bakr said (to me). 'You are a wise young man and we do not have any suspicion about you, and you used to write the Divine Inspiration for Allah's Apostle. So you should search for (the fragmentary scripts of) the Qur'an and collect it in one book)." By Allah If they had ordered me to shift one of the mountains, it would not have been heavier for me than this ordering me to collect the Qur'an. Then I said to Abu Bakr, "How will you do something which Allah's Apostle did not do?" Abu Bakr replied, "By Allah, it is a good project." Abu Bakr kept on urging me to accept his idea until Allah opened my chest for what He had opened the chests of Abu Bakr and 'Umar. So I started looking for the Qur'an and collecting it from (what was written on) palmed stalks, thin white stones and also from the men who knew it by heart, till I found the last Verse of Surat At-Tauba (Repentance) with Abi Khuzaima Al-Ansari, and I did not find it with anybody other than him. The Verse is:

'Verily there has come unto you an Apostle (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves. It grieves him that you should receive any injury or difficulty..(till the end of Surat-Baraa' (At-Tauba) (9.128-129) Then the complete manuscripts (copy) of the Qur'an remained with Abu Bakr till he died, then with 'Umar till the end of his life, and then with Hafsa, the daughter of 'Umar.

NB Abu Bakr commissioned Zaid Ibn Thaabit to compile the Qur'an
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 61, Number 510:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and the Christians did before." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. 'Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, "In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur'an, then write it in the dialect of Quraish, the Qur'an was revealed in their tongue." They did so, and when they had written many copies, 'Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. 'Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt. Said bin Thabit added, "A Verse from Surat Ahzab was missed by me when we copied the Qur'an and I used to hear Allah's Apostle reciting it. So we searched for it and found it with Khuzaima bin Thabit Al-Ansari. (That Verse was): 'Among the Believers are men who have been true in their covenant with Allah.' (33.23)

NB Uthmani Qur'an was obtained from Hafsah daughter of Umar
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 61, Number 511:
Narrated Zaid bin Thabit:
Abu Bakr sent for me and said, "You used to write the Divine Revelations for Allah's Apostle : So you should search for (the Qur'an and collect) it." I started searching for the Qur'an till I found the last two Verses of Surat At-Tauba with Abi Khuzaima Al-Ansari and I could not find these Verses with anybody other than him. (They were):

'Verily there has come unto you an Apostle (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves. It grieves him that you should receive any injury or difficulty ...' (9.128-129)

NB Abu Bakr commissioned Zaid Ibn Thaabit to compile the Qur'an
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 61, Number 512:
Narrated Al-Bara:
There was revealed: 'Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and those who strive and fight in the Cause of Allah.' (4.95)

The Prophet said, "Call Zaid for me and let him bring the board, the inkpot and the scapula bone (or the scapula bone and the ink pot)."' Then he said, "Write: 'Not equal are those Believers who sit..", and at that time 'Amr bin Um Maktum, the blind man was sitting behind the Prophet . He said, "O Allah's Apostle! What is your order For me (as regards the above Verse) as I am a blind man?" So, instead of the above Verse, the following Verse was revealed:

'Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame etc.) and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah.' (4.95)

NB Zaid Ibn Thaabit used to write down the Qur'an in the Prophet's lifetime

innotutorial

haekymbahd:
No, he said it may be lost if eventually all Hafiz at the time died so he felt it was better for the Quran Hafiz to sit down and compare also with written copies to write the Quran. As I said if not for that Quran will only be learnt through memorization and they won't have to write it down becuse they already knew the whole Quran off head.

Are you just pretending not to listen Quran had been memorized during the time of the prophet and recited during salat infact during Ramadan the whole Quran was been read couple with fact that there are certain occasion where they read the whole Quran even during the prophet time and after him till date. If there had been an error it would have corrected. Did you also not see the Hadith I posted that nullified the writing of the verse of stoning in the Quran.
Umar ibn Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, said:

رَجَمَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَرَجَمَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ وَرَجَمْتُ وَلَوْلَا أَنِّي أَكْرَهُ أَنْ أَزِيدَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ لَكَتَبْتُهُ فِي الْمُصْحَفِ فَإِنِّي قَدْ خَشِيتُ أَنْ تَجِيءَ أَقْوَامٌ فَلَا يَجِدُونَهُ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ فَيَكْفُرُونَ بِهِ

The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, stoned (the married adulterer), Abu Bakr stoned, and I stone. Were it not that I hate adding to the book of Allah, I would have written it in the copy of the Quran. I fear that people will come and not find it in the book of Allah, so they will disbelieve in it.

Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 1431, Grade: Sahih

You are saying uthman burnt the Quran. At the time was he the only one who knew the Quran. He was the leader but then Quran had been memorized before that how will he change without people knowing and who attacked him..

Before Uthman burned copies of the Qur’an, the Book already had a history. As soon as the verses were revealed they learned by heart and recited during prayers. There may have different ways of reciting it but that does not mean there were different versions as some people would like us to believe.

The Noble Quran was revealed in one language and that is Arabic. It has only one original Arabic copy. Arabic 1400 years ago had 7 dialects. There exists today one original copy of the Noble in Saudi Arabia today. A copy of this original copy also exists in Turkey today as well.

When the Noble Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, it was revealed in Arabic, and in the Quraishi dialect. The Quraishi dialect is the most proper Arabic dialect that properly uses the Arabic words without altering their sound.

The Quraishi dialect was the most popular dialect in the Middle East at that time, and is today the dialect used among Arabs who speak Proper Arabic. The dialect that books teach at schools is also a Quraishi dialect today.

Back in the Middle East 1400 years ago, the Quraishi dialect was not the only one used among Arabs. There existed 6 other dialects along with it, but as I said, it was the most popular.

It is very important in the Islamic faith that when we recite the Noble Quran, we recite it in the Quraishi dialect or what we call today in the proper Arabic. We can't pronounce for instance "th" as "sa" or "za". We can't pronounce "la" as "laman". We can't pronounce "ja" and "ga", etc...

There are no variances or missing parts in the Noble Quran. These are all false and baseless assumptions by some anti-Islamics. The Arabic dialects had problems with each others, and that's why standardizing the Noble Quran with its original Quraishi dialect was essential to keeping it as a perfect Holy Book: For instance, take the letter "j". Did you know that some Arabs don't pronounce the "j"? They always pronounce it as "g" or "ga".

Take "the" as another example. Some Arabs also don't pronounce "the". They pronounce it as "za".

Another example, and this is an important one in my opinion, is that some Arabs used to have a dialect which originated from Yemen, where they would add "an" at the end of a noun. Take for instance the popular word of today "Taliban", as in the Taliban in Afghanistan. "Taliban" is the same as the Arabic word "Talib" which means "Student".

The Afghans today used the old Arabic dialect from Yemen which dates even older than 1400 years ago when the Noble Quran was revealed. Back then in Yemen, as I said, they used to add the word "an" for nouns. So if they for instance wanted to refer to a stone "sakhr (in Arabic)", then they would refer to it as "sakhran", even though it would be written in Arabic as "sakhr".

In Islam, properly reciting the Words of Allah Almighty is the way it must be practiced. Otherwise, it would be considered a sin and disrespect toward Allah Almighty and the individual would be disobeying Allah Almighty and would gain bad deeds that will count against him in the Day of Judgment if he did it intentionally.


What Uthman only did was to make sure only the Quraish dialect which is the dialect of the prophet himself and that in which the Quran was revealed is what was used throught out the to avoid the confusion of non Arab speaking nations in future. Is the Quraish version not Quran.. if he had omitted anything followers of Islam would told him or reported it. He was only a leader and not the only Muslim.

haekymbahd:



You had said this earlier



You saw a large portion of Quran may be lost and not large portions of Quran was lost. they are 2 different statements and that was the reason the Quran was written down or else it would just be learnt only by memorization and they wouldn't have needed to write it down. So whatever written Quran you see today is only meant for non Arabic speakers to learn.

Quran itself meant the recitation so what I am telling you in essence when two person reads the accepted Arabic Quran they would still say the same thing and have the same meaning throughout to the world.

Not all Hafiz of the Quran who memorized it at the time had died then and they were present during it's written down coupled with the fact they still cross checked with written documents.

If the Hafiz whom were taught to recite the Quran did not include anything in the Quran it means Muhammad taught them that.

haekymbahd:
it is a wrong statement for you to say large portion of Quran was lost due to death of huffaz because not all Hafiz of the Quran d
died and they only called for written down down the Quran when they realize the inevitable might occur also to make it easy for the non Arab speaking nations who are ready to embrace islam. or else they wouldn't have had to write a Quran it was learnt by memorization and this happened during the time of the prophet if the Hafiz did not include anything in the Quran it means it was not meant to be there in the first place. Rather you should say lot of Quran Hafiz died not large portion of Quran was lost.
[/b]

On the verse of stoning

Umar, in fact, had asked the Prophet (ṣ) for permission to write this verse in the Quran, but he was refused.

Zaid ibn Thabit reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:

الشَّيْخُ وَالشَّيْخَةُ إِذَا زَنَيَا فَارْجُمُوهُمَا الْبَتَّةَ

The married old man and old woman, if they commit adultery, then stone them irrevocably.

Umar said, “When this was revealed, I went to the Prophet and I said: Let me write it.” Shu’bah said:

فَكَأَنَّهُ كَرِهَ ذَلِكَ

It was as if the Prophet disliked that.

Source: Musnad Aḥmad 21086, Grade: Sahih


And Abu Muhammad said:

لِأَنَّ آيَةَ الرَّجْمِ إذْ نَزَلَتْ حُفِظَتْ وَعُرِفَتْ وَعَمِلَ بِهَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ إلَّا أَنَّهُ لَمْ يَكْتُبْهَا نُسَّاخُ الْقُرْآنِ فِي الْمُصْحَفِ وَلَا أَثْبَتُوا لَفْظَهَا فِي الْقُرْآنِ وَقَدْ سَأَلَ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ ذَلِكَ كَمَا أَوْرَدْنَا فَلَمْ يُجِبْهُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ إلَى ذَلِكَ

When the verse of stoning was revealed, it was memorized, acknowledged, and it was acted upon by the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, except that he did not have it written in the copies of the Quran, nor did he affirm its wording in the Quran. Umar ibn Al-Khattab asked about that, as we have related, and the Prophet did not obligate him to do it.

Source: al-Muḥallá 12/177




If the verses were to be in the Quran the Hafiz would have memorized it. The Quran was compiled considering both the written and memorized form which I have said earlier..

At least if any sheep eat any verse of the written Quran did it also eat the momorized one.

Haines:
nice... But bro twin tower was constructed with iron steel not aluminum and What about building 7? Hope you watch the video

haekymbahd:
Whether you like it or not there is only one Quran. Even you do not understand what you are saying, can you tell us the disagreements? whiçh I know you can't because there is certainly no disagreement.

Arabs has dialects , every tribe used to have its own way , and what it was right to say in their dialect was wrong in other regions .

The prophet peace be upon him taught those Arabic tribes the holy Quran in their way. The Quran is the miracle of our prophet so it must be perfect for every tribe and that what it was ; but after the death of the prophet peace be upon him ; the Islamic territory expanded and non-arabic speaker introduced to Islam , so they faced problems reading the Quran . To solve this problem, the Qalif Uthman may Allah accept him, gathered the Companions of the prophet PBUH, and they used the dialect of Korich “قريش” which is the tribe of the prophet.

This doesn’t mean that the destroyed versions wasn’t genuine versions of Quran ,but there was a purpose to gather all the Omah ‘people’ on one version. Unless you want to tell us the dialect Quraish is not approved by the prophet..

Before Uthman burned copies of the Qur’an, the Book already had a history. As soon as the verses were revealed they learned by heart and recited during prayers. There may have different ways of reciting it but that does not mean there were different versions as some people would like us to believe.

What non-Muslim do not, or prefer not to know, is that Umar instituted the practice of Tarawi prayer during which the whole of the Qur’an is recited in front of the congregation. Had there been the least deviation the Hadith writers would have mentioned it. There is not a single word written about any discussion about the recitation in the Tarawi. This simply means that the Qur’an was already intact.

From the very outset, the Prophet employed two independent but mutually complementary methods for preserving the revelations. The two methods used for this purpose were memorisation and inscription. Besides ensuring independently the transmission of the revelation, the two methods also served as internal checks, thus ensuring its accurate preservation.

atheistandproud:


His voice is okay. He could improve on his pronunciation but it's fine.

Be proud of your accent and your identity. Don't have internalized racism.

Have a wonderful week ahead.

fineboynl:
I don't know oh. That voice is not even exciting to listen further.

You need a pitch and pronounce things the accurate words. It's just like most indian YouTube video. Foreigners don't finish watching watching it. They cut it off.

You need to watch alot of YouTube video to understand what I am talking about. They way the sounds and make it look so interesting.

Some women fall for some guys They have never seen before over the phone. Just because of the way the sound and talk.

Urs is not just cool. Women will not find it attractive either

Lightway:


Try speaking like Americans or British people. Or you could use AI voice. This is only if you want more foreign views

If your content is just for Nigeria, then your voice is the best

haekymbahd:
who made the Hafiz of the Quran able to memorized and completely remember the Quran if not Allah. What inspiration is Greater than that, moreover the Hafiz of the Quran had recited it during the time of the prophet while he was alive so why are you asking if prophet did not write it down, who taught and explain to the memorized how to read the Quran if not the prophet..

Quran is a dictated word of Allah, so far it is written and compiled by the Hafiz and also written materials can you tell me what other inspiration is needed to write it down what greater inspiration is Greater than this tell me

Allah SWT said:

سَنُقْرِئُكَ فَلَا تَنْسٰىٓ
"We will have you recite, the Qur’ān, so that you will not forget, what you recite,"
(QS. Al-A'laa 87: Verse 6)

* Via Qur'an English http://quran-en.com

McGg:
Please how can we demolish this country in peace?


Who will be Nigerias Col. Mamadi Doumbouya?

Davidgr8:
Over here in Nigeria we don't demolish this kind of buildings.we dey craze? Na until e collapse on it's own.

If you think I'm lying ask Dayo who was present when this natural demolition happened;he is six feet below.

D2UU:
I just demolished my 87storybuilding at Aso rock yesterday because Nigeria bad....oboy choop all you don hustle ooooo bandits are taking over power very soon

shogsman:

Subscribed

Tonymegabush1:
Is that so